April 30, 2006
Oh, that innumerate media

In today's weekly column, Seattle Times editorial page editor James Vesely laments the high price of gasoline: "At the pump, the movie never ends"

Those little brass cap-lock keys became ubiquitous on key rings and they will certainly return again as gasoline becomes more expensive than any other liquid we use in our lives
Vesely probably didn't bother to consult any actual numbers before making this ridiculous claim. Gasoline is a long way from becoming the most expensive liquid we use in our lives. In fact, it's one of the least expensive liquids we use in our lives. Here's a table comparing the price of gasoline with other common liquids -- coffee beverages at my neighborhood cafe and prices at QFC for the three liquids that happend to be in my shopping basket this evening (recall that 1 gallon = 128 fluid oz.)
  Price per familiar unit Price per gallon
Gasoline
(regular unleaded, Chevron N 45th St. Seattle)
$3.059 / gallon
$3.059
Caffe Latte (triple shot) $3.77 / 16 oz.
$30.16

Espresso (single shot)

$1.65 / 1 oz.
$211.20
Campbell's Homestyle Chicken Noodle Soup $1.69 / 10 oz.
$21.63
Talking Rain Sparkling Water $2.99 / 4 16 oz bottles
$5.98
Suave Shampoo $1.49 / 15 oz.
$12.72
Okay, comparing liquids by unit volume isn't necessarily fair. So compare instead the amount of each liquid that one typically consumes in a single day -- The average single-occupancy commuter uses roughly 1 gallon of gas a day 1 (unless you're an environmental activist politician like Mayor Greg Nickels and you use 5 gallons of gas a day). The person who consumes a gallon of gas a day still spends less on gas in an entire day than he would spend at a mass market restaurant for a large latte, a bowl of soup or an alcoholic beverage.

1 The average daily commute (one way) is 12.1 miles (this report, table 26). The average car on the road get just under 23 miles per gallon. Ballpark figure is just over 1 gallon of gas for the round trip commute. Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at April 30, 2006 11:55 PM | Email This

Comments
1. 1 Interesting matrix
2 Have you considered pricing your favorite beverage, microbrew, Jagermeister, and Grey Goose?
3 James Vesely (Seattle Times) is off base as usual, since he probably never sat in a gas line in 1973/4 and most vehicles in existence nowadays already have locking gas caps
4 Vesely also does not take into account inflation over 30 years or that the two (2) used Monorail salesmen have surfaced in Moses Lake trying to sell the residents a bio diesel plant

Posted by: Green Lake Mark on May 1, 2006 01:58 AM
2. In 1971-72 I was paying 45-50 cents a gallon for gas -- a small 2 bedroom one level house w/o garage was seen in Seattle at $14,000 (property taxes around $150/yr)-- same house now is valued at $200,000+ with property taxes around $2000 >>> very good lunches served on actual ceramic plates and real metal utensiles could be had for $1-$2.00 -- now $6.00 to 10.00 and you stand in line to eat offa styrofoam with plastic utensiles or disposable chopsticks -- the basic prices and wages of and for just about everything important (except consumer electronics -- a real necessity - duh)has gone up 5 to 15 times in the last 35 years -- price of gas -- at 3 bucks a gallon -- about 6 times -- right in line at the bottom end -- and it will be coming back down -- it did last year

When you hear all the moonbat tinfoil hat gasbag lib's in congress trying to whip up the politics of envy over oil co profits -- remember that the collective fed and state gov'ts collect far more in gas taxes than the net profits - and the tax take is guaranteed quarter in and quarter out --

Posted by: Bill on May 1, 2006 05:04 AM
3. And here's the QFC price of another common liquid, one that is generally sold by the gallon, or fractions of a gallon.

It's funny. For years, reporters have used the price of milk (and bread) to show that (a few) politicians had no idea what ordinary items cost at the grocery. Now, here we have an editor at a major newspaper who doesn't know what milk costs.

(Full disclosure: Neither did I. But that's because I have lactose intolerance and buy soy milk instead. And I can tell you to within a dime or so what soy milk costs at Trader Joes.)

