April 18, 2006
More findings from the transaction logs

Here's another finding from the voter registration database transaction log that Deanron finally released earlier this month, more than six months after I requested it--

Recall the challenges filed by GOP activist Lori Sotelo against several hundred voters who were improperly registered claiming residence at private mailboxes and public storage facilities. The Angry Left opponents of election integrity in county government and the liberal media spent the next few weeks hammering Sotelo and the GOP for daring to inconvenience unlawfully registered voters. Even though the vast majority of these registrations were plainly bogus -- nobody really lives in a mailbox -- all but a handful of the challenges were dismissed. The only ones upheld were those where the voter admitted that they didn't live in the mailbox. But as it turns out, the transaction log contains even more evidence that hundreds of these registrations were bogus: 306 of the official letters mailed by the Elections office to the challenged voters were returned as undeliverable. So not only did these mailbox voters not live at the mailboxes where they claimed to live, they didn't even receive their mail there. Imagine that.

Nevertheless, Deanron rejected the challenges and those registrations remain on the books. While these registrations won't necessarily be used by the original voter who abandoned them, they could be a tempting target for someone else to cast a provisional ballot or sign an initiative petition in the original voter's name. (and don't tell me that signature verification can prevent such mischief)

Also, recall that the GOP did goof by challenging 46 voters registered at the Watermarke apartment building. Even though the GOP apologized and retracted the challenges immediately upon discovering the error, and every eligible voter was able to vote without difficulty, the Angry Left is still in a lather over this. But as it turned out, 21 of those 46 challenged voters didn't really live at that building anyway -- their mail was also returned to the election office as undeliverable. So those 21 challenges were (unintentionally) correct after all.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at April 18, 2006 12:12 PM | Email This
Comments
1. We are angry that Dean Logan is so lax about his job that all this stuff just floats by him. We demand better! How come Stefan Sharkansky knows more about illegal voting in KC than Dean Logan claims to??? We demand better!!!!! We demand clean elections!

Posted by: Fire Dean Logan NOW on April 18, 2006 12:19 PM
2. It typically goes like this:

Stefan finds something that shows that the election system was abused and is easy to abuse.

Godstein defends whatever Stefan has found as important to the "right to vote" and promptly accuses Stefan and anyone who wants basic election security as a neocon wingnut. And Goldstein accuses the WA GOP of organized disenfranchisement.

Then Stefan finds more evidence of vote fraud that he had previously found and predicted, actually happpend.

And the cycle continues.

Meanwhile, Dean Logan does little to correct obvious problems, and the Democrats in the legislature steadfastly refuse to accept or create any serious legislation that will provide even the most basic controls on voting that we've all come to expect in the protection of every other aspect of our lives. And Sam Reed continues to whitewash the entire affair with a naivety that makes even Pollyanna jealous.

Bottom line is that the left wants to keep the system easy to cheat, and easy to abuse during or immediately prior to any election where they've got a chance of losing a close race.

Posted by: Jeff B. on April 18, 2006 12:29 PM
3. Oh, I inadvertantly mispelled Goldstein, Godstein. How appropriate. He certainly believes his views are on the level and with the authority of a deity.

Posted by: Jeff B. on April 18, 2006 12:31 PM
4. Is it possible to file a class action law suit against KCE, Dean Logan, Ron Sims, et al for voter disenfranchisement, namely ours? Or maybe obstruction of justice? What can be done? A real legal stink needs to be made before this mess can be cleaned up!

Posted by: katomar on April 18, 2006 12:32 PM
5. 1 Don't hold your breath waiting for a class action lawsuit
2 If someone was going to file one it would have been done by now
3 The KCGOP should have filed challenges each week and should have written an "audit program" that would have had the work reviewed and verified before Lori Sotello signed the complaint
4 KCGOP meet Mr/s Murphy of "If anything can go wrong it will go wrong" fame
5 Since KCGOP and WSRP are not pursing improperly registered voters, you need to contact
Evergreen Freedom Foundation
POB 552
Olympia, WA 98507
(360)956-3482
www.effwa.org
and tell them you want to participate in the Voter Integrity Project
6 Please give them three (3) business days to return your call, since they are extremely busy
7 Assuming you do a voting district, you will send the original to Sam Reed in Olympia and a copy to Evergreen Freedom Foundation
8 You may send a copy to your local county auditor, but in King County Dean Logan will probably ignore it
9 It's basically up to us to
a) contact EFF
b) walk the precinct
c) notify SOS and EFF of results w/ a courtesy copy to the County Auditor
d) begin doing this now
e) request another precinct to walk
10 If we break this into managable parts and walk a district a month, we'll begin to make headway

Posted by: Green Lake Mark on April 18, 2006 03:16 PM
6. That seems really strange: Letters notifying the "voters" of the challenges came back as undeliverable, but the ballots which were sent approximately a month earlier did not come back as undeliverable?

People do move around, but I wouldn't have thought that such a high proportion of this group of "voters" would have moved within that month.

Posted by: Micajah on April 18, 2006 04:25 PM
7. The important question now is..."Did these bogus mailbox voters "vote" in recent elections - while registered illegally?" And "Did their votes count?"

That's 306 MORE bogus ballots!

Posted by: Deborah on April 18, 2006 06:59 PM
8. Ms. Sotello claimed, "under penalty of perjury", to know that persons who claimed to reside at 320 Cedar Street, in Seattle, really had filed false claims of residency at a storage complex, located at 320 Cedar Avenue, in Forks. When I asked that Attorney General McKenna prosecute Ms. Sotello on multiple felony counts, a member of his staff responded, in writing, that (a) King County Prosecutor Norm Maleng has sole jurisdiction, and (b) it's okay for Ms. Sotello to do this, if she retracts her bogus challenges, once she's caught. I leave it to you self-appointed crusaders for voting purity to demand her prosecution, and to note that both above-counted abdications of prosecutorial responsibility are as bogus as Ms. Sotello's challenges.

Posted by: Paddy Mac on April 18, 2006 11:14 PM
9. Paddy Mac - What about the hundreds of challenges that weren't "bogus"?

Aren't you upset even a little about those?

Aren't you upset that Logan allowed this to happen, because he wouldn't do his job and screen the voter registration applications?

Aren't you upset that Logan stonewalled on thousands of requests for public records?

Posted by: ewaggin on April 18, 2006 11:43 PM
10. "it's okay for Ms. Sotello to do this, if she retracts her bogus challenges, once she's caught."

Hmmm... Ok!

Then just have your boys - Ron Sims and Dean Logan - retract the hundreds of bogus votes from Gregoires November 2004 totals... thus showing that she was indeed the "LOSER" we all know she was...and it should be equivalent to Sotello's action........I'm good with that.

Posted by: Deborah on April 18, 2006 11:43 PM
11. Don't bother with paddy-cakes - he/she/it lost what's left of it's mind sniffing used urinal cakes at the bus terminal.

Talk about straining at gnats!

Go paddy-whacked, go!

Posted by: alphabet soup on April 19, 2006 09:59 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?