March 30, 2007
Also in Olympia

* HB 2079, which would do an end-run around the forthcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision and allow government employee unions to use mandatory fees for political activities without seeking permission, passed out of the Senate Committee on Labor, Commerce, and Research & Development yesterday.

* A bipartisan group of legislators, led by Sen. Cheryl Pflug (R-Maple Valley), is holding a news conference this afternoon to discuss her plan to

to solve Puget Sound's largest transportation problems once and for all. The "Vision 21" Plan can fully fund the six-lane Seattle tunnel, 520 Bridge, 509 connection to I-5 and more ─ within budget and without tolls.
Details in SB 6169. As far as I can tell, it would reshape the propose RTID/Sound Transit joint ballot proposal to kill light-rail across Lake Washington and redeploy the funds to the other projects.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at March 30, 2007 10:28 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Stefan, where do you get this nonsense anyways?

First, the bill to circumvent the US Supreme Court. Ugh!! So, that means we have to go back to the Court will the illegalities of this new bill?

Second, what in the world is a R doing reinstituting a tunnel when the people of Seattle said no?

Posted by: swatter on March 30, 2007 10:27 AM
2. I'll need more background on Phlug's proposal before I can decide I like it, but at least someone is looking at better alternatives. The negative is that Cheryl is a Republican and will not likely get a hearing - let alone support.

Posted by: deadwood on March 30, 2007 10:38 AM
3. Sounds like smoke and mirrors to me.

Can you say Big Dig? I knew you could

Posted by: Jack Burton on March 30, 2007 03:10 PM
4. AN ACT Relating to use of agency shop fees; amending RCW 42.17.760; and declaring an emergency.

Can someone explain to me what the emergency here is? Or is that just put on every bill out of habit, to make it not subject to referendum?

Posted by: Michael on March 30, 2007 03:15 PM
5. Oh, wonderful. So, build the tunnel with the dollars for the project with the best public support of anything in RTID/ST2? Way to make the entire package fail.

Posted by: Ben Schiendelman on March 30, 2007 05:06 PM
6. It just kills me - now that ST turned the corner and projects are coming in on time and under budget, a bunch of part-time hacks on the State level want to take away our local control. You deserve this for electing them . . ..

Posted by: evergreen_rails on March 30, 2007 05:56 PM
7. @ #4 the reason for the emergency clause, in this case, is to get the bill enacted into law before the US Supreme Court hands down thier opinion. That would reder the opinion moot.

Posted by: Tadpole on March 30, 2007 06:29 PM
8. #6 - you are imagining things - that will NEVER happen. Can you prove that assertion with documentation ?

I hope Rep. Pflug has some support. ST light rail needs to be quashed. Otherwise, this state will dig a hole deeper into Social engineering and a socialist, nanny state mentality.

HB #2079 is downright devious ! One big reason to vote out the Democrats in '08. Why don't the Repubs filibuster it to buy time until the US Supreme Court adopts it as law. If that doesn't work, then the WSRP needs to jump all over this issue for that to even be a possibility in the Blue State. Eventually, this HB needs to get repealed, but that won't be possible until the Dems are out of control. Get that ?

Posted by: KS on March 31, 2007 10:13 AM
9. First KS, you can't filibuster in the State Senate. Second, don't hold your breath on that GOP takeover happening anytime soon. Third, Sen Pflug said she had bipartisan support for her proposal but there were no democrats at her press conferece. One Dem did show up late (a guy from Spokane), stayed in the back of the room, and left moments after a reporter noted he was there.
Fourth, parts of Pflug's proposal make far more sense than the mess the GOP-dominated RTID has come up with, but it is still DOA, like RTID will be in November.

Posted by: Tacoma on March 31, 2007 10:34 AM
10. Just being a reporter here. No evaluative opinion being expressed, except that this looks "good enough to criticize."

Details from Senator Pflug at
http://src.wa.gov/media2007/2007Releases/Pflug/PflugVision21033007.htm

Plug's words:
"The Vision 21 Plan calls for fully funding and completing a six-lane tunnel replacement for the Alaskan Way Viaduct, rebuilding SR-520 and bridge, connecting SR-167 to the Port of Tacoma, connecting SR-509 to I-5 and expanding the Cross-Base Highway. Funding comes from just one source: delaying Sound Transit's Light Rail to the Eastside."

Posted by: John Niles on March 31, 2007 01:04 PM
11. Suggest we all read the bill, not the press release puffery --
http://www.leg.wa.gov/pub/billinfo/2007-08/Pdf/Bills/Senate%20Bills/6169.pdf

What this bill does, by legislative fiat, is override the will of local elected officials and commands a decision from Olympia. It redirects dedicated transit tax revenues to fund highways. There was a time when the GOP respected local government and local voters' decisionmaking. Are those times gone?

Polling data show the East Link light rail line to be very popular with east side voters, so I suspect another agenda at work -- give voters one big reason to vote NO on the Roads+Transit package this fall.

Posted by: Roger Pence on March 31, 2007 07:05 PM
12. #7 This is an abuse of process. What can stop them from abusing the emergency provision? Please don't say vote them out because that could take awhile.

Posted by: Michael in Seattle on March 31, 2007 10:06 PM
13. It sounds like Vision 21 promises us all the things the 9 cents promised us but didn't deliver.

Posted by: Michael in Tacoma, formerly known as Michael on March 31, 2007 10:10 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?