October 06, 2005
Missed ballots

Today's Seattle Times: "Missed ballots raise questions"

King County election workers' discovery that 18 ballots weren't counted in the September primary has set back efforts to restore confidence in the election process and could hurt County Executive Ron Sims in his re-election bid.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at October 06, 2005 07:59 AM | Email This
Comments
1. OMG...The sky is falling!!! Tell me it isn't So!!!

Posted by: Chris on October 6, 2005 08:15 AM
2. Hypocrites to the max yet again, they keep saying "Count EVER Vote" and we continue to see that is just lip service.

Posted by: Ray on October 6, 2005 08:33 AM
3. "I can't believe it," County Councilman David Irons, R-Sammamish, said yesterday. "They are still losing ballots inside the election office — that's the bottom line."

Good for Irons - he accurately nails it, and in a timely fashion as well. Must have really pained the Slimes to have to report it ;'}

Posted by: alphabet soup on October 6, 2005 08:49 AM
4. Gee, what a surprize!!

Posted by: Laurie on October 6, 2005 08:50 AM
5. Why can't the primary be moved a couple of weeks earlier?

Has anyone visited property information on the county website? It has all addresses and owner's names.

Why can't this be one of the first crosschecks when registering? First, if there is no address, then send the suckers a letter telling them so; if nothing comes back, trashcan it. People need to be responsible. Frankly, irresponsible people's vote shouldn't be counted. Sorry, Democrats.

So, in summary of item 1 on my list of easy things to do is to tie the registration and voting records into the auditor's recorded documents (yes, deaths get there, too) With the speed of search engines today, it is not like the punch cards we used to have done for the Fortran computers. It ain't rocket science folks!!

And the old saying, "close enough for government" doesn't apply here, either.

Posted by: swatter on October 6, 2005 08:58 AM
6. Amazing isn't it when even the Seattle Times prints a story on the corruption in the local elections office. Maybe the end is near.

Posted by: JustSumGuy on October 6, 2005 09:03 AM
7. Nothing has changed.
Nothing will change.

Sims has his lapdog running KCE.

The MSM is to late, to syncophantic, to STUPID to care much about election reform. (Unless republicans are getting elected then It would have been page 1 above the fold every day for the last year).

Sims is a shoe for Nov.
Sims 80% Irons 60%.

Posted by: JCM on October 6, 2005 09:15 AM
8. The spokesperson...Bobbie Egan, I think...was quoted as saying this shows the need for a new, unified facility.

Posted by: South County on October 6, 2005 09:49 AM
9. "First, if there is no address, then send the suckers a letter telling them so...."

Ummmm...I think I see a problem here.

My personal favorite never-gonna-happen reform is the end of permanent absentee status (except for military personnel). The ballots that get lost are not those cast at poll sites.

Instead, we're going to get all-mail voting in every county, because our elected officials don't care about the integrity of our elections.

Posted by: ScottM on October 6, 2005 10:07 AM
10. Maybe everyone should start writing these reporters and ask them why they only quote King County insiders?

The 3 quoted people in the article have no credibility. Irons is running against Sims, so anything he says is biased. Obviously Sims' opinion is worthless, as is the opinion of his hand-picked "protect Ron" committee chairman.

There is only one expert on the county's election system without a personal stake, and that is Sharkansky. Local papers should know by now the if they want an expert view on the continuing elections debacle, they should contact Stefan - every time!

Let the reporters and their editors know that interviewing the guilty, defenders of the guilty, or the political opponents of the guilty adds nothing to the story. Tell them to talk to Sharkansky and report an outsider's expert opinion and the significance of these continuing discoveries.

Posted by: Mike on October 6, 2005 10:32 AM
11. "It's certainly an area we need to take seriously and we need to put safeguards in place to make sure that doesn't happen again. At the same time I think it's still a sign of improvement in terms that it was identified up front and it was brought to the canvassing board," said King County Elections Supervisor Dean Logan.

