August 06, 2006
The Monorail is Racist

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer's article on Umoja Fest in Seattle this weekend quotes supposed community activists saying black advancement here requires more meetings on police oversight, more money for (failing) public schools, and that gentrification and income differentials are de facto evidence of racism. But my favorite claim is that the monorail (buried by voters last fall) is coming to black Seattle, the clear inference being that's another sign of Whitey's callous quest for lucre.

"Umoja," a Swahili word which means "unity," is what the festival is all about. But for many who have Central District roots, gentrification has made unity difficult when their community is disappearing...Tony B. Conscious, community activist and Pan-African artist said, the community is slipping into the hands of those without its best interest in mind. He performed a spoken word piece to express his frustrations. "You see this was my neighborhood, overcrowded and underrated, now their building condos and monorails because its 15 minutes away from downtown," Conscious said.

B. More Conscious, Tony. The monorail is over; has been over since last fall. Stanchion One was never built. A Vote Of The People. Maybe you didn't participate. And about those evil condos. Free market. The prior landowners made out fine. Probably moved to Kent or Federal Way, in fact.

Omari Tahir, senior advisor and historian, said there needs to be a sense of culture instilled into young people. "We are trying to keep our cultural base here," Tahir said. "The new racism is economic apartheid."

Actually, Omari is also a convicted Mayor-beater who has previously called himself "a refugee of the African slave trade" who suffers from "delayed stress syndrome due to racism." Yep. We should really want to hear from him about instilling a sense of culture in young people. Omari, the new accountability is about black fatherhood. Put that in your megaphone, OK?

Michael Taylor, longtime community member and former president of the Pacific Northwest Black Community Festival Association, admits the black community in Seattle has issues of its own to sort out. "We are engaged in a culture clash that is why there is no collective progress in our community," Taylor said. "There needs to be visible accountability. We need community meetings to deal with these issues of gentrification, police harassment and lack of school funding," Taylor said.

Let me get this straight. Progress of economically-challenged blacks in Seattle depends on more money for the failing public schools, more police oversight, and the "issue" of gentrification?

With such beliefs granted legitimacy ad nauseum in the mainstream media, it is no wonder that the whole racial Kabuki dance in Seattle finds a convenient locus in the historically black Central District. The P-I writer refers to it as "their" community," but since when does one racial group have a moral claim to constitute the majority of any community in perpetuity? Clearly-defined free market forces continue to bid up Seattle residential real estate. We have especially attractive natural amenities in the region; constrained urban boundaries, and thanks to the state's Growth Management Act, a limit on suburban residential density, as well.

The only constant is change. We can either adapt, or flail against the currents. The real story about Puget Sound's black community is dispersal, signs of economic progress, and the growing middle class, increasingly evident in South King County. The paint-by-numbers "blacks struggling to hold on in the Central District" reportage has runs its course. Unless of course, it is really the P-I's aim to write for people like this.

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at August 06, 2006 10:45 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Tony probably is referring to light rail. It looks like monorail coming out of Beacon Hill and onto MLK. And Tony is correct that light rail doesn't really help any black (or yellow or brown or poor white)people much.

Posted by: Reilly O'Connor on August 6, 2006 10:50 AM
2. Maybe they would prefer that it be called dark rail?

Posted by: Murgel on August 6, 2006 11:15 AM
3. What you failed to mention Reilly, was that the light rail project which you feel so oppresses the black, yellow, brown and poor whites, is entitrely a construct of Liberal Democrats such as Ron Simms.

An inconvenient truth perhaps?

Posted by: pbj on August 6, 2006 11:17 AM
4. Maybe they would prefer that it be called dark rail?

Posted by Murgel at August 6, 2006 11:15 AM

I don't, if I understand what you mean! K Thnx!

Posted by: me on August 6, 2006 12:28 PM
5. Okay, so let me get this straight. We went through the civil rights movement in the 60's, and most of us believed deeply it was the only moral thing to do, fighting for equal rights. It was an end to segregation, and was a triumphant time. Now Central District is telling us they "don't want no white folks living there?" I'd be laughing if it wasn't so sad. It's professional victimism in its most virulent form. Why don't they "gentrify" their own neighborhood? That's how it's done in most places. Pride of family, home, neighborhood, country. I guess that's what we're loosing.

