January 11, 2007
Your state legislature: overworked and underpaid?

"Panel OKs pay boosts for Washington elected officials" -- Mrs. Gregoire gets a 10% raise to $167,000, and legislator salaries go up by 16% to $42,000.

Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles (D-Seattle) wants a constitutional amendment "redefining the job of legislator as a full-time job", (with more pay, of course).

But work expands to fill the available time, and this year's proposed bills suggest that Kohl-Welles and some of her colleagues already have more available time than they can use productively:

HB 1069 "Designating the Pacific chorus frog as the state amphibian"

SB 5153 "Encouraging employers to be infant-friendly"

HB 1158 "Certifying animal massage practitioners"

SJR 8209 "Amending the Constitution to allow an income tax"

SB 5106 "Requiring emergency preparedness planning for service animals and household pets"

HJR 4203 "Amending the Constitution to provide for four-year terms for members of the house of representatives"

HB 1111 "Determining the best interests of a corporation"

HB 1119 "Achieving economic security through income sufficient to meet basic needs"

HB 1116 "Creating a plan to increase the homeownership rate to seventy-five percent by 2020"

SJR 8205 "Relating to the constitutional provisions regarding initiatives and referendums"

SB 5069 "Extending retirement benefits to domestic partners"

SB 5067 "Requiring the use of headlights when windshield wipers are used"

SB 5063 "Removing gender references"

SB 5015 "Designating the state ornithologist"

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at January 11, 2007 02:44 PM | Email This
Comments
1. I think the above bills are proof that not only should the legislature be force to stay part-time, but there should also be a move for term limits. Kohl-Welles never has done much for the benefit of the taxpayer and she continually demonstrates that need that all legislators be required to take an economics exam before being allowed in office.

I guess having a frog for a state amphibian would make sense because with the above noted legislation the economic climate in this state will croak from the increased tax revenues required to pay for Olympia's continued foolishness.

Posted by: Burdabee on January 11, 2007 03:00 PM
2. I agree the legislature should not be a full time job. Every day that the legislature is not is session is a day that our lives, liberty, and property are not at risk.

Posted by: Obi-Wan on January 11, 2007 03:04 PM
3. But what about the Official State Sandwich Spread---How about Cheez Whiz?

Posted by: Michele on January 11, 2007 03:24 PM
4. Well folks, here we go: The assault on the state constitution begins here:

SJR 8209 "Amending the Constitution to allow an income tax"

HJR 4203 "Amending the Constitution to provide for four-year terms for members of the house of representatives"

SJR 8205 "Relating to the constitutional provisions regarding initiatives and referendums"

All 3 of these are likely to pass, kiss good-bye to the referendum process, say hello to perpetual legislatures and open your wallet for the income tax.

An income tax that sure as hell will NOT be accompanied by any sales tax relief. It's almost like the dems WANT small business to die in this state.

Posted by: Steve (was Steve_Dog) on January 11, 2007 03:27 PM
5. They already make a fortune for the "part time job" they have. Taking their legislative job to full time status will get them out of the private sector.
Wait a minute, most of them are dems and have no clue how to make it in the private sector.

Posted by: PC on January 11, 2007 04:00 PM
6. I agree the legislature should not be a full time job. Every day that the legislature is not is session is a day that our lives, liberty, and property are not at risk.

A rare mistake from the Jedi master. Judges may be seduced by the power of the Dark Side all year long.

Posted by: TB on January 11, 2007 04:37 PM
7. SJR 8209 "Amending the Constitution to allow an income tax" = another tax for us.

HJR 4203 "Amending the Constitution to provide for four-year terms for members of the house of representatives" = savings for incumbents on campaigning.

HB 1119 "Achieving economic security through income sufficient to meet basic needs" = prices going up.

SJR 8205 "Relating to the constitutional provisions regarding initiatives and referendums" = We the people are too stupid to actually know what we want so they the "enlightened" will take that burden away from us.


Posted by: TrueSoldier on January 11, 2007 05:18 PM
8. Like all democratic Politicians. Tax, Spend, Protect. Tax the people, Find ways to spend more money than is available, and Protect their jobs from being kicked out of office because they want to keep power long enough to chase out the people who would vote them out of office.

Posted by: David Anfinrud on January 11, 2007 05:39 PM
9. HB 1158 "Certifying animal massage practitioners"

I like to massage animals with my teeth...if I don't, they are too hard to swallow.

Posted by: Steve on January 11, 2007 05:53 PM
10. Shouldn't higher pay for legislators attract better, more qualified people into those positions? I thought we pay those who govern so they can specialize in governing, and become better at governing.

Posted by: Travis Thomas on January 11, 2007 06:08 PM
11. There has been a light dusting of snow since last night, has gregoire declared formal disaster to get more money to squander yet?

Interesting read on where corruption eventually leads:

http://www.buildanark.net/survival_stories/ferfal1_1.html

Sigh....

Posted by: Fox3 on January 11, 2007 06:21 PM
12. Higher pay for legislators attract better, more qualified people is such a BS. It may be one small attraction, but those seeking prestige, power, position will run for an office with or without pay. US congress pays reasonably good money, but how many can you say are better, more qualified people to be holding the respective offices?

Posted by: C. Oh on January 11, 2007 06:21 PM
13. My heart and pocketbook continue to bleed for and as a result of these poor souls.

