January 19, 2007
Election reform proposals, with LBJ and Stalin smiling on


State Senate Democrats Kohl-Welles, Fairley and Oemig held a press conference yesterday to announce their "election reform" proposals. (TVW video). Hilariously, the backdrop consisted of portraits of Lyndon Johnson and Josef Stalin, reminding us not to trust the Democrats' proposals.

Oemig quoted LBJ as a role model, as if unaware that Johnson's path to power included stealing a Senate primary. Oemig quoted the Stalin line "it's who counts the votes" as a warning, but of course it's partisan Democrats who count most of the votes here in Washington.

Their stated goal is "improving the elections process so far more citizens can exercise their right to vote" (as if eligible voters are currently prevented from voting). No mention of protecting lawful voters from well-documented sloppiness and fraud. Their biggest ideas: publicly financed campaigns and same-day registration.

(credit: Postman)

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at January 19, 2007 02:59 PM | Email This
Comments
1. It has been said that LBJ won the election for himself and Kennedy by creating votes. In other words, they did the same thing the current batch of Election Officials did in selecting Gregoire.

Posted by: swatter on January 19, 2007 03:02 PM
2. same-day registration

how about retroactive registration instead

Posted by: dan425 on January 19, 2007 03:02 PM
3. dan, the new owners of KIRO would enthusiastically approve your suggestion. After all, they're all about retroactive baptism.

Posted by: Rey Smith on January 19, 2007 03:15 PM
4. "improving the elections process so far more citizens can exercise their right to vote"

What in the name of sanity does that mean?

I guess the logical question for these loons at this point is to ask them to identify the citizens that are being denied their right to vote.

I've been voting for decades. I've never found it to be particularly difficult.

Posted by: Bill Cruchon on January 19, 2007 03:38 PM
5. I despise the way they use the cry for reform as their own personal opportunity to institute the corruption they've been dying to implement. We are not fooled.

NO NO NO NO to all this!

Posted by: Michele on January 19, 2007 03:40 PM
6. A picture is truly worth a thousand words! Need anyone say more.

Posted by: Fed Up on January 19, 2007 03:42 PM
7. ..it wasn't lack of opportunity to vote that everyone objected to--they were disgusted at the fraud and inability of KCE to properly count or even keep track of votes and to enforce voting laws that are in place to prohibit fraud!

Posted by: Michele on January 19, 2007 03:42 PM
8. Oh my gosh, this is the funniest thing I have heard in a long, looooong, time. lolololololol /deep breath / lolololololol

Posted by: kim in vancouver on January 19, 2007 03:50 PM
9. "more citizens can exercise their right to vote." Is that citizens of this state & country or all countries? How about citizens that are legally able to vote? Or just anyone. I know I would have liked to vote when I was 16 or even 12....i was a citizen then as I am now.

Posted by: Dengle on January 19, 2007 03:50 PM
10. "...same day registration" What's next-drive thru voting?

Posted by: John425 on January 19, 2007 03:52 PM
11. Someone please tell me there is more to the story of the pictures?
Are these people genuinely stupid or are they being deliberately obtuse? Do they have any idea how repugnant and objectionable it is to put Stalin's picture in a Democratic setting? Quote him if you want but good grief, don't use him as a backdrop in a photo-op.
So what is it we can look forward to...a Great Society and Pogroms?

Posted by: Diogenes on January 19, 2007 03:59 PM
12. Stalin was politically correct and demanded politically correct speech and actions from his people. Stalin's "political correctness" is always what I think of when the "PC" crowd starts in on us.

Diogenes - "Do they have any idea how repugnant and objectionable it is to put Stalin's picture in a Democratic setting?"

Objectional in a democratic (with a little "D") setting but maybe not as objectionable in a Democratic (with a capital "D") setting.....

Posted by: SouthernRoots on January 19, 2007 04:07 PM
13. I can see lots of their supports getting pissed that Che wasn't pictured too.

Posted by: Dengle on January 19, 2007 04:17 PM
14. S Roots,

Good point. I was thinking in terms of Democratic as in Democracy, and this setting as Democracy in action... not Party. Bbut alas, as Uncle Joe taught us, the Party is Everything.
Never be the first to stop clapping.

Posted by: Diogenes on January 19, 2007 04:21 PM
15. LBJ and Stalin are model for voting standards?

Did someone just cut and paste the pictures into the scene or are these folk really this stupid?

Or are we that stupid for electing this gang of lossers?

Perhaps both?

Posted by: Snuffy on January 19, 2007 04:39 PM
16. I originally thought this was a cheap Photoshop joke. Not that there is anything wrong with that.

This photo does show what a tin ear, how out of touch, these people are.

So . . . these are our "leaders"?

I just can't get it out of my head. Ha, ha, ha!!

Posted by: G Jiggy on January 19, 2007 05:06 PM
17. The people out of touch are they "leaders" or "voters"? Or both?

The joke is on us, you know.

Posted by: Snuffy on January 19, 2007 05:15 PM
18. Oh do make me laugh....Democrats offering Election reform....

Hardy Har Har Har.....

Posted by: GS on January 19, 2007 05:47 PM
19. Many of the posts here are quite comical, but in a serious vein, yes these people are in fact our leaders and their party has almost total control in Olympia. So don't make too much of a joke of these idiots. Their foolishness likely has a reasonable chance to become the law.

So all you out there that wanted to make send a message to President Bush and voted for any and all "D"'s on the ballot, here's your reward and sad to say there is likely a lot more to come!

Posted by: BornRight on January 19, 2007 05:55 PM
20. There's the very real possibility that they don't know who Stalin is.

