August 27, 2007
Protest Bush. Or protest the protestors.

President Bush is coming to Bellevue today to headline a fundraiser for Congressman Dave Reichert at the Bellevue Hyatt around 3 p.m. Having a POTUS visit is a signature event for the average get-yer-ya-yas-out professional protestor.

The excitement among liberal activists here is spreading like a wet spot on a toddler's pants just before meeting the mall Santa Claus. This includes a "spontaneous" rally to call for Bush's impeachment and to end the occupation in Iraq. At least that's what a group calling itself Drive out the Bush Regime sent out. Apparently the "spontaneous" event is being sponsored by Washington for Impeachment and Eastside Fellowship of Reconciliation with about a dozen other "groups" adding their names to the bill of fare.

Protestors are asked to wear orange. I'm guessing this is meant to show solidarity for the citizens of Ukraine. Or to protest the King County Elections Office handling of the 2004 gubernatorial recount. Or to show their appreciation for Sound Politics. Maybe it's hunting season... although it's still too early even for stick-slingers...

At any rate, Bush protestors, wear orange because it's supposed to mean something.

A counter protest is also being staged for Bush supporters. If you want to give a thumbs up to W while waving another digit or two at the people shouting "Bush Lied - Folks died" and other meaningless monosyllabic chants you'll want to meet at around 1 p.m. at The Hyatt Regency, 900 Bellevue Way on the corner across from Bellevue Square.

Bush protestors are mustering at The Bradford Center, 700 108th Ave.

The art of protesting seems to have fallen by the wayside over the past few years. Last year's visit by Bush in Bellevue drew between 100 and 200 folks at the rally; pathetically paltry numbers when you consider the region. The rubber chicken feeds featuring Karl Rove or Dick Cheney drew even less flies. This is a far cry from the halcyon days of the 1990s when visits by Bill and Hillary Clinton drew hundreds of protestors egged on by Kirby Wilbur, John Carlson and Mike Siegel who outnumbered the fawning Democrats listening to their speeches two-to-one. (If I remember right...)

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention. Or maybe you are but just have better things to do than spend an afternoon with dirty hippies.

Since the art of the anti-whatever rallies seems to be dying, I've included a few helpful tips for Bush Protestors and Bush Supporters.

Bush is baaaad.

You'll want to wake up a bit earlier than normal. Maybe around 10 or 11 o'clock.

Eat a healthy breakfast. Nothing beats a morning nosh of Twinkies, organic oatmeal and bottled water.

Since time is of the essence you won't have a chance to shower, brush your teeth, use deodorant, fix your hair or put on a change of clothing. Treat today just like every morning then.

Catch a bus over the lake.

Get absolutely wasted on the trip over. If multiple protestors are riding Metro or Sound Transit try hot-boxing the bus. Some studies have shown that people who smoke those torpedoes tend to develop feelings of paranoia. Use it. You'll be needing this when making up chants about illegal wire-taps and how the Patriot Act has taken away Americans' rights; including the one about petitioning the government.

Dress appropriately. Your standard Che t-shirt is a good starter uniform. But try upping the ante by donning an eight-foot tall paper-mache head of Condi Rice.

Bush is a Good'un.

Call your boss and tell him you'll be taking a longer lunch break than normal. For you business owners get someone to fill in for the afternoon.

Eat a healthy breakfast or lunch. Try Burger King's Meatnormous Omelette Sandwich to show solidarity with any PETA or CAIR member who you might run into today.

The best place to park your car is at Bellevue Square. Be thankful the event is held on the Eastside and not Seattle so you don't have to worry about getting bent over like a Stranger staff writer with any exorbitant parking fees.

Get riled up by listening to Rush on 770 KTTH because, after all, you-are-an-unthinking-Dittohead-who-is-unable-to-form-opinions-of-your-own-without-MahaRushie-on-the-radio-telling-you-what-say. (And sorry KVI, the Commentators with its contrived conservative-vs-liberal storyline is a stale waste of air-time).