Posted by: Jim Miller on May 1, 2006 05:08 AM
4. Vesely passes the moron test once again

Posted by: swassociates on May 1, 2006 05:40 AM
5. I find it ironic that no one seems concerned about the high cost of the vessel we use to carry around the gas. Where are the calls for the government to "do something" about the profits made by car mfgrs. and dealers, the mechanics who work on them, the price of tires, insurance, etc. Gasoline is still a relatively small portion of the total cost of using a car.

If the Left isn't whining about Wal-Mart's low prices, they are whining about Exxon's high prices. They need to make up their mind.

Posted by: Elaine on May 1, 2006 05:49 AM
6. Vesley failed to look at the cost of the single most important liquid in his pathetic, useless life.....THE ENEMA!!!
Without the ENEMA, Vesley would have exploded by now as he is so full of sh*t that he needs a regular colon cleansing!!!
If the average ENEMA is $.89 for 12 ounces....that "works out" to be $9.50 per gallon!

Perhaps Vesley overlooked the obvious because he hasn't ENEMIZED lately!

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on May 1, 2006 06:17 AM
7. Elaine, GMTA, that was my thought. Look at the price increases of automobiles over the last decade or so. I think the rate of increase outpaces the increase in fuel costs. And I don't think the Arabs have a corner on automaking.

This is one reason why I have to scoff at the Globalists who extoll the virtues of offshoring and outsourcing as "good for the consumer" because we can all live happily ever after on a boatload of cheap foreign goods, all those "savings" from cheap foreign labor being passed on to the consumer. I'll believe that when I start seeing $2000 KIAs on offer at the local dealer.

Posted by: Interested Observer on May 1, 2006 06:24 AM
8. Hey Stefan,

Suave Shampoo??? Obviously, you don't have any teenage girls in your household. They pay alot more then that for some of the other brands and they would go thru a bottle that size in about 7 or 8 days.

Posted by: Janet on May 1, 2006 06:38 AM
9. The Left is at least consistent with their solution for Wal-Mart's low prices and Exxon's high prices. More Socialist government price controls and regulations would solve everything.

Posted by: Elaine on May 1, 2006 06:39 AM
10. RWR:
The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.

Posted by: Dishman on May 1, 2006 07:15 AM
11. When I was a kid my mother used to send me to the store with a quarter and a note to pick her up a pack of Kent Filters. Gas was also ~ a quarter per gallon. What's the big deal.

I like high gas prices they are a bargain for me. I generally take the Sounder to work so that I don't have to sit in traffic. It takes me a net of ~1.5 hours each way on the Sounder. The last time gas prices went up to near $3/gallon the roads cleared up and I drove to work for about six months.

It takes me ~35 minutes door to door and costs me about $9/day to drive when gas is ~$3/gal.

I hope the day never comes that having and extra couple hours per day isn't worth ~$5/hour to me.

Posted by: JDH on May 1, 2006 07:53 AM
12. Typical Seattle menality.

Those of us that don't live in a dense population area are being hit hard by gas prices.

It costs me about $9 just to go to the grocery store. I spent almost $150 on fuel two weeks ago.

While I work from home my wife does not. She makes $8 an hr. Her 40hr week paid for fuel and medical. That's it. If fuel gets much more expensive it will be cheaper for her to stay home.

Posted by: BigV on May 1, 2006 08:35 AM
13. Someone should send an Econ text book to dick durbin. Anybody catch him on meet the press?

He had nothing to say except profits biggest in history, $1000/household, oil evil, bush evil, 400 million dollar parachute, exxon evil. Dick- go sit at the kids table and don't come back until you can spell all 50 states.

I don't care for jim cramer all that much, but he had the most [intelligent] to say regarding ethanol mandates.

I don't doubt gouging, but at the same time getting 8 MPG is a choice most drivers make with free will.

Posted by: andy on May 1, 2006 08:42 AM
14. Oil company profit margins have remained fairly static around 8%. There main things contribute to the record profits mania. First the media reports the PBT (Profit Before Tax), and not placing the PBT any context other than a raw BIG numbers. Second they are reporting the combined profits of the combined companies, of course ExxonMobile has twice the profit of Exxon or Mobile. Third record volumes, profit margin remains the same, volume goes up, profit goes up. I learned that in 3rd grade selling pencils to other students (I did price gouge just before a test, higher demand before a test ;-) (I repent of my evil capitalist ways. NOT!)

