July 26, 2007
State high court: Felons must complete sentence in order to vote

The Washington Supreme Court has upheld the current state law which requires felons to complete their sentence (including payment of all fines and restitution) before getting their voting rights back, reversing a King County trial court. The punch line is this:

We hold that Washington's disenfranchisement scheme does not violate the privileges and immunities clause of the Washington Constitution or the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution. It is the province of the legislature to determine the best policy approach for re-enfranchising Washington's felons. We also hold that respondents lack standing to bring their cross-appeal and that they are not entitled to attorney fees. We reverse the trial court.
See recent opinions under Madison v. State.

UPDATE: A statement from Secretary of State Sam Reed and Attorney General Rob McKenna, who personally argued the case, is here.

Postman has more, here.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at July 26, 2007 08:51 AM | Email This
Comments
1. And time should include probation, not just time in jail.

Posted by: swatter on July 26, 2007 08:49 AM
2. Any time spent on probation is indeed part of the sentence. Violation of parole can result in being incacerated to complete the original sentence. If more parolee violators were rejailed, there would be a lot less crime....and futire parolees would then know that parole violations will no longer be tolerated. A win-win for the law abiding public.

Posted by: Allan Rothlisberg on July 26, 2007 09:00 AM
3. A small but not insignificant victory for the right of law-abiding citizens to choose their political leaders.... And roger that to what swatter said.

Posted by: Methow Ken on July 26, 2007 09:00 AM
4. I haven't had time to fully read the decision, but I agree with it. I know that ACORN suporters and limolibs will throw out stats about the rate of incarceration for Blacks and the high numbers are true. What needs to happen is not an attempt to patronize or mine votes, but an honest look at why. On a prior thread, a poster idiot suggested that Black children might benefit from having hip hop thugs as role models and this was a good idea because he played hoops with some folks from the Urban League. No poster idiot, Black children need role models that support values like education and strong families.

Many inmates are in prison because they lack basic skills, such as the ability to read. Many have substance abuse problems. Because of the fractured families in many low-income communities children are growing up without strong support and a stong initiation into mainstream culture. Like, how to go to work and maintain a job.

People have graduation ceremonies at different times in their lives, sometimes from elementary to middle school, high school, and college. We need to bring felons who have served their time and paid their debt to society back into society. We almost need something like the citizenship ceremonies at the Center to welcome them back.

Many groups, like the Union Gospel Mission, for example realize that integrating people back into society has to deal with the whole person. Addressing whatever demons that got them into their circumstance and then helping them make restitution for the harm they may have caused.

Limolibs generally do not care about healing the person, they want to patronize and mine votes to keep themselves in power. Former felons that I have met who have gone through the process of restoration feel better about their new position and role in society than they would have had they just been used by folks like ACORN as a convenient ballot in a rigged election.

Posted by: WVH on July 26, 2007 09:06 AM
5. WVH: I couldn't agree more and certainly could not have articulated your analysis better. As usual, right on target.

Posted by: katomar on July 26, 2007 09:35 AM
6. Great. But the next logical step will be the state legislature changing the law to make felons eligible to vote without paying monetary restitution, and the Queen of course will sign it.

Posted by: Palouse on July 26, 2007 01:19 PM
7. The ACLU couldn't have picked a more appropriate poster child in Daniel Madison, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit. Pravda-Izvestia (Seattle P-I) notes that Madison can't pay restitution (less than $500) for his crimes because he is mentally ill. Judging from the politicians and elections officials Seattlites choose to represent them, allowing Mr. Madison to vote certainly couldn't do any harm....

Posted by: Saltherring on July 26, 2007 01:26 PM
8. because he is mentally ill. Judging from the politicians and elections officials Seattlites choose to represent them, allowing Mr. Madison to vote certainly couldn't do any harm....

___________________________________

not to worry, THEY will tell him how to vote. )-:

Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on July 26, 2007 01:57 PM
9. Hi all!
Find a real sex partner for tonight
http://realpartner.bravehost.com
Good luck

Posted by:
Fearnenna on July 31, 2007 05:51 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?