Yet more fishy business in the investigation and booking of Julie Anne Kempf that adds to the perception that this is politically motivated --
There have been four major print media stories on this since yesterday: Seattle Weekly , Associated Press , Seattle P-I , Seattle Times
Among the highlights of these articles are that (a) no charges were filed, (b) neither Kempf nor her attorneys are speaking to the press, except to say that they're not commenting. The fact that no charges were filed means that the Sheriff and the AG's Office do not publicly disclose the details of the allegations. And Kempf and her attorneys aren't speaking, so how did the Seattle Weekly come up with this?
sources say Kempf, 40, allegedly sent current King County Elections Director Dean Logan an e-mail, pretending to be someone else. She is also suspected of inserting false documents into a file of public records while she was reviewing them, allegedly constituting forgery. Sources also say she stopped payment on a check that she had used to pay for the documents and, during an investigative interview attempt last week, allegedly tried to hit a sheriff's detective with her car.Who are those sources? It's difficult to imagine who it could be other than somebody in the Sims/Logan cabal who is using this as a publicity stunt for political purposes.
I have no knowledge about any of the details reported by the Weekly, but I do have some experience with King County Elections and public records requests. On several occasions, the documents they've produced in response to my requests have been incomplete and/or defective. I've been tempted on more than one occasion to stop payment on the checks I used to pay for them. My immediate hypothesis is that if there was indeed a stopped check, it was likely to have been motivated by the county's delivery of a defective product. And this they use as an excuse to file a criminal complaint? What a bunch of thugs.
Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at July 21, 2005 10:19 AM | Email ThisStephan:
Sorry I provided the wrong document for examination. Go to:
www.corrupt-union.com
then, look for the following documents:
"The HAC REPORT II"
and,
"The SMOKING GUN"
There, you will retrieve documents with U.S. Department of Labor interviews with Julie Anne Kempf. It is the estimation of several honest union workers that Julie Anne Kempf told the truth in her interview with the DOL investigators, and that the union bosses lied to cover-up a massive union election fraud operation. Ms. Kempf had no objective to lie to the DOL investigators and she had nothing to benefit from lying. But the union bosses needed to lie in order to hang on to their big, fat- paying union jobs. Ms. Kempf helped reveal to us that the King County Election Division ballot-counting machines were used mischieviously to help throw an election for the union bosses. The U.S. DOL and the U.S. District Court dismissed all charges. Now you know who assists corrupt union bosses in Seattle.
The Rocket.
Posted by: the Rocket on July 21, 2005 10:57 AMps.
Ms. Kempf knows where all of the skeletons lie in the King County Election Division. Its not just the general elections that have been riddled with fraud all of these years. Labor unions around Seattle used to "rent" the Accu-Vote machines from KCED for their union elections. These machines can be "pre-calibrated" in order to affect outcomes of elections.
Now we know why "certain" union bosses contribute so much money to the Democratic Machine in Seattle. For more insight read-----------------
"The Deposition of Allan Darr"
at www.corrupt-union.com
Mr. Darr is the business manager of Local 302 (IUOE) in Seattle, and a known liar, corrupt union boss, AND a player for the Dems in Olympia.
Once she was arrested, the speedy trial clock starts. they have about another 12 days to arraign her and then must go to trial within 90 days.
Wish I knew how to get in touch with her attorney. They would drop the charges as soon as he would mention my name to the AG's office.
Posted by: Don on July 21, 2005 11:23 AMRight you are, Realist. The Democrats NEVER care about white-collar union boss fraud. Only Republican business fraud "counts" in the Democrat's world. If the government prosecuted union bosses for fraud, election violations, and theft of the union treasuries, 95% of the unions would be under investigation. And 100% of the Seattle unions would be investigated. Why do you think the Clintons and Al Gore spent so much time coming to Seattle in the 1990's? The union bosses were giving away the member's money to the Democrats in power, so that the government "would NOT investigate them."
I hope that Julie Anne Kempf gets some assistance from us. She will need it. She is the subject of a huge "diversion" which is what the Democrats always revert to when they need to direct attention away from their pathetic selves.
More Julie Anne Kempf documents to follow.......
the Rocket.
Posted by: the Rocket on July 21, 2005 12:00 PMWhat is YOUR IP Address.....Can you oblige me Stefan?
Posted by: Chris on July 21, 2005 12:22 PMMr. X: Exactly, what was your position of involvement with Ms. Kempf and election matters? You speak very vaguely. You leave an impression that you are a pathological liar and a stoolie for Ron Simms and the liberals. Glad that you take the time to read the conservative blogs. Why don't you try using a little more intel, that is, if you have any. I doubt that you do. Go smoke some more marijuana..........
Posted by: the Rocket on July 21, 2005 12:38 PM1. Who counts the votes is more important than who votes.
2. Election fraud is ignored, covered up, and endorsed by authorities.
3. Current election irregularities are ignored, while workers and subordinates are legally harrassed and prosecuted.
This strongly sounds Stalinish, Russia behind the iron curtain...unamerican. As punishement for her "crimes" will Kempf be sent to Siberia?
I knew Sim-bo was a scaundrel, but I didn't know he would go this far into gangland tactics in order to intimidate those that have the dirt on him.
Posted by: BananaLand (aka Iguana) on July 21, 2005 12:57 PMUnbelievable. Rocket, you are so right on. Ron Simms uses the same tactics as that of union bosses. No wonder Seattle is a town with so much hate and vile.
Posted by: Drake on July 21, 2005 01:20 PMAnd then the US Attorney Generals office has no comment on a tunnel built under the Canadian border. They probably had no idea it was happening, or that more efficient authorities were investigating under their noses. Because they are chasing their tail in Spokane, and trying really hard to avoid having to investigate election fraud in their own district.
