August 20, 2007
Primary Prediction

The discrepancy between Democratic ballots and Republican ballots are going to be a bath this year. I predicted a similar story last year, which turned out to be true.

Renee Radcliff Sinclair's campaign for Snohomish County Council is making a similar such point to members of the local press corps. Given past history with the party preference ballot, the lack of competitive primaries, and the mood toward generic Republicans in the electorate these days they make some good points...mostly that the party preference primary is not predictive of general elections results the way the blanket primary used to be.

Here's the full memo:

TO: Snohomish County Government/Politics Media

FR: Renee's Friends

RE: Partisan Primary vs. Blanket Primary

August 20, 2007

The partisan primary in Washington State is still a relatively new process and has frequently been subject to misinterpretation. The new partisan primary is much different than the old blanket primary "beauty contest." Unlike the blanket primary, raw votes from the partisan primary do not portray an accurate picture of where the candidates stand for the General Election.

There are numerous examples of where candidates who receive less raw votes in a partisan primary go on to defeat their opponent in the General Election. Several examples are provided below:

2004 8th Congressional District Primary vs. General Election

Primary Results

Democrats

Alex Alben - 24,903
Dave Ross - 39,347
Heidi Behrens-Benedict - 16,992
Total Democrat Votes - 81,242

Republicans

Conrad Lee - 8,350
Dave Reichert - 31,088
Diane Tebelius - 16,468
Luke Esser - 16,309
Total Republican Votes 72,215

As you can see, the Democrats outpolled the Republicans in this primary by 9,027.

General Election Results

Dave Ross (D) - 157,148
Dave Reichert (R) - 173,298

But in the general election, the Republican candidate outpolled the Democrat candidate by 16,150 votes, a swing of 25,177 votes.

2006 8th CD Primary vs. General Election

Primary

Darcy Burner (D) - 54,776
Dave Reichert (R) - 52,598

General Election

Darcy Burner (D) - 122,021
Dave Reichert (R) -129,362

As you can see, Burner outpolls Reichert by 2,178 votes in the Primary, but loses by 7,341 in the General Election.

The same holds true for state legislative races:

2004 39th Legislative District Primary vs. General Election

Primary

Pedro Gonzales (D) - 11,267
Kirk Pearson (R) - 9,462

General Election

Pedro Gonzales (D) - 21,960
Kirk Pearson (R) - 32,344

2006 42nd Legislative District Primary vs. General Election

Primary

Jesse Salomon (D) -11,571
Dale Brandland (R) - 10,495

General Election

Jesse Salomon (D) - 22,684
Dale Brandland (R) - 25,836

Again, significant differences between the primary and general election. Why is this? There are several reasons.

First, turnout is significantly higher in general elections than in primaries, usually over twice as high. That means the electorate, as a whole, is much different in the primary than in the general election.

Secondly, factors external to a given race always have an impact on partisan primary results. For example, in 2004, Democrats had a much more competitive primary for Governor than did Republicans. This competitive race on the Democrat side higher up the ticket increased Democrat turnout in that election and subsequently increased turnout in Democrat races all the way down the ballot. It's difficult to predict how races for County Executive , Sheriff, Clerk, and Edmonds and Lynnwood City Councils will impact the 3rd County Council District race.

What does this mean for the 3rd County Council District primary? In the 3rd CCD, a lean Democrat district, we expect that Mike Cooper will pull more votes than Renee Radcliff Sinclair. However, based on the examples above and other mitigating factors, we caution against reading such results as one would the results of a Blanket Primary.

As a four term legislator and someone who has remained very involved in her district, public reception to Renee's candidacy has been very positive. In their only previous head to head match up, Renee defeated Mike Cooper. In fact, Renee is 5-0 in electoral contests - she has never lost. Renee's broad appeal in a Democrat-leaning district means, in addition to the Republican base, she has earned the support of independents and marginal Democrats, voters who are not likely to participate in the Republican primary.

We are confident that Renee Radcliff Sinclair is in a strong position to win the General Election in November. We urge you to not misinterpret the primary results.

Posted by Eric Earling at August 20, 2007 08:40 PM | Email This
Comments
1. It was for the reasons mentioned above, the wife and I reluctantly cast our ballot for the Republican, Turk. Head counting purposes only.

We were thinking of some write-in names for the non-existent campaign on the R side.

As for the election, the back-and-forth here on SP on some of the obscure positions helped us make our decisions for clerk and treasurer. So, thanks for those who participated.

Renee is too classy to lose. When people line the two candidates up, they will vote for the R.

Posted by: swatter on August 21, 2007 06:41 AM
2. At least where I am the R ballot had no competitive races. On the D side only the race for Prosecuting Attorney was competitive. While I am a solid D, I am seriously considering voting for Satterburg. I voted for Sherman in the primary becasue when it comes to the PA experience is the most important factor. So unless some significant difference emerges between the two I am leaning Satterburg becasue he has the experience and knowhow to lead the office. So there is at least one who voted D in a race that was competitive in the primary but might go R in the general.

Posted by: Giffy on August 21, 2007 08:04 AM
3. re: #2 - The fact that a Prosecuting Attorney race is partisan at all shows how low our politics have gone.

We have given political parties (i.e. Dems and Reps) too much power. How about banning the listing party affiliation in our elections altogether, and require voters to research where candidates stand on issues?

At least in WA we are fortunate that our judicial races are non-partisan. Not so for much of the rest of the country.

Posted by: Seabecker on August 21, 2007 09:22 AM
4.
I find that the Republicans are far less contentious in our choices as in it's a done deal, we don't have to vote on it -- whereas the Democrats claw and scratch each other to death.

The Democrats seem more like people who want to be elected just for the salary. Like those Seattle City Council members who get what? $90,000 a year? No wonder they bite each other...they certainly aren't there to "serve".

Posted by: John Bailo on August 21, 2007 09:50 AM
5. Our judicial races are non-partisan?

Posted by: zach on August 21, 2007 11:29 AM
6. @3, I would be all for making prosecuting attorney non-partisan. Hell it would make feel better about voting for Satterburg. :)

Posted by: Giffy on August 21, 2007 06:46 PM
7. Seabecker: the parties have ... too much power? The only power parties have is to decide which candidates get to use the party's name. That's it, and it's their Constitutional right.

It is the right of the people to not put those party names on the ballots, but I think you'll find very few people would want to take that step. Making the Prosecutor non-partisan might be something the people would go for, though. But likely not county council or executive. I think you'd have a better chance of making municipal council races partisan than making county council/exec non-partisan.

Posted by: pudge on August 22, 2007 10:22 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?