January 04, 2006
Our Friend: Treated Wastewater

As Puget Sound looks forward to welcoming several million more residents in coming decades, strains on supplies of potable water will likely grow even as current expansion projects come on line. Which will make it even more vital to get creative in expanding sources. An example comes from this Bremerton Sun story (free reg. req.).

Port Orchard -- The Karcher Creek Sewer District has received a $200,000 grant to plan use of a byproduct from the expanded Retsil sewage treatment plant. A $22 million expansion is nearing completion on plant jointly operated by the sewer district and the city of Port Orchard. The modernized treatment will produce millions of gallons of treated water that can be used in public irrigation. Dick Fitzwater, the sewer district's general manager, said that for an estimated $4 million, that water can be delivered uphill to the Orchard Heights area where South Kitsap School District has three schools, Kitsap County has the Village Greens Golf Course and South Kitsap Parks and Recreation District has South Kitsap Community Park.

They'll have to find that additional $4 million. But if successful, they'll have several hundred thousand more gallons of water per day, for non-potable uses. An added benefit: Class A biosolids - some call it sludge - for fertilizer. (If anyone wants to weigh in the pros and cons of biosolids, have at it).

Regionally, Tacoma's recently-completed Second Supply project is a boon to Pierce County, and southern King county. Major Eastside suburbs in the Cascade Water Alliance will wean themselves from Seattle's municipal water supply if the Lake Tapps deal, finally, really, gets cleared. (That deserves a whole entry of its own - hopefully soon). And better inter-ties between differing regional water systems are a long-term priority, too. But less conventional supply strategies such as repurposed, treated wastewater will be important. As may be de-salination of Puget Sound water. De-sal's cost will be dropping exponentially in coming years. GE has a major de-sal unit, and sees big growth ahead. It would be good to see the inevitable enviro-scare tactics about de-sal get the critical examination they so richly deserve. Even better for Puget Sound to truly secure its water future, crucial for handling projected population and economic growth while simultaneously addressing salmon recovery concerns, which will NOT go away. Any water supply strategy that relies only on conservation isn't enough. The media need to put water utility managers from outside Seattle more in the spotlight. They've got a lot to say, as I discovered.

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at January 04, 2006 04:37 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Lacey is having at it as well. The aquifers are getting to be empty. The LOTT plant has some sort of deal on recharging them. In some manufacturing elements, treated water CANT be released into streams because it is too pure- it will literally leach the existing water of nutrients fish and critters need.


check out www.pumper.com for all of your poop processing resources :-)

Posted by: Andy on January 4, 2006 04:52 PM
2. We, in the NW, have gotten away with lousy water planning for many years. We rely on snowpack as a source with minimal additional storage capacity. Why can't we do the obvious and build some reservoirs? Why must we always opt for the most expensive "hi tech" solutions. As an example, I have yet to see a year when the Sno Valley hasn't flooded. There's plenty of water, we just need to store some of it, just like the rest of the Nation.

Posted by: Fed Up on January 4, 2006 06:44 PM
3. The desalination advocates had better factor in the price of the energy required to stuff all those water molecules through the membranes.

However, if the local Sierra Club will just forbid private automobiles to its membership - after all, they constantly harp on getting US out of OUR cars - the fuel saved thereby could be diverted to those smart reverse-osmosis plants and we'd have unlimited fresh water.

And after another hundred thousand Sierra Clubbers immigrate into Washington to live in ultra-densified urban highrises and commute to their wilderness sojourns by, uh, perpetual motion machines, we can divert the energy they don't use to the pumping of treated effluent from the treatment plants (always at the bottom of the gulch, remember) up to the plateaus where it can be most useful.

Problem solved.

Posted by: Hank Bradley on January 4, 2006 07:14 PM
4. Nuclear powered de-sal plants, lubricated with ANWR oil.

Gotta love it.

Posted by: JCM on January 4, 2006 09:12 PM
5. Ya know, I think I read somewhere that the Satsop WPPSS plant was about 95% complete when abandoned. And it's still there. Now that power is a bit more scarce, and businesses are leaving the state because our relatively cheap power is no longer enough to make up for the moonbattery, why not finish the bloody thing?

The problem with nuclear is that folks are afraid of it because they have no clue how it works, and probably believe that any given nuke plant could explode in a mushroom cloud. In the interest of educating the public, why not take all that hot water (referred to by eco-Nazis as "nuclear waste," falsely implying that it is radioactive) and use it in an adjacent water park / spa? Hot springs, hot tubs, water plume rides, and a water cannon you could be fired out of after signing about 53 liability waivers. Kids'd love it.

And you power all kinds of desalination.

Along with providing for all the electrical needs of several adjacent counties.

All while spewing no emissions whatsoever from any sort of combustion into the atmosphere.

Ah, but that would make too much sense.

Posted by: TB on January 4, 2006 11:32 PM
6. TB, too correct all fear and no knowledge regarding nuc energy. It gets even better, the old style water modulated reactors had to be held in a non-cricital state, and if there was a problem (3-mile Island) they would go critical. The new generation are held in a critical state and if there is a problem they naturally fail into a non-critical "cold" state. Not only is there no danger of explosion, it is impossible for them to melt down.

Sigh! Emotions rule! To hell with science, engineering, and facts.

Posted by: JCM on January 5, 2006 07:07 AM
7. Forget about desalinization. That would be the equivalent of the Saudis growing corn to make ethanol. Western Washington is loaded with groundwater resources that have barely been tapped. Nuclear power is great and should be developed to supply our increasing population and as a hedge against low hydro years, but not for desalinization that we don't need. Water supply challenges of the northwest have nothing to do with resources and everything to do with local and state governments not doing their job.

Posted by: GN on January 5, 2006 08:38 AM
8. I have to agree with "Fed Up". As somebody who grew up in the desert (New Mexico), I am somewhat flabbergasted when droughts are proclaimed here in the Northwest. When I have to wade through mud to get to my garbage can in my backyard due to all the rain we've had, I have a hard time keeping a straight face when someone states we have a water problem.

Posted by: LMK on January 6, 2006 12:38 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?