In the computer chip industry in the class of chips were I work on USB, timing devices, MCU etc... we shoot for a gross profit margin of at least 40%.

Other factors contribute to the rising price:
Beginning of the summer demand.
The switch to summer formulations requiring refineries shut down to convert to the summer blend, restricting supply.
A fairly static world supply (can you say OPEC) and increasing demand, China and India.
Uncertainty with Iran and Venezuela.
Speculators on the oil market, driving up oil prices on that uncertainty.
Big Oil companies owning very few of their own wells (industry average 3-5% if I remember right), and therefore having their own oil. They then have to buy oil at the current market prices.

Don't forget the taxes: $0.494 per gallon here in WA.

Anyone with a basic understanding of economics, say junior high level, and more of understanding of world events than you can get on the evening news can see perfectly well that the current situation is being driven by the above mentioned factors.

Vesey further displays his profound ignorance with this :
n the Midwest, they are selling something to put in your car called E85, which means an ethanol content of 85 percent of each gallon. In Washington, the hope was to retail B2, only 2 percent of each gallon from a biofuel such as crushed canola seeds.

E85 or 25 or 15 is an ETHANOL blend.
B2 or 50 or 85 is a BIODIESEL blend.
Apples and oranges. Diesel is a different fraction of crude and has different refining costs. Ethanol is produced by fermenting the corn sugars, biodiesel the oil is extracted and refined. Very different cost structure.

Everybody take a deep breath and relax. If the price the of oil stays at current levels the oil shale and oil sands from Canada down into Colorado become economical. If we really wanted to we can have that up and running in 5 years, sooner if we make it a national security project on the priority of the Manhattan project. The oil deposits in the Rockies are estimate in the 2 Trillion (that's right T trillion half of the worlds' total reserves) barrel range as opposed to the Saudi reserves of 112 billion barrels, while we have 160 billion barrels in our working oil fields. If we used our own oil reserves Saudi and the Mideast as an oil source is round off error.

In other words, we can control the price of gas. If we have the political will and determination to do it. Right now the politicians are too friggin' stupid to do the right thing, $100 gas rebate check!!? Arrghhh!

Historically in the last 25 to 30 years there have been 11 Congressional investigation into oil company gouging and collusion. The results, bumpkis, nada, free market and world events drive the price of gas.

May a barrel of oil fall on the politicians heads and knock some sense into them, and just plain squash media maroons like Vesey with facts.

Posted by: JCM on May 1, 2006 08:45 AM
15. Oh, to be average. I'd kill for a 12.1 mile (one way) commute. My current commute is 37 miles (one way), thankfully my car does a bit better than 23mpg but at 27mpg it's not much.

The windfall from the current cost of gasoline is going into government coffers as near as I can tell. Last I heard, big oil makes $0.09 per gallon profit. So with the state taking almost $0.50 and the fed $0.40 (unsure on that one), a tax holiday on gasoline would save us more than taking away tax incentives for big oil. What the fed does need to do, is make it harder for big oil to hand out 400 million dollar golden parachutes and push harder for re-investment of those soaring profits.

Posted by: Jim in Clark County on May 1, 2006 08:53 AM
16. One Barrel Oil is currently around 70 Dollar....outch...

but here are some other per barrel prices

1. Coca Cola : $ 200 (supermarket discount)
2. Dasani Water (yep, the one in the plastic bottles) : $ 563
3. Extra Virgin Olive Oil : $ 1655
4. Starbucks Coffee: $ 2566
5. Head and Shoulders Hair Shampoo : $ 3312
6. Reasonable French Wine: $ 4088
7. Bottle of Veuve Cliquot (Champagne) : $ 5700
8. HP Printer Ink (HP 56 Black) : $ 183,750 *yes, that's right
9. Channel No 5 (ok, Parfume): $ 2,565,000


just to put it in perspective

:-)

Posted by: seattlewasgreatonce on May 1, 2006 09:08 AM
17. The big difference with gas compared to the other liquids....is....we don't need them to propel our cars. If I never bought expensive bottled water, drank coffee or used shampoo again....no big deal, but....I have to buy gas to get myself to work and to heat my home.
Time for gluttonous SUV drivers and other gas hogs to do their part to conserve. There are so many other things we need oil for..carpets, fabric, manufactured products galore.
Maybe its time for a little rationing. Let the manufacterers, truckers, and shippers, get first crack and let the rest of us fight over what's left with soccer mom's at the bottom of the list.

