February 17, 2006
Baby Blethen Watch

Ryan Blethen, son of Seattle Times Publisher Frank Blethen, is apparently being groomed to take over the family business. He was recently appointed as the fourth Blethen on the editorial board . Ryan now has his own semi-regular signed column, which I suppose is the best peek into the Seattle Times of the future. Today he writes: "Orwell wrote Bush's script"

Bush and Co.'s battle against terrorism has turned into a power grab and a war on Americans
Oy. My free and friendly business advice to Ryan Blethen: By all means continue to criticize those in power. But when you own the newspaper you do not need to shout like Indymedia to get attention. Not to mention that over-the-top absolutist rhetoric makes you less persuasive, will deeply offend a portion of your readers and probably hurt your bottom line.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at February 17, 2006 09:55 AM | Email This
Comments
1. When Baby Ryan takes over, they really can go ahead and merge the PI and Times together in one big Daily Daily Kos (The Print Edition!), and pursue that agenda of combined circulation of about 100,000 total. Yeah, that outa work.

Posted by: Cliff on February 17, 2006 10:03 AM
2. I sent the following e-mail to Rayan:

Ryan, 1984 happened in 1979-1980, so you are not breaking new ground here.

The intrusion of government was tremendous from the early 70s to 1980. Or, at least what I thought so as a young 20-something. If you are a 20-something today, my Orwellian world is your non-Orwellian world, so what you are asserting today may be correct in your life experience, but not in mine.

I think we both can agree that government has become too intrusive in our lives.

Posted by: swatter on February 17, 2006 10:17 AM
3. This is why to this day I will not purchase a Seattle Times or PI. Put them out of business and maybe they will get a clue. I doubt it however!

Posted by: GS on February 17, 2006 10:23 AM
4. When you oppose inheritance taxes, you get morons like the Blethens. That is one of the consequences of flawed public policy. Ryan Blethen could not hack it in the newspaper world if his father did not own the newspaper. Repeal of inheritance taxes works against a merit-based society.

I know Ryan Blethen personally, although it is unlikely that he would admit it. He is even dumber than his father, which is saying a lot.

The Seattle Times is not going down the toilet because of its "leftist" politics.

In the first place, it's a lie that its politics are leftist. The wackaloons who post on this blog will never admit that they are out there on the fringe, but that's exactly where they are.

In the second place, the fringe leftists around this town dump on the newspapers from the left, saying that the papers are just right wing tools. The newspapers don't pay attention to any of you, and never will.

They're going down the toilet because the Blethens are a bunch of incompetents who have driven good employees, including managers, away, and only the toadies survive.

They are out for themselves and themselves only. If they thought it might benefit them to go totally right-wing, that's exactly what they would do. I tell you all this with some authority, having worked there for just short of 33 years.

Of course, that will not happen any time soon, because this is not that kind of town, for which I give thanks every day.

So keep coughing up your rhetorical hairballs at the newspapers. It has no effect on what they do. But if you don't buy them, and continue not to buy them, that does, absolutely, have an effect.

Posted by: Ivan on February 17, 2006 10:32 AM
5. Ivan says:

In the first place, it's a lie that its politics are leftist.

Wow! You must be really smart, Ivan.

Now where do I know you from, big guy? You didn't use to hang out at the B&I store in Tacoma, did you?

Posted by: huckleberry on February 17, 2006 11:31 AM
6. Still sore from being taken to the cleaners during the strike, Ivan?

Posted by: jimg on February 17, 2006 11:38 AM
7. I found this quote from the editorial especially amusing:

"American democracy has buckled under the weight of Americans voting scared, a weak press diluted because of consolidation by mega-public companies, and no real political alternative."

I don't know about scared, but in KC they like voting so much that many voters vote twice or more in each election.

And since the Times hasn't been involved in any "mega-public" consolidations, what's their excuse for the mega-weak reporting they've done (or failed to do) on the rotten mess Sims and Logan have caused at KC Elections?

Posted by: ewaggin on February 17, 2006 12:04 PM
8. Jimg:

You are saying this to the one person involved in that strike who made out likea bandit from it. It is I who took Frank Blethen to the cleaners, not the other way around.

Sadly, one of the terms of my settlement was a nondisclosure agreement. But I know I took Frank to the cleaners, and Frank knows it, and what you think is of no consequence.

Posted by: Ivan on February 17, 2006 12:11 PM
9. It's greedy bastards like Ivan (and I'm going to run on the assumption that he did work for the Times) who ruined the job market in this state for good up and coming newspaper reporters with their stupid, ill-timed, and ultimately failed newspaper strike back in 2000.
Still it makes me glad I crossed the picket lines if it helped take folks like Ivan out of the papers.

