Joel Connelly looked at what John Edwards says. I just finished looking at what John Edwards has done, and gave him a 0.1 on the Vilsack meter. I think you will find the comparison between our two approaches interesting.
(If you have any requests for the next Vilsack meter rating, let me know in the comments, or directly by email to my new email address: jimxc1@gmail.com. I am limiting myself to declared candidates, and plan to do a Republican next.)
Posted by Jim Miller at May 08, 2007
05:05 PM | Email This
It's one of my missions in life to get Eric Oemig, D-Tehran, replaced with almost anyone!
The Piper
Posted by: Piper Scott on May 8, 2007 06:18 PMSeems like the Vilsack meter is good, but it made me wonder, "if you have accomplished something while an elected in government, doesn't that by definition mean you have ticked somebody off and don't have a chance for further office?"
I don't know if that is a good corollary or not, but it is why I sometimes stick with someone like Bush or Reagan or even Nixon, thought they sure ticked people off.
Posted by: swatter on May 9, 2007 07:36 AMgutting most doctors' practices due to fear, 2nd guessing & lawsuits?
forcing insurance companies to jack malpractice rates to an unsustainable level due to runaway lotto-juries? subjugating true good-sense doctoring to "CYA medicine?"
printing asinine warnings on every product? look at the recent shoplifter incident at Albertson's. employees fired. dirtbag (alleged) perp given near hallowed status.
it's all upside down if you ask me. and you want lib Dems in power in '08? good luck. watch your wallet & assets. because THEY are...like vultures...
Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on May 9, 2007 06:02 PM