Putting this statement through the disgronifier:

"It's certainly unfortunate we got caught (again) we need to take seriously and we need to put safeguards in place to make sure that doesn't happen again. At the same time I think it's still a sign of improvement in that we only got caught on these 18 ballots and it was identified up front and it was brought to the canvassing board. Going forward we will insure we don't get caught and Ron's re-election is guaranteed. We consider this as a practice run for '08 and Gregoire's re-election."

Posted by: JCM on October 6, 2005 10:47 AM
12. Mike, your suggestion is awesome! But somehow I can't see these two papers going to their competition to get a story - given that blogs ARE cometition. Besides, its harder to control the facts if you get someone knowledgable and can and will speakout when they twist them. Not good for what ever reputation they have left - pun intended.

Posted by: fred on October 6, 2005 10:48 AM
13. Mike,

That might have worked once upon a time. When papers were actually interested in news.

The Seattle papers have chosen sides in the political debate. The filter everything based on the that point of view.

If the papers were really concerned about clean valid election process. They would have done the work Shark is doing, they would have sued under Freedom of Information. Each and every revelation would have been a front page story. Because KCE is actively assaulting our franchise.

But they don't. That alone speaks volumes about the integrity or lack thereof of the Seattle papers.

The Least Intelligence and the Seattle Slimes are Partisan Hack Shills for the Democrat party in King Co.

Posted by: JCM on October 6, 2005 10:59 AM
14. As a tip of the hat to the late great Nelson:

Y A W N !!!

Posted by: Danny on October 6, 2005 11:00 AM
15. If the Times would read this blog, they'd find out there's a lot more problems than they ever knew. How about, for instance, that mail ballot Stefan recently showed us where the signed name is completely different from the name machine-printed on the ballot!

Posted by: MIchele on October 6, 2005 11:18 AM
16. Scott, exactly. I am not so trusting of those records either. Send the letter out to the "apparent" (how is that for Democrat talk) false address ....... That way, a potentially valid address won't cause problems.

If the records are perfect, then, of course, you don't get a response.

Posted by: swatter on October 6, 2005 11:26 AM
17. Michele - my guess is they do read it. It is easier to create a defense (make up a fact) when you know what is coming. They probably go to KCE and ask them is this true? KCE says no. The end of the investigation. Time to slander the "Christian right wing fanatics" again - make up another piece and print that - skipping the results of their indepth reporting and what initiated it.

Posted by: fred on October 6, 2005 11:28 AM
18. If nothing changes, nothing changes.

Posted by: Tim on October 6, 2005 11:33 AM
19. Wait, wait ... lets not get carried away here. After all Simms own spin master was quoted as saying "Every indication is that we are light years ahead of where we were a year ago in terms of the performance of our elections department,"

Lets see - 18 screwed up ballots (that we know of so far) is "light years ahead of where we were a year ago" - isn't that the first time a Simms spokesman has admitted just how badly the election results were a year ago. He even said that 18 was light years better.

Gotta get out my calculator - we may have just gotten a definitive answer on just how many screwed up ballots King County knew there were last year!

Posted by: Jay on October 6, 2005 11:41 AM
20. For what it's worth, I've worked with a lot of reporters over the years, and most of the lower level grunts are good people simply doing what their editors want or expect. When you write them and challenge some of their assertions, or "omissions", you will get a sense of their frustration if they respond to you. They will also understand that pleasing their editors carries a personal consequence to their credibility, and maybe it's worth it to fight a little harder to present a more balanced and factual story.

I've had reporters admit some pretty interesting things to me, and in many cases, some didn't stay around long with their papers, possibly because one day they woke up and couldn't keep spinning the news to their editor's satisfaction.

Let them know what you think. I suspect it will have a greater impact than you think, and a lot better chance of making a difference than talking to their editors, who for the most part have developed the thicker skin and probably been promoted to their positions because of their biases.

Posted by: Mike on October 6, 2005 11:42 AM
21. JCM,
Agree with you 100%. local papers here are a joke. In an email about 6 months ago I challenged our local political reporters to do the kind of ivestigation that Stefan was doing.