Dress appropriately for the protest. My recommendation is a sensible pair of boots; with the steel toes if you got 'em. Clothing that is stain resistant and can hold up to any fake blood, real spit or any other liquid or solid that gets hurled is a must.

Lastly, I do intend to be at this shindig. Look for the tall, dead-sexy looking guy carrying a Nikon SLR and sporting a blue jean jacket. The '80s might be over but good taste in fashion and cameras never change.

Posted by DonWard at August 27, 2007 06:35 AM | Email This
Comments
1. WELCOME TO THE GREAT AMERICAN SYSTEM, AKA. DEMOCRACY IN ACTION.

I AM A REPUBLICAN WITH A GREAT RESPECT FOR THE RIGHT TO DISSENT AND TO VOICE THAT DISSENT.

LAWFUL PROTEST IS WELCOME, AND WHO WILL CARE?

Posted by: kelper on August 27, 2007 07:53 AM
2. Don,

You're all wrong on the breakfast eaten by bush badders. First of all, any self-respecting protester wouldn't eat Twinkies, they contain animal by-products and paraffin, an oil-based product. Second, no protester would be caught dead drinking bottled water, they might as well just leave their car idling in the driveway at night.

Do you know how big the carbon "footprint" of that breakfast is? Sheesh, you haven't been studying up on the new material in their handbook. It clearly says in chapter 2, verse 13 of the book of Al that not being carbon neutral is a sin.

Posted by: Nobody on August 27, 2007 07:54 AM
3. "Drive out the Bush Regime" is just another incarnation of "The World Can't Wait", a pathetic band of communists and other leftist malcontents. I find it amusing that these loons have been unable to mount a protest rivaling their beloved Vietnam protests of the '60's and early '70's. There will probably be maybe a hundred of these moonbats protesting today. But watch our "fair and balanced" media feature them prominently.

Posted by: Bill Cruchon on August 27, 2007 08:25 AM
4. I don't have a problem with the President's visit. It is a free country where we can travel mostly unimpeaded. If I were in his place I'd travel the country to meet with people much more and travel abroad much less. Gotta take care of our own before we can cure the worlds' ills.

I do take issue with Reichart shutting down evening commuter traffic for his own benefit. Not a smart move to tick off voters in this manner. Seems like a good way to drive voters to his opponent. Republican, Democrat, or whatever tickles your tail feathers - still not a smart move.

Bruner's campaign would be smart to latch on to this opportunity to publically flog Reichart :: "He (Reichart) doesn't really care about us. He screwed up our commute home for his own benefit and pleasure."


Posted by: Iso on August 27, 2007 08:34 AM
5.
Bush is poised for a huge upswing in popularity.

Now instead of shunning him, people realize they should (and should have) BOUND themselves to him.

History will tell us that G. W. Bush is the most important President of the first half of the 21st Century...and possibly one of the best Presidents in history.

Instead of protesting people should be thronging to see the man, like when Pope Paul the VI came down Van Wyck Expressway in 1965.

Posted by: John Bailo on August 27, 2007 08:51 AM
6. Does the cost of the President's flight, secret service protection and other various travel costs get paid by the RNC? I hope so. I didn't like it when the Clintons went around the country on Air Force 1 campaigning on the public dime, and I don't like it when Bush does it either. All costs of campaigning should be paid with partisan campaign funds.

As for protesting, it's not that important to me to take valuable vacation time from work to oppose some whack jobs with nothing better to do.

Posted by: Palouse on August 27, 2007 08:52 AM
7. Iso,

We'll promote this as an excuse to get people out of their cars. Reichart is just providing an opportunity to experience mass transit, etc.

And as I've stated before, I hope Burner latches onto Bush's visit...it will do wonders for her political asperations.

Posted by: Chris on August 27, 2007 09:20 AM
8. Chris: I am not much of a fan of any politicial type or genre. Every candidate for any office should be subjected to intense psychological examinations and brain scans with those results made public.

Will people get out of their cars for this event? Doubt it.
Will it piss off thousands of registered voters like me? Very much so.

This is a huge opportunity for Bruner to strike at a Reichart choice that directly impacts his district without jumping on the "I hate all things Bush" liberal spew. If her campaign is smart they will make no mention of Bush.

