August 15, 2005
COW blogging

The King County Council Committe-Of-the-Whole is now having its elections briefing. Watch on KCTV.

Meeting is now adjourned. Some running commentary in the extended entry...

First up is Cheryl Scott, the Democratic bigwig donor who was the handpicked chairwoman of Ron Sims' personal task force on whitewashing the elections disaster.
Scott: biggest problem in elections office is culture.[I wonder whose fault that is]. Bring in a turnaround team! [Indeed, bring in a turnaround team]

Scott: "in order to fix the culture, we need all-mail voting!" [what the hell does that have to do with the broken culture? This woman is an idiot]

Kathy Lambert: how can we intervene when the employees aren't doing what they're supposed to be doing?
Scott: something has to change in a fundamental way. [Yes, it does]. We bring in a turnaround team! We have to hold the Executive accountable!
Lambert: we have held the Executive accountable. Nothing's changed.
Scott: We bring in a turnaround team! [Give this idiot the gong]

Jane Hague: you recommend all-mail ballots. But most of the problems were in mail ballots. Why should this increase confidence?
Scott: "We have to solve those problems" [Idiot Scott won't be bothered to understand what those problems are, let alone what is involved in solving them]

Comrade Phillips: goal is to get "every vote to count". [but not apparently, to prevent illegal votes from being counted]

Cheryl Scott has fortunately left the stage. Next up is County Auditor Cheryle Broom. This woman is in desperate need of a haircut.

Ron Sims' chief-of-staff Kurt Triplett is now on. Promises a reappearance next week with Dean Logan to explain everything they're doing to improve elections. Today --- highlights!
* Sent two pieces of legislation to council
-- appropriations for more elections staff
-- adopt state legislative agenda.

David Irons: [I summarize] "So you're not going to adopt the task force's recommendation and vest authority in the turnaround team instead of Dean Logan?"
Triplett: [I paraphrase] "Correct. Dean Logan is still the Man"
Triplett: "We all know the technology of 2003 couldn't handle the 2004 presidential election. That's why we had to change the technology" [yes, but the fabulous new technology couldn't handle the 2004 election either!]

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at August 15, 2005 10:38 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Translation:

In order to fix the election, without getting caught next time we need all mail voting.

Posted by: JCM on August 15, 2005 10:59 AM
2. Tell us what you really think, Stefan.

But I agree 150%.

Posted by: swatter on August 15, 2005 11:15 AM
3. We have held the executive accountable.

WTF!!!!????? Where does she live, not King Co. Off the cuff diagnosis, Lambert is delusional, I recommend a room and board at Western States for a while.

Reasonable question from Hague. A reasonable intelligent respond would be, "We have to fix the problems before we even think of all mail balloting." Another sign control of the election process is the paramount consideration, not a clean, accurate, fair, open election process.

Scott should be fired for being stupid if nothing else.

Posted by: JCM on August 15, 2005 11:25 AM
4. JCM,
If we fired people at King County for being stupid, that would leave us with less than a quorum for these insidious County Council meetings...

And that's just for starters.

Why is taxpayer $$$$$ being spent for this pap? Why are they gumming up the airwaves with this???? couldn't they be showing reruns of Mr. Rogers or Sesame Street or something else worthwhile????

Posted by: SnoCo Voter on August 15, 2005 11:28 AM
5. In fairness to Councilmember Lambert, I think that what she was saying was that there have been problems in the past, that Sims has been identified as the elected official responsible for the agency, and thus responsible for correcting the problems, that Sims has said that he will correct the problems, and that Sims has clearly failed in doing so.

Indeed, all Sims seems to have done is bully elections workers who have dared to speak publicly about solutions to the problems.

Lambert seemed to me to be expressing skepticism that Sims has the competency to corrent the problems. Basically she was saying, "We've already given Sims several chances -- why should we give him another one?"

Posted by: Observer on August 15, 2005 11:47 AM
6. Kurt Triplett AKA the spinmister!

Posted by: Joe on August 15, 2005 12:09 PM
7. Interesting comments from Lambert about the 14 renforcements being "recycled" employees from other departments.

Excluding Jim Buck's name cited in a Seattle Times article has anyone seen a list of these employees pulled from other departments yet?

Posted by: Joe on August 15, 2005 12:17 PM
8. I missed the meeting, but I also know that I didn't really miss anything. This is just more of the facade of concern and reform, but things will only get worse now that they've learned what works and what needs to be covered up better.

When I tuned into King County TV, though, after watching several county-funded commercials on environment, chat rooms and other public service stuff, now there is some cultural artistic program on that began with some blond doing some drug-induced dance called art in some Seattle back-alley with a bunch of homeless bumbs watching and applauding. It raises a question for me that is outside this thread but I think worthy of some investigation.