I believe that none of them have the balls or the ambition to do what it really takes. Most of them are extremely lazy. They get a whiff of a story they call about two local officials (usually the ones responsible for the screw up) for comment and throw them a couple softball questions and then pump out a puff piece article. Second they are all affraid of offending a local politician because they are too affraid of losing their access to the official's well spun quotes.

On occasion Ervin shows promise but the rest of them do almost no investigative journalism. They suffer from the Mary Mapes syndrome of journalism: Call who you want to believe and ignore the rest!

Posted by: Joe on October 6, 2005 11:45 AM
22. Do 18 missed ballots, in the very light voter turnout of the primary, represent a greater fraction of the total count than the piles of botched ballots in the 2004 general election in King County?

Posted by: Hank Bradley on October 6, 2005 11:51 AM
23. There are light years and then, there are lite years. I doubt Sims has any idea about what a light year is. He must be referring to lite years!

Posted by: Fed Up on October 6, 2005 11:56 AM
24. "I believe that none of them have the balls or the ambition to do what it really takes. Most of them are extremely lazy. They get a whiff of a story they call about two local officials (usually the ones responsible for the screw up) for comment and throw them a couple softball questions and then pump out a puff piece article. Second they are all affraid of offending a local politician because they are too affraid of losing their access to the official's well spun quotes."

There is a very simple explanation as to why the local media will not investigate this corruption. It is this: with the corruption and fraud that is in place now, the candidates the media support "win". For example, the fraud and corruption got Fraudoire into the Governor's Mansion. Fraudoire is the media's candidate, so they are happy with the result. Why should they do anything that might change that?

The only way the media will investigate is if a Republican is suspected of benefitting from fraud. As soon as Republicans start winning important offices (unlikely in WA state) and fraud is suspected, then you'll see investigations by the media and calls for reform by the corrupt 'Rats in Olympia.

Posted by: Interested Observer on October 6, 2005 11:59 AM
25. Hank,

Ordinarily I would say 18 ballots would be an acceptable error rate, and that the election department should look into how and what happened, and issue a corrective action.

Given the history of KCE. That by all reasonable standards Logan is 11 months over due on his termination. Sims' handpicked commission, bogus audit etc... That no one absolutely no one in KCE is honest or smart enough to recognize that a KCE counted vote cannot be trusted. Topped off with all the empty platitudes from Sims, Logan et. al. and the brain dead press, then...

ONE error by this crowd is to many.

Until KCE is top to bottom revamped, seriously election reform instituted, I would not trust them to count anything, let alone my vote.

18 ballots means nothing has changed.

Posted by: JCM on October 6, 2005 12:06 PM
26. Interested Observer and ALL,

Beth Kaiman, bkaiman@seattletimes.com, is Keith Ervin's editor. Write her and make your objections to her. Why only Sims, his appointed enabler and his political opposition quoted in the story? Tell her you think the article stinks and ask her who was responsible. Because as the editor, she is responsible!

We all are preaching to the choir on these pages. Everyone should take their comments and let these reporters and editors know what you think.

Posted by: Mike on October 6, 2005 12:11 PM
27. Mike, I have done that, as others likely have, but, like I said, why should they change when it is THEIR candidates who are getting into office via fraud? They will only work to change things if they suspect THEIR candidates are losing races because of fraud. These people live by outcome-based ethics. They don't care about ensuring an honest process, just that their candidates get into office by hook or by crook (mainly the latter).

I am more and more convinced that "unconventional" solutions are the only thing that are going to fix an elections system as corrupt, dirty, and broken-down as the WA state system has become. The governor's race last fall, with it's blatant, in-your-face fraud/theft, coupled with the idiot brainless assclown Bridges' admonition that it's our fault, we are the ones who have to use the corrupt, broken system to fix it, and helpless, brainless Sam Reed standing by wringing his hands saying he can't do anything about the fraud, and these sham "Commissions" and "Audits" running around with their hands over their eyes and ears saying "Fraud? What fraud? I don't see any fraud. (But I'm not looking for any, either.)", is just too much to take.

