July 26, 2006
43rd District Democrat race could use another candidate

The most watched and contested partisan primary race this year is probably the 43rd Legislative District Democrat fight to succeed Rep. Ed Murray. There are six candidates in the race, all offering essentially the same tried and failed far-left foolish proposals, all trying to outpander to the same far-left Democrat constituencies, and who will end up splitting the vote six ways. It seems to me there's both a need and and opportunity for someone who has a different (and more moderate and sensible) perspective to jump in by this Friday's filing deadline.

The Stranger has been covering this race better than anybody else in the local media (among other things, read Dan Savage's liveblogging of today's candidate debate before the editorial board). And Eli concluded a few weeks ago that the six candidates are "ideologically indistinguishable for the most part".

One of the candidates, Bill Sherman, stopped by my house this weekend while doorbelling my neighborhood. I give him bonus points both for having the endurance to doorbell in 90° weather and also for reaching out to someone across the ideological divide. He seemed pleasant enough and gave the impression that, if elected, he would welcome dialogue with all of his constituents (which unfortunately cannot be said for some of our other elected officials). But his policy proposals? Oy. One example -- His education platform is:

I will go to Olympia as a champion for the Seattle schools.
Actually, instead of a champion for a dysfunctional institution, I'd rather have a champion for the families with schoolchildren who aren't well-served by that institution. He acknowledged that many people have serious concerns about the Seattle School district, but dismissed school choice out of hand. Some more of his positions here.

The other candidates don't add much ideological diversity. That's too bad. There are a lot of moderate Democrats, independents and Republicans who will be poorly represented if any of these folks are elected. It would be nice to see a moderate person throw their hat in the ring so some of these issues could be debated for a change. And with 6 "progressives" splitting the nutburger vote, there's a non-trivial chance a moderate could win the primary by attracting moderates, independents and, yes, Republicans to vote in the primary. To have any chance of winning, this person should be fiscally responsible, liberal or libertarian on social issues; and most importantly -- have enough pre-existing name recognition and access to earned media that they can generate enough of a buzz to overcome the late entry. Even if it's a longshot, it would be worth it to force a debate and make some of the six "ideologically indistinguishable" candidates separate themselves from the pack and start appealing to the moderate voters.

The filing deadline is Friday at 4pm. And you don't need to be pre-approved by the Democratic Party to run in the primary.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at July 26, 2006 06:32 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Just don't vote for, or support, Pederson.

Posted by: wants a good representative on July 26, 2006 09:40 PM
2. What's your specific beef with Pederson?

Posted by: Stefan Sharkansky on July 26, 2006 09:43 PM
3. Lawyer at Preston Gates. That outfit facilitates vast overreaching by local governments. It is outside counsel for ST, SMP, and partner W. Gates through his son's foundation funds the transportation planning at PSRC that leads inexorably to boondoggle mega-projects that make PG partners wealthy. PG knew damn well for years what Abramoff and Scanlon (its employees) were doing, and it loved taking in that money more than doing the right thing. A nasty organization. Plus it ensconced one of its former partners as McKenna's litigation guru when he became AG, which taints how the AG's office is able to deal with citizens' rights.

Posted by: wants a good representative on July 26, 2006 09:50 PM
4. Well, that should do it.

Posted by: Hinton (Former Seattleite) on July 26, 2006 10:49 PM
5. I have no idea who to support in this race, but I would not give a vote for Dick Kelley under any circumstances.
He is the ultimate political hack who has run for several offices always glad handing with a phoney smile. A friend of mine, who knows him well, says he isn't to be trusted in politics or personally.

Posted by: bulldozer on July 27, 2006 07:55 AM
6. Jamie Pedersen was one of Seattle Popular Monorail Authority's main lawyers at PG&E. He was one of the designers of the "tax-without-end" financing package disclosed several years AFTER the voters very narrowly approved the project. He's a poster boy for bad government.

Posted by: altruist on July 27, 2006 09:32 AM
7. "3. Lawyer at Preston Gates. That outfit facilitates vast overreaching by local governments. It is outside counsel for ST, SMP, and partner W. Gates through his son's foundation funds the transportation planning at PSRC that leads inexorably to boondoggle mega-projects that make PG partners wealthy. PG knew damn well for years what Abramoff and Scanlon (its employees) were doing, and it loved taking in that money more than doing the right thing. A nasty organization. Plus it ensconced one of its former partners as McKenna's litigation guru when he became AG, which taints how the AG's office is able to deal with citizens' rights."

I can vouch for this. Pedersen is one of the partners at the firm. (I work there. Doesn't mean I have to like it.)

Posted by: ferrous on July 27, 2006 02:21 PM
8. Also, about the Abramoff thing, the previous poster is actually referring to a connection to Preston Gates Ellis Rouvelas & Meeds in Washington DC. We were told that the partner involved in that didn't do anything with the knowledge of the firm at all. LOL! Um, yeah.

Posted by: ferrous on July 27, 2006 02:25 PM
9. Re #3, #7 and #8

Last I checked, the Gates Foundation funds education, libraries and global health issues. It has nothing to do with transportation funding. Plus Bill Gates Senior was long retired from Preston Gates. Please get your facts straight before spouting off!

Sounds like #3 is Josh Feit or someone who has an axe to grind with Jamie, precisely because he is the ONLY ONE of the six candidates who has actually worked in the private sector and understands the needs of business. That is the kiss of death for most wacko Seattle lefties!!!!

Posted by: Spudster on July 27, 2006 04:06 PM
10. The Cascadia arm of Discovery Institute just got tens of thousands from the Gates Foundation to pay for studies ST2&RTID's proponents will use in their 2007 campaign (both are preston gates ellis clients). Cascadia also is paying for that transportation boondoggle advocacy group that Gary Locke and John Carlson are the talking heads for now, Spudster. The Gates Foundation also directly contributed thousands to Mary Becker's failed judicial campaign for the Supreme Court.

Posted by: word on July 27, 2006 09:17 PM
11. Pederson doorbelled me a few weeks back. When I told him I was GOP, he said "well, that's ridiculous--we're going to elect a Democrat in this district anyway so you may as well vote for me." Very, very arrogant IMO.

Faced with his logic, I asked him if he could name a single program or tax he could see himself wishing to eliminate if elected. The silence was deafening.

Posted by: Marc on July 27, 2006 09:21 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?