December 11, 2005
Fishy Fund Raising

Briefly, the Washington state Democratic party was selling this magnetic Christian fish symbol on its site, along with the ribbons that you can still see there.

Somehow I don't think this particular fish was intended to honor Christians, given the "hypocrite" message and what I suppose are hellish flames.

This saddens but does not surprise me.  Three years I wrote about the dislike many of the delegates to the 1992 Democratic convention felt toward those on the fundamentalists.

The secularists, especially in the [Democratic] leadership, have a hostility toward fundamentalists that comes close to bigotry, and may sometimes cross that line.  Delegates to the 1992 Democratic convention gave fundamentalists an average score of 11 on a 0 to 100 warmth scale.  (By contrast, conservatives got a 34 from the same delegates.)  This was the coldest view toward any group by the delegates at either convention.  More than half of the Democratic delegates gave Christian fundamentalists a 0 score, rating them, in effect, with Hitler and Stalin.  (Well, perhaps not with Stalin.  It is not a big secret that there are still people in the Democratic party with some warmth toward socialist experiments.)  What makes these low ratings even more striking is that they come from political people, who one would think would be inclined to like, or pretend to like, every potential voter.

This intense dislike by many in the Democratic party for fundamentalists (or evangelicals, or the religious right) has helped the Republican party in some elections.  But I think, as I said in this post where I compared the Democrats to the French Radical Socialists, that it has been bad for the nation.  I hope that the state Democrats apologize for this.  And I think they should show they are serious about the apology by firing the person responsible.

Cross posted at Jim Miller on Politics.

(Thanks to local blogger "DunnerMeister" for spotting this fish, and to World Net Daily for publicizing it.  Like DunnerMeister, I wonder whether this story will get picked up by the local TV stations or the Seattle newspapers.

The fish isn't the only nasty thing for sale at the Democratic site, as you can see here.  The state Republican site is more positive and less commercial.)

More:  If you want more data on these questions, see this article by Bolce and De Maio.

Posted by Jim Miller at December 11, 2005 02:00 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Yeh and over and over and over HA claims they are not trying to take Christmas out of Christmas.

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ho Ho Ho

Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah, Happy Holidays. Celebrate the Diversity, not the elimination of!

Posted by: GS on December 11, 2005 02:09 PM
2. Is anyone really surprised? That's what the base of the Dem donors and activists love see.
Anti-Christianity is right up there with being anti-war, pro-gay, pro-abortion, anti-Bush, anti-military, anti- anything the libs don't like for the Democrats.

Posted by: MES on December 11, 2005 02:24 PM
3. Jim, I can't believe that you are so naive that you would have to look to the Dems to see this type of bigotry.

Recently John Carlson on his afternoon show commented about the Mainstream Republicans that the group was created to 'oppose the Religious Right'. In my assessment, there is little difference between these so-called Republicans and the Dems on this issue. And considering the fact that these so-called Republicans won't even own up to the fact that they feel the same way about 'fundamentalists' (Religious Right, Evangelicals, etc.) I would say that makes them even more insidious. While on one hand they oppose the group, on the other hand they try to trick these same people into voting with them. I don't consider that good politics, I consider it fiendish and vile.

It's also interesting to note that in the same breath John said that he usually agreed with them. As a long-time listener I have no doubt that he meant that he agrees with them in their fundamental philosophy: oppose the Religious Right.

Posted by: JB on December 11, 2005 02:28 PM
4. JB,

I'm more interested in the fact that you apparently can see no difference between saying "I oppose your political agenda" and "You can burn in Hell."

Posted by: Kirk Parker on December 11, 2005 02:39 PM
5. Bravo for posting this! It was too good not to! What does Howard Dean think of this?

Posted by: Misty on December 11, 2005 02:42 PM
6. ..and can this REALLY be the same party that was wringing its hands wondering how to get 'values voters'to take them seriously? The very same party that one Dem said "The Democrat party is going to take back God!!" ??