Posted by: DD on May 1, 2006 09:08 AM
18. According to the Energy Information Administration, Washington rank’s #43 in gasoline consumption at 424 gallons per year per person or 8.1 gallons per week. At $3.25 per gallon that comes out to $26.33 per week per person.

At $26.33 per week, here is how the money brakes out:

Fed gas tax $1.46
Fed income tax $10.42
Fed & State Environmental Controls $8.78
Washington State gas tax $2.51
Washington sales tax $.65
Greedy Oil Company profits $.09
Cost of oil, refine, distribute, operations, ECT. $2.42

Posted by: Pacific Grove Phlash on May 1, 2006 09:12 AM
19. dd-
What is the babbling about "rationing." I drove the state end to end this weekend, and I didn't see a single gasoline station without gasoline available. Not one.

The supply of gasoline is there. The price isn't actually that much. (Go to Europe or Asia sometime and realize they pay much, much more and have for years.) Why would we ration gasoline?

The profit margin reported by the oil companies is 8%. When you consider that a big piece of the cost of gasoline is federal, state and local taxes, if becomes obvious that if the oil companies dropped their margin to zero, the price of gas would not drop that much.

The only real solution to gasoline prices is moving away from oil based energy sources. Nuclear powerplants (like France), bio-fuels (like Brazil) and wind, solar, geothermal, etc. as the technologies develop.

Rationing won't solve anything.

Posted by: johnny on May 1, 2006 09:32 AM
20. Hey Johnny…

You are right but we must remember it took Brazil 30 years to develop their ethanol program based on sugar cane and 3 years to make the change over. We must also remember that Brazil’s oil consumption was only 3% of what we use in the U.S.

In Brazil, they had the political will to make change but as long as we have elected officials like “I’ll cross that bridge when I get to it”, Kennedy and other liberal WHACK-JOBS were all screwed!!!

Until we get rid of the Bi-Partisan Demagoguery, nothing will ever happen!!!

Posted by: Pacific Grove Phlash on May 1, 2006 09:55 AM
21. DD-

Huh? That is the most inane post I've read yet on this subject. I don't drive an SUV, but if I decide to drive a monster gas guzzler, it's my choice and the price I pay is the cost of gas to operate the vehicle.

America is still the land of the free!?

Posted by: Jeffro on May 1, 2006 10:10 AM
22. There is absolutely nothing more than Democrat Politics in the "High Gas Price" action line. As soon as a bigger story comes along, this will be gone. This is all a big joke and waste of everyone's time. We go through this every year. The end result to the average Joe is not too much more than an additional $300 in a year. There may be some who are poor enough that this will be a significant amount, but if we were to examine the finances of even the poorest, we would probably find a new Television, a new Cell Phone, lots of cellular air time, etc. that would more than cover the extra $300 spent on so called "high gas prices."

Move along, nothing to see here.

Posted by: Jeff B. on May 1, 2006 10:27 AM
23. I bought a diesel powered van, full size, 10 pass, gets 25 mpg. And is certified in Europe (higher standards) as a Low Emission Vehicle (yes a diesel).

Under the new Calif emission rules adopted by WA in '09 this Van will be illegal to sell in WA.

WA is pushing Biodiesel but the Calif emissions puts huge restrictions on passenger diesel vehicles.

You can't buy a VW TDI in CA, 40-50 mpg and VW make a diesel version of the Golf for Europe that gets 65 mpg! You can't buy the thing in the US.

The pols instead of listening to sense are following interest groups and ending up at cross purposes.

Posted by: JCM on May 1, 2006 10:59 AM
24. I hear liberals yapping about SUV drivers doing their part on conservation, but I see no suggestions on what they can do. Most SUV drivers are middle class, and they can't just trade in their SUVs for small cars. To them, heck to anyone for that matter, it makes very little economic sense to bear the cost of buying a different car, because it would take 10+ years to recoup the cost through gas price savings.

Another thing I hear all the time from the liberals is the value of hybrids/electic cars. Again, it makes, at least to me, no economical sense to buy a hybrid instead of a car/suv of the same class because the cost of ownership of hybrids, even with the consideration for the saving in fuel, is significantly higher. Any doubters can go to Hybrids vs. similar all-gas models and see for yourself.