If we have to vote on Medic One, parks, and other programs that everyone generally would support as part of government's role, where in the hell does King County fund the production and airing of this liberal culture crap on King County TV, including the implied endorsement of what is presented as King County TV?

Medic One or liberal programming, including interviews with budding artists in Seattle? The answer is pretty obvious.

Posted by: Mike on August 15, 2005 12:51 PM
9. What amazes me is that they keep talking about how they couldn't handle the load of the 2004 election and need more bodies for this years election. Why? We will have a fraction of the turnout for this off year election. This is the least load they should ever see, not an election with 80+% turnout.

What this shows us is that the current leadership and management at King County is incapable of dealing with this, or any other major, issue. They don't even know what the problem is and a year later they have done nothing that will do anything to make things better. It's all smoke and mirrors.

Thankfully the Republican Caucus is asking some tough questions but without control they can do little but make them squirm.

Posted by: Steven Pyeatt on August 15, 2005 12:52 PM
10. SnoCo, I think when to update the saying;

Those who can do, those who can't teach.

To include; those who can do neither get elected.

Posted by: JCM on August 15, 2005 01:41 PM
11. Solution, purple thumbs! Cheap, low tech and it works.

Posted by: Fed UP on August 15, 2005 01:56 PM
12. If we have to vote on Medic One, parks, and other programs that everyone generally would support as part of government's role, where in the hell does King County fund the production and airing of this liberal culture crap on King County TV, including the implied endorsement of what is presented as King County TV?

I suspect there's a line item somewhere labeled "public outreach" or "education."

Posted by: South County on August 15, 2005 01:58 PM
13. Interesting to see that Dean Logan is still the "go to man." Does he have something on Sims we don't know about that is giving him job security as long as Sims is County Executive? If Sims made Gov I wonder what role Logan would be playing, er, I mean what job would he get.

Posted by: Shannon C on August 15, 2005 03:13 PM
14. Has anyone figured out Iron's position on I-912? Rumor has it he's been telling buisness interest that he's against it.

Posted by: The Dude on August 15, 2005 04:42 PM
15. I watched the entire council meeting......It was painful...

Scott is indeed an idiot! Her body language was so revealing of her deception - that my 7 year old asked what was wrong with her?! She evaded the most important questions from council members...like :
* When she and her task force identified the KC Executive (Ron Sims) as the main election problem - Why did they seemed very comfortable giving the executive (Ron Sims) ultimate authority over the turnaround team? When asked about this, Scott started her spin on how private sector turnaround teams report to the CEO ..blah blah.blah..
*And when questioned about the possibility of the turnaround team reporting instead to the County council - she poo-pooed the idea of the team reporting to even the smallest number of council members! She could not allow the control of the elections to be taken out of Sims hands - even when she identified him as the problem! ....DUH!
*Then there was the revelation that All Mail Ballots actually *increased* the election problems! Scott simply did not want to deal with that fact....It didn't fit into her 'Sims approved' script!

I thought all Republican council members did a good job questioning the many absurdities of Scott and her task force recommendations!

Ms. Broom, the auditor?, had the most distracting hairstyle! It was as though she were trying to hide inside of her thick black locks! I don't recall a thing she said! I just kept hoping she would put her hair behind her ears.....

Triplett was the most ridiculous of all at the meeting today! My God! He was gleefully addressing the council - assuring them that heads were gonna roll next week when Sims makes some big announcement of election staff action! Woooooh! I can feel the shaking.....NOT! Ron Sims has probably identified a few right-leaning employees - who's employment he will slaughter as sacrificial lambs! Then - like the smoking man on the X files - Sims will claim these poor employees are responsible for every problem and questionable practice that has plagued the KC elections since the early 1990's!!

Oh yeah Ron......like anything you offer at this point will fly with the citizens.....Hah!

I have to admit...Scott and Triplett are actually becoming *Transparent* in their deception! So - I guess *transparancy* is coming to the elections one way or the other!

Posted by: Deborah on August 15, 2005 07:59 PM
16. Here is a report on voter fraud: Seattle is ranked #3 on the list of fraudulent voting activities. Why did the Task Force keep saying it was all due to "good faith" mistakes?

Posted by: madmartagan on August 16, 2005 08:31 AM
17. Here is a report on voter fraud: Seattle is ranked #3 on the list of fraudulent voting activities. Why did the Task Force keep saying it was all due to "good faith" mistakes? http://www.ac4vr.com/reports/072005/default.html

Posted by: madmartagan on August 16, 2005 08:32 AM
18. No end to the Banana Republic in sight.

And, no end to our opportunities to watch a room full of idiots in action.

Posted by: BananaLand (aka Iguana) on August 16, 2005 04:56 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?