Uh--not like this, they won't!

Posted by: Misty on December 11, 2005 02:49 PM
7. Governor Gregoire felons cant be wrong.

Posted by: YO on December 11, 2005 03:13 PM
8. OK--fair is fair--

the next time you want diversity funding, "cultural" speakers (like the lady promoting 'post traumatic slavery syndrome' or whatever at your community college?)--or those school bonds to continue the same messages in K-12?

"GO FISH" as the kid's card game holds...tick enough people off and you get squat! It's not about funding--it's about insulting the majority of taxpayers and their values...get a clue...

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on December 11, 2005 03:21 PM
9. I agree with JB. The so-called "Mainstream" Republicans seem to be most animated by their hostility to Evangelical Christians and their influence on the Republican Party, which is much less than they imagine. Indeed, it seems their very reason for being.

Posted by: jsa on December 11, 2005 03:38 PM
10. Evangelical Christians and their influence on the Republican Party, which is much less than they imagine.

Indeed. After challenging several lefties on another blog to cite examples of the "Theocracy" Bush is supposedly trying to impose, I have come to conclusion that "theocrat" is just the new scare-word for those who oppose unlimited abortion and same-sex marriage. Same as "racist" meaning someone who disagrees with a liberal.

Posted by: V the K on December 11, 2005 03:56 PM
11. Apparently, they've taken down the offending ribbon. Apparently they would prefer to keep their prejudices out of the public eye.

Posted by: Marc on December 11, 2005 04:12 PM
12. This is outragous.....thats all i have to say

Posted by: andre on December 11, 2005 04:25 PM
13. jsa....as usual we can rely on you to make no sense at all.
first you harp about the religious right and that's what the WHOLE republican party is.so when moderate conservatives like myself take the fanatics to task, here you are trying to back peddle and say that the religious far right..."wasn't really that much of a problem...really...after-all"
so which is it?
or, as a far left loonie are you just suffering from the usual political bi-polar disorder so typical of your party?

Posted by: christmasghost on December 11, 2005 04:29 PM
14. The "religious right" term is just another usurping of the language to tar and feather the whole party.

Because conservatives tend to be more a more "churchgoing" group as a whole, because we are more pro life, more traditional, they who are none of these things need to make them into a vulgarity.

Those who are none of these things, through arrongance or fear or whatever, need to make us the extreme to feed their own prejudices and especially their own insecurities.

I say we should pray for them! ;)

Posted by: Cheryl on December 11, 2005 05:10 PM
15. Aren't Catholics Christians? Aren't there quite a few Catholic Democrats? Don't they find this offensive? I do!


Posted by: Peggy U on December 11, 2005 05:48 PM
16. Kirk Parker: you apparently can see no difference between saying "I oppose your political agenda" and "You can burn in Hell."

I can see plenty of difference. But do I need to spell out every detail of a comment so people like you don't read into it? It seems to be a problem in these comments. And just so you don't miss my point, I'll explain it. People here often reinterpret the comments of others and then argue against something that wasn't actually said.

And on the point of 'I oppose your political agenda', you're implying that those I referred to are upstanding and honorable in all that they do, which is hardly the case. They're backhanded, ham-handed double-talkers.

Posted by: JB on December 11, 2005 06:21 PM
17. When did you see that image on the wa-democrats.org/bertha.php site? I don't see it there and I never did, as to republicans being less commercial, they have a donate button on their page and are trying to sell the rossi book on the main page of their website. The bertha.php section of wa-democrats.org is the party store page, not the main page of the party. if it was up, it was definitely taken down by the time I looked, probably because the party disagrees with that image and finds it to be offensive. Without proving that it was up on purpose on the party website, I have a hard time believing your post. More likely just a right-wing hoax.

Posted by: Patrick on December 11, 2005 06:29 PM
18. I think the fish is pointed at folks who display Christian emblems yet have no interest in "the gospel" or the mission of Christ, "spreading good news to the poor." Bad form on the WAdems.