Posted by: Organization Man on January 19, 2007 08:06 PM
21. Talk about photoshop--somebody should photoshop the lady in the middle's head back onto her shoulders...

Posted by: Organization Man on January 19, 2007 08:25 PM
22. Question about that picture. Is that Cindy Sheehan on the viewers' left? It's not? Kohl who? What's her job?

Posted by: Tyler Durden on January 19, 2007 09:16 PM
23. Recommend y'all DO visit Postman's blog and catch that version of this thread too. The update on Sen. Oemig whining about Postman putting up that TVW screen shot is a classic. In my $0.02 over there I noted poster ''DJ'' was the thread winner, with his ''Which one's Stalin ?''.

Posted by: Methow Ken on January 19, 2007 09:21 PM
24. No, the next think they will want is Internet Voting...

Posted by: CrazyFool in Lynnwood on January 19, 2007 09:34 PM
25. Tyler, I thought the one on the left looked like Ciny Sheehan, too.

Posted by: Michele on January 19, 2007 09:51 PM
26. Ha, ha, ha!! Every time I stop by here and see those boobs in that picture I fall out of my chair! Ha, ha, ha!!

Priceless.

Posted by: G Jiggy on January 19, 2007 10:19 PM
27. They do long for the days of a, well, more "democratic centralism," not unlike that practiced by their hero in the picture.

Posted by: Hinton on January 20, 2007 05:03 AM
28. Yeah, if I were Kohl-Welles, I'd get a makeover and a new haircut. Even if I was dumb enough to think like a secular progressive, I wouldn't want to be mistaken for Cindy Sheehan.

They should have pictures of Hugo Chavez and Dean Logan behind them as well.

Posted by: Jeff B. on January 20, 2007 07:20 AM
29. This photo is disturbing. Their proposal disgusting. I think they will skip Drive-by-voting and go straight to voting for us - save us the trouble. Oh wait...

Posted by: THBarb on January 20, 2007 07:54 AM
30. In checking the latest, Sen. Kohl-Welles jumped onto the thread at Postman's and threw her staff under the bus.

Don't believe for a second she and the other two senators didn't know of the props and how they were to be used. If there's one thing a legislator pays attention to, it's how they will be presented to and perceived by the press. Especially at a press conference.

They simply didn't think a picture of - and a quote from - Stalin at an election-'reform' press conference would generate a negative reaction. That reveals far more about them than it does the people taking them to task over it.

Posted by: jimg on January 20, 2007 10:45 AM
31. I thought everyone knew what a crook LBJ was. Seriously, the guy should have been in prison.

Posted by: H Moul on January 20, 2007 11:44 AM
32. It seems everytime the legislators enact "election reform" all they manage to do is make the system more complicated and more prone to a mistake being made. The infamous electronic voting devices, once outlawed for use in Washington State, came about as a result of election reforms. Good luck!

Posted by: Bob B. on January 20, 2007 12:01 PM
33. Kohl-Welles claim on Postman's blog of not knowing what was going on is remindful of Ashlee Simpson blowing her spot on "Saturday Night Live" and blaming her band.

Note: This is not an attempt to draw a comparison of a performer with questionable talent and the performance talents of a state senator.

But I do love it when politicos try to explain their actions on blogs ;o)

Posted by: Tyler Durden on January 20, 2007 01:09 PM
34. Why would the Dems want to be seen with a picture of LBJ? Wasn't he the last president that had an unpopular escalation in an unpopular war?

Posted by: SouthernRoots on January 20, 2007 01:10 PM
35. Same day registration is an open invitation to fraud. There really isn't anyone eligible and motivated to vote who is reasonably prevented from doing so - as long as they take care of registration a little way ahead of time. It is a very simple thing to do.

Same day registration aids the unmotivated until the day of the election (i.e. the clueless or those selling their votes) and the organized criminals (who bus groups from poll to poll to register and commit multi-voting fraud.

Posted by: km on January 20, 2007 02:51 PM
36. Oh, man, this is almost as funny and as much fun as the now infamous John Kerry "stupid soldiers" remark. They must all be in great shape, considering the constant back pedaling they have to do.

Posted by: kaotmar on January 20, 2007 04:27 PM
37. Note over on Postman that he has ''suspended'' the parallel thread on his blog for the weekend; after apparently discovering that one of more of the posts by well-known names was spoofed.

Posted by: Methow Ken on January 20, 2007 10:45 PM
38. same-day registration? typical American instant gratification. make as much sense as liquor mini bottle dispensers in high schools.

does the same-day bill have a companion bill? the Multi Lingual Same Day Diversity Registration? after all, we'll need scores of translators and 12 different ballots to "be inclusive" and "not disenfranchise" anyone (except, that is, again disenfranchising legal citizens & taxpayers of their $$).

and--how can we shoehorn-in the 'it's for the children' angle?

Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on January 21, 2007 10:15 AM
39. This picture just kills me. It's been a couple of days and I still laugh out loud when I see it.

For some reason the Looney Left promotes their biggest losers and bums to the Parthenon of party lead lights (Stalin is honorary however). I wonder why they left out a picture of Jimmy Carter? If they included him I wouldn't be able to stop laughing for a month.

Posted by: G Jiggy on January 21, 2007 05:16 PM
40. Opps, sorry. That would be "...Parthenon of party leading lights (Stalin is honorary however).

Posted by: G Jiggy on January 21, 2007 05:19 PM
41. took one look at that picture & thought---hmmm--these half-wits are charged with MY overall welfare, tax funds & protecting my borders, ports & cities? mien Got! or, was that a Clown University grad photo? Emmett Kelley, where are you??!!

Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on January 21, 2007 06:37 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?