September 15, 2006
Out-of-state billionaires trying to buy WA state Senate seat

As noted in The Olympian, The Daily World and on Postman's blog, Washington, DC-based Progressive Majority has dumped $100,000 into the Kyle Taylor Lucas primary campaign to unseat moderate Democrat Sen. Tim Sheldon. The money was funneled through an Astroturf PAC "Working Families Who Have Had Enough". The money has been spent on TV ads, mailers and most Astroturfy of all ... paid doorbellers. Where does Progressive Majority get its money? Much of it comes from out-of-state billionaires.

Perversely, as an out-of-state political committee, Progressive Majority has laxer requirements for disclosing its donors than do in-state political committees. They file hard copy, not electronically, and donors aren't entered into the searchable database. Thus in-state activists with donorrhea (e.g. environmental hazard Peter Goldman ) can use out-of-state committees to stuff more money into in-state campaigns with a lower profile. The threshhold for reporting out-of-state donations is $2,500. Smaller donations are not disclosed. Finally, out-of-state committees have significantly more time to file their reports than in-state committees.

Here's a copy of Progressive Majority's latest disclosure statement.

Its list of out-of-state donors reads like the Forbes 400 -- $600,000 from insurance billionaire Peter Lewis of Ohio/Florida, $50,000 from billionaire currency speculator George Soros of New York, $20,000 from Richard Rockefeller of Maine, son of billionaire David Rockefeller. Among the sub-Forbes-400 gazillionaire donors are Schlitz beer heiress (and campaign finance scofflaw) Lynde Uihlein of Wisconsin ($200,000) and trust fund playboy Stephen Bing of California ($50,000).

I'm trying to contact some of these tycoons to learn why they're so interested in electing Kyle Taylor Lucas to our state legislature.

N.B. (To get out-of-state disclosure statements from the PDC, visit this form, enter the group's name (e.g. Progressive Majority) in the "FILER NAME" field and hit "Send Query". Click on the top entry in the output list to see the most recent report. To see all out-of-state committee reports, instead of entering the filer name, enter C5 in the "FORM TYPE" field)

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at September 15, 2006 11:22 AM | Email This
Comments
1. What an eye-opener. The Democrat party is certainly loaded up with beyond-rich people who have money to burn.
Thanks for looking into this.

Posted by: Michele on September 15, 2006 11:33 AM
2. nice work, Stefan--Lights on! Roaches are running! Keep the light on--

this is as disturbing for me as would be a guy in another city after MY contribution to his opponent. "Keep your azz out of our pond!"

Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on September 15, 2006 11:41 AM
3. have you read the Shadow Party? It shines the light of truth on Soros' activities. Actually I think his efforts are going to come result in speeding up the demise of the Democrat Party, I hope so.

Posted by: JDH on September 15, 2006 11:43 AM
4. What else could we have expected when these want-a-be's put their seat's up for grabs.

Yes, this is an articulation that these people are ALL prostitutes!!!

Posted by: Pacific Grove Phlash on September 15, 2006 11:44 AM
5. And these are the same hypocrits that complain when in state money is given to a judge for their campaign..

The left is self destructing this election, and it will cost them dearly!

Posted by: GS on September 15, 2006 11:44 AM
6. At the same time, Dems have filed a PDC complaint about PACs and the SC races.....

http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/6097252p-5344131c.html

Compare that story with how Lucas is being funded. See any difference?

Posted by: SouthernRoots on September 15, 2006 11:46 AM
7. This is scortched earth politics where the only rule is cheat, and if you get caught, lie!

Besides, look at who counts the votes. If this much money from out of state is spent for one senate seat in a State election, does anyone really believe the vote count is untainted?

Posted by: Diogenes on September 15, 2006 01:06 PM
8. Amazing how brazen the progressives get when they are desperate.

Posted by: Jeff B. on September 15, 2006 02:05 PM
9. Sorry to repeat, but it still applies:

You are voting for corruption, live with it. Your candidates are bought and paid for by the (insert) liberal special interests.(/insert). I know that's just fine with most of the posters here. Your candidates are the tools of special interests, at a level unprecedented in this state's history. That isn't even debatable.
- Ivan the Hypocrite

Posted by: jimg on September 15, 2006 02:09 PM
10. Progressive Majority is a funnel for especially last minute special interest outside dollars to steal elections. Here is what voters learned in 2006, well after the Nov. 2005 election...

Barnett gave to pro-Stuart group; PAC put $86,000 into contest against Mielke for county seat
Columbian. Vancouver, Wash.:Feb 22, 2006

"Cowlitz casino developer David Barnett contributed large amounts of money to a Washington, D.C., political action committee that spent more than $86,000 to defeat Tom Mielke in the waning days of last year's Clark County commissioner race.

Barnett, his wife and two limited liability companies that have the same address in Seattle each contributed $25,000 to the committee, for a total of $100,000.

His contributions to Progressive Majority were made in late October, at roughly the same time the group was spending more than $86,000, primarily on negative mailers, to defeat Mielke and help elect Democrat Steve Stuart, who won by a narrow margin."

Posted by: Margaret on September 15, 2006 02:56 PM
11. So... somewhere in all of this, it's pretty clear that the progressive majority, like Washington Conservation Voters, can be bought if the price is right. And, of course, Barnett, who hated Mielke for being a mega-casino opponent and Stuart, a mega-casino supporter who benefited from Barnett's "buy-a-government" scheme, had ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA that the 100G would actually be used against a casino opponent in a county commissioner race!
.
.
I wouldn't be surprised if someone in Washington State was laundering money through progressive majority to nail Sheldon, exactly like Barnett did it. So, I don't believe most of those big donors mentioned know that Sheldon is alive, and I do believe that the money PM is using against Sheldon has been illegally earmarked for that purpose from a source in this state.

Posted by: Hinton on September 15, 2006 11:41 PM
12. Perhaps it's the Senate Democratic Campaign Committee - the D caucus hates Sheldon more than anyone, because he refuses to vote with them every time. Funny, Working Families Who Have Had Enough, (who receives the Progressive Majority money on behalf of Lucas to run her vicious defamation-of-character campaign by phone, mail,tv and paid doorbellers )has hired Jason Bennett of Argo Strategies to do the dirty work --and dear old Jason lists one of his clients as none other than the Senate Democratic Campaign Committee....hmmmmmm......

Posted by: Clagett on September 16, 2006 01:10 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?