I celebrated Earth Day by walking to Gregg's Greenlake Cycles to buy a bicycle for my 5-year-old, demonstrating once again that conservative and conservation come from the same word.
Meanwhile, Seattle's Enviro-Mayor Greg Nickels celebrated by driving around town from one photo-op to another.
Indeed, yesterday's P-I article -- "Nickels and Sims: Green and greener" -- reveals that our Dear Environmental Leaders have "room to improve". Both enjoy processing their household garbage, but Sims's private car is a fuel-swilling SUV and Nickels conceals the truth about his gas-guzzling commute:
[Nickels] doesn't bike into work -- "I have a thing about riding a bike in traffic" -- but he did swap in the town car that Seattle police used to drive him into work for a hybrid. He and Sharon often carpool to their downtown jobs.In fact, his chauffeur-driven SUV travels 100 miles a day, including a daily 12-mile round-trip between its downtown garage and Hizzoner's house. Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at April 22, 2007 04:32 PM | Email This
He's got another alternative. Since I drive far less than he does, he's more than welcome to purchase "carbon offsets" from me.
Posted by: Bill Cruchon on April 22, 2007 04:36 PMI challenge Mayor Nickels to have a State patrolman take an early trip via Sound transit to Greg's home, and the two of them can ride the bus back to Greg's work location and to all of his appointments each day for just one week.
It would be a good scenereo on how the real world works.
I would also like them to pick a daycare center out and assume they have children that they need to drop off and pick up on time (or get hefty fines) and accomplish this feat day after day. Stop and get off the bus at this location for 10 minutes, and then resume your trip.
I'd like to see him try this for one week.
This is how many of us must deal with the real world!
Posted by: GS on April 22, 2007 05:32 PM
Gore, Sims & Nickels Admit Confusion---
3 Political Environmental Politico's with zero Science training between them have admitted confusion about today's celebration.
In a Press Conference held at Old Country Buffet in Lynnwood, a spokesperson for the 3 CHERUBIC KLOWNS said they all thought today was GIRTH DAY.
"It's a bit embarrassing to say the least" said spokesperson David Matthews. "We believe it was Karl Rove who sent us the misleading e-mail".
Gore, Sims & Nickels were seen chowing down 3 heaping platefuls of starch & carbo's....and had yet to hit the Dessert Buffet as of the time of this report.
Matthews went on to say "It is unfair for the Neo-Cons to make fun of these 3 great Americans for this misunderstanding. We were lead to believe Girth Day was to call attention to the plight of overeaters. FatAsses have feelings too!"
Posted by: Mr. Cynical on April 22, 2007 06:31 PMWhat is a rat?
A. The mayor of Seattle
B. The King County Executive.
C. What will infest your neighborhood
when Seattle bans all food scraps in trash
in favor of backyard composting.
D. All of the above.
BTW, the very first "Earth Day", April 22, 1970, was chosen for that date to honor the 100th birthday of V. I. Lenin. Isn't there some wacko town in the Pacific NW that has a statue of that creep in their public square? Nice memorial to a man who has cost the lives of tens of millions.
Posted by: Interested Observer on April 22, 2007 06:52 PMYou just can't make this stuff up.
Posted by: Bill Cruchon on April 23, 2007 06:35 AMI took down 5 trees in the backyard, cut em up with a gas powered chainsaw and hauled the refuse away in a full sized truck with a 460 big block.
happy earth day. I found the irony very enjoyable.
Posted by: k2 on April 23, 2007 09:14 AMIt's "protection money".
Protection from what you say?
Oh, from the Sun and cosmic rays that are responsible for heating and cooling.
Oh...ok.
Posted by: John Bailo on April 23, 2007 09:46 AMNot surprising that the 'holiday' was created to concurrently celebrate the birthday of one of the leading murderers, land thieves and dictatorial tyrants of the 20th century: V.I. Lenin himself, inspiration to both Stalin and Hitler. That's a signal to sulk, or moon the Mayor AND the property-confiscating Ron Sims, rather than celebrate.
Dear Friend,
I had a debate a couple weeks ago with Sen. John Kerry -- followed by a speech last week -- about something called "green conservatism." Some of my old friends have approached me to ask why I'm spending so much time talking about the environment -- and with a former Democratic nominee for President no less.
The answer is simple: For the last 36 years, I have watched the pro-regulation, pro-litigation, pro-taxation liberals label themselves as the only Americans who care about the environment.
The leftwing machine would have you believe that to care about clean air and water, biodiversity, and the future of the Earth you have to both buy in to their catastrophic scenarios and sign on to their command-and-control bureaucratic liberal agenda, including dramatic increases in government power and draconian policies that will devastate our economy, as the only solution to environmental challenges.
The time has come to define a fundamentally different approach to a healthy environment and a healthy economy. The time has come for the development of Green Conservatism as an alternative to big bureaucracy and big litigation liberal environmentalism.
Conserving Our Environment, Not Expanding Our Government
Before I talk about what I mean by Green Conservatism, I want to say a few words about how I got to this belief and why I think it's so important for the future of our movement.
I first became interested in conservation when I was a kid in Pennsylvania. Notice that I use the word "conservation." It reflects my fundamental disagreement with today's liberal environmentalists. I believe we should be good stewards of the natural world. We should "conserve" it for our benefit and our children's and grandchildren's benefit, not use it as an excuse for massively expanding regulation, litigation and bureaucracy.