Posted by: Iso on August 27, 2007 09:37 AM
9.
You guys talk like it's only the President's opportunity.

What about the media attention focused on Down Town Bellevue?

Posted by: John Bailo on August 27, 2007 09:54 AM
10. @6, if it's a political trip some of the costs are borne by the party, e.g., the flight costs are, but I doubt the secret service costs are as POTUS gets secret service protection 24X7. Often the trip is an "official" trip, to tour a factory or some such, and the taxpayers foot the travel bill, and then POTUS stays a few extra hours on the ground for the fundraiser, as he's already there on official business.

Posted by: Obi-Wan on August 27, 2007 10:39 AM
11. Well Don, will you answer my question from several threads ago?? I will not go away. You apparently cannot defend giving money to people that waste it down a rat hole so you do your best to avoid the question. I am not going away.

Posted by: pbj on August 27, 2007 10:51 AM
12. History will tell us that G. W. Bush is the most important President of the first half of the 21st Century...and possibly one of the best Presidents in history

Uhhh, actually G. W. Bush is the ONLY president of the first half of the 21st century. Well I guess you could say that Bill Clinton had about 20 days.

Posted by: RBW on August 27, 2007 11:14 AM
13. Welcome President Bush. You honor us with your visit.

Posted by: GaryB on August 27, 2007 11:34 AM
14. pbj, Don did answer the question. You just didn't like the answer. Move on, please.

Posted by: swatter on August 27, 2007 12:27 PM
15. I really want to counterprotest, but it's too far for me to bother. If someone else wants to make a "IM IN UR PROTEST MAKIN U ANGERED" poster and credit me, that would be fine.

LOLPROTEST!

Posted by: pudge on August 27, 2007 02:01 PM
16. Swatter - Really? Post the link to it then. He has been avoiding the question ever since he was spewing tax-me-more propaganda like a drunken liberal.

I will patiently await you posting the link to his answer.


Posted by: pbj on August 27, 2007 02:23 PM
17. You bush lovers love your money and cars so much you can't stop and think about the dead people's families that will never be the same because of your unelected presedent and his hoard of criminal friends that are raping this country and waving the flag at the same time. shame on you for suporting murder and cheerleading the fake "war on terra".

peace

Posted by: videoguy on August 27, 2007 02:32 PM
18. Thanks, videoguy. I appreciate it. Just knowing people like me are making your life as miserable as possible makes me smile.

And the fact that you're too gutless to do anything about it makes it even better.

Posted by: jimg on August 27, 2007 02:39 PM
19. What is a "presedent"?

Posted by: pbj on August 27, 2007 02:58 PM
20. You should ahve said bent over like ted haggard for parking fees.

Posted by: justin on August 27, 2007 03:06 PM
21. What? a fag joke? Is that all you've got? wow,I mean Wow. Nope, you don't make any sense on this thread either skippy. Don't go away mad Justin, just go away.

Posted by: Huh? on August 27, 2007 04:25 PM
22. #2 Point taken. I stand humbled by your greater understanding of progressive dietary habits.

#11 Ka-ching!!!

Good comments rest of y'all.
Had fun today. Will try to post some of my thoughts on the event soon.

Posted by: Don Ward on August 27, 2007 05:54 PM
23. I got a picture of The President's plane landing today: http://www.flickr.com/photos/smartjunco/1253284598/

At the airport there were no dirty hippes protesting, just some aviation nut jobs and police officers.

Posted by: Andrew S on August 27, 2007 08:24 PM
24. check out this article that "the stranger" did on the counter protest. it includes some pretty sweet pro-bush pictures.

http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/how_to_piss_off_liberal_protesters

Posted by: bush/cheney08 on August 27, 2007 11:42 PM
25. check out this article that "the stranger" did on the counter protest. it includes some pretty sweet pro-bush pictures.

http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/how_to_piss_off_liberal_protesters

Posted by: bush/cheney08 on August 27, 2007 11:43 PM
26.
Protest this Libs (i notice the PI buried this story):

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1155AP_Poverty.html?source=mypi

"Poverty rate declines significantly

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

WASHINGTON -- The nation's poverty rate dropped last year, the first significant decline since President Bush took office.

