Well, if you define a day loosely.
Anyway, Joel Connelly started things off yesterday expressing his undying fondness for the crew at the Stranger.
David Postman followed it up today with a lengthy, public chiding of Josh Feit for playing self-perpetuating rumor mill rather than reporter. In some fairness to Feit's blogging, he followed-up by covering some harsh criticisms from the King County Republican Party toward the Democrats who bought into Feit's original random thoughts. Even at that though, Feit didn't do much of substance to defend himself against Postman's critique.
While we're at it then, allow me to pile on as well with a complaint. Eli Sanders had a post today that essentially comes down to parroting a Democratic Party press release. Sanders highlights this YouTube clip, ironically posted originally by John McCain's camp, supposedly catching Mitt Romney in an abortion contortion:
Romney's campaign promptly posted the full press conference, which shows him emphasizing his pro-life position in vetoing a specific embryonic stem cell research bill, while restating his commitment to hold to a pledge to the citizens of Massachusetts that he would not alter existing state laws on abortion.
Romney also responded directly himself on the Michael Medved show, which is an easier summation than watching the dueling press conference clips:
What Sanders' copy-cat post didn't convey was how totally flat the McCain campaign's original attack of selected editing fell. One could even argue the attack backfired in full - something Sanders didn't mention in his post in his apparent glee to see a Republican confronted with the flip-flop label that doomed John Kerry.
This compilation of reaction from center-to-right pundits showed the attack quickly became a negative for the attacker, not the attackee. Instead of instigating a round of negative coverage on Romney, the weak attack promptly led to questions of McCain's desperation, as demonstrated by comments from Rich Lowry and by hostile questions from the media at McCain's subsequent press avail.
Thus, the danger of posting what amounts to a glorified party press release, which the Slog has fallen victim to in the past. Any blogger - left, right, or otherwise - should be castigated for such poor form. Such attack screeds for party apparatuses have a place in politics. But they very rarely provide new facts or fresh analysis that make them newsworthy, or even bloggable in their own right.
I actually like the Stranger. They fill nicely the role of the edgy, alternative paper; spouting an almost obnoxious liberalism that's actually entertaining. But the tarted-up party press release posts do nothing but degrade the Slog's product.
Posted by Eric Earling at June 20, 2007 10:09 PM | Email ThisBut now there are reports the fund will be handed over to a charity. This may be legal, but it is not right. The donors didn't give to charity. They gave to get Malen elected, and now the premise of the gift is no longer operative. Of course the intent to give to charity is a fine thing and so on, but why can't we let the donors make an election as to whether they want their money back or give it to the cancer fund? Their intent in helping Malen be prosecutor has been frustrated by evvents and they should get the donations back. BTW yes it is likely many would give it to the Republican candidate, whom I likely would not favor, but the principle is what counts. Not my preference, not Ms. Maleng's, not Feit's, not the GOP central committee's, only the donors.
Posted by: Seattle Democrat on June 21, 2007 05:55 AMThe folks at the Stranger aren't journalists. They're advocates and make no bones about it.
Posted by: Don Ward on June 21, 2007 07:13 AMTrue. And I'm better described as an activist than a straight journalist too, but that doesn't mean I as well should make a habit of posting based on party press releases. It's lame.
Posted by: Eric Earling on June 21, 2007 07:43 AMI'm no expert on Mitt, so I guess I have to confess in advance to rumour mongering on this subject.
But somehow I find the money going to support Romney very suspicious - when the two leading candidates both have the ability to stand, and lead, based on their reputations (though certainly both with flaws as well).
Romney just shouts out to me, corporate shill, selling corporate soap.
I may be wrong, but his numbers aren't holding either.
-Douglas Tooley
Tacoma, WA
I actually like the Stranger
You feeling ok? Might want to re-check your conservative credentials there.