As for the original topic of this post, it would be nice to have some fellow reporters underground working from within to change the failed climate of today's media.

Posted by: Reporterward on February 17, 2006 12:40 PM
10. Ward:

Threre is always a place at the Seattle Times for good little conservatives who kiss up to management and do only what they are told. If you can't get hired there, you just must not be skilled enough, because you certainly fit their profile.

Take it up with them, not with me. I don't do their hiring for them. Don't blame "the market" for your lack of "professsional" advancement. Nobody likes a scab, you know.

As for our being "greedy," don't let the facts get in your way, bucko. All we wanted was to keep up with the cost of living. I guess that's some leftist, radical notion.

Posted by: Ivan on February 17, 2006 01:00 PM
11. My professional advancement is going just find Ivan, considering my byline is being seen by around 100,000 readers.
I'm talking about the other poor reporters and college grads who are serving lattes in this state now because a handful of greedy union slugs weren't happy that they were making twice the income, or more, of any other reporter in the state for doing half the work.
Kind of hard for me to be all pro-union when I witness columists raking in six-figure incomes out picketing for increased wages when 90 percent of the rest of the reporters in this state bring in $12 an hour or less.
Sorry for laying the facts on you like that Ivan, but cutting through lies mouthed by folks like you is what I do.

Posted by: Reporterward on February 17, 2006 01:31 PM
12. I doubt Ryan read 1984, much less understand 1984.

It was also Orwell who said:

People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

Posted by: JCM on February 17, 2006 01:38 PM
13. Saw his scrawlings today and thought, "How cute! He's learned to spell!"

Because of the evolution in technology, Baby Blethen will be as relevant as Pinchy Sulzberger, and they'll both be about as relevant to the 3rd millenium as the long lost scions of The Plantagenets and of The Valois.

Who knows? Someone might even right books about them also. "The Last Blethens" or "The Last Sulzbergers."

Posted by: Cartman on February 17, 2006 01:54 PM
14. Saw his scrawlings today and thought, "How cute! He's learned to spell!"

Because of the evolution in technology, Baby Blethen will be as relevant as Pinchy Sulzberger, and they'll both be about as relevant to the 3rd millenium as the long lost scions of The Plantagenets and of The Valois.

Who knows? Someone might even right books about them also. "The Last Blethens" or "The Last Sulzbergers."

Posted by: Cartman on February 17, 2006 01:54 PM
15. Ward the whiner:

Hey, what kind of conservative are you anyway? Don't you know that it's *their* fault if they're not making the big bucks? And if you're a *real* conservative, what do you care about anyone else anyway?

Columnists making six figures (I defy you to name one) did not drive our strike. It was circulation drivers who were getting screwed left and right.

They have accepted a wage freeze now because the company has cried poor and are still getting screwed.

Don't pretend that you are "laying the facts" on me. If people aren't making what they think they should, let them form a union and bargain collectively, or quit whining.

Why in the world do you think unionized journalists are making more than nonunion ones anyway? How stupid can you be? Did you think you were making it better somehow when you, as you say, crossed our picket line?

Posted by: Ivan on February 17, 2006 01:57 PM
16. Art Theil to name one.

Posted by: Reporterward on February 17, 2006 02:02 PM
17. I e-mailed Ryan this morning to tell him that someone at the Times is writing stupid editorials and signing HIS name to them. Just thought he'd want to be alerted.

Posted by: John425 on February 17, 2006 02:07 PM
18. Art Thiel (at least spell his name right) works for the P-I, not the Times. I can tell you for a fact that Art does not do "half the work."

He is one of the hardest-working journalists in this or any other state. He is anything but a slacker. He got to where he is by skill and hard work. Sorry you're jealous.

I know who some of the overpaid slackers are, and yes, there are some, just like in any other field, but Art isn't one of them.

Here's a little hint for you: Most of them are managers.

Posted by: Ivan on February 17, 2006 02:16 PM
19. Sorry folks for wasting space here bitch slapping some failed ex-copy editor. If I had known that was all that he was I wouldn't have even wasted my time.
Apparently he was a union "shop steward" too. Oh, I am so impressed. With leaders like that, no wonder why the 2000 newspaper strike failed so ignobly.

Getting on to a real topic. I know a lot of folks here look at the Times, PI and other local newspapers and see that the stories are written by a clutch of biased liberal hacks. Fact. Why would anyone in their right minds buy slanted, poorly written, (poorly copy edited), rags that don't even cover local news events and that are filled with wire stories which you can get for free anywhere online?

The answer is nobody would, which is why you see both papers hemorrhaging circulation and ad sales.

I kind of have the naive belief that local institutions like the PI and the Times should be saved, even from themselves and they can even be fixed. Besides, where else can get Mallard Fillmore, Tank McNamara and bizarre Art Theil analogies for such a cheap price?