The Census Bureau reported Tuesday that 36.5 million Americans, or 12.3 percent - were living in poverty last year. That's down from 12.6 percent in 2005."

Posted by: John Bailo on August 28, 2007 07:51 AM
27. I heard there were like 300 people that showed up for support of Bush or some small ass number like that. You're quite the minority, also please go join the army...THEY NEED YOU.

P.S. They wore orange to symbolize the torcher going on by the US and how we should probably stop it being that it's not only wrong but against everything we've stood for for the past 200 years. I thought you were a conservative and feared change? I would think changing something like the geneva convention would scare someone like you no?

Posted by: chris on August 28, 2007 11:24 AM
28. Chris: HA! You think 300 is a small number? In the middle of the day? To counterprotest? Pull the other one.

Of course there's going to be more protestors than counterprotestors. Doesn't mean anything. Protestors have more reason to be there, since they are the ones trying to change something. That's the way of things. Duh.

Also, you don't know what "conservative" means, because it has nothing to do with "fearing change."

Also, you would win more people over if you could spell "torture." Maybe. Also if you knew what torture was, since it's not actually going on, and there's nothing going on that represents a change in the Geneva Conventions.

Stupid facts, daring to prove you wrong!

Posted by: pudge on August 28, 2007 11:45 AM
29. Palouse: Since you are concerned about who is paying for Presidents Bush's trip....are you concerned as to who pays for secret service protection costs for Clinton and Carter?.....as far as I know, they make a lot of money for their respective travels......and raising money for the DNC and their respective "non-profits". Also, are is Clinton still charging rent for secret service protection located above their gargage?...Next time, please try not to cherry pick facts.....it shows your lack of honesty, but then again, you are a dem.....you can't help yourself.

Posted by: Allan Rothlisberg on August 29, 2007 07:15 AM
30. The Washington, DC Financial Services Association (DCFSA), a coalition of over 40 advance cash loan online payday stores in the District l promoting responsible lending, ...

Posted by: Kneereepync on August 29, 2007 07:36 PM
31. pudge, there were way fewer than 300 out in the crowd to support bush and reichert. word has it that perhaps 300 were inside putting out from $1000 - $10,000 to support reichert and have a photo taken with bush. there were between one and two THOUSAND folks out to tell bush and reichert what they thought of their disgusting war policies... as for the money spent by us taxpayers so that bush could spend less than 3 hours on the ground in WA to raise money for the party, if you really think that the Republican party actually reimbursed the federal government, i've got a really nice bridge in brooklyn i'd like to sell you, cheap.

Posted by: peacelover on August 29, 2007 09:44 PM
32. peacelover: Nice to see that you left wing nut jobs still refuse to answer what I posted about the former groper-in-chief and the peanut man real costs are to us tax payers for their jaunts all over the world. These trip are not at the behest of or are official us government sponsered events.....just personal, ego gathering and for the money. Also no response as to the fact the clintons charge the secret service rent for being on their property.....which by the way the rent chatged equals their house payment. Real classy people are the clintoons. So to all of you left wing nut jobs...keep drinking that kool-aid (hopefully laced with a lethal compond)and go far, far away. In fact, the workers paradise in either cuba or north korea could use your talents.

Posted by: Allan Rothlisberg on August 30, 2007 06:42 AM
33. peacelover: NUMBERS OF PROTESTORS DO NOT MATTER. All that matters is the vote. There are more of us than there are of them. Er, you.

And don't pretend to care about the money spent to ship Bush out here, unless you also complained when Clinton did it. And for some reason, I doubt you did, and so I therefore couldn't care less about that lame criticism.

