1. Watch out Stefan, Dave is a snake in the grass and chances are that he will have Goldy call in to refute and twist anything you say.

Posted by: Smokie on June 13, 2006 08:38 AM

2. Will Goldy invite Stefan on his radio show to discuss the departure of Dean Logan?

Even though Stfan doesn't have his own radio show, would he accept?

Posted by: SouthernRoots on June 13, 2006 08:45 AM

3. I am sorry to say that I missed the show. Can you fill me in on how it went?

Posted by: ERNurse on June 13, 2006 09:48 AM

4. I would have loved to tune in, but was in a meeting during Kirby's show, and will not subject my radio to Socialist Radio AKA kiro.....

Posted by: alphabet soup on June 13, 2006 09:51 AM

5. Typical Socialist spin machine, Dave Ross at his Democratic best. " Well if you had all of this evidence Stefan, how come nobody's being prosecuted? You have a Republican prosecutor in Norm Maleang." If Ross have a curious intellect he might actually ask Stefan to sit down with him over coffee and go over what he has and then Ross could determine if Stefans work has merit, instead of busting him over some photoshop pictures of Dean Logan.

Posted by: Smokie on June 13, 2006 10:02 AM

6. I heard most of your appearance on KVI, and all of it on KIRO.

I thought you did a good job on info and argument.

2 comments:

1. I thought Dave Ross was biased against you, beyond merely being a "devil's advocate", which would otherwise be fine. At one point he said something like that Maleng's not prosecuting anyone was because he "apparently" (or did he say "obviously"?) didn't think the cases had merit. You had just responded to that question by saying it appeared to be a matter of priorities. That was a good and sensible answer. It seemed to me that Ross made an unsupported leap of logic to say that Maleng wasn't pursuing the cases because they lacked merit. All we know is Maleng isn't prosecuting. You offered some support for your opinion - conversations you'd had with insiders. Ross offered nothing to support his opinion that, effectively, marginalized what you had just said.

I am so disappointed in the "crusader for common sense" - he frequently shows nothing but disdain for "common sense".

2. I called in to the show early in your interview to make the comment that when Ross asked you if you'd found any more than the 8 cases, how would you, or anyone, know? How do we know how much more information hasn't been divulged?

I was going to draw comparisons to my case, where it took 4 years to get documents whose very existence had been denied all that time. And even after those documents were produced (in something like a dozen installments, with each installment being accompanied by the statement that "that's everything now") it was apparent there were yet more documents that looked like they would be smoking guns, but the trial judge (in the 2001 trial) specifically described those remaining documents not produced as "miscellaneous" and that "reasonable disclosure had been made" and wouldn't order King County to produce any more - I'd obtained all I was going to.

How do we know what more you haven't received? Answer: we don't - and given King County's pattern and practice, there probably is more. There certainly is a low level of confidence in my mind as to whether anywhere near all the documents anyone ever requests of King County get produced - whether because of their sheer incompetence - which has been their defense since 2001 in my case - or conscious intent.

So did I get on? No, I was on hold right up until 9:58 and then told they'd run out of time for that segment. This is now probably the 6th time this has happened to me when I've called the Dave Ross show in the past two years - versus earlier times when I would routinely get on.

Posted by: Armen Yousoufian on June 13, 2006 10:51 AM

7. Expecting Dave Ross to be fair and objective is like expecting Goldstein to be fair and objective. Ain't gonna happen. They brought Stefan on the show, knowing full well that they control the callers that get on the show, and the show itself. If Dave Ross wants to spin the show so Stefan looks bad, then that's what he does. The same thing happens on KVI only it's the liberals that look foolish. I don't expect anything resembling balanced coverage from KIRO and neither should anyone else. KVI and KTTH are slightly more balanced in that we already get saturation coverage of the Democrat point of view from the Seattle Times, PI, TV stations, KIRO, etc. At least on KVI and KTTH they actually want to hear the other side of the story. KVI and KTTH do not bring Stefan on just to discredit him before allowing him to explain a rather complex overall story.

Don't waste your time on KIRO.

Posted by: Jeff B. on June 13, 2006 11:02 AM

8. If you want to actually get on the air with a host like Dave ross you need to do the following that learned when I was an in studio guest on a KIRO show several years ago and saw how the host can pick and choose their callers. You need to tell the screener that you want to say something that you think the host (Dave ross) wants to hear.

Because the host can read on his PC screen a brief description (usually written by a liberal screener)he can pick and choose those callers, and their opinions he wants to put on the air.
When I call, I don't tell them what I am actually going to say. Instead I tell them some thing that I think they want to hear.

My success rate in getting on the air is pretty good and it is especially funny to listen to Dave Ross when he has picked a call that he thinks will agree with his view but instead supports exactly the opposite view point.

Posted by: Rob on June 13, 2006 12:30 PM

9. Dave Ross...I remember him. I think. Short, smokes Camel nons. Used to have a pretty good talk show 9 to noon. Whatever became of him?

Posted by: Organization Man on June 13, 2006 07:16 PM

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?