February 13, 2006
Beaver Relocation Bill

HB 2381 "Authorizing a beaver relocation permit" has just passed unanimously in the state House of Representatives. In an e-mailed statement, Rep. Joel Kretz (R-Wauconda) says:

“While the media has poked a little fun at this bill, I promise it’s a serious issue,” Kretz said laughing. “In all seriousness, this bill will be very helpful and cost-effective for landowners in our district that are looking for different solutions to water storage on their land. Considering the pending legislation that has the potential to de-water the 7th district, this bill is one step to retain every drop of water in our district’s watersheds.”

Kretz says beavers are nature’s own water storage stewards and have proven to help the ecosystem around streams and create natural water storage in the upper watersheds - at no cost to taxpayers.

It sounds like a good idea, but it's still pretty darn funny.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at February 13, 2006 12:06 PM | Email This
Comments
1. I fear them being fired for not paying union dues.
I wonder if they have thought this through, like beavers cut down many trees for food, and generally won't leave an area until all the food is gone.

Posted by: Jason Woodruff on February 13, 2006 12:21 PM
2. I think this bill needs an emergency clause, else we run the risk of being "too rough on the beaver"....

Posted by: Palouse on February 13, 2006 12:32 PM
3. A host of adolescent, juvenile, middle-school jokes has just flooded my memory banks, none of which I shall share today.
However, being a Republican who loves beavers I can say that I'm fully behind this measure. We all know that there are areas where populations of beavers needed to be trimmed back. So sending them to parts of the state where residents haven't seen a healthy beaver for years seems mighty sensible.
Maybe there should be a beaver support group should be formed to help ensure passage of this bill. Beavers United to Save Habitat might be a good name to start with but I'm sure others can come up with something far more clever.
Maybe we can even resurrect the old 1970s slogan "If you love nature, kiss a beaver" to aid the process.

Posted by: Reporterward on February 13, 2006 12:37 PM
4. Ward, it's nice to hear you still love the beaver. I think a beaver support group is a fantastic idea. In fact, I think if Beavers United to Save Habitat joined forces with my local chapter of Beavers United to Save Trees, it would provide a terrific combination for beaver enthusiasts everywhere.

Posted by: Palouse on February 13, 2006 12:59 PM
5. Reporter World:

An acronym of BUSH for Beavers United to Save Habitat would never fly in the legislature.

:-)

Posted by: timman on February 13, 2006 01:05 PM
6. Beaver Relocation Bill???.......OK, so when will the Queen be relocated?

Posted by: dan on February 13, 2006 01:16 PM
7. This is nothing new.
Why Bill Clinton was the czar of relocating "beavers"! Hell, Clinton relocated "beavers" to places most of us married guys could only dream of.

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on February 13, 2006 01:42 PM
8. This just in, I just received word that a union group has filed a grievance. The Lumberjacks Against Beaver Intervention Association filed a court injunction to stop the beaver relocation project. Something about the beavers not being paid prevailing wage. Story at 11.

Posted by: Palouse on February 13, 2006 01:46 PM
9. Will King County designate my land a "wetland" after the beaver moves in? If the dam breaks will I be forced by KC to restore it (subsidizing the beaver)?

Will I have to pay for beaver health insurance? Sounds like state insurance is off limits.

Posted by: Buck on February 13, 2006 02:49 PM
10. Don't these people have anything better to do, like dealing with sexual predators and MEANINGFUL election reform!!

Where are the priorities? FIRE THE BASTARDS!!

Posted by: TH on February 13, 2006 02:53 PM
11. I told a friend's daghter about this & we both considered it lol material & a w3aste fo taxpayers money!!

Posted by: Laurie on February 13, 2006 03:38 PM
12. Does this mean that the state (taxpayers) are going to set aside a pot o' money for the landowners who's property gets flooded once the beavers dam up the streams in their backyards?

Posted by: SubDoc on February 13, 2006 03:41 PM
13. I'm impressed. The permits for Beavers are free. Who would have ever thought that?

Posted by: sgmmac on February 13, 2006 04:24 PM
14. Good Golly! Of all the silly things for the feminist state to be doing, providing relocation money to beaver is about the silliest.

Posted by: BananaLand on February 13, 2006 08:02 PM
15. So.. do the beavers have to file Environmental Impact Statements? Or get permission to fell trees? Or get permission to litter in the stream? Free housing? Relocation?

Now I wish I'd gradated from Ballard High.

Posted by: Al on February 13, 2006 09:59 PM
16. As an active member of the Okanogan County Farm Bureau AND the Okanogan County Republican Party, I got my own pretty good chuckle out of this one....: from some of the comments.... ;-]

Oh; yeah: Full disclosure:
Before he became State Representative Joel Kretz, he was President of my Okanogan County Farm Bureau; and lead the charge on the RMAP fight against the State agency bureaucrats; and we turned out about 350 people for a hearing in Olympia a couple years that some long-time legislative staffers told me was the biggest crowd they had ever seen at any one hearing.

And why did this pass unanimously ??... well...:
Probably because until now it was illegal for private parties to trap and transport beavers; only State agents could do it. So what did the state do ?.. To meet the requirements of the recent 'live trapping' law, the state would carefully trap nuisance beavers in live traps... and then whack them over the head with a club or shoot them or whatever, because it was too expensive to transport and release them (only in the government).

Sooo....: With the passage of HB 2381 (if it passes the Senate and gets signed by the Gov), PRIVATE ENTERPRISE can take nuisance beavers and relocate them where they are wanted; instead of having some state agency whack them over the head with a club and kill them... who's your daddy now... At least you know some of the 'Paul Harvey rest of the story'.

SIDEBAR: Anybody want a couple of my beavers ??..
The island in the Methow River where it runs thru the middle of my place is loaded with them; they keep coming over to my side of the river and chewing up my small trees.

Posted by: Methow Ken on February 13, 2006 11:07 PM
17. Methow Ken...Yasss I vant Zeee Beeevairs! Save Zee furry little fuzz Balls of Flavor for me. My Friend Emeril just zent me zee recipe for Zee Beeevair Oh la la che Magnifique!

Posted by: Chef Barnyardee on February 14, 2006 06:51 AM
18. Dose this mean that Boeing will stop trapping Urban Beavers at their Renton “Longcers location”…

If you did not know it, this Boeing location is a great indicator as to how nature will flourish in an urban setting. A REAL GEM, stuck between I-5 & I-405 at the site of the old racetrack.

There are lakes with fish, beavers, muskrats, fox, bald eagles, red tail weasels, coyotes, opossums, raccoons, many species of ducks, and a bird watchers haven. You should check it out.

Posted by: tacoma phlash on February 14, 2006 04:40 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?