Posted by: pudge on August 30, 2007 10:25 PM
34. allan and pudge, sorry you are so focussed on the past. my concern really is more about the present and the future. i've been voting since 1966 so don't preach to me, kids. i don't believe that taxpayers should pay for any campaign trips for either party. i believe that both are corrupt and in the pockets of the large multinational corporations. i actually still have hope for a nation of, by and for the People. i'd guess you guys think that is naive... but what the heck, i still do have some hope for my country. sorry you believe that name-calling is appropriate. my education and upbringing do not allow me to behave that way. think you guys need to grow up and start listening to news other than Fox...

Posted by: peacelover on August 30, 2007 10:55 PM
35. peacelover: Been voting longer than you.....so I am not a "kid". What I have said is still currently being done by the clintons/carter camps. I do agree that we taxpayers should not be paying for secret service protection for anything other than offical US government business by current/former presidents. This should also include current/former first ladies and candidates for the presidency. Those expenses should be picked up by their respective parties.... Multinational companies do have way too much clout...as do foreign countries donating money to the democrats, ie communist china is a prime example. Remember the missile technology they bought under the clintons?....scary thought to think another clinton in the WH selling even more technology to the communist chinese. She is indeed an avowed marxist so don't be surprised if she gets elected and the communist chimese get access to even more secrets from our marxist president. Peolple will never take back control of the government until they decide to quit taking government handouts and become self sufficient. We don't need the government, they need us. Its time to grow a backbone and say no to the opiate of government handouts (either state or federal).

Posted by: Allan Rothlisberg on August 31, 2007 06:16 AM
36. peacelover: nonsense. A criticism is not valid to me unless it comes from someone willing to apply that criticism fairly. I will preach to anyone I damn well please: I am no respector of persons. If you can honestly say to me that you criticized Clinton and Carter and LBJ for the same thing, or that in retrospect you believe now that they were wrong, then fine. Otherwise, you are being dishonest and I couldn't care less what you say or how old you are.

And don't pretend you care more about or have more hope for this nation. It's the grassroots conservative Republicans who for 25 years now have been preaching hope and optimism, while it's the liberal Democrats who have been telling us to abandon our hopes of liberty and prosperity.

It's the Democrats who have been telling us that times change, and we should give in to restrictive gun laws, to the destruction of unborn children, to high taxes, to federal government control over everything they can get their hands on (which constitutes in itself a direct loss of liberty by the people, disallowed by the Tenth Amendment), to so many other things that I believe in that the Democrats say I should give up on.

But I have hope. I still believe this is morning in America. I still believe we can have freedom and liberty and prosperity without giving into the fanciful notion that we need to give up those things because "times change" and the federal government needs to control everything from education to health care just because people are, frankly, far too fearful of freedom.

You say you have hope for a nation of, by, and for the People, yet the Democratic party is devoted to destroying the most important parts of the Constitution, most especially, the Tenth Amendment, which is what guarantees more than any other part that we can have the most power possible to make for ourselves the decisions that affect us.

Most Democratic officials, in the federal government anyway, are afraid of states, of people, having that power. They work as hard as they can to destroy that power. They only care about the parts of the Constitution that they like, or that they can use to attack Republicans.

Also, I also almost never watch Fox News. I watch CNN and MSNBC far more often, because I have a degree in journalism and my standards are high and, even apart from the significant bias, Fox News has the worst news reporting out of any of the news channels, not to mention the greatest focus on non-news. The news I watch most is PBS NewsHour, which I watch every single day, and I even on occasion write to the PBS Ombudsman (he posted two of my letters recently, about the Bill Moyers impeachment program).

Not that any of that makes me better than anyone else, of course. But you seem to think it matters.

So stop pretending I call you names, stop pretending you care more about the money spent than which President is spending it, stop pretending you have more hope or care for our country, and stop pretending you are somehow more well-informed or wiser. You're just another guy, and you're not better than anyone else. (That's another thing many on the left are: elitist snobs.)

Posted by: pudge on August 31, 2007 07:06 AM
37. Pudge: You hit the bullseye with your comments. Thomas Jefferson would be irate to see his name connected with the democrat party. Another site that may be of interest is stratfor.com....a very good site for overall intelligence from around the globe. Have a great day in this great Republic.

Posted by: Allan Rothlisberg on August 31, 2007 08:11 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?