August 05, 2005
A handy way to restore confidence

I e-mailed Nick Handy earlier to thank him for promptly sending the information that nailed the case that King County failed to mail all of the required overseas and military ballots on time and also misrepresented the facts:

It looks pretty clear now that King County's own documents contradict what they told your office last October, and that its misrepesentations induced Secretary Reed to issue a false statement in his press release on October 8th. Will the Secretary of State's office issue a public statement correcting the record and retract some of its earlier comments to the effect that Republicans were making false accusations about military and overseas ballots not going out on time?
Handy's response:
Stefan,

I have not reviewed your materials.

I understand King County is still taking the position that ballots went out timely and I have another blogger advising your information is simply not correct.

So far as I am aware, King County met state law requirements.

We were making efforts to ensure compliance with federal requirements under the Federal Voting Assistance Program. It is my understanding that the FVAP did not have any complaints from military personnel regarding issuance of Washington State ballots.

I'd be more convinced by Handy's response if he

(a) reviewed and addressed the information I sent him before he dismissed it

(b) shared whatever unspecified information it was from the unnamed other blogger that he seems to think is worth considering

(c) didn't try to evade the issue with weaselly statements like "ballots went out timely". I've never disputed that some ballots went out timely. The issue is whether all ballots went out timely, which is pretty clearly not the case.

Forgive me if I conclude that the Reed/Handy way to "restore confidence in the voting process" is to look the other way when confidence-lowering facts present themselves.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at August 05, 2005 07:25 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Liberals covering for liberals.

Why work and try to uncover the facts? Their minds are made up!!!

Posted by: Norm on August 5, 2005 07:33 PM
2. Good work Stefan. It is unfortunate but typical that the 'chosen ones' will dismiss the obvious. Let's hope we all remember this next election!.

Posted by: Don in Yakima on August 5, 2005 07:36 PM
3. Good work Stefan. It is unfortunate but typical that the 'chosen ones' will dismiss the obvious. Let's hope we all remember this next election!

Posted by: Don in Yakima on August 5, 2005 07:37 PM
4. Actually, if Stefan's material clearly demonstrates that King County failed to follow the laws regarding military ballots, and since the SOS office seems intent on covering up the errors, wouldn't this be a reason to recall Sam Reed? I mean failure to do your job is one of the justifications for a recall in this state, isn't it?

Posted by: MIMike on August 5, 2005 07:46 PM
5. That "other blogger" comment reminded me of Goldstein... oh the days when he was actually recongized as a legitimate blogger and not a wingnut.

Posted by: bmvaughn on August 5, 2005 07:54 PM
6. Considering Nick Handy's habit of not looking at the details of documentation, it's entirely possible that he had no idea what a bombshell he was sending you, for which you so nicely thanked him! Imagine his 'charred grin" now! Lots of back pedaling and spin to do.

Posted by: katomar on August 5, 2005 08:06 PM
7. Nick Handy is a dumbass. Plain and simple. He used to work for the Port of Oly and really messed up, and there was a lot of hooplah over his pension. He's as corrupt as they come outside Louisiana. I'd offer more details but it was a few years ago and even though I was living in Olympia at the time, I didn't really pay much attention, I had bigger fish to fry than worry about Port business. I still can't believe Reed hired him. I think I am going to vote for the first Democrat in my life in 2008. I'm definately NOT voting for Reed, but if I abstain from that race its a 1 vote swing. Voting for Ruderman/Dem nominee results in a 2 vote swing.

Posted by: ARS on August 5, 2005 08:25 PM
8. It has been apparent Since last November that no one at any level of government in Washington is really interested in election reform. The status quo got them elected or their patron elected. Why should any of the change the system that provides for them?

Until we turn our all the SOBs currently in office nothing will change. Only by a through housecleaning will we begin to see any change.

I have give up on the idea of any meaningful reform from any of the current crop of elected officials.

Posted by: JCM on August 5, 2005 08:30 PM
9. Nothing in the Seattle media about this.

I guess they are hoping that if they ignore it, this will go away, and nobody will know that they were beaten to the story again.

Posted by: BananaLand (aka Iguana) on August 5, 2005 08:32 PM
10. Handy's comments would have been, if not for the latest rash of bad emails posted here, probably would have read..."Stefan, I don't care what you sent, I didn't read it before and sure as hell won't read it now. Why don't you just shut up and leave the government to those that can't do anything else for a living?"

Posted by: Dengle on August 5, 2005 08:57 PM
11. Does Handy think the brave forces we have serving across the globe have time to check the spreadsheets to see if their votes arrived in time? I think I will file and FOIA in Skagit to see the two boxes of ballots that were denied due to postmarks and the like.
By the way, those ballots are still sealed in ballot boxes so no tampering could take place

Posted by: JimL on August 5, 2005 09:03 PM
12. Huh?

