January 18, 2007
State Supremes Nix City Light's Global Warming "Offsets"

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports the State Supreme Court by a 5-4 vote today rejected Seattle City Light's global warming "offsets" program. It involved compensating for above-threshold City Light-related carbon emissions by paying for, among other things: Princess Cruises using electricity, not diesel, while in port; (county-run) Metro buses using biodiesel; and Dupont Fluorochemicals cutting freon emissions. Chief Justice Gerry Alexander said the actions were not "sufficiently related to the purpose of supplying electricity." Um, yeah.

Instead of using ratepayer funds to appropriate civic virtue, City Light should use the money to fill glaring frontline vacancies, and improve real-time public communications during power outages.

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at January 18, 2007 12:05 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Combatting global warming isn't "civil virtue." It is the stemming of a giant externality. But who cares about global warming? People who live on the Sunderbans don't pay taxes.

Posted by: Travis Thomas on January 18, 2007 04:18 PM
2. "civic virtue," rather.

Posted by: Travis Thomas on January 18, 2007 04:19 PM
3. It is what happens when power utilities forget what business they are really in. SL has a short attention span.

Posted by: Fed Up on January 18, 2007 07:22 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?