Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy is "sick and tired of getting half-truths" about the fired U.S. Attorneys. Tell me about it.
Meanwhile, I'm told John McKay said this on the Mike Siegel Show, May 26, 2005:
The Federal Government has an important historic role in elections ... if there's a Federal crime in the election - if there's bribery, if there's extortion, if there is ballot stuffing - then, if it involves a Federal election, the Federal Government's involved. So that's the basic outline of where we are. But the bottom line is if there is a crime, somebody goes to jail.That's certainly the right sentiment.
Is it "ballot stuffing" when election officials toss hundreds of ineligible votes into the do-count pile, and then cover it up and prevent that information from being presented in court during a trial about the election? I'm just asking.
Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at March 19, 2007 03:51 PM | Email ThisNo sign of Ballot stuffing......My Ass!
10% of all Ballots being overwritten.......BS ?
Third count is a charm?
Need a new set of glasses John McKay?
Posted by: GS on March 19, 2007 05:56 PMAt least conservatives joining the Democratic Party, would make Democrats more moderate.
ZMac
Posted by: Zmac on March 19, 2007 07:42 PMGood editorial on Power Line !
Posted by: KS on March 19, 2007 08:47 PMSenate Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy is "sick and tired of getting half-truths" about the fired U.S. Attorneys.
Maybe Leahy should stop talking to himself so much...
Posted by: SouthernRoots on March 20, 2007 08:27 AMI randomly went to look at one and coincidentally it began with letters of requests for John McKay to look into the 2004 ballot irregularities:
http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/DOJDocsPt7-11070319.pdf
I only looked at two files, but there seemed to be a bit of redundancy - it seemed as if they were posting email chains with everyones copy.
Posted by: SouthernRoots on March 20, 2007 10:19 AMYour link contains a lot of revealing information about John McKays refusal to investigate the 2004 election fraud. Bob Edlemans dialogue with McKay in 2004 and 2005 shows McKays clear resistance to even "begin" an investigation. I'm wondering if he ever did direct his office to perform a preliminary investigation as he now states he did? The EFF's correspondence states that several requests for investigation were denied by McKay....No mention of a preliminary investigation having been performed by McKay's office.
Posted by: Deborah on March 20, 2007 03:14 PM