Posted by: C. Oh on May 1, 2006 11:16 AM
25. Time for gluttonous SUV drivers and other gas hogs to do their part to conserve.

Last time I checked I pay for my own gasoline. In addition, my travel, and my wifes travel combined amounted to 4833 miles last year.

Posted by: swassociates on May 1, 2006 11:51 AM
26. It's all just rhetoric to gain political power and advance the progressive socialist agenda.

I'm waiting for Stefan to do a post on Gore's new Inconvenient Lie.
The latest in environonsense coming to a theatre near you.

Posted by: Jeff B. on May 1, 2006 12:38 PM
27. Great comparison Stefan. Careful though, you'll give ideas that it's a good idea to bring back the latte tax because it's clearly such a largely untapped 'revenue' source ;) LOL.

Posted by: Emily on May 1, 2006 01:35 PM
28. Look at DD rolling out the barbed wire right now!!! Congrats with the Stalinist practice recommendation I am all for it on MY terms – not yours...I am smarter than you think.

I'll come over and help out my electrical bill by cutting off your hot tub, that extra freezer in the garage or the x-box that wastes so much juice must go. That computer must be rationed so you'll have to cut down on reading commie.com and simplesolutionsthatneverwork.com.

Also call me up for the unlock code on your car's computer after I have approved your next trip to the doctor after making sure your electricity bill is going down. Then I will send the unlock code good for six hours of driving unless you’d like to take the bus…the Ron Sims bus to no where…BBBEEEEEWWWAAaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh.

BTW your tin helmet is a little off center and the Dick Durbin for Leninist of the Year Awards Banquet is filling up quick so get your tickets now!

Hey jerkiod leftist when is it enough is enough to leave well enough alone…oh right yes when you want to do pot, vote from Joel Connelly’s Whidbey pot shack, add votes, screw interns, give away Los Alamos, encourage aliens to riot in the streets, take all the money and squander it on HOV lanes, build gambling halls instead of levees, blame white folk for everything, buy HAMAS greenhouses, root for Iran and impeach Bush etc. etc. etc. then we need to leave you alone….right sorry….can I come burn down another ski resort with you….that was you right??? What is the best kind of club to carry around? One that can beat opponents, SUV’s and any Hispanic not at the “rally” today. Can ya tell me please!!???

Posted by: Col. Hogan on May 1, 2006 02:05 PM
29. Now that, Col. Hogan, was quite the rant.

Posted by: jimg on May 1, 2006 03:23 PM
30. Those high powered Brainiacs at the Seattle Times continue to to speak with forked tongue. Apparently they see no contradiction in lamenting the high price of gas while at the same time editorializing that the "pristine wilderness" of ANWR should be left untouched.

I think the Seattle Times editorial board should one month in ANWR on a camping trip in July when the weather gets above freezing. Of course, then the mosquitoes would number in the billions. I think the allure of this "pristine wilderness" would quickly pall for them.

Posted by: Bill K. on May 1, 2006 10:22 PM
31. As a liberal ... I agree with you all: gas prices aren't all that high. I'll go even further: gas prices are too low.

We need much higher gas taxes to reduce consumption, which in turn will hurt oil-rich corrupt dictatorships, reduce funding for terrorism, and help the environment. Sadly, both parties are too stupid and/or chicken to admit that.

Posted by: Bruce on May 1, 2006 11:02 PM
32. You left off vanilla. Buying vanilla, and looking at the unit price, makes me cringe!

Posted by: Peggy U on May 2, 2006 08:51 AM
33. Howyousdoin

Yo, Peggy forget Vanilla, Saffron is ten times more expensive than an A.P.Indy Foal

Forgetaboutit

Posted by: Joey bag of doughnuts on May 2, 2006 10:11 AM
34. Someone noted that the average person pays $26 per week for gas.

That's $1352 per year.

Is there another liquid that most people spend $1352 per year on?

The statement seems perfectly defensible to me.

Posted by: Hugh on May 2, 2006 12:09 PM
35. Lowest price vanilla I found was $79.00/pint ($632.00 per gallon).

Posted by: Peggy U on May 2, 2006 01:58 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?