Posted by: Interested Observer on October 6, 2005 12:42 PM
28. One thing that The Seattle Times caught that nobody else seems to have done:

---

County Council Vice Chairman Pete von Reichbauer said it was unacceptable that County Council members learned of the uncounted ballots from news stories rather than from Sims or Logan.

"I hope we don't get to the stage where we have to bring in outside observers to our election like a Third World Country," von Reichbauer said.

---

Yeah, today's paper - yesterday's news.

FIRE DEAN LOGAN. DO IT NOW.

Posted by: David Irons Supporter on October 6, 2005 12:45 PM
29. Oops, that was the Reagan Dunn version :-(.

I guess campaign HQ will have to make one for my man.

Posted by: David Irons Supporter on October 6, 2005 12:46 PM
30. Jay - good call!

How many (missing) ballots are there in a light year?

(turn county upside down for answer)

Posted by: alphabet soup on October 6, 2005 01:06 PM
31. Actually Keith is one of the better reporters who have covered the election fiasco messes. He also answers his emails. His address is at the bottom of the article and I have emailed him several times in the past and he always answers.

Since they did a selective recount, I would like to know how many other uncounted ballots are out there??????????

What is the error % rate?

Thanks

Posted by: sgmmac on October 6, 2005 01:21 PM
32. Horse-butt is still going on about this.

Sure, there were errors in other counties - but gee whiz how come is King County Elections still finding ballots?

Why did the King County Council find out about the "found" ballots via the press than via Executive Sims' office (that includes Logan)?

Gee whiz, I think an Executive David Irons would have simply flown his proverbial B-52H right over their heads and fired some people. Oh well, this is the death knell for the Sims campaign - provided we get a good spread in a month's time. Shouldn't be hard.

So please join me in contributing at least 5% of your next paycheck for democracy to David Irons HERE. Might be a worthy goal if everybody in King County & Washington State who had enough of this gave 5% of their next paycheck to the Irons campaign for their ad-buys. Just a thought :-).

Posted by: David Irons Supporter on October 6, 2005 02:21 PM
33. According to the King County website announcement, they said that the recount sample was 18,761 ballots from 160 precincts. If we have 18 uncounted ballots in a sample of 18,761 ballots, that is an accuracy rate of counting ballots of 99.90% (one error per thousand). This is significantly worse than Sims claimed level of accuracy of 99.98% and ironically close to the error rate in last fall’s governors election in King County. If you extrapolate this rate county wide, it would estimate 288 uncounted ballots in the primary.

I am concerned that by pointing this out in a public forum I my not be demonstrating “good home training”. Oh well, some times honesty and democracy are more important, right? I am 100% sure it is time for a change in King County Government.

Posted by: Mark on October 6, 2005 02:43 PM
34. In order to avoid the mess associated with the last governors race, the error rate must drop to less than 1 per 100,000 or, another way of putting it, five nines accuracy. The system is delivering less than four nines accuracy. The election pundits say it can't be done, but it is done all the time in the financial world and other places. Would you put your money in a bank with less than a four nines accountability rate? I don't think so!

Posted by: Fed Up on October 6, 2005 03:35 PM
35. KCE is in a no win situation.

Errors indicate that nothing has changed.
No errors no one would believe it.

The only way is a complete restructuring of KCE and the election system.

Posted by: JCM on October 6, 2005 03:39 PM
36. David Irons Supporter:


The first thing David needs to do is
setup some meetings with residences on
the south side of the county.He needs to
do some damage repair because in order for
him to have any chance of winning he needs
the support of those people.


They are upset about what happened in the
district 9 council race.Since Reagan Dunn
doesn't give a hoot about those people.David
has to do this.because its very likely that
a lot of those people will sit out the
general election if he doesn't.

