February 23, 2006
Dumb E-mails from Elected Officials
Today's dumb e-mail from an elected official is from Secretary of State Sam Reed. Reader Shannon recently e-mailed Secretary Reed to ask why he directed his staff to testify against HB 2526, which would have enabled citizens to challenge a duplicate voter registration. Shannon forwarded Secretary Reed's dumb reply, from which I quote.
The Voter Registration Challenge process is to catch people are either not eligible to vote or who have given an improper address. 99.9% of the duplicate registrations occur when a person registers at a new address without canceling his or her previous registration. It is a simple and quick administrative step to correct that. It doesn’t require a costly, time-consuming public hearing embodied in HB 2526.
[Emphasis added] Reed's numbers imply that only 0.1% of duplicate registrations (1 in 1,000) are caused by something other than a voter who reregisters at a new address without canceling the old registration. That's almost an accuracy rate that any bank would envy! But Reed's math has an accuracy rate that makes Ron "99.98%" Sims look like Albert Einstein. As I reported several days ago, the new statewide voter database contains 1,353 pairs of duplicates with a perfect match on first, name, last name, birthdate and exact address. (and there are even more duplicates at the same address, these were only the easiest to identify). If these alone represented only 1/1000 of the total duplicates, the imputed number of duplicate registrations would be 1,353,000 or roughly 35% of all voter registrations in the state. Obviously that's absurd. Reed also implies elsewhere in his email that county auditors will readily remove duplicate registrations when such are brought to their attention. But if that's the case, why is Dustin S. O'Coilain still registered three times, months after he was prosecuted for double voting? Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at February 23, 2006 05:36 PM | Email This
Comments
1. "How to Get Yourself Un-Elected," by Sam Reed.

Coming to bookstores soon.

Posted by: MES on February 23, 2006 05:56 PM
2. We need full re-registration. And we need it now!

As to the "Motor-Voter" garbage, we need a state executive that will tell the feds to "go cry in you milk. We're not going to do that here!"

If the libs had their way, people would here this all the time: "Ok, that's 1 big-mac, large fries, small diet coke. Is that it? Ok, your total comes to $5.66. Would you like us to automatically register you to vote with that?"

Argh!

Posted by: Jeremy on February 23, 2006 06:03 PM
3. They can't just remove Dustin from the database, he was an important contributor to Gregoire's margin of victory. Frankly, they are gonna need him and every other improperly registered voter who plans to vote for Gregoire in 2008.

Posted by: Jeff B. on February 23, 2006 06:36 PM
4. The question is not: Can the non existent be enfranchised...?

The question IS: Can the non existent be DISenfranchised?


Posted by: master of the obvious on February 23, 2006 06:52 PM
5. It is frightening to see how, oh, how should one put this....how less-than-bright the leadership of WA is. Peter Principle in full flower.

Posted by: Danny on February 23, 2006 06:59 PM
6. but as we've learned here at this blog, Dean Logan et al don't care if people are registered twice. They just send two ballots anyway, and consider it good.

FOUL~! Sam Reed, sorry, but you actually BELIEVE that Dean Logan wants to get rid of all double registrations. Current evidence suggests that there are far too many in the mix to make that true!

Posted by: Misty on February 23, 2006 09:02 PM
7. It is proven once again that this state does not care about the rights of it's citizens, unless that right is to kill the unborn or keep those that would kill us alive. Oh and of course make sure we pay our Union dues.

I was taught as a child that voting was the most important thing you could do for society and that it was "sacred". My grandfathers fought in WWII and they knew what it was to be an American and why to fight for what is right. To bad our WA government believes in a different America.....one that Stalin and Hitler would love

Posted by: Dengle on February 23, 2006 09:56 PM
8. Howyousdoin’

I’m given’ any of yous 7/2 odds that Sam knows how to count “BAG” money.

Forgetaboutit

Posted by: Joey bag of doughnuts on February 24, 2006 12:10 AM
9. Now that our voter database troubles are showing up on a "State-wide" scale...(instead of just King County)....and this statewide database may soon be linked to the "National" database...could this be enough to finally interest the Federal Government??

I mean - if they allow this mismanagment of one state database...how can they create a national voter database with any confidence and integrity?Why bother - if they can't assure the nations voters that all that of these fixable errors have been corrected on a state level under the oversight of the Feds?

At some point - Sam Reed will not be able to play this game of ignorance any longer...

Posted by: Deborah on February 24, 2006 12:20 AM
10. And this guy claims to be a Republican! Well he won;t get my vote when he runs again!

Posted by: GS on February 24, 2006 02:09 AM
11. Shark, you forgot high school English... you meant to structure your sentence as...

E-mails from Dumb Elected Officials

Posted by: righton on February 24, 2006 07:07 AM
12. People
Wake up and smell the coffee. The voting system is undermined. Let there be no doubt about it. When we quibble about legal meanings to straight forward regulations, see aliases, and other assorted problems, such as citizenship, then the system is broken, perhaps beyond repair. And Sam Reed is just doing what is expected of him.

Given just the following facts:
1. Non-citizens vote
2. People register multiple times, frequently using address which are not their abodes.
3. People vote multiple times, sometimes using aliases
4. Dead people rise up and vote.
5. People cast and sign ballots for the infirm and mentally incompetent.
6. Criminals vote, sometimes from prison.
7. No attempt is made to assure balances prior to certifying elections.

The above are just a few examples that immediately come to mind. Examples which clearly violate regulations. I am certain that the readers may add to the list. My point is that the system is intentional undermined. What else will explain the abhorrent behavior of the leaders and managers. Corruption has become a way of life in Washington State. Judge Bridges called it a culture. I prefer the term, corruption.

The real question is can one political party accomplished all of this corruption? I seriously doubt that only one party is to blame. Sam Reed is just the poster child of that activity. I refuse to believe that past Republicans did not aid or abet in a wink and nod fashion. Only when the corrupt pot boiled over and stunk to high heaven across the state and country did the Republican Party challenge the voting contest. Prior to that no other state wide voting contest were seriously challenged, even the close race between Slade and Cantwell went unchallenged. Silence implies tacit acceptance. For had Slade challenged the results of the Senatorial race the outcome of the Governor's race two years later made had been different. And that is my point, Republicans quietly acquiesced. And they continue to quietly acquiesced on a daily basis by voting for legislation that further diminishes the values they campaigned on. If the Democrats are the Devils incarnate, what are the Republicans? Judases.

Posted by: Snuffy on February 24, 2006 08:46 AM
13. Oh, that's right this is... Surface-to-Air Missile Reed :-).

Could we just send him to Tehran to run their air defense network?!?!?!?

I presume he'd do a heck of a job (and not hit any of those pretty Israeli Air Force jets)!!!

Posted by: A Watchdog on February 24, 2006 10:13 AM
14. Good point Watchdog!! I llok forward to the day Reed is voted out of office!! (Along with Chrissy of course!!)

Posted by: Laurie on February 25, 2006 10:28 AM
15. We can only hope that whoever replaces Reed has some integrity.

Posted by: KS on February 25, 2006 09:30 PM
16. Integrity, fairness and security are not known human traits.

Posted by: Snuffy on February 27, 2006 09:22 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?