Posted by: Liberal Guy on December 11, 2005 06:44 PM
19. Yes... I saw the image on the wa-democrats / berth site when this was first disclosed several days ago. The images disappeared overnight... apparently they knew they got caught!

Check with any of the several internet cache sites... it's still there

Posted by: Right Wing Wacko on December 11, 2005 06:45 PM
20. Next the Washington Democratic Party will be selling Nativity scenes and Christmas Trees on their Website to make up for this boneheaded move!!!
How do you pi$$ of the vast majority of Washington citizens on Paul Berendt’s bon voyage???!!!
You gotta love these CLOWNS!!

Oh wait……..I forgot.
OWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWCH. OMYGOD!!!!!!! I AM SO OFFENDED!!!
THIS IS LIKE HITLER!!! I DEMAND AN APOLOGY!!!!!
Man, it’s impossible for me to get all scrunched up and offended like the CLOWNS on HorsesA$$….no matter how hard I try!

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on December 11, 2005 07:03 PM
21. If the Party of TOLERANCE and DIVERSITY weren’t so ashamed of this…..why did they take it off when confronted???
Who is running the insane asylum??? Howard Dean?
Just when you start to be a little concerned that the CLOWNS might gain a foothold, THEY SHOOT OFF THEIR F***ING FOOT!!!!

David CLOWNstein claims to be a Holocaust Victim....from PHILLY!!!!!—
How does CLOWNstein feel about the Washington State Democratic Party selling something as hateful and intolerant as this????

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on December 11, 2005 07:07 PM
22. I’m glad the Washington State Democratic Party leadership has finally COME OUT OF THE CLOSET as the intolerant, Christian-hating Party that they are!!!
Keep up the bad work CLOWNS! In one swift move, you've ticked off virtually all Undecided Voters and about 1/2 of your own Party!! The only folks happy about the Christian-hating are the New Age Progressives and the hardcore "I hate EVERYTHING" Atheists.

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on December 11, 2005 07:11 PM
23. I think the fish is pointed at folks who display Christian emblems yet have no interest in "the gospel" or the mission of Christ, "spreading good news to the poor." Bad form on the WAdems.

Yes, very bad form... and incredibly stupid. The problem is is that you have no way of knowing, if it really were aimed merely at Christians in name only. If I saw it while driving down the road, I would take it as what it probably is, at slap at all Christians on any stripe. This is further proof that the Democratics are incrisingly being controlled by the MoveOn.org wing of the party and have lost touch with reality.

Posted by: Mike H on December 11, 2005 08:01 PM
24. I find the fish story and Paul B retiring at the same time very interesting........

Posted by: sgmmac on December 11, 2005 08:41 PM
25. The Dems made a stupid move - so keep the heat on ! The Republican Party needs all the help it can get - but above all, they need to help themselves and sell themselves to the undecideds.

The Moveon.org wing of the Democrat party is more hated than they might realize - but they who preach lies and hatred should get it back in their face. Welcome to the culture war !

Posted by: KS on December 11, 2005 09:00 PM
26. "Fish? What fish? We didn't do it. I mean, we had good cause, if we'd done it, but we didn't do it. Maybe someone we know did it, but it wasn't us. And even if it was us, you still can't prove it, because we covered our tracks really well after we did it. Except that we didn't do it."

Thanks, Patrick! I needed a good laugh, even though I suspect that wasn't your intent.

Have a nice day!

Posted by: TB on December 11, 2005 09:23 PM
27. If we could just take one more count of all who saw it there, I am sure we would be able to determine it was never there afterall.

Call Ron and Dean and just ask them if they saw it there.

If not, it must not have been there...

Damn, some of these people must clean the ears with Q tips and insert them a bit too far....

