September 12, 2006
Snohomish County Pride

Stefan has covered the intriguing news that perhaps 20% of Snohomish County voters may not be the sharpest tacks in the box. Putting aside debates about the required partisan rather than open-ballot primary, and the debate about all mail voting, this level of voter performance is singularly unimpressive.

For personal reasons, I've had to take some time off of work as of late, and have thus been catching a bit more talk radio during the day . Consequently, today I heard Sam Reed on the air talking about the sampling the Secretary of State's office has done in other counties, including a suburban peer to Snohomish in Clark County. None of the other counties has had over 10% ballot spoilage due to failure, or refusal, to mark partisan preference.

That leads to this logical conclusion: fellow citizens of Snohomish County, we are some kind of stupid. I've examined my primary ballot, which will likely go in the mail tomorrow. Seriously, it's not that tough. Then again, I suppose it's no great loss that those that can't follow basic directions may not have their partisan votes counted (their non-partisan choices will still of course be tabulated). One would think that state law could be changed so that under the current system, people that vote a straight partisan ticket can still have their primary votes counted, regardless of their interest or ability in selecting a party preference. In the meantime, pay attention people!

UPDATE: The Everett Herald reports more on the sweet skills of voters in Snohomish County, compared to other parts of the state, in Wednesday's paper. The article includes this dead in the water suggestion:

Mark Hintz, chairman of the Snohomish County Democratic Party, thinks there is a solution - require people to register as members of a political party.

Good luck with that, Mark.

Posted by Eric Earling at September 12, 2006 09:42 PM | Email This
Comments
1. I'd like to think that most of the 20% are fighting the system and deliberately not marking their party affiliation. But I can't quite bring myself to believe it, these poor people would have trouble pouring water out of a cup even if the instructions were on the bottom.

I did like the "ballot spoilage" remark, it makes me think there should be a "best if used by" date on the ballot.

Posted by: Tyler on September 12, 2006 09:46 PM
2. After careful consideration and assurance that no record of my party preference would be retained, I promptly marked the party I definitely do not prefer and picked their candidates that were least offensive to me.

Since I live in an area that always votes that party in the general election, I did my best to thumb my nose at the state's political parties. When they start paying for 'their' election, I may respect their wishes, until then they have to count my vote even though they surely did not want me casting that vote.

Posted by: Doug on September 12, 2006 10:13 PM
3. I wonder how King County would fare in such a sampling...

Posted by: mark on September 12, 2006 10:15 PM
4. What? no one is going to try and determine voter intent?

Posted by: karl on September 13, 2006 12:58 AM
5. I've made hundreds of phone calls for the Roulstone/McGavick campaigns in Snohomish County and get the same answer...A lot of independent people hate this system, and so do many of the party faithful.

Posted by: AndrewRoberts on September 13, 2006 08:40 AM
6. I've made hundreds of phone calls for the Roulstone/McGavick campaigns in Snohomish County and get the same answer...A lot of independent people hate this system, and so do many of the party faithful.

Posted by: AndrewRoberts on September 13, 2006 08:40 AM
7. I've made hundreds of phone calls for the Roulstone/McGavick campaigns in Snohomish County and get the same answer...A lot of independent people dislike this system, and so do many of the party faithful.

Posted by: Andrew Roberts on September 13, 2006 08:41 AM
8. Could the 20% be making a statement that they still want to vote for anyone in the primary as before?

IMO: Each party "paying for it's own election" would only lead to selection by caucus or convention

BTW: Thurston County has separate ballots for Dem, Repub and NonPart. While this may be a solution for the "Dumb and Dumber Factor," it doesn't alleviate voter apathy.

Posted by: Jack Burton on September 13, 2006 09:35 AM
9. Having seprarte ballots for each party and for those who are uncommitted, as they do in Maricopa County, AZ (about same size as King County) costs a bundle in paper and printing costs. It is even worse when you have to send one of each to an absentee voter. Having a single ballot where the voter indicates preference on the top, as both Snohomish and King County do, saves the taxpeyers a great deal but requires a lot of voter education...but as said above, some people can't follow directiuons etc...

Posted by: Bob B. on September 13, 2006 10:26 AM
10. If you send everyone two ballots, I would bet a certain percentage of the people would return both ballots... then what would you do?

Posted by: Right Wing Wacko on September 13, 2006 02:32 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?