In any case, as a child I originally wanted to be either a zoo director or a vertebrate paleontologist because I was fascinated by the natural world -- and still am. In 1971, I participated in the second Earth Day and became the coordinator of an interdisciplinary Environmental Studies program at West Georgia College. In my commitment to the environment, I was echoing the conviction of two well known Republican leaders. The first was President Theodore Roosevelt, who said that "the nation behaves well if it treats the natural resources as assets, which it must turn over to the next generation increased, and not impaired, in value." The other was then Gov. Ronald Reagan, who upon the occasion of the first Earth Day said that "[there is an] absolute necessity of waging all-out war against the
debauching of the environment.
Liberal Environmentalism: Radical, Hysterical and Inaccurate
I care about conserving our environment. But for too many years, liberals have defined what it means to care about the environment -- and too often at a level that is so radical, so hysterical and so inaccurate that the first reaction of conservatives is to oppose them. Without articulate conservative leadership on conservation, the result has too often been that conservatives are labeled anti-environment. For too long, we have not led with our solutions for the environment, while liberals propose and dominate the debate with ill-conceived regulations, a focus on litigation instead of science, and a focus on taxes instead of markets and incentives. Conservatives have allowed liberals to monopolize and hold the high ground on a subject of great concern to all Americans. With your help, I want to change that.
We have every reason to call out all outlandish, fear-mongering exaggerations -- but that doesn't mean we should stop there when it comes to the issue of the environment.
For example, former Vice President Al Gore suggests that global warming is so bad that we could have a 20-foot rise in the oceans in the near future. No responsible scientist anywhere believes that to be true. But if the debate becomes, "Al Gore cares about the earth, and we're against Al Gore," we end up in a defensive position where the average American could end up perceiving conservatives as always being negative about the environment.
Green Conservatism: Pro-Freedom, Pro-Market, Pro-Environment
I'd like to offer you a different view: You can be totally committed to conservative principles -- to individual liberty, a market economy, entrepreneurship and lower taxes -- and still be a Green Conservative. You can believe that with the sound use of science and technology and the right incentives to encourage entrepreneurs, conservatism can provide a better solution for the health of our planet than can liberalism.
So what is Green Conservatism? Here are its basic values:
1. Green Conservatism favors clean air and clean water.
2. Green Conservatism understands biodiversity as a positive good.
3. Green Conservatism favors minimizing carbon loading in the atmosphere as a positive public value.
4. Green Conservatism is pro-science, pro-technology and pro-innovation.
5. Green Conservatism believes that green prosperity and green development are integral to the successful future of the human race.
6. Green Conservatism believes that economic growth and environmental health are compatible in both the developed and developing world.
7. Green Conservatism believes that we can realize more positive environmental outcomes faster by shifting tax code incentives and shifting market behavior than is possible from litigation and regulation.
Key to Green Conservatism: Energy Independence From Dangerous Dictatorships
A key part of Green Conservatism is to make sure that we don't have only an "environment policy," but we have a comprehensive "energy and environment" policy.
For green prosperity and green development, we have to have a strategy that makes the transition from the unimproved fossil fuels that dramatically improved the quality of life over the pre-industrial period. We need a new generation of clean energy that will: enable us, in national security terms, to be liberated from dependence on dangerous dictatorships; enable us, in economic terms, to be effective in worldwide competition; and enable us, in environmental terms, to provide for a much cleaner and healthier future.
Reliable, affordable energy is indispensable to economic growth around the planet, and economic growth is essential to a healthier environment. In so many ways, both here and abroad, we truly achieve "green through growth."
Sounds Good, but How Do We Get There?
You may have heard me say before that one of the reasons I am optimistic about the future of America is that we can expect four to seven times as much new scientific knowledge and innovation in the next 25 years as we have had in the past 100. As a result, America is truly ideally suited to meet the challenges of conserving our environment. Americans excel at precisely those capabilities that will be required: entrepreneurially led technological innovation and utilization of the power of the free market to provide better environmental outcomes with economic growth advantages, not disadvantages.
There are two key ways we can encourage this entrepreneurialism and innovation:
* Allow Prizes to Compete With Process in Our Government-led Scientific Research Investments. We should significantly invest in prizes as a competitive alternative to the current peer-reviewed process of scientific research. We should, for example, offer prizes for the development of high gas mileage cars and other carbon-reduction challenges. We must maximize the rate at which we develop and diffuse new technologies both here and abroad, and prizes have historically unleashed dramatic creativity and innovation. Read here for a partial listing of examples of previous and current prizes.
* Offer Carbon Reduction Tax Credits. Green conservatism values reducing the carbon loading of the atmosphere. The least economically disruptive and least government empowering models will be the most effective in achieving this value. We should therefore create a program of carbon-reduction tax credits. One such tax credit idea is to incentivize the creation of new energy production technologies that reduce carbon loading.
Our Entrepreneurs and Markets vs. Their Lawyers, Bureaucrats and Regulations
Our generation faces the extraordinary challenge of bringing to bear science and technology, entrepreneurship, and the principles of effective markets in order to enable people to have a good life both economically and environmentally.
So in the future, I'm going to be talking a lot about Green Conservatism. After all, conservatives can stand toe to toe with any liberal anywhere in America when it comes to wanting to build a better future for ourselves and our families. Four hundred years of American experience has demonstrated that a commitment to science, entrepreneurship and free markets can create better solutions for a better future than lawyers and bureaucrats and their never-ending schemes of regulation and taxation.
So stayed tuned. Green Conservatism is an idea whose time has come.
Your friend,
Newt Gingrich
