May 29, 2007
Crunch time for I-25

First, the good news -- the I-25 signature drive is still on track to gather enough signatures (54,732 valid ones) by the June 20 deadline, only 22 days away.

But "on track" does NOT mean that it's done, it only means that it's ours to lose. The campaign needs every signature. If you have petitions, get every signature from registered King County voters that you can get and return the petition to the campaign by June 10th (address here), even if it has only 1 signature.

Also, the campaign still needs more money to finish the paid signature drive.

Many thanks to the many people who have gathered signatures, donated money and raised money from others. (And I'm told a lot more has come in since the last PDC filing). But now's the time for those who support the concept, but haven't contributed yet, to step up to the plate and help finish the job.

If I-25 succeeds, we have a fair shot at having fair elections in King County. If it fails, then we can only look forward to a replay of recent elections -- corruption and mismangement (or in the words of John McKay, "incompetence" and "stinky, nasty things"), or if you're charitable, "mistakes" that happened to favor one side and were actively concealed from the public. It's nice to have a political party and recruit people to run for office and raise money for their campaigns, but what's the point of doing any of that if there's a culture of corruption in the elections office that favors the other side? Why would any sane person put their lives on hold and run for office when they expect a close contest if the actual election doesn't have enough integrity to fairly decide a close contest? It makes me sad to have to say this, but that's what we're looking at.

But if you believe that fair elections are important, whether you're an ordinary voter or someone who invests time and money to help elect your favorite candidates, then now's the time to help ensure that we can have fair elections again.

Let's get this done. Donate today

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at May 29, 2007 11:30 AM | Email This
Comments
1. "mistakes" that happened to favor one side and were actively concealed from the public

If I recall correctly, the biggest mistake was ballots in King County that were almost not counted. The mistake favored the Republicans; the correction of the mistake favored the Democrats (in the sense that it undid the favor to the Republicans).

(As if that matters to you.)

Posted by: Bruce on May 29, 2007 01:11 PM
2. Thank you, Bruce. You identified one mistake that probably favored the Republicans but was corrected in time to affect the outcome of the race. Other mistakes that probably favored the Democrats were concealed, and some of which have never been officially admitted, even though the evidence is overwhelming

Can anybody spot the bias?

Posted by: Stefan Sharkansky on May 29, 2007 01:17 PM
3. Bruce, it's good those votes got counted, because I would have been hacked off if it were my vote that almost didn't get counted because of KC's screw-ups. But how about the 93 or so that never got counted and favored Rossi? Are you okay with that? How about all the double and dead voters and illegal votes and fatal pends, tons of votes with no voter. ALL of that most certainly favored democrats, but I'm not hearing you complain about it. do so, and maybe we'd buy the rest of what you're saying. Why does the majority of the state believe that Dino really won? He was ripped off. Even many democrats think so.

Posted by: Michele on May 29, 2007 01:31 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?