Posted by: phil spackman on October 6, 2005 03:43 PM
37. Wow!

Ron Sims is truly toast now! There is absolutely NO WAY he will be able to recover from this latest election snafu before November.....

Even his most supporting poll numbers showed Sims neck and neck with Irons BEFORE these ballots were reported.....He can only go down from here...

May I be the first to welcome King County Executive, David Irons, to his position!

Posted by: Deborah on October 6, 2005 04:17 PM
38. Posted by: phil spackman on October 6, 2005 03:43 PM

Sad to see you care more about then than now. That said, good point - my man needs to be on TV. Please join my 5% of your paycheck to the Irons campaign idea :-).

Posted by: Deborah on October 6, 2005 04:17 PM

And please make me the second. An Executive Irons will fire Dean Logan and install the turnaround team.

Posted by: David Irons Supporter on October 6, 2005 04:33 PM
39. Have you read THIS from our Supreme Allied Commander, King County David Irons:
- - - - -
David Irons, candidate for King County Executive, responded today about the 18 ballot mistake discovered in Tuesday’s recount of 10, randomly selected precincts, on King County sheriff’s primary. “It’s obvious that the Elections Department has made very little progress since the 2004 debacle. Even if it was a one ballot error it would be unacceptable – but 18? If this random sample shows 18 uncounted ballots, what would a recount of the entire county look like?”

Irons went on to say, “In my plan for King County I’ve called for a County Auditor . Our county is the only county in the state that does not have one. We are long overdue for this.”

Encouraged by the daily momentum building in his own campaign to become the next King County Executive, Irons went on to state, “These election mistakes have all been made on Ron Sims’ watch. This isn’t a Republican or Democrat issue. Clean elections should be important to all of us in King County .”

Area-wide polls show David Irons gaining steadily in voter favorability with the countdown to the General election just 34 days from now. Irons’ total fund-raising has topped $375,000 this week, with $65,000 coming into his coffers since the Primary. Irons, who currently represents County Council District 12, said that his goal between now and the General election on November 8 is to meet as many county residents as possible with his message of the changes and improvements he’ll make as King County Executive. These plans include improving present transportation to relieve road congestion by adding some new lanes to highways, restoring effective leadership and trust to the Executive seat, making major changes in the elections department and restoring efficiency and accountability to county government.

Irons’ positions on issues of importance to King County residents can be found on the David Irons for County Executive website: www.davidirons.org.
- - - - -
Battle Hymn of the Republic, anybody?

Remember - 5% of your next paycheck for David Irons and we will send back to h-e-double-l Ron Sims, Dean Logan and Bill Hunnekins. Call this a V for Victory Bond!

V FOR VICTORY!

Posted by: David Irons Supporter on October 6, 2005 04:39 PM
40. I see a close race with Sims winning due to strong support from -

Non-citizens
Non-residents
Dead people
Double voters

and David Irons having weaker than expected support from

Absentee voters

Posted by: PW on October 6, 2005 04:55 PM
41. This is one example of why I moved out of King County 3 years ago. It outrageous how they do business. K.C. stole the election from Rossi, they steal the taxpayers money and people are such saps they keep electing the idiots. When are the you going to wake up and do something about this? Get involved and start making a difference.

Posted by: Dave on October 6, 2005 07:52 PM
42. Dave:

your right they do need to wake up.
The biggest problem is the king gop
leadership they are to busy trying
to silence there own to even realize
what's happening.


The king gop leadership has had a
divide and conquer mentality for to
long.Until this changes nothing will
get better.


Deborah and david irons supporter you can laugh
and make jokes all you want about I said.
However it doesn't make what I said any less
true.David Irons needs to mend some fences
on the south side.Ignoring those people could
be fatal to his campaign.

Posted by: phil spackman on October 6, 2005 08:45 PM
43. "Deborah and david irons supporter you can laugh and make jokes all you want about I said."


Phil?

I didn't comment at all on your post. Why are you including me here?

Posted by: Deborah on October 6, 2005 10:59 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?