May 09, 2006
"The big problem is with mail-in ballots"

The King County Council is now actively considering Deanron's proposal to switch to mail-only voting. This letter against the proposal appears in today's P-I: "The big problem is with mail-in ballots" It opens:

As Gregory Roberts reports May 2, the problem with King County elections is not in the polling places, it's with absentee voting.

[The entire letter is in the extended entry below]. The author, Richard Borkowski of Seattle, is an active Democrat. There are a lot of people across the political spectrum who have looked into the problems with mail-voting and correctly concluded that it only undermines the integrity of our elections. Borkowski e-emailed me:
Perhaps the left, right and center can form a united front on this issue and at least defeat the mail-only portion of the King County elections plan. I attended the Committee meeting yesterday and they said they'll be discussing it in the entire King County Council next Monday afternoon. ... I think this can be defeated, just like the monorail, but it will require cooperation and public appearances.
I will be there.

The entire letter:

As Gregory Roberts reports May 2, the problem with King County elections is not in the polling places, it's with absentee voting.

In 2002, there were "repeated failures to mail absentee ballots to voters on time" and in 2004, problems "included overlooked absentee ballots left out of the count."

Yet King County government insists on pushing toward mail-only voting with its blinders on, ignoring the well-documented fact that the problem is with the absentee ballot processing, not the polling places.

Mail-only voting increases the unacceptable practice of outsourcing our elections. The Postal Service provides no security for ballots, easy targets for theft. Mailboxes are targeted for checks and credit card information. The stakes in elections are far, far higher.

No wonder confidence in voting is so low. In fact, 51 percent of all Americans doubt that votes are counted accurately, according to a November 2004 Pew Research Center Poll [here]. Perhaps this is related to the fact that 55 percent of King County voters are mail-in voters who wonder if their ballot is being counted correctly.

Richard Borkowski
Seattle

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at May 09, 2006 01:48 PM | Email This
Comments
1. A glimmer of hope?

Posted by: Fred on May 9, 2006 02:30 PM
2. Oooooh great letter. I've got to write one of my own and back him up.

Posted by: RBW on May 9, 2006 03:13 PM
3. Well sign me up for the cause. Didn't know the PI would publish such a letter. Hurry up and protect this guy before "they" get to him and have him shut down for good....

Posted by: Me on May 9, 2006 03:52 PM
4. During the 2004 Election Recount debacle, the majority of the ballots where problems developed (not counting the provisionals, which are a whole different kettle of fish) were with the mail-in ballots.
It staggering to think that that election came down to determining voters' intent on ballots that were filled out with light-blue glitter fingernail polish or partially burned on a stovetop while military ballots were delivered late or not at all overseas.
And I am not at all joking about that last paragraph as Stefan or anyone else who was at MBOS, the "Ridgeway Building" or at the Admin. building can attest.

Posted by: Reporterward on May 9, 2006 04:17 PM
5. Oh, and don't get me started about postmarks and their legibility or whether the post office is obligated to process ballots that were dropped off "on time" or not.

Posted by: Reporterward on May 9, 2006 04:18 PM
6. Oh, and dont get me started either voter coercion and vote selling.
Are you telling me that abusive husbands (or wives) can't force their spouses or children to vote a certain way at home with a mail-in ballot and that it hasn't happened?
Or that there aren't people who are willing to vote for a certain candidate or ballot measure for a price?

Posted by: Reporterward on May 9, 2006 04:21 PM
7. And I'm not even going to start on ballot security with mail theft being as rampant as it is today. Nor is there much way to tell whether the person who fills out the ballot and signs it is the actual person whom it belongs to.
Unless you trust the KC Elections department who had trained signature analysts like Bill Huennekens who were able to tell at one glance whether people's John Hancocks matched.

Posted by: Reporterward on May 9, 2006 04:25 PM
8. And let me tell you something else...ack...fraudulent...erk! Logan! Blood pressure medication...
*blood vessel pops...Don turns blue in face and collapses on keyboard*

You get the point. We all lived it and the one regret is not being someplace where I could have had my byline over a story that I've written about that. Just infuriating.

Thanks again Stefan for the good work instead.

Posted by: Reporterward on May 9, 2006 04:30 PM
9. So Reporterward - Why don't you approach Stefan about becoming a contributer? I say the more the merrier!

Posted by: alphabet soup on May 9, 2006 04:51 PM
10. Because I have a byline now that appears in nearly 100,000 papers on the Eastside twice a month. Hence the monicker "reporter" in front of Ward.
And Stefan doesn't pay as much. Although not by a lot:-)
The Shark knows where to reach me if he needs reinforcements and besides. I have more fun contributing like this.

