November 28, 2006
"Queen Of Pork"

In this post, I suggested we call Washington's senior senator, Patty "Pork" Murray, for her devotion to grabbing money for indefensible projects.   As I learned from this Seattle Times article, the Taxpayers for Common Sense had already come up with a better nickname, the "Queen of Pork", which I will use from now on.

By the way, in some cases, pork projects are not just wasteful, but actively harmful.  That proved to be true of many public housing projects in our large cities.  I think that's true of Sound Transit's light rail project.  In other words, I think that the net benefits from the light rail project will be negative.  It would be better to take the money and throw it out of airplanes over King County, giving us a random tax cut.  It would even be better to take the money and burn it.  There is probably no way to explain that point to the "Queen of Pork", Patty Murray, but I suppose I should try.

(Wondering what makes a project "pork"?  Here's my explanation.)

Posted by Jim Miller at November 28, 2006 02:57 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

Posted by: G Jiggy on November 28, 2006 03:13 PM
2. Medved reminded us all today that Murray is consistently rated the dumbest senator out there. Cantwell is one place away from being the absolute least effective.

And the democrats are proud of this? The dumbest and least effective?

Posted by: Misty on November 28, 2006 03:19 PM
3. How about this for an alternative definition of "Pork." Spending on anything that those who have paid those taxes that are eventually returned as "Federal" funding for a project in their local jurisdiction (after a portion has been siphoned off as they passed through Washington DC and Olympia) would never have seen as a priority in the first place.

Posted by: JDH on November 28, 2006 03:19 PM
4. So, it's around $2 billion to extend the light rail line, which has yet to go into service. So we don't know if the ridership estimates are accurate for the current line, or if the train does ANYTHING to improve traffic congestion in the area. Yet, let's go ahead and expand it. And expand it to an area which already has excellent bus service, so the people riding buses can switch to trains and the college students at the UW can hop on the train to head downtown and get drunk. Fantastic.

I would not have as big a problem with it if it was just Seattle paying for it (my position was the same with the ill-fated monorail). How is this extension going to improve congestion for those of us on the east side?

Posted by: Palouse on November 28, 2006 03:24 PM
5. When I saw that photo of Patty Pork in the ST hard hat I had a really bad Ducaccuss (sp) flashback of him in the ary helmet. Yuck, why are these idiots such posers.

Posted by: Jeffro on November 28, 2006 03:28 PM
6. "How is this extension going to improve congestion for those of us on the east side?"

The short answer is... soon people will become so fed up with living in this socialist state represented by two idiots in the Senate that they will move to Montana.

This will reduce congestion.

Posted by: Huey on November 28, 2006 03:30 PM
7. Heavy rail costs per passenger runs about 30-40,000 (that's 30-40 THOUSAND) each year. What are the estimates per rider for the light rail boondoggle?

Yay for Patty. Porky Patty. Queen of Pork. Purse-strings Patty. Patty Pork. "You'd better not vote against my projects, or I'll kill your's". Now that's leadership!

Posted by: Shaun on November 28, 2006 03:34 PM
8. Jeffro....yeah, only idiots pose with safety helmets on.

Posted by: Cato on November 28, 2006 03:37 PM
9. Hey!! I resemble that. I am paying for this Sound Transit boondoggle and I don't live in the Martin Luther King County.

Gregoire needs a name along those lines, too. Every position she had had at the State has resulted in doubling of staff.

Posted by: swatter on November 28, 2006 03:49 PM
10. A Kitsap variation on Patty "Pork" Murray saga deals with Congressman Jay "Sweet-and-Sour Pork" Inslee, D - 1st CD. Inslee promised his aide,Clarence Moriwaki, who heads up a $5 million dollar Japanese-American internment monument on public-donated 8 acres of Winslow waterfront, to get National Park (Pork) Service a $1.2 million fund and $200K recurring by having this site made a NPS site. Congressman "Sweet-and-Sour Pork" Inslee is busy putting the final touches on the fix.

Memorial will cost $5 million but there is no reason a private memorial should be getting major pork support from Inslee. Congressman Inslee triumphant victory speech election eve promised even more Sweet-and-Sour Pork for his aide's special-interest monument.

Needless to say the NPS is a willing accomplice to Inslee by staging a sham "independent study" that just happened to select the $1.4M plan over an option that would have just provided consultantcy advice to the private sponsors.

Ka-ching -- ka-ching $$$$$ -- spend they must to build a loyal group of liberal believers here on Bainbridge.

Posted by: James M. Olsen on November 28, 2006 04:00 PM
11. Yeh she has already paid a consulting firm to develop a way to tax Internet sales.

She is the one that Killed our State Sales Tax deduction in 2006, costing each household in this state over $500.

Yup Welcome aboard Queen Ka Ching 2

I doubted anyone could surpass Queen Christine 1 as the number one Pork spender and provider in the state.

But I beleive we are on a brand new level of massive Ka Ching Now.

Thank God and Bush for the presidential Veto Power for two more years while these big spenders piss away our hard earned $$$.


