February 22, 2007
The MSM & McCain

John McCain's upcoming visit to Seattle, with an event co-hosted by the Discovery Institute, seems to have finalized the termination of the MSM's love affair with the "maverick" Senator from Arizona.

Locally, Joel Connelly has reached a point of total disdain. This following the severe annoyance he expressed last December with McCain, in stark contrast to the fawning local coverage of McCain's 2000 insurgency. It seems a conservative isn't acceptable to some in the media once they start talking to conservatives.

Of course, McCain's problem is actual conservatives - including this writer - remain incredibly leery of him for various reasons. The new tone in media coverage may oddly do nothing to change that trend.

Just a couple of the media stories as of late I've read capture the issue, spotlighting topics related to the Discovery Institute. First, a long profile of McCain in Vanity Fair:

Nor, presumably, was it straight talk last summer at an Aspen Institute discussion when McCain struggled to articulate his position on the teaching of intelligent design in public schools. At first, according to two people who were present, McCain said he believed that intelligent design, which proponents portray as a more intellectually respectable version of biblical creationism, should be taught in science classes. But then, in the face of intense skepticism from his listeners, he kept modifying his views - going into reverse evolution.

Also, a blistering critique from the Philadelphia Inquirer:

McCain in 2006 suggested that creationism was not a fit topic for the schoolroom: 'I respect those who think the world was created in seven days. Should it be taught as a science class? Probably not.' But he suggested the opposite in 2005 ('all points of view should be presented'), and next Friday he is scheduled to be the keynote speaker at a confab sponsored by the Discovery Institute, a prominent creationism advocacy group.

Personally, I don't have much passion for the issue of intelligent design in the Presidential race, but Discovery's mere involvement in the event is certainly drawing attention (for those more interested in McCain on intelligent design, start here). It will be interesting to see how upcoming media coverage of McCain's Seattle visit is affected by the Discovery angle.

Meanwhile, I suspect the view of many conservatives in observing the shift in media coverage of McCain is: "it's about time."

Posted by Eric Earling at February 22, 2007 07:21 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Actually my view of the MSM media coverage shifting over John McCain is now I guess nobody likes him anymore and it is his own fault.

Posted by: TrueSoldier on February 22, 2007 07:44 AM
2. Something has been nagging at me re: McCain. Normally I would be a supporter, and have wanted him in the WH for some time. But I have doubts about his temperment, his opposition to tax cuts, and campaign finance "reform" that is an infringement of the 1st amendment, and now his pathetic attack on Don Rumsfeld.

Dean Barnett sums it up

The most pointed comment:
"As a man, John McCain almost universally has the respect of Republicans. His biography is unique and powerful. But my co-blogger Hugh Hewitt long ago coined the shorthand for Sen. McCain that defines him perfectly for most conservatives. In Hugh's formulation, John McCain is a great man, a bad Senator and an awful Republican."

Posted by: Obi-Wan on February 22, 2007 07:52 AM
3. John McCain is a shameless flip-flopper. His constantly changing views on major issues seem to be the product of "intelligent design", instead of "evolution".

Posted by: Richard Pope on February 22, 2007 07:52 AM
4. Argh!

Dean Barnett sums it up here

Posted by: Obi-Wan on February 22, 2007 07:54 AM
5. I once had a lot of respect for John McCain for having endured six years of captivity by the North Vietnamese, and I had some sympathy for him after the Republican "smear and slime machine" run by Karl Rove targeted him. But lately with McCain's "flip-flops" based not on principle or conviction, and his pandering to the lunatic fringe of the Christian right-wing, both that respect and sympathy are dwindling. His free-fall has taken on a momentum of its own. It may be too late for him to redeem himself, at least with voters like me.

Posted by: Jay McCaffrey on February 22, 2007 08:10 AM
6. I was willing to listen to what McCain had to say about Rumsfeld, but when I heard that his comment was about not enough troops and not the real issue- gloves tied behind backs and the rules of disengagement by our fighters- I just walked away. No more.

But, if the MSM is going to pound on him, then maybe he is doing something right. McCain was in my top 3 in 2000 but isn't in my top 5 this time. Whatever; whoever the Rs pick for the fight, I will go along with.

Posted by: swatter on February 22, 2007 08:14 AM
7. I'd wondered why I was warming to McCain all of a sudden. And now I know: Dopey knee-jerk polemicists like Connelly and "smear and slime" Jay McCaffrey make it hard for me to not rally to McCain's side.

Keep it up, libs! With your continued insane rantings against relatively moderate (and highly electable) Republicans like Giuliani and McCain, you're making it easier for conservatives to hold their noses and support these guys. Good work!

Posted by: DJ on February 22, 2007 08:15 AM
8. McCain Feingold is unconstitutional, I'll never vote for someone who doesn't understand the constitution to be its top protector.

Posted by: Dan on February 22, 2007 08:18 AM
9. As someone who has met a few of the men who flew with McCain and know him.
I could never vote for this guy. He used his fathers name to get him in the Navy to fly, his flying skills should have flushed him out, but daddys name saved him. Now as a POW has was a great person. But that is not the reason to vote for him.

Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on February 22, 2007 08:33 AM
10. Well, when McCain got up on the floor of the US Senate and basically said that Americans were too lazy to pick lettuce at $50/hr, that was it for me.

McCain is pro-Illgal invasion. He is probably an honorary member of LaRaza and Mecha.

Posted by: pbj on February 22, 2007 09:42 AM
11. This is sure to be the RINO event of the year!!!

Posted by: Pacific Grove Phlash on February 22, 2007 09:57 AM
12. Eric,

One bone to pick with you good buddy. Your link to Google news alleging that the "Mainstream Media" has already picked up on the Discovery/McCain connection is stretching it a bit.
Northwest Progressive and Huffington Post are neither mainstream nor media. And of the actual news outlets, flawed as they may be, the Discovery item is barely even tertiary to their main story.

Posted by: Reporterward on February 22, 2007 10:34 AM
13. Jay @ 5
his pandering to the lunatic fringe of the Christian right-wing

You really should not slam the GOP base like that.

Posted by: Cato on February 22, 2007 11:33 AM
14. Well, well.. Just in the news,McCain joins the GW fools and blames the White House.

I bet david M will join us soon.

Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on February 22, 2007 11:47 AM
15. Won't vote for McCain to be dog-catcher, let alone President!

Posted by: David on February 22, 2007 03:19 PM
16. Hey McCain, you need to hear this!

I just heard University of Wisconsin's Dr. Sean B. Carroll (Professor of Molecular Biology and Genetics and an Investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical) talk about evolution and how the Discovery Institute cheats students out of an education.

Carroll, author of the recent book "Making of the Fittest," explains that the US is paying a price for its lack of scientific literacy.

(Listen at: http://www.wsst.org/labtable.asp?newsID=280)

Posted by: Drake Milton on February 22, 2007 08:38 PM
17. Giuliani sounds better to me. A couple of more flips and flops and McCain will do himself in. And that thing he does trying to get onto the "bible belt gravy train" ain't pretty.

Posted by: HappyHeathen on February 24, 2007 04:44 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?