Posted by: GS on December 11, 2005 09:50 PM
28. JB is right. We need to clean our own house. The midstreamers are just as bigotted at Christians. We keep getting fooled into believing their on our side.

Posted by: Republcan In Exile on December 11, 2005 09:54 PM
29. Typical, and yet they refer to all of us as wingnuts and wackos. Hey we are not the one's dumb enough to sell, publish and say things like the Democrats. There will eventually be a backlash, even in Blue States like WA. There are far more moderates than there are extremists. And there are probably a lot of good, honest, church going Democrats who would be just as offended by this as their Republican counterparts.

To me, these are just more signs of frustration on the left. Frustration is what we emit when we are cornered, on the decline and lacking in hope.

Posted by: Jeff B. on December 11, 2005 10:27 PM
30. PUHLEEZ...save us the pious handwringing about Ds being negative.

Hard to imagine why those who say 9/11 was God's revenge on a nation that tolerates fags, abortion and feminism (as fundamentalist leaders Falwell and Robertson did) might incite a bit of ire from more tolerant folks?

You give disingenuousness a bad name.

Posted by: bartelby on December 11, 2005 10:41 PM
31. as someone of libertarian bent, I think that little fish is pretty accurate.

Posted by: hmoul on December 11, 2005 10:50 PM
32. The magnetic emblem is without context. As such, it does not target any specific Christian group to the exclusion of other Christian groups. Catholic or protestant, liberal Christian, conservative, fundamentalist are all included. It would be no different if it were done with a star of David. It would lump all Jewish groups together, like the Nazis did with a yellow star.

It is simply Anti-Christian hate symbolism which says to any Christian in this state. Do not vote for us, we the Democtatic party of the state of Washington hate and despise you for your religion.

Posted by: TomasM on December 12, 2005 12:27 AM
33. This was actually covered on the Dori Monson Show on either Thursday or Friday. It was removed about a half an hour after Dori called Paul Berendt (off the air - just before the show) for comment.

Posted by: Mikey B on December 12, 2005 06:24 AM
34. If the Hypocrite Fish was not an Anti-Christian symbol, then why did the Washington State Democratic Party take it off of their website?
Inquiring minds would like to know.

Posted by: Dude on December 12, 2005 06:24 AM
35. MikeyB--
Did you actually hear the discussion on the Dori Monson Show??? What did Berendt have to say?
It would be interesting to get a copy of that segment for sure.
It's kind of like Paul Berendt giving a big middle-finger to Christians everywhere on his way out the door!
Typical of these CLOWNS! This is precisely why their agenda will never succeed....the LEFTIST PINHEADS are arrogant and mean!!! And dumb.

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on December 12, 2005 06:28 AM
36. As the originator of all of this hullabaloo, I have to say that I took a double-take when I saw this on the Dems' site. Seeing stuff like this makes me want to go around church parking lots in Seattle with printed copies of their original website and put them on cars that have John Kerry or anti-Bush bumperstickers to show these folks just how hostile their own party is to Christians.

If they are Christians first and Democrats second (just as I'm a Christian first and a conservative second), it should at least give them pause as to how they can associate with people that despise people of faith.

Posted by: DunnerMeister on December 12, 2005 07:28 AM
37. JB,
As usual, in your own "holier than thou" mode I see. You continue to spout Democrat propaganda at every turn. This was a direct attack by WA Democratic party leadership, not an individual's stated opinion, about christians.

For it required the WA Democratic Party's support to design, fund, order and distrubute this symbol. Which shows far more of the Democratic parties true opinions of christian's. Than any commentary on any radio show about them.

Of course I know, JB does not see it this way. After all, he is reality challenged on most issues.

Posted by: Mike P on December 12, 2005 08:18 AM
38. I was informed by a lovely lady last December that it was "those horrible Christians" that got W elected. When I asked if she was referring to those people who bless their meals, read the Bible, and attend church regularly, she nearly choked on her bile.

