May 02, 2006
Bill Clinton's Arsenic Trap

Just caught Seattle.

Drinking water is being shut off at all 100 Seattle public schools after tests last month found traces of arsenic in the water at several elementary schools.
. . .
The federal government recently changed the amount of arsenic it considers unsafe from less than 50 parts per billion to less than 10 parts per billion.  The water tested in the five elementary schools contained between 11 and 18 parts per billion.

When the Seattle Times reporter, Emily Heffter, says "The federal government recently changed", she glides over what actually happened.

Here's the story:  At the end of his eight years in office, Bill Clinton set a number of political traps for President Bush.  One of them was changing the allowable level of arsenic in our water supplies from 50 parts per billion to 10 parts per billion.  At the time, the scientific evidence that this change was needed was, at best, weak.  And the proposal put severe burdens on some small towns.  When the Bush administration took office, they set the rule aside and asked for a second look at the evidence.  Immediately there was an outcry that Bush wanted to poison our children.  (Sometimes from politicians, such as Tom Daschle, who had supported the higher level for years.)  There was enough political damage from the charge that the Bush administration yielded to pressure and, after some months, accepted the lower standard.

And here's the joke:  More recent studies showed that the level of 50 parts per billion is fine.  In fact, there is some reason to believe, thanks to the curious phenomena of hormesis, that a level of 50 parts per billion may be healthier than lower levels.

So Bill Clinton's arsenic trap caught George W. Bush — and is now catching the Seattle public schools.  I suppose there is some rough justice in that, since the city gave Clinton strong support in 1992 and 1996.  But it is sad that Seattle schoolchildren, who had nothing to do with this, will lose resources that might have gone to better use.

Cross posted at Jim Miller on Politics.

(By the way, it is not just conservatives who thought that Clinton was setting a trap with this move.  So did Ralph Nader.  And the scientists at the World Health Organization never found any reason to change their recommendation for a limit of 50 parts per billion.

Was Heffter ignorant of this history?  I can't tell from the article.  But I'll ask her.)

Posted by Jim Miller at May 02, 2006 03:05 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Even Michael Kinsley had a nice article in Slate (http://www.slate.com/id/104250/) about the arsenic idiocy. I live in a city where the concentration varies from about 15 to 30 ppb. I almost gagged when I read about shutting off water that was "between 11 and 18" ppb.

Posted by: Ex-WA on May 2, 2006 03:23 PM
2. Interesting. However, it may be something more than politics. Arsenic may actually be bad for you.

The Seattle schools had a similar problem with lead awhile ago.

Posted by: Erik on May 2, 2006 03:49 PM
3. In my past I was in the beverage business and many “spring & natural” bottled waters contain arsenic, some as high as 35 ppb to 49 ppb. I wonder what bottled water are they feeding our kids...it may contain more arsenic that the schools drinking fountain!!!

Posted by: Pacific Grove Phlash on May 2, 2006 03:53 PM
4. This is so typical of the left and the way the Mainstream Media exploits BS like this to get viewers and readers. Yesterday the big headline was "Arsenic Levels FIVE TIMES HIGHER THAN ALLOWED." We're all gonna die! Of course the question that the left and the MSM never asks is; as compared to what? Did anyone measure the water from a mountain stream or a typical well to find out what mother nature's own contribution of arsenic to water? And little mention of the fact that many bottled waters contain higher levels of arsenic than tap water, but are still considered safe, etc.

50 parts per billion. Any scientist or engineer will tell you that if you take enough samples of tap water you can probably find 50 parts per billion of just about anything in the water. That's 50 our of 1 Billion. Short of distilling all water, you can't get purity greater than a certain point without enormous expense. And many studies show that the minerals in tap water are actually good for you compared to pure distilled water.

Just more sensationalism. A bunch of BS. But you can bet there will be hundreds of left leaning ambulance chasers running after this story.

Posted by: Jeff B. on May 2, 2006 04:39 PM
5. And once again, we run into those darned things called consequences. No drinking water? The kids will switch to soda (which should upset liberals of the Junk Food Nazi variety), bottled water (which should upset liberals of the Petroleum Nazi variety), or milk (which should upset liberals of the Animal Treatment Nazi variety). If only they'd ever notice the correlation between their own actions and unintended consequences, which they don't.

Posted by: TB on May 2, 2006 04:46 PM
6. But it's the thought that counts, right?

