March 23, 2006
Colville Tribes Mining Vote Hinges On Off-Rez Absentee Ballots

By a large margin, on-rez members of the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation in northeastern Washington State voted at the polls last Saturday against a controversial proposal to mine molybdenum from tribal lands on Mount Tolman. But - as The Star Of Grand Coulee reports, there are quite a few absentee ballots uncounted from off-rez tribal members. As of 11:28 a.m. today, those votes were unreported on the tribe's mining vote count Web page. They're reportedly to be tallied this afternoon, Thursday, even though the vast majority had been turned in by Monday. Hmmmm. The Star:

Absentee ballot requests out-number poll voting 1,625 to 628. An election official said 1,326 absentee ballots had been returned by Monday. Absentee ballots will be counted on Thursday afternoon. The absentee ballot requests were 443 for Inchelium, 180 for Keller, 524 for Nespelem and 478 for Omak. What trend absentee ballots will take is anyone's guess, the election official said Monday. If sentiment for mining exists with tribal members living off the reservation, those votes could change the local vote decision.

The mining referendum has stirred up strong feelings throughout the reservation and with tribal members living off the reservation....One estimate suggests that there are a million tons of mineral ore on and around Mt. Tolman. Molybdenum is used in the manufacture of steel, among other products. It is now selling for more than $30 a pound. Environmental organizations on the reservation have been fighting the mining issue and have developed studies showing the dangers of pollution from runoffs, and concern for health issues associated with the project.

Stay tuned.....If the results are reversed, I'd imagine questions would arise about the validity of the registration process for off-reservation tribal members. In addition, transparency would have been better if results of the many non-rez absentee ballots already received by Monday had been posted at the tribe's vote results page shortly after they came in. Rather than leaving the online absentee results "hole" empty for three more days, pending receipt of the final absentees. I guess the rulers of a sovereign nation make and enforce election law the way they want.

UPDATE: 3/24/06, 1:25 P.M.: The tribe's Web site now shows the absentee ballot results have been released, and the molybdenum mining proposal for tribal lands on Mt. Tolman has been defeated. The total vote is reported as 1,254 against, 847 for.

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at March 23, 2006 11:28 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Assuming no voting irregularities (a large assumption, I know), I hope the mine goes in. My wife has family on the Coleville Rez, and they need all the industry they can get. The unemployment rate is huge, and life expectancy is like 35 or something.

Posted by: Timothy on March 23, 2006 11:35 AM
2. A little off-topic...but my observation during last years election...

I noticed that WA State tribal voting increased dramatically last year with the "smoking ban" on the ballot! Apparently, the tribes of the state stood to make an enormous bundle if the smoking ban went into effect....(Go figure!)
Many of the counties that have tribal lands went to "all mail voting" last year. Most of those counties voted overwhelmingly for the smoking ban - via absentee ballots...

It seems quite odd and unfair that a certain part of our state's population - who will not be effected by - say the state initiative to ban smoking (Indian tribal lands are exempt from the smoking ban), are able to greatly influence the election outcome of these initiatives!

To me, it appears that our tribal governments have succeeded in their own versions of election manipulation with the help of changing to "all mail voting"...

I'm beginning to see how election fraud, thanks to the mandatory "all mail voting", will be used
to manipulate various special interests.

This is just ridiculous!

Posted by: Deborah on March 23, 2006 01:15 PM
3. Maybe someone can explain to me how it is that Native Americans are considered to be a sovereign state on some issues, but citizens of the US in others. If they want to be islands of independence, then they need to sever all financial ties to the govt. If they in fact are citizens of the US, then all laws should apply equally to them.

Posted by: Janet S on March 23, 2006 02:07 PM
4. As a tribal member, I am very pleased to learn that the mountain will not be desecrated for the sake of a few dollars. Looks like that game doesn't play so well as it did when the govt. paid us a dollar an acre for our ancestral homeland.

Posted by: Greener on April 13, 2006 06:36 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?