Posted by: GS on January 11, 2007 07:53 PM
14. hey folks--when was the last 10-16% raise YOU received? and the inflation rate is...?

split the difference--we're sure to get an average of 13% more work & efficiencies for our "investment," right?

time to outsource the Legislature.

Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on January 11, 2007 08:33 PM
15. I think it is time citizens across the land started demanding that we, the voters, set the pay rate for these elected officials. No other job allows you to set your own pay scale, why do we allow them to do it?

I don't know how to set it up, but can't a citizen's initiative be put together calling for State and Federal Officials pay rates to be put before the voters?

Posted by: Lew Waters on January 11, 2007 11:26 PM
16. If silly bills are to be the standard, then legislators ought to be paid as much as the members of Congress who, under Republican control couldn't pass the budget but did have time to consider legislation dealing with the end of life decisions of Terry Schiavo and constitutional amendments to ban flag burning and gay marriage.

Posted by: Tacoma on January 12, 2007 12:06 AM
17. Seattle City council is full-time and look how that's working.....(flakes aplenty). I believe KC council is, too. Not too many good ones there, either. And some of them are just way too insulated at this point. those who have real lives and keep them while legislating will have more to bring to the table at this level than a bunch of people who get their vision skewed by steeping in this 24/7

Posted by: Michele on January 12, 2007 01:36 AM
18. You all need to be aware of this. This is what the dems want to do to the state constitution as it pertain to initiatives - the bolded part below would be redacted from the document:

BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE
2 STATE OF WASHINGTON, IN LEGISLATIVE SESSION ASSEMBLED:
3 THAT, At the next general election to be held in this state the
4 secretary of state shall submit to the qualified voters of the state
5 for their approval and ratification, or rejection, an amendment to
6 Article II of the Constitution of the state of Washington by repealing
7 section 1 thereof in its entirety; and an amendment to Article I,
8 section 34; Article II, sections 24 and 41; Article XXVIII, section 1;
9 and Article XXXII, section 1 of the Constitution of the state of
10 Washington to read as follows:
11 Article I, section 34. The legislature shall pass the necessary
12 laws to carry out the provisions of section thirty-three (33) of this
13 article, and to facilitate its operation and effect without delay((:
14 Provided, That the authority hereby conferred upon the legislature
15 shall not be construed to grant to the legislature any exclusive power
16 of lawmaking nor in any way limit the initiative and referendum powers
17 reserved by the people)).

Everyone get that? The above passage is an analog to Amendment X of the US Constitution...and Her Majesty wants it gone.

They need to blow away that part of the Constitution so the legislature can raise the bar (call it a new kind of poll tax) for initiatives.

With that part in place, they're prohibited from making any changes...take it away, say hello to a new law allowing the legislature to veto initiatives, fees to submit them, etc.

This is dangerous, guys.

Posted by: Steve (was Steve_Dog) on January 12, 2007 07:50 AM
19. SB 5067 - 2007-08, Requiring the use of headlights when windshield wipers are used.

Do you have to blink your lights if your wipers are on intermittent?

Posted by: Marmstro on January 12, 2007 08:48 AM
20. the list of bills and the pay raises remind me of that famous picnic game: put one's head on a standing baseball bat--hold head down to bat & spin around bat as fast as one can--tnen, stand up.

...and we marvel at the result? like the spinners, the legislators are working hard. activity for its own sake.

...and terrorists/illegal aliens knock at our door...and businesses leave our state...and our schools are a laughingstock...amazing. are we back in Rome with a corrupted Senate? history repeats itself.

Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on January 12, 2007 09:20 AM
21. In order to pay the increases. The amount of legislators should be down sized to a minimum.

Posted by: George on January 12, 2007 09:57 AM
22. I think it is time citizens across the land started demanding that we, the voters, set the pay rate for these elected officials.

Lew,

This pay raise was determined by the Citizens Salary Commission, not by the elected officials. The voters passed an initiative about 20 years ago creating the commission so the 'public' is setting the salaries. Not sure what else you want.

Got a beef with the salaries? Take it up with the citizens on the commission.

Posted by: jimg on January 12, 2007 10:05 AM
23. I don't know what they are talking about; there are only a dozen that do the actual work; the rest is feel good assignments.

Posted by: swatter on January 12, 2007 10:35 AM
24. #8:

Even though your phrase wore out long ago, what we have now is borrow and spend, borrow and spend, borrow and spend.
National debt up about 50% (fifty per cent) since Bush inherited an operating surplus.
Can you figure this out?

Posted by: Jim on January 12, 2007 01:46 PM
25. The Citizens Salary Commission are appointed by Whoooo??????????? and the of course legislators will turn down their pay increases for the kids.

Posted by: George on January 12, 2007 01:54 PM
26. Power corrupts power, stupidity breeds stupidity.
This state use to be a great place to live, now
it's a great place to be from. If we leave these
same STUPID people in charge, we'll get the same
stupid bills and power grabbing that is here now!
Let's vote these MORONS out and see if the next
ones can do any better. The least of my worries
is if my pet has a massage theraptist!!!!!!!
Come on get real or they can say good-bye!!!!!!

Posted by: Richard on January 12, 2007 05:18 PM
27. the list of so called "bills" tells me the legislators have never ran a Kool Aid stand, much less a REAL business. if they have, they are sell-outs or corrupted.

anyone sitting at a desk creating this tripe in most companies would be sacked in a second. they are "playing solitaire" on our collective state computer--and not on lunch time!

send them a message from their employers at every election from now on.

Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on January 15, 2007 05:24 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?