The Evergreen Freedom Foundation reports that the Secretary of State has released guidelines for canvassing boards to divine "voter intent" from mismarked ballots.
The 37-page guidelines document is here. It's one positive step, anyway, beyond the insconsistent and arbitrary process that I documented last year. But this is not enough. What good are these guidelines if voters don't know how their intent will be divined? What confidence can we have that intent is being divined correctly? If Sam Reed believes that everybody should vote by mail and that election officials should divine the voters' markings, then he should have insisted that these guidelines be mailed to every voter along with the ballot.
Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at October 31, 2006 12:08 PM | Email ThisFor example, on page 17 it gives rules and examples that would specifically have denied the Christine Rossi vote.
Little by little.
Posted by: SouthernRoots on October 31, 2006 01:00 PMTrying to implement flexible standards of "voter intent" is a recipe for disaster. For optical-scan ballots the standard should be whether people followed directions. If someone fails to follow directions, their vote doesn't count. Simple.
Posted by: supercat on November 3, 2006 04:39 PM