August 19, 2007
Gregoire's appointment of open records foe to "Sunshine committee" drawing criticism from all sides

P-I reporter Daniel Lathrop is also disappointed with Mrs. Gregoire's choice of Seattle City Attorney Tom Carr to chair the state Sunshine Committee, calling Carr an "open records foe"

As an investigative reporter, I file a lot of public records requests. It's often how we are able to find out when officials aren't doing their jobs. [Carr] is known for supporting even obviously illegal city efforts to avoid disclosure ... Carr, in keeping with municipal bureaucrats' and elected officials' long-running resentment about having to provide the public with access to information under their control, has aided Mayor Greg Nickels in efforts to hamper public disclosure of documents.
Lathrop posts a letter from Nickels urging Gregoire to appoint someone from the City of Seattle, because they are experienced balancing public disclosure obligations "against the privacy rights of the individuals we seek to serve".

The only "privacy rights" at issue is the desire of government officials to avoid having to explain themselves to the public.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at August 19, 2007 12:19 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Ugh! She has been a disappointment from day one! Nothing new here! Same o same o

Posted by: dcat on August 19, 2007 01:31 PM
2. Okay, y'all, send your emailed complaint to Gregoire at the gov website. Hopefully, thousands will do same.

Posted by: Michele on August 19, 2007 02:36 PM
3. they have a delete key :}

Posted by: dcat on August 19, 2007 03:52 PM
4. Is his daddy a big wig like norm dicks?

I have a theory about Gregoire's recent appointments- she's going to steal the next election one kickback at a time.

Posted by: Andy on August 19, 2007 04:10 PM
5. Once the illegal medical marijuana plant limit was exposed as the city attorney he did nothing to stop it.
Thanks to Tom Carr Seattle has a 9 plant limit nobody knows about.
When He was informed that breaks the state law
DUTY TO PUBLISH PROCEDURES
RCW 42.56.040
(1) Each state agency shall separately state and currently publish in the Washington Administrative Code and each local agency shall prominently display and make available for inspection and copying at the central office of such local agency, for guidance of the public:

(a) Descriptions of its central and field organization and the established places at which, the employees from whom, and the methods whereby, the public may obtain information, make submittals or requests, or obtain copies of agency decisions;

(b) Statements of the general course and method by which its operations are channeled and determined, including the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures available;

(c) Rules of procedure;

(d) Substantive rules of general applicability adopted as authorized by law, and statements of general policy or interpretations of general applicability formulated and adopted by the agency; and

(e) Each amendment or revision to, or repeal of any of the foregoing.

(2) Except to the extent that he has actual and timely notice of the terms thereof, a person may not in any manner be required to resort to, or be adversely affected by, a matter required to be published or displayed and not so published or displayed.

Mr.Carr did nothing....
So where is Seattles 9 plant limit posted you eye rolling idiot.
Its not.. then patients don't have to resort to it.. So it can't be legally enforced....
Mr Carr ,Why are you enforcing illegal plant limits and then trying to cover it up.
I know you are out there somewhere rolling your eyes.
Mr Carr You are unfit for public office.


Posted by: Publicbulldog on August 19, 2007 04:13 PM
6. Heh, Speaking of the reading the fine print, check this out in the all of the 11 tax and spend bills facing the voters this year:

It's in the Seattle Times today

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorialsopinion/2003842627_nobleed19.html

A few key comments in the article:

Under SB 5498 -- a governor's-request bill passed by large majorities in both houses -- unless a tax levy says it is temporary, its authority is permanent. So says the Department of Revenue in an official memo to county assessors.


King County Assessor Scott Noble, who drew our attention to this, has looked over the 11 property-tax measures that will be on county ballots Tuesday: two for King County parks, two for Redmond, one for a hospital district and six for fire districts.

"All of them are permanent increases in new levy capacity," he says.

"It's permanent," Noble says. "In 15 years in this office, I have never seen anything like it."

Noble wonders if legislators who voted for this knew what they were doing. So do we.

"It's permanent," Noble says. "In 15 years in this office, I have never seen anything like it."

Noble wonders if legislators who voted for this knew what they were doing. So do we.

Ya gotta love these tax and spenders in Olympia, they are after you big time in this season of permanent tax increases.


Posted by: GS on August 19, 2007 06:12 PM
7. I voted No on all levies

Posted by: me on August 19, 2007 08:04 PM
8. Four of the governatrix's appointments are to be "citizens".

In high school civics I learned that those are folks without a dog in the hunt, and whose work and income does not depend on the outcome.

Since she only appointed ONE citizen, and three folks with a dog in the hunt, she needs a remedial civics lession.

This group is stacked with folks who are no friend of the light of day on their public dealings.

For shame, Governor.

Posted by: The Geezer on August 20, 2007 01:10 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?