The discrepancy between Democratic ballots and Republican ballots are going to be a bath this year. I predicted a similar story last year, which turned out to be true.
Renee Radcliff Sinclair's campaign for Snohomish County Council is making a similar such point to members of the local press corps. Given past history with the party preference ballot, the lack of competitive primaries, and the mood toward generic Republicans in the electorate these days they make some good points...mostly that the party preference primary is not predictive of general elections results the way the blanket primary used to be.
Here's the full memo:
TO: Snohomish County Government/Politics MediaPosted by Eric Earling at August 20, 2007 08:40 PM | Email ThisFR: Renee's Friends
RE: Partisan Primary vs. Blanket Primary
August 20, 2007
The partisan primary in Washington State is still a relatively new process and has frequently been subject to misinterpretation. The new partisan primary is much different than the old blanket primary "beauty contest." Unlike the blanket primary, raw votes from the partisan primary do not portray an accurate picture of where the candidates stand for the General Election.
There are numerous examples of where candidates who receive less raw votes in a partisan primary go on to defeat their opponent in the General Election. Several examples are provided below:
2004 8th Congressional District Primary vs. General Election
Primary ResultsDemocrats
Alex Alben - 24,903
Dave Ross - 39,347
Heidi Behrens-Benedict - 16,992
Total Democrat Votes - 81,242Republicans
Conrad Lee - 8,350
Dave Reichert - 31,088
Diane Tebelius - 16,468
Luke Esser - 16,309
Total Republican Votes 72,215As you can see, the Democrats outpolled the Republicans in this primary by 9,027.
General Election ResultsDave Ross (D) - 157,148
Dave Reichert (R) - 173,298But in the general election, the Republican candidate outpolled the Democrat candidate by 16,150 votes, a swing of 25,177 votes.
2006 8th CD Primary vs. General Election
PrimaryDarcy Burner (D) - 54,776
Dave Reichert (R) - 52,598General Election
Darcy Burner (D) - 122,021
Dave Reichert (R) -129,362As you can see, Burner outpolls Reichert by 2,178 votes in the Primary, but loses by 7,341 in the General Election.
The same holds true for state legislative races:
2004 39th Legislative District Primary vs. General Election
PrimaryPedro Gonzales (D) - 11,267
Kirk Pearson (R) - 9,462General Election
Pedro Gonzales (D) - 21,960
Kirk Pearson (R) - 32,3442006 42nd Legislative District Primary vs. General Election
PrimaryJesse Salomon (D) -11,571
Dale Brandland (R) - 10,495General Election
Jesse Salomon (D) - 22,684
Dale Brandland (R) - 25,836Again, significant differences between the primary and general election. Why is this? There are several reasons.
First, turnout is significantly higher in general elections than in primaries, usually over twice as high. That means the electorate, as a whole, is much different in the primary than in the general election.
Secondly, factors external to a given race always have an impact on partisan primary results. For example, in 2004, Democrats had a much more competitive primary for Governor than did Republicans. This competitive race on the Democrat side higher up the ticket increased Democrat turnout in that election and subsequently increased turnout in Democrat races all the way down the ballot. It's difficult to predict how races for County Executive , Sheriff, Clerk, and Edmonds and Lynnwood City Councils will impact the 3rd County Council District race.
What does this mean for the 3rd County Council District primary? In the 3rd CCD, a lean Democrat district, we expect that Mike Cooper will pull more votes than Renee Radcliff Sinclair. However, based on the examples above and other mitigating factors, we caution against reading such results as one would the results of a Blanket Primary.
As a four term legislator and someone who has remained very involved in her district, public reception to Renee's candidacy has been very positive. In their only previous head to head match up, Renee defeated Mike Cooper. In fact, Renee is 5-0 in electoral contests - she has never lost. Renee's broad appeal in a Democrat-leaning district means, in addition to the Republican base, she has earned the support of independents and marginal Democrats, voters who are not likely to participate in the Republican primary.
We are confident that Renee Radcliff Sinclair is in a strong position to win the General Election in November. We urge you to not misinterpret the primary results.
We were thinking of some write-in names for the non-existent campaign on the R side.
As for the election, the back-and-forth here on SP on some of the obscure positions helped us make our decisions for clerk and treasurer. So, thanks for those who participated.
Renee is too classy to lose. When people line the two candidates up, they will vote for the R.
Posted by: swatter on August 21, 2007 06:41 AMWe have given political parties (i.e. Dems and Reps) too much power. How about banning the listing party affiliation in our elections altogether, and require voters to research where candidates stand on issues?
At least in WA we are fortunate that our judicial races are non-partisan. Not so for much of the rest of the country.
Posted by: Seabecker on August 21, 2007 09:22 AMThe Democrats seem more like people who want to be elected just for the salary. Like those Seattle City Council members who get what? $90,000 a year? No wonder they bite each other...they certainly aren't there to "serve".
Posted by: John Bailo on August 21, 2007 09:50 AMIt is the right of the people to not put those party names on the ballots, but I think you'll find very few people would want to take that step. Making the Prosecutor non-partisan might be something the people would go for, though. But likely not county council or executive. I think you'd have a better chance of making municipal council races partisan than making county council/exec non-partisan.
Posted by: pudge on August 22, 2007 10:22 AM