November 22, 2007
Karl Rove Speaks to Local Legislative Candidates

I'm going to throw a few posts up today to satiate those without a life or those "hiding" in front of the computer screen from various family members they'd rather not deal with.

As such, Karl Rove's inaugural Newsweek column directed toward the eventual GOP Presidential nominee makes for interesting fodder, especially this passage:

Tackle issues families care about and Republicans too often shy away from. Jobs, the economy, taxes and spending will be big issues this campaign, but some issues that used to be "go to" ones for Republicans, like crime and welfare, don't have as much salience. Concerns like health care, the cost of college and social mobility will be more important. The Republican nominee needs to be confident in talking about these concerns and credible in laying out how he will address them. Be bold in approach and presentation.

Local translation: Legislative candidates hoping to re-capture once Republican seats anywhere near the suburbs would be wise to run campaigns that spend a lot of time talking about solutions to everyday problems at the tops of voters minds - the proverbial "kitchen table issues." Yes, voters care about public safety, but campaigns seemingly run on the theme of beating the hell out of sex offenders are likely to have the same dismal electoral results Republicans are all too familiar with around here.

Dino Rossi already came out of the gate with his announcement speech emphasizing education and transportation at the top of his agenda. Suburban legislative candidates hitching a ride on that train wouldn't be making a bad choice.

Posted by Eric Earling at November 22, 2007 09:45 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Agreed.

Posted by: Fred on November 22, 2007 10:32 PM
2. Locally, I would agree that education and transportation are the top two issues. I am apalled at some Republican candidates (at least in my area) who think sex offenders are the scourge of the community. To them sex offenders, not matter the level of the crime, which is quite broad in its definition, should be classified as non-human, drug out on the streets, and beaten. They think this will deter the crime. Yet, meth, identity theft, and other drug related crimes are rampaging our local areas. Our prisons are filling up and we are being asked to build even more prison space and fund more prison guards.

To me, the priority in crime prevention needs to start at the source. We need to stop the crime from starting in the first place and not think that punishment alone will stamp out crime. The base root is economic in nature. It is the breakdown of the family and community, in nature. To me, where candidates can win is to speak to restoring and building up communities and at this basis is the community's education system and economic condition. We need to spurn job growth in communities, instead of central major metropolitan areas. Local jobs can help establish community, and can address the transportation issues. Instead of figuring out how to stuff more people community to central areas, we need to figure out how to allow them to work in their own communities. With local jobs, you also grow the local tax base which helps with educational funding and funding for local infrastructure, like roads, sewer and water. You also create a pride in community that helps build a sense of neighborhood where neighbors watch out for one-another.

I know it may seem like a dream, but to me, this is the type of candidate that I am looking for.

Posted by: tc on November 23, 2007 10:37 AM
3. Eric, I mostly agree, except for one thing: our candidates have NOT exploited the sex offender issue very much. We could bring up vote after vote, quote after quote, of the Democratic candidates supporting light sentences and treatment for sex offenders. We don't. We give them a pass on the issue, except for maybe mentioning the issue in general, but without specifics.

Posted by: pudge on November 24, 2007 10:58 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?