February 14, 2007
Elect the King County Elections Director

A campaign committee called Citizens for Accountable Elections has filed with the PDC for the purpose of supporting a Nov. 2007 ballot initiative to "create the position of an independently elected elections director in King County". The campaign isn't releasing many details yet, and the website is still under construction, but former state Rep. Toby Nixon is listed as the media contact. The existence of a PDC filing would indicate that the group is already raising money.

This movement has been building for a while, inspired by Ron Sims' mismanagement of elections administration, especially in 2004. I first heard the idea of a separately elected non-partisan elections director raised by then Councilman David Irons in January 2005. The Cheryl Scott task force included it as a key recommendation later that year. The CEOC announced it as a key recommendation in its March 2006 report. The County Council was poised to put this charter change on the November 2006 ballot, but the deal fell apart after Sims' allies pressured Bob Ferguson to back out.

The Sims crowd knows that this is a popular idea and would pass if it gets on the ballot. Ron Sims' stated excuse for keeping it off the 2006 ballot was that he had already recruited a (secret) appointee, who would take the job but not run for the office. The candidate, later identified as John Arntz from San Francisco, backed out anyway. I spoke with Arntz and could tell he wasn't a serious candidate to begin with.

The King County elections office remains under the interim leadership of Jim Buck. Buck told the Council recently that "the recruiting of his permanent replacement is moving forward". Sims would do well to assume that the charter change initiative passes in November and accordingly limit his executive search to candidates who are willing to run for the job next year.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at February 14, 2007 01:59 PM | Email This
Comments
1. And all envious banks should pay their Auditor / Director / IT Operations staff well and take good care to prevent them from jumping ship to work under Sims, in the prestigious role of King County Elections Director.

Posted by: Jeff B. on February 14, 2007 02:47 PM
2. I really hope this makes it onto the ballot as it would be a great thing for everyone in King County and, as the 2004 election showed, it would be a great thing for everyone in this state.

Posted by: TrueSoldier on February 14, 2007 05:16 PM
3. How will voters be sure that the canidates running actually have election knowledge and how much is enough knowledge? As with many other races there alway seems to be an abundance of power hungry "wana bees" and a shortfall of qualified, experienced and knowledgable individuals who can lead.

Posted by: Anna on February 14, 2007 08:33 PM
4. How will voters be sure that the canidates running actually have election knowledge and how much is enough knowledge? As with many other races there alway seems to be an abundance of power hungry "wana bees" and a shortfall of qualified, experienced and knowledgable individuals who can lead.

Posted by: Anna on February 14, 2007 08:34 PM
5. How will voters be sure that the canidates running actually have election knowledge and how much is enough knowledge? As with many other races there alway seems to be an abundance of power hungry "wana bees" and a shortfall of qualified, experienced and knowledgable individuals who can lead.

Posted by: Anna on February 14, 2007 08:41 PM
6. Anna @3&4&5: A good question, and worthy of consideration. But KC Elections is a department, not an individual. Were you hiring just one individual, you would want to make darn sure that they knew all about the DIMS system, RCWs & WACs, WANDA errors, ballot reconciliation, details of MBOS operations, etc., etc., etc.. But you're not. You're hiring a manager to oversee all of the people who actually do know all about those details.

Good leadership requires a solid, general understanding of how and why things work as they do in one's department; flaming ignorance just won't do. But plenty of very effective managers are in charge of hundreds of people whose specific jobs they could not simply step into and do -- they simply understand the basics of what is being done, and can pick and lead the right people to handle the details.

More to the point, take a look at out last appointed Elections director... would the voters not have fired him, if given the chance?

Posted by: TB on February 15, 2007 12:39 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?