She was stupid, and stupid can't be fixed. May God have mercy on her/their souls. They clearly "know not what they're doing."

Posted by: Danny on December 12, 2005 08:36 AM
39. I saw this early Friday morning on Orbusmax. It linked to the dunnermeister's page and the dem page. I saw it from both links.

Later, Dori Monson brought it up on his show that he had phoned Paul Berandt and asked about it. According to Dori, Paul said he didn't know about it and would look into it. Shortly after that, it was removed from the dem site and only available from cached pages.

Paul was never on the air that I heard.

I have since seen this news on several more sites, so it is making the rounds. Nothing like advertising.

Posted by: SouthernRoots on December 12, 2005 08:37 AM
40. Amen, DunnerMeister! Thank you for exposing this example of hypocrisy in the Party That Embraces Diversity (TM).

Ain't it ironic?

Posted by: starboardhelm on December 12, 2005 08:40 AM
41. Bartleby, you paint with a very broad brush. The difference between the Republicans and the Democrats is that the Republican base has a much greater tendency to smack down prominent Republicans who say stupid things than do the Democrats, who have more of a tendency to fall silent, cover their tracks, stall, rationalize, project, and deny.

Hypocrite.

Posted by: ERNurse on December 12, 2005 08:56 AM
42. As far as the Democrats apologizing, don't hold your breath. All you'll get is the same old, "Gee we are so sorry that you misunderstood the nuance of our message" crap that characterizes the Democrats' inability to take responsibility for their own actions. Their consciences have been seared, and the only 'right' that they embrace is whatever puts them back in power.

Painting with a broad brush, am I? Nope. I'm pointing out actions that speak for themselves.

Posted by: ERNurse on December 12, 2005 09:05 AM
43. I get a giggle out of the trolls' "do as I say, not as I do" preachiness.

They hold conservatives to a much higher standard of behavior than they hold fellow liberals or themselves, then are scathing when conservatives fail to clear the high bar, but back and fill, cover-up and deflect when one of their own ducks under the low bar they've set for them.

Hypocrites.

Posted by: starboardhelm on December 12, 2005 09:22 AM
44. MikeP: As usual, in your own "holier than thou" mode I see. You continue to spout Democrat propaganda at every turn... Of course I know, JB does not see it this way. After all, he is reality challenged on most issues.

Do you have me confused with someone else? That would be the only way that I could see anyone coming up with something as off-the-wall as this. If you're looking for 'Democrat propaganda' you can find it from the 'Mainstream Republicans' (a misnomer on both counts). They're Democrats in disguise. Wolves in sheeps clothing, if I can borrow an analogy.

So for the moment, I'll assume you're talking about someone else and not return the personal attack.

Posted by: JB on December 12, 2005 11:00 AM
45. I am a born-again Christian and I attend a small Baptist church in Tukwila. My church is smack in the middle of one of the most culturally diverse neighborhoods in the Seattle area.

I am also a very conservative, well-informed voter. I consider individual candidates in each race before I vote and then support the most qualified candidate who also supports my views. Not surprisingly, I almost always vote for Republican candidates.

Living in West Seattle and driving up and down I-5 on my work commute to and from the Boeing Everett site, I see many bumper stickers that have the potential to get me a bit excited. Sometimes I allow them to offend me, but other times I just tell myself, "Grace and mercy", and then I ask God to help me to extend to others the grace and mercy that that he freely extends to me.

Yes, bumper stickers get me riled up sometimes, but then I remember that loving and accepting others, just as they are, is more important.

Merry Christmas, everyone.

Posted by: Gary on December 12, 2005 11:02 AM
46. I have the inside scoop on the next series of religious and cultural emblems to be presented:

Lovely blood red Star of David available with the words Oppressor, Hater or Jude inside.

Lovely yellow ribbons with the phrases "Support Our Baby Killers," "Support Our Contract Killers" or "Support Our Jack Booted Thugs" inside.

More to come.

