Strategic Visions has released its latest statewide poll. Among the more interesting, but not entirely surprising findings:
1. On Christine Gregoire's job performance: 36% Approve, 56% Disapprove
2. In a hypothetical rematch for governor in 2008: Gregoire 39%, Dino Rossi 55%
3. "Are you confident that Washington has overcome the problems that hindered the 2004 Election and that there will be no problems with the 2006 Election"? Yes 11%, No 73% [Sam Reed, call your office]
Some might say that Strategic Visions is a Republican pollster, but not all of this poll is consistent with the Republican party line. The President's approval rating is 43% Approve, 49% Disapprove.
Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at August 11, 2005 11:11 AM | Email ThisRemember, last spring she took office and immediately declared a water disaster was in the making. She had everyone up and scared about 'for sure' water shortages. Then, we had a wet spring and early summer. Did that change things? Whatever, she is not the Great Communicator. She should be ashamed of herself for not letting us know what is happening.
As far as I know, the water utilities have not demanded rationing like they would have during a real shortage.
The fish people aren't complaining real loud. What's happening?
Obviously (and this is my tie-in to the poll), nothing.
Posted by: swatter on August 11, 2005 11:35 AMGeeeeez.
BTW, it was great in Idaho. Got 5 cartons of ciggies for some friends and bought all the gas I could stuff in the tank...and made darn sure to fill 'er up in Oregon before I crossed the River of No Return (aka Columbia) on my journey home.
Posted by: SnoCo Voter on August 11, 2005 11:53 AMAt the time, she was relying on her "just give me six months" plan hoping to gain gradual acceptance. But as this recent poll underscores, the people have not forgotten nor forgiven her.
Speaking of the KC Exec race....anyone know the current Irons v. Sims numbers?
Posted by: Darth Dogbert on August 11, 2005 12:50 PM
In regards to the sims-irons race
it is a virtual dead heat.Which
is good sign however I believe Irons
would be out in front if he actually took
a position on the hammond-dunn race.
He has infuriated alot of those on the
south side because he endorsed both hammond
and dunn.If irons doesnt change this behavior
I strongly believe this will hurt him in
the general election.
Should dunn go on to win in the primary
and I am not saying irons should endorse
steve hammond.But because he's not willing
to step up and make a decision in this race
The people on the south side will in all likelhood sit out
the general election.Should this happen
david irons will probably lose.
The last poll taken has David and King Ron in a dead heat. David is gaining momentum and Sims is continuing to slide.
It's not good when the Governor-Pretend is even loathed by state workers...even if the #'s even out for her, the ghost of 2004 will be back come the 2008 primaries...
Any word on Gov. Rossi running for Re-Election?
Posted by: flexnfx on August 11, 2005 01:34 PM"The last poll taken has David and King Ron in a dead heat. David is gaining momentum and Sims is continuing to slide. "
Does anyone have the percent margin required for an Irons victory based on Sims and his election thugs participatory distributed voter fraud activities? I imagine David's poll numbers are going to have to be about 90% Irons to 10% Sims to pull it off.
Posted by: Jeffro on August 11, 2005 01:51 PMThe question is, when will a non biased poll, especially a local poll like Elway, give us real numbers.
And, even if you are happy with these numbers, the right track numbers for the state are doing very well, especially given all of the supposed anger the GOP talks up. I think the honest people here would admit that Govenor Gregoire must be doing pretty well to being pulling in such strong right track numbers. Bush would give up body parts for them. Add in the 5-8% bias of a SV poll, and both Cantwell and Gregoire should see this as a positive.
Posted by: JDB on August 11, 2005 02:12 PMBush, click, Bush, click, Bush, click, Bush, click, Bush, click, Bush, click, Bush........
You can't post anything without some lefty bringing up GW. Gets old.
Posted by: Jeffro on August 11, 2005 02:30 PMMatch elected officials' ACTIONS to the fluff they say. Keep a record if you have to. Like a car salesman, who cares about the puffery talk--you will know very soon when you actually drive it off the lot and it blows blue smoke!
Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on August 11, 2005 03:21 PMTrue, there are such things as "Republican" pollsters and "Democratic" pollsters. But firms of either type don't magically generate phone numbers for Republican leaning voters or Democratic leaning voters.
The "party affiliation" of a firm has to deal with what types of questions they ask.
Take the Rossi vs. Gregoire race. Firms of all types will ask blind questions in the beginning, such as gender, party affiliation, etc. Then the poll will ask which candidate they would vote for if the race were held today. The results from those questions for every polling firm should be quite precise. Later, the poll will read certain facts/opinions/etc. about each candidate, in a way testing campaign messages, and gauge if it swung voters in any way.
