P-I: "Vehicles burn in suspected arson"
Twelve city vehicles are charred ruins after they deliberately were set on fire early Monday morning in a city lot on South Royal Brougham Way, Seattle fire and police officials said.I'm confused. There's no suspect to indict. No smoking gun. (okay, 12 smoking vehicles, but no smoking gun). No suspiciously redacted e-mails claiming attorney-client privilege. No informants, confidential or otherwise, accusing anybody of willful misconduct. No e-mails asking subordinates to cover their tracks. No false statements to the news media. There is zero evidence to attribute this conflagration to a human being, let alone to a criminal act. Why should the police even investigate?
All of this innuendo about felony arson when it was obviously an innocent mistake or an act of God is just not the way things are done around here.
Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at March 26, 2007 09:55 PM | Email ThisPerhaps McKay could have subpoaened all of the departments emails to see if they were purposely counting the fatal pend ballots when they knew them to be ineligible. I guess we'll never know.
Posted by: Palouse on March 27, 2007 07:47 AM'12 cars were on fire, and it might be suspicious'
_might_be_?!?
I wish.
Posted by: REBEL on March 27, 2007 10:36 AMafter 24-hour release, they will be issued NASA-quality fireproof suits after winning a HUGE (settled) lawsuit against the County for storage of gasoline in cars, in a tempting and entrapment-oriented way.
Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on March 27, 2007 02:23 PMPosted by: Who signed off on that 6 unit condo complex on a single family lot? on March 27, 2007 03:16 PM