The tactic that is popularly espoused is to just stop buying the paper and let them collapse on their own arrogance.

Personally I feel that a strategy of engagement is the best solution. Rather than shaking your finger at them, try to offer a positive alternative. If there were more dissenting views on the editorial page, if they'd present the news in an unbiased manner and if they had more local news stories then they might get back in the black.

(Most importantly tell the Blethen family that there's a toady conservative reporter out there who'd like to turn their paper around and get them making money again!!!)

Posted by: Reporterward on February 17, 2006 03:19 PM
20. It takes more than some wet behind the ears scab punk to bitch-slap this child.

I'd hardly call a 33-year career with the same employer "failed." I probably worked there more years than you have been alive, and probably have forgotten more about journalism than you'll ever know.

And I chose to leave, rather than beat their butts in four separate actions. They would have had to prevail in all four of them to keep me from going back there, after they broke the law and the contract trying to keep me out.

You might say I "retired undefeated," and they are paying me not to work there now, for the rest of my life.

You know why, punk? Because I had a UNION! And when a company breaks the law and violates its contracts, the UNION gets justice.

Or maybe youre just a little corporate absolutist p*ssant, and you think anything goes when you're hustling a buck.

Posted by: Ivan on February 17, 2006 03:33 PM
21. Ivan--
Please swallow whatever little pride you still legitimately have. You appear to believe you are relevant.
I wonder if Mike Fancher has room underhis "big-boy" desk for Baby Blethens to hide with him.
Can you imagine the horror on little Baby Blethens contorted face if some bearded Muslim with the Koran in one hand and a backpack over his shoulder showed up at the Times and asked for him???
Just another coward who would rather poke at Bush than address the important issues of the day.
I guess they are trying to retain their LEFTIST BASE in Seattle. No conservatives I know currently subscribe to either Seattle fishwrapper. Problem is most LEFTIST are cheap with their own money and don't buy the "Corporate America" stuff the newspapers hawk between their lies. Advertisers are amazingly naive when they look at some buyer demographics. They could save a whole lot of money in Seattle! I hope they do because that is what's keeping the 2 rags afloat.

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on February 17, 2006 04:27 PM
22. Let me get this straight..Ivan had a JOB? I mean other than as a pimp for the 36th district democrats? Hey Ivan, how's that illegal teachers strike test case in your district coming along? I talked with Rob today he's looking forward to using your own tax dollars against you to sue your skinny behind into the stone age.

Posted by: Just Wondering on February 17, 2006 06:10 PM
23. With columns like that, we now see that the Times is headed for even larger slides in circulation.

Posted by: Misty on February 17, 2006 06:26 PM
24. ..and with that kind of attitude from Ivan toward the likes of me and others here I can see that my decision to not buy the Times is justified. It kind of confirms the contempt we all suspected was there all along toward anyone right of center.

Posted by: Misty on February 17, 2006 06:32 PM
25. Well Blethen's column certianly left no doubt where the Seattle Times stands on the war on Islamic terrorism: It's all some Orwellian plot by George Bush and the Republicans to deprive us of our rights. Oh, and for good measure those nasty media conglomerates, who would swallow up the brave little Seattle Times, are also responsible.

Blethan really has some gall complaining about media takeovers. How long has the Times kept that poor dead stinking zombie, the P-I, above ground?
The P-I should have gone to the Big Printing Press in the Sky decades ago but the Times keeps pumping cash into that rotting carcass because it wants to keep the competition out of Seattle. Alas for the Times the fresh young upstarts like the Seattle Weekly and the Stranger are nipping at the gray old lady's butt.

Typical of the MSM, the craven capitulation of the Seattle Times to the Islamic mobs in the Cartoon War has accelerated it's decline. The Stranger, which printed the cartoons along with a strong article in support of them, received nationwide acclaim.

The Seattle Times is stagnating, outdated and in denial about it.

Posted by: Bill K. on February 17, 2006 11:04 PM
26. Blethen--Blatherin'--same difference;
do a spread on Tent City perma-pitched & hosted in the Blethens' own Yards and that'll make me a believer; till then, it's a nice read--but just words; politics;

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on February 20, 2006 10:42 PM
27. Wow, reading all the posts from "Ivan" really gives you an understanding of why union dominated businesses in the U.S. continue to fail.

Name it. The airlines, newspapers, steel mills, our public educations system.... They're all in a world of hurt.

If it's a union job, I guess it attracts whiney malcontents that don't understand business and care about their paychecks but not their jobs.

the PI should already be dead. The Seattle Times is slowly bleeding out. I keep this in mind whenever I see any of the editorial work these geniuses foist on the public.

Posted by: Johnny on February 23, 2006 04:56 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?