So SV may be a Republican polling firm in that at the end of their polls, they ask "loaded" questions tilted towards the GOP candidate looking for any reaction.
I don't have SV's exact poll on me, and I'm too lazy to look for it (polling numbers 2 years out don't mean much to me), but I would guess the 55% Rossi got was after the poll introduced positive information about Rossi and/or negative information about Gregoire. This in no way guarantees victory, but it shows if Rossi plays his cards right, he could get about 55% of the vote right now.
Posted by: ARS on August 11, 2005 03:24 PMBefore anyone one jumps down my throat, note I said POLITICAL POLL. Things that don't really matter such as restaurants, movies, etc. go ahead and follow the crowd, who cares.
Posted by: Jeffro on August 11, 2005 03:37 PMi NEVER followed them--even from my first (young idealist) vote; i just distrusted someone 'feeding' me something too easily; to be honest, though, i did believe the newspapers when young for some time, thinking--as i'm sure my parents did--that it was mostly true, complete, having integrity and not TOO biased; an old h.s. teacher told me once: "...always ask WHO is telling you, WHY they would and WHAT is MISSING from their story!" i got wiser; now, i look for what is NOT stated nor covered in the news--why is it not 'newsworthy'? healthy skepticism I guess;
Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on August 11, 2005 07:00 PM
Agree and understand the purpose of polls. My problem is, they have become the bellweather for too many of our leaders. Leading by consensis will be the deconstruction of our great republic. Nor is that leading.
Jimmie-
Damn, probably not the same instructor- I had a teacher by the name of Morriou. He was tough as nails, taught U.S. History, made us question everything - even his class text books - his reward, they put him in an administrative position so as not to warp the minds of his students. He wrote me a year later informing me that he quit and had become a gentleman farmer on one of the San Juans with his wife and kids. Didn't know his political leanings,but I always admired his thoughtfulness.
Posted by: Jeffro on August 11, 2005 08:33 PMAlthough I don't agree with GW 100%, he does appear, especially this term, to not give a hair about polls. I imagine that any political leadership roll can be intoxicating and there would be a tendency to want praise and adolation - but the best interest of the whole must always prevail. As exemplified by our brave millitary in the mideast. My fiance's cousin being one of them. May God keep him safe.
Posted by: Jeffro on August 11, 2005 09:16 PMStrategic Vision Poll, August 10, 2005
http://soundpolitics.com/SV_WAAugust.pdf
Interesting how moderate Republicans are in this state. 55% of them support moderate candidates (Guiliani, McCain, Pataki, Romney, Hagel), 21% support conservative candidates (Frist, Gingrich, Santorum, Allen), and 24% are undecided.
Posted by: Richard Pope on August 11, 2005 10:44 PMToo bad the media are trying to bury these facts by refusing to mention them.
Posted by: Michele on August 12, 2005 02:35 AMSounds like the 'emergency' for the gas tax increase. We do need the money and if we don't eventually don't get the money it will be an emergency. So, let's just call it an emergency now.
Wow!!!
Posted by: swatter on August 12, 2005 08:10 AMPrayers for your fiancee's cousin in the military; actually MORE for your fiancee--(ha-ha just kidding); best to you both on the happy event; tip a beer with you any day;
Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on August 12, 2005 11:55 AMJust like our soldiers' good actions anywhere. Just like the good cops or firemen or politicians who silently do their job well without any fanfare. Too bad, but car wrecks turn heads. Normal lives don't. How can we change that? Just human nature? We need to get more positive in this great country. There are a lot of pit-hole countries out there. I've seen some.
Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on August 12, 2005 01:32 PMDitto to both of ya. Guess we're all just preaching to the choir since JDB bugged out.
Totally off topic-
When ever somebody mentions beer, I start to shake. It would be a good time to round up a bunch of willing SP posters and put a few pints away. Imagine how loud and obnoxious the talk would get in short order. Especially if Jimmie shows up (just kidding).
We all should organize something.
Posted by: Jeffro on August 12, 2005 03:25 PMi'd prefer right in the den of the lion--next to a tent city or in Freakmont; geez--i can just see my first arrest for disorderly conduct; nah--my backyard would be better; by invite only; entrance password is the Pledge to the Flag--anyone not saying "under God" will be tossed--like the dogs identifying the robots in Terminator;
Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on August 12, 2005 09:27 PM