Posted by: katomar on August 6, 2006 06:52 PM
6. What katomar said.

Posted by: Me on August 6, 2006 07:39 PM
7. The Central Area was at various times in its history a predominantly white protestant neighborhood, an Asian neighborhood and a Jewish neighborhood before it became a predominantly African American neighborhood post-WWII. Does that mean that the neighborhood's Blacks should be castigated for pushing out those that came before them?? Uh huh . . . I didn't think so.

Posted by: Spudster on August 6, 2006 08:13 PM
8. This is just more of today's Progressives peddling Marxist class warfare. But market forces along with Blacks and other minorities who refuse to believe the lie that they are permanent victims, are exposing the Progressives as liars and race baiters.

The left will lose this battle too. But just as the mainstream media refuses to acknowledge their own demise, they refuse to acknowledge the failure of Progressive ideas.

Posted by: Jeff B. on August 6, 2006 08:41 PM
9. Yes, Spudster, they should be castigated for pushing anyone out at any time. Anyone should. Remember the word "diversity'? What does that mean to you? Remember the word "desegregation"? What does that one mean to you? This is indeed a trip into the Twilight Zone, and backwards at that!

Posted by: katomar on August 6, 2006 08:41 PM
10. There are solutions available to the African-American community (and every other group) to succeed:
1. Choose leaders that actually do something, not race-baiters and fancy talkers.
2. Encourage youth to take school, work, marriage, and raising children seriously.
3. Don't have a child unless you're married and at least one of you (the parents) is working.
4. Encourage and practice responsibility.
5. Quit thinking the government and liberalism is the answer to all ills.

Posted by: MES on August 6, 2006 09:33 PM
11. Two more items for the list above:
Stop glorifying those who are poor role models.
Treat others with the same respect you want them to give to you.

Posted by: MES on August 6, 2006 09:35 PM
12. MES, that's far too much common sense in one sitting for the average leftist to take in. "-)

Posted by: Me on August 6, 2006 09:51 PM
13. City of Seattle employees are required to undergo re education in the Racial and Social Justice program. In the program it is taught that only whites can be racist. Blacks may not be labeled rasisct because they are not in power. There is a strong movement in the country to incrementally redefine the meaning of racism. It is to become a class concept and not one rooted in hatred. Ask the mayor if he hasn't approved this program. He can't say no.

Posted by: joe.libertarian on August 7, 2006 04:26 AM
14. MES at 10--badda bing--you nailed it for me; what i've been railing on for years--for blacks and all communities;

are the Indian, Vitenamese or other ethnic communities wailing as continuously and as much? standing as much in line demanding more $$/jobs for all their own ills? also, when we have a "chinatown' or "international' district, no one calls it segregationist, racist or apartheid, even though in practice it effectively functions as one; there is no 'caucasian town' for obvious reasons; would the above African Americans (gawd--i HATE those 'hyphenated American' names) now promote segregation to make their own neighborhoods? lots of double standards and excuses to go around;

we just had Seafair--there were many minority Blue Angel flyers, Blue Angel crew and other military personnel in town; yet--no promotions of them from their own minority groups nor much in the mainstream news as their being TRUE role models--and they are the best of the best--another problem--no role model promotion; yet most kids could name tons of 'gangsta rappers;'

to me, it's called 'self-policing your culture' to expect & ensure excellence & acheivement;

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on August 7, 2006 06:25 AM
15. Tahir said. "The new racism is economic apartheid."

definition of "economic apartheid:" "i did not bust my azz or make good choices in school or in life, so I'm now entitled to YOUR stuff."

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on August 7, 2006 06:39 AM
16. Someone explain to me why gentrification is such a bad thing... It seems to me that it's great thing for a community and the existing homeowners. Doesn't it result in higher property values for the existing property owners which in turn allows them more economic advantage? It doesn't force out any lower income people, it makes them richer. What is so bad about that?

Posted by: JustSumGuy on August 7, 2006 08:46 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?