"It is my understanding that the FVAP did not have any complaints from military personnel regarding issuance of Washington State ballots."

Were there not more than a few complaints on the behalf of some overseas military personnel regarding this? If so, Handy's statement is ridiculous.

Posted by: Shaun on August 5, 2005 09:11 PM
13. Handy is an idiot.

He has 'another blogger advising' him? Oh, wonderful. With all due respect to this wonderful cottage industy - regardless of who the blogger is, why would that inspire any confidence in his opinion?

If he's going to examine and evaluate the evidence, that's one thing. Taking King County at face value and being advised by bloggers is simply not sufficient to fulfill his responsibilities as State Elections Director.

"I understand"..."So far as I am aware"..."It is my understanding"..... In other words, I have not independently verified these facts, but I understand them to be true.

Posted by: Larry on August 5, 2005 09:20 PM
14. Nick Handy and Sam Reed are both RINO's (Republicans In Name Only) of the worst kind.
They are RINO's in key positions to insure the liberal left is allowed to continue their election fraud....

No one here ever bought their claims that the absentee ballots were mailed on time. King County elections never could produce adequate receipts for proof of mailing and their hand written log was less than acceptable.

In Nick Handy's reply, he seems to be in denial of the severe chastising the SoS's office received from the Department of Justice regarding the late mailings of Military ballots! This wasn't a non-issue.

Stefan,
I'd say to send all you've uncovered on the late mailings of the King County absentee ballots to the Department of Justice - (attention it to the person who sent Sam Reeds office the warning about late mailings). If they fail to respond - then we - in this state - ........Oh God...I don't even want to think about it.....

Posted by: Deborah on August 5, 2005 09:43 PM
15. Might the other blogger be the degrading one with the horses behind in the title??

Handy isn't acting so handy right now. I can't believe the state's elections office is heavily in HIS hands. No wonder everything is so screwed up. These people want to shove everything under the rug as much as possible. Keep at it. the truth has to come out.

Posted by: Michele on August 5, 2005 09:53 PM
16. Re:""It is my understanding that the FVAP did not have any complaints from military personnel regarding issuance of Washington State ballots."

Considering that Whitman County claimed to have not gotten back a single military or overseas ballot, I am sure that some people never got their ballot. Considering that statewide around 75% of overseas ballots that were concerned, the odds of getting 0 returned out of a sample of over 200 is 3 x 10^-134

Posted by: Michael on August 5, 2005 10:11 PM
17. returned, not concerned above.

Posted by: Michael on August 5, 2005 10:12 PM
18. When Handy said another blogger I am willing to bet each one of us said "Goldie" to our selves as we read this.

He is just as much in denial as Sims, Logan and company. Everyday this gets more comical and more unbelievable.

Posted by: 4pawz on August 5, 2005 10:18 PM
19. Stefen,

I admire your desire to hope that Handy and Reed would do the right thing.

Unfortunately Handy is nothing more than a political hack. It has already been proven that he was not particularly qualified for the job in the first place. He has also proven himself to be an apologist for the King County Elections Dept.

Why would he change now?

Don't worry though, after the 2008 elections when Reed is voted out, he will soon be forgotten.

Good riddance!

Posted by: jaybo on August 6, 2005 07:55 AM
20. Storm the Incumbent Bastille!
Purge! Purge! Purge!

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on August 6, 2005 08:51 AM
21. Michael,
I am still trying to find out why Whitman County does not separate their military and overseas citizens ballots from the rest of the mail ballots. The auditor and election supervisor here said they were sent and received about 132 back. If they don't keep track, how can they prove this? They said their "new" computer system would track these. Are they saying Whitman County is the last county in the state to be up to date? Outrageous.

The fact that Nick Handy is not interested comes as no surprise. The fact that he has chosen to take the word of another blogger really aggravates me.

Posted by: cc on August 6, 2005 09:51 AM
22. "Forgive me if I conclude that the Reed/Handy way to "restore confidence in the voting process" is to look the other way when confidence-lowering facts present themselves."

You are more than forgiven, Stefan, since that's what about everybody I know thinks by now, too.

Posted by: jsa on August 6, 2005 02:19 PM
23. Seems for Nick handy and SoS Covering their hind end is the order of the day concerning this info Stefan has dug up on military ballots!! They need to be gone for sure in 2008 (although I wish it were sooner!! if possible)If I were them Iwouldn't consider that a very flattering endorsement!!

Posted by: Laurie on August 6, 2005 08:15 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?