Posted by: Rickvid on December 12, 2005 03:15 PM
47. I think some people are missing the point. There are hypcrits of everything everywhere. The point here is that the dems were selling this on their WEB site. They were not going after specific Christians, they were OFFICIALLY going after ALL Christians. There are Christian hypocrits on both sides. Their implecation is that the only hypocrits are Rep.

Posted by: bob emerson on December 12, 2005 03:22 PM
48. Precisely bob emerson!!
If the LEFTIST PINHEADED CLOWNS really didn't think this magnet was wrong, why did they take it off of their website???
Why not continue to sell it and defend themselves?
This magnet is available on a website called Northern Sun (see www.northernsun.com)
"Northern Sun Products for Progressives, Independents, Democrats ...T-shirts, bumper stickers, buttons, posters, mugs, flags emblems & more with political, funny, social, spiritual, environmental, etc designs & statements."
My guess is some CLOWN bought them here and the Dems thought is was so cute, they resold it on their website.
I looked at the State Democratic Party PDC and couldn't find any payments to this vendor in a quick look. Maybe it's there though....or they bought them thru someone else???

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on December 12, 2005 04:18 PM
49. Note the "don't blame me" hat comes in white -- They should have the "Give Peace a Chance" hat in white - perfect for waving when one feels the need to surrender....

Posted by: Mark on December 12, 2005 10:12 PM
50. Just finished reading the link to the article from 2002. Fascinating reading. The H-fish makes a lot of sense, given what is becoming historical antipathy towards all of a serious religious bent in American political life.

Posted by: Mark on December 12, 2005 11:25 PM
51. JB,
If you are not how I think you are, than I am truly sorry. But your writing style and continual derision of Republicans, who nothing to do with this topic, remind me of someone I know all to well. Still like him, you failed to address the topic at hand.

This was an organized effort to denigrate "all" christians. This fish symbol required forethought and has malice directed behind it. In fact, if it had a swastika for an eye. The FBI would be investigating "it" as a "hate" crime. All from the party of tolerance. Like I said before, this was not a single persons opinion but a "sanctioned" opinion from the WA Democratic Party leadership.

Do not drag other people into the fray, who have nothing to do with the issue at hand.

Posted by: Mike P on December 13, 2005 12:58 PM
52. The WADem's "H-Fish" needs national attention brought upon it. Anybody able to make that happen?

Posted by: GMT on December 13, 2005 04:06 PM
53. WorldNetDaily wrote this article about it:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47836

and...

It was featured on the Best of the Web (Opinion Journal) yesterday:

http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110007670

Not a bad start on nation-wide coverage. Too bad the local press is totally mum on it.

Posted by: DunnerMeister on December 13, 2005 04:17 PM
54. I am personally offended by the actions of the State Demo. Party. They have taken politics down to a new low and they know it but that seems to be their behavior these days.

I am now thinking how history repeats itself. remember Adolf Hitler in the 1920's and 30's and how their political party was against the Jewish Faith(I am Catholic)? Are we seeing the emergence of another such movement? Remember, History tends to repeat itself unless we learn and act on the past.

Posted by: Rob Matthews on December 13, 2005 06:35 PM
55. I am personally offended by the actions of the State Demo. Party. They have taken politics down to a new low and they know it but that seems to be their behavior these days.

I am now thinking how history repeats itself. remember Adolf Hitler in the 1920's and 30's and how their political party was against the Jewish Faith(I am Catholic)? Are we seeing the emergence of another such movement? Remember, History tends to repeat itself unless we learn and act on the past.

Posted by: Rob Matthews on December 13, 2005 06:35 PM
56. GMT: I think this is a good topic for a call to Rush on Open Line Friday. If you get enough people to call in on this topic, one person is bound to get some airtime. Just a thought...especially in light of an article linked to his site, "Democrats Embracing God".

Posted by: Peggy U on December 15, 2005 09:53 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?