Posted by: Reporterward on May 9, 2006 05:07 PM
11. So what are the odds that Mule's Rear will join forces with SP and others to halt the mail-only voting?

Posted by: Danny on May 9, 2006 05:16 PM
12. We should do away with all mail voting entirely, unless the voter is handicapped and unable to travel to the polls. Poll voting is far more secure. There's a certain barrier to cheating when one has to appear in person to vote. And it would do away with almost all of the double voting when someone receives more than one ballot at the same address.

If the issues and candidates are important enough to you, then you'll take the 5 to 10 minutes to stop off at your precinct and vote. If voting is not important enough to make 5 to 10 minutes in your day for the few times a year when we vote, then you should not be voting anyway.

There's plenty of simple and effective ways to authenticate ballots and assure the integrity of the elections. If they can do it in Iraq, then they can do it in King County. I think we should ink stain people's fingers after they have voted as well. I don't trust moonbats any further than I could throw them.

I'm willing to support Richard Borkowski and Stefan to do whatever it takes to abolish all mail voting. This battle is worth fighting.

Posted by: Jeff B. on May 9, 2006 05:16 PM
13. I knew there *had* to be an honest Democrat (he gets the capital 'D') in King County. Bravo! Let's team up and circular-file this bill.

Posted by: Steve_dog on May 9, 2006 09:29 PM
14. I am going to forward this to my county representative. How about a flood of these forwarded-- especially by those who wont be in attendence at the meeting. On the other hand, everyone should send this to their county rep anyway.

Posted by: herezanIdear on May 9, 2006 09:31 PM
15. I just sent off a quick email to my representative, Kathy Lambert, to let her know I think all-mail voting is a bad idea. It took just a few minutes, less time than it takes me to visit the polling place. Everyone should contact their rep. to let them know how they feel and why.

This is an easy step to take - our reps won't know our opinions if we don't tell them!

(I didn't forward the SP post, as I wanted to use my own words. But I did mention that SP was where I heard the vote is coming up.)

Posted by: Robyn on May 9, 2006 10:47 PM
16. I can't think of ANYTHING that needs to be defeated more than the reality of All Mail Voting in King County!

At this point.....you Stefan, and Richard Borkowski - ARE the cavalry!

Posted by: Deborah on May 9, 2006 11:07 PM
17. I am an Oregonian and ALL elections EVERYWHERE are by mail-in balloting, for EVERYONE. Nobody in the entire state has any confidence that their vote counts, and everyone presumes fraud because there's simply no accountability. You send the ballot off and it disappears... what happens to them? How can you know whether you've been counted or not? How can you know if they getting counted more than once?

College students regularly get ballots both at home and at their college. People who move get both home and their previous residence, forwarded to them.

Families have to deal with the spectre of one strong member forcing everyone to vote a certain way... or simply voting for them and mailing it off. How could anyone possibly know what happened?

Add this to the US Constitution's requirement that all federal votes take place on the same day and prohibiting the requirement to pay to vote and you've got some real issues.

Vote by mail is fraud-inducing, untrustworthy, and incredibly frustrating. One of the greatest joys in my life as a citizen was going to the polls to vote along with everyone else. I wore that I VOTED sticker almost as proudly as a purple finger in Iraq. Now all I have is papercuts and a stamp gone to what purpose?

Posted by: Christopher Taylor on May 10, 2006 09:41 AM
18. IF the county manages to make voting all-mail, I and most of my neighbors will be quitting the system, and most probably, moving from this state.

I will cede this socialist hell-hole to the rest of you.

If this is FORCED on us (notice no vote on the issue?) there is no way we will ever get our rights back, short of armed rebellion.

This state (and country) is at a crucial fork in the road. Which way are we going to turn?

Posted by: elmo on May 10, 2006 12:34 PM
19. What Boroski proposes is justice - this friggin county does not deserve all mail voting. The whole concept is preposterous !
Are there enough Democrats of clout with integrity in King County to see this through ? I have my doubts, but can always be hopeful.

Ron Sims wants this to be like Cook County, Ill or Philadelphia or other bastions of corruption, in spite of what he says - his actions speak quite differently.

Posted by: KS on May 10, 2006 10:20 PM
20. Steve_dog- There's a world of difference between the Democratic leadership and the Democratic grassroots. I imagine the same is true on the right too.

Posted by: zappini on May 11, 2006 12:22 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?