Posted by: The Dude on May 2, 2006 05:05 PM
7. Not so much a trap as just another Clinton cave to his friends at his exit. It was not unlike the pardoning of all the scumbags he did just before being dragged out of office.

Typical media coverage though - always working to protect the Democrat and deceive the voters into thinking Republicans were responsible.

Posted by: MJC on May 2, 2006 05:12 PM
8. This is always one of the things liberals pull out to try and claim that Billy Clinton was so brave in setting new,lower arsenic levels.

Well, no, he wasn't brave.

He waited until the end of his administration to do it. Didn't have to. He could have done it in the first year of his administration. But he waited in order to avoid the certain fall-out that he knew would come and didn't want to deal with it.

How 'brave'.

Posted by: Michele on May 2, 2006 05:58 PM
9. ..and Erik, personally I would rather have NO arsenic in MY water. But this story is about the way Bill Clinton went about doing something in what was a very cowardly way of doing it.
If he really wanted to be a hero, he would've enacted those new lower levels the minute he entered office instead of letting people be exposed to those higher levels for eight more years. Basically what he did was the equivalent of throwing a rock at a window and running away just after pushing someone else to stand outside the window holding a bunch of other rocks. He did the deed but did not wish to deal with the consequences. Clearly.

He really just acted cowardly in this and there is no arguing it.

Posted by: Michele on May 2, 2006 06:03 PM
10. Erik, try this experiment on your living room floor:

Stack up ten pennies. Then stack up one billion pennies next to the first stack. Compare.

Now stack up fifty pennies and another billion-penny stack. Compare to the first two stacks.

The difference is obvious, isn't it? :)

Posted by: F451 on May 2, 2006 07:27 PM
11. Environmental extremists are socialists in drag, in other words they want big government.  Apparently the 10 ppb is a reasonable standard - in spite of the hysteria flatulated by the environmental community.

Greed is rampant in this society - so much talent that could change things for the better, but selfishness rules the day !

Posted by: KS on May 2, 2006 08:52 PM
12. Time out ! Clinton was the king of selfishness. Since the change from 50 down to 10 ppb was so recent that there is no data to back it up. Bush did not change this standard back, although I think that he attempted.

It's hard to trust the scientific community nowdays in some instances, as they are affected by the greed virus as well.

Posted by: KS on May 2, 2006 08:56 PM
13. Classic Seattle, classic schools.

I just seethe when I see this.

First where is the science to show that the right number is 10, or 50 or something else?

Second, how many of the whiner-baby parents have checked and fixed lead and arsenic in their home system where their kids spend wayyyyy more time than at school?

Geezer rests.

Seattle school administration bends over.

Geezer wants to go back on the School Board, where he spent 13 years, and kick some sense into these patoots!!!

Posted by: The Geezer on May 2, 2006 09:12 PM
14. I did some quick math… 20 ppb is equal to two drops of water in a standard tanker truck!!!

Posted by: Pacific Grove Phlash on May 2, 2006 09:19 PM
15. I can't blame the schools Geezer, they're just reacting to the set standard. If the gummint is retarded enough to drop the speed linit on I-5 to 20 MPH I'm not gonna get mad at the people who drive slow.

Posted by: Dave on May 2, 2006 09:42 PM
16. The media reports make it sound like they discovered a toxic waste dump leaching into seattle school water.

What the reporters neglected to ask is if the water in the surrounding communiy is any different. As Pacific Grove Phlash wrote above, the "emergency" bottled water being shipped in is probably equal or above in arsenic ppb... I would bet every local building has that range (11-18ppb) as well.

But it is such good fun seeing these guys panic. This is an object lesson in Chicken Little mentality. May even wake up a few greens in the process.

Posted by: Bleeding heart conservative on May 2, 2006 10:04 PM
17. Notice how this 'straw man' pops up just as the illegal alien marches fade off the scene -- gotta keep people's attention aimed at something that does not matter to keep their minds off the fact that the powers that be are ignoring and /or playing games with the real problems facing the country

Posted by: Bill on May 3, 2006 12:36 AM
18. Please, Bill, the American public has an attention span of an ameba.

The loony get loonier.

If I recall, most of the arsenic damage has been attributed to the miners where they really get arsenic concentrations.

What effect does even 100 ppb of arsenic have on the ecosystem or the human environment?

Posted by: swatter on May 3, 2006 07:10 AM
19. This is too weird! How about something practical like flushing the water system for a day and retesting before the panic?? Naw, that wouldn't make headlines!

Posted by: Fed Up on May 3, 2006 10:54 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?