Posted by: Gs on November 28, 2006 04:08 PM
12. Almost any mass transit project in this region falls under pork and insanity. The only thing I am for, is a very modest 50-100 year plan to increase mass transit that fits easily within current budgets. Any kind of accelerated time scale, large bond issue, federal pork matching, etc. will only lead to the false sense of hope that there will be meaningful congestion relief for a significant number of residents.

But that's impossible in any near term. Both because it would take a minimum of 25 years to build such a minimally useable, and given our geographic and water limiting features, it's really more like 35 years. And that would be at a huge cost of indebtedness and taxation that's not compatible with this state's tax structure.

On top of all that, even if we built such a system, it would only create relief for a relatively small percentage of total Puget Sound residents. There are just far too many small business parks, and other new and differing approaches to employment and home locations to satisfy the overwhelming majority of transit needs with anything but automobiles, or buses.

We have to invest in roads first, simply because that is the economic and physical reality of our region. Building emasculated, yet incredibly expensive new projects like the Tacoma Narrows Bridge only serve to worsen the problem, because despite all of the millions spent, there is no net gain in overall transit due to mass transit fantasies like HOV lanes.

And the same is true for Sound Transit. Sure there are a few people that ride the Sounder Train for free in downtown Tacoma, and get free parking. But compared to the total population of the Tacoma area, it's an utterly insignificant number of people, with a similarly negligent reduction in overall Pierce County congestion.

In short, we are wasting billions of dollars to benefit a relatively small number of people while simultaneously ignoring the transit needs of the vast majority.

That definitely fits Jim's definition of Pork.

Posted by: Jeff B. on November 28, 2006 04:11 PM
13. When I saw her photo in the Timewaster I thought it was a mascot for Metronatural Village. Sort of an androgenous Bob The Builder.

Posted by: Tyler Durden on November 28, 2006 04:27 PM
14. I love the quote at the beginning of the Times article: "Congratulations, senator. For *all* of us." It brought a tear to my eye.

I'm certain that we had a similar quote in an article when Slade won in '94. Sure.

Between this and the article Monday saying that the suburbs could be better off due to the Democrats' victory, the media bias is leaping off the page.

Posted by: Damian on November 28, 2006 07:14 PM
15. God help us!....Pork projects for nothing! The village idiot and her money pit!

Posted by: on November 28, 2006 07:16 PM
16. Here's hoping her ideas on port security finally get traction, after being ignored for years by people who are wholly unserious about protecting us from terrorism. They'll soon vacate our Congressional leadership, but as the current Administration will continue to fit that description, she'll still have a challenge ahead of her. Let's all give her our patriotic support!

Posted by: Paddy Mac on November 28, 2006 07:45 PM
17. I hear she will be recommending bin Laden for port security czar. After all, in her own words, he has the reputation for building schools and hospitals and generally getting things done.

Senator-for-life Murray is a perfect example of why legislators should be required to pass the WASL. If she was a true blond and better looking, we could label her an airhead.

Posted by: Organization Man on November 28, 2006 08:55 PM
18. Murray is a perfect example of why legislators should be required to pass the WASL

She'd flunk - she was a teacher.

Posted by: Tyler Durden on November 28, 2006 09:27 PM
19. i'm not worried about the pork per se--wild boars can be quite formidable against terrorists. :(

Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on November 29, 2006 06:35 AM
20. From the article:

"Lobbyist Steve McBee, who represents Sound Transit...."

Why are our tax dollars going to pay for a lobbyist, who if successful, will convince our elected officials to throw more good money after bad?

(Which they would do anyways, knowing their track record.)

Posted by: Brent in Ferndale on November 29, 2006 07:39 AM
21. Is there a connection between the dismal results on the WASL and those who see "Pork" as a good thing? I say that there is. It should be evident to anyone with I.Q. sufficient to screw in a light bulb that the "windfall" they see as proof of their elected representative's effectiveness in representing them is not a net benefit at all. The money was extracted from them in the first place and then carried to back and forth accross the country in a leaky bucket before what was left was "gifted" back in the form of a Government project that they would not have voted to tax themselves to build in the first place. Politicians have a vested interest in reducing the entire population to the status of bugger eating morons so that they can continue to dole this money out, it is as simple as that.

Posted by: JDH on November 29, 2006 07:41 AM
22. I coudn't agree more. Instead of contributing 750 million for a Sound Transit tunnel linkng downtown to the university of Washington that money could go towards Social Security or some other notable financial project. Possible pay down the national dept?

Posted by: Gary on November 29, 2006 08:27 AM
23. can we still use the term "pork" these days with all the p.c. pandering?

after all, we have to be sensitive to the multi-culti one & twenty religions that want to change/rewrite (not assimilate to) America's history, cultural foundations and traditions in favor of nuetered, ridiculous traditions like "Holiday Trees" and "Harvest Dinners" and "holy Cities"--heck--all of America is a "holy city" to me--

maybe we should call it "religiously-neutrally-termed-inoffensive over-enhanced governmentally-funded local spending"

Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on December 1, 2006 03:23 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?