News hasn't been this funny since Clinton said "define sex."
Posted by: dl on July 21, 2005 01:26 PMRead the briefs you link to, and they really don't indicate much except that the plaintiff throws around a lot of allegations about lying without providing any proof (hmm, sound familiar?). Julie Anne Kempf is cited quite briefly on a technical matter regarding ballot scanning, which really doesn't prove the point you try and make at all - anyone who knows anything about technical ballot processing issues could and would have said the smae thing.
I couldn't find a final disposition or ruling on the case, but I'd bet you a nickel it was dismissed outright.
If you want to prove Ron Sims is Robert Mugabe redux, you're gonna have to do a whole lot better than your little Joe McCarthy wannabe act...
Posted by: Mr. X on July 21, 2005 01:42 PMThe RealID is a voluntary program (as it should be given what the feds jurisdiction is). No state is required to comply. If they do not, the state's ID will not be valid to board an airplane or enter a federal building, among other things.
Anyone remember all the fuss that was made when the Motor Voter law was pushed onto the states? All the outcry about how much it was going to cost the states. How it is turning the DMV into an election registration office. That's funny, neither do I. Anyone want to venture a guess as to why?
Posted by: fred on July 21, 2005 03:00 PMWhy no writing about ROVE?
What is being hidden?
Posted by: Pierre Drinkingwater on July 21, 2005 04:58 PMWay off topic - Please remember this is SoundPolitics.com
Mr. X - didn't you get enough of a horsy-ride a little while back?
Posted by: alphabet soup on July 21, 2005 05:22 PMThis merits an investigation.
Posted by: KS on July 21, 2005 05:56 PMNot like McKay is busy with a voter fraud case or anything like that these days.
Just another reason why there is a growing U-haul shortage in King County.
Posted by: Jericho on July 21, 2005 05:57 PMProbably the same KC bunch who ran over here to post in the thread about it yesterday......
Could be Sim's faithful few....just spinning around causing trouble...spreading disinformation..
This is actually an amazing glance into their stupidity! They are so dense they don't understand they can be tracked and traced to the Seattle Weekly...to Sound Politics, to the King County Website where they processed a request for Stefan's property information!
Duh! This tells me that Sims and Logan are truly desperate if they have to depend on the second- string thugs to do their dirty work now!
Right now - Ron Sims is being heavily seduced by Southwest and Alaska Airlines to get the OK for terminals at Boeing Field...Sims cannot turn away from money...He should be trying to cover his butt right now with what's going down in the elections investigation...but he just can't concentrate...Too much money involved in the airline deal! He is going to slip up!
Posted by: Deborah on July 21, 2005 08:56 PMMr. X:
ok, let me try again. First, I commend you for taking the time to read
The HAC REPORT II
and
THE SMOKING GUN
at www.corrupt-union.com
They involve some reading. Please be sure to read the supporting documents at the end of the reports. Here's what happened: The U.S. DOL investigated the plaintiff's complaint. the ballot printer for the union (employed by the union bosses) controverted testimony that was provided by Julie Anne Kempf regarding the size and parameters of the election ballots. In otherwords, Julie Anne Kempf told the investigator one thing and the union ballot printer told the investigator another. So who does one believe? Well, JAK did not work for the union, but the ballot printer did. Wouldn't you say that the ballot printer had more to gain from lying and covering up the corrupt footprints of his union buddies who happen to give him lots of work and $$$$$$$$$$$ ? Now, X, I know that you are smart enough to figure this all out. I mean you took the time to read the briefings and the reports, didn't you? For that, I take back my earlier comments about you.
the Rocket.
Posted by: the Rocket on July 21, 2005 09:05 PMReally, if you need it, I can get you the number for AA. Just take it one day at a time. But you really shouldn't post your comments when you are tank, unless you like all of us laughing at you.
Posted by: jdb on July 23, 2005 11:25 PMTank goodness you are at your usual literate best.
Posted by: Amused by liberal twits on July 24, 2005 12:43 PMRight you are. Tank is a big word for you, so stick to very simple comments.
What’s more likely here? If jdb gets up to “jdb 6, amused 0” is he fixin’ to dazzle
everyone with his penetrating intellect and rapier like wit, sort of “cast his pearls to the swine (so to speak)”
or will he go the safe route, steal a pair of clogs and “award” them to himself?
Leave it to a liberal Democrat like jdb who upon losing an exchange, arbitrarily presumes to
reduce it to a "contest" of his own making where voting is the only imperative so long as he controls all of the voting.
Hey jdb, that’s one way you can win (that you know of) there little feller.
And me, politically correct? Please. KS, you have done better. I know most of you have no idea what to do when you are not preaching to the choir, but I thought a bit higher of you.
Posted by: jdb on July 24, 2005 09:33 PMNotice that jdb took exception to you calling him politically correct, but avoided that part about his obvious lack of common sense.
He's a bit sensitive about his mental disorder.
jdb,
Who cares? Go practice your words and counting now.
And lack of common sense a mental disorder? Interesting theory there, Herr Freud. You came up with that one all on your own, didn't you.
Posted by: JDB on July 25, 2005 12:12 PMGive yourself another point or two there little feller.
I know you have no sense of humor, but I'm really surprised you have problems with sarcasm. You are a sad little man, aren't you big fella?
Posted by: JDB on July 25, 2005 02:09 PMDon't worry there little feller, you provide me and many others with plenty of mirth. I enjoy
clever sarcasm as well . . . got any?
Good boy jdb, stick to very simple comments that
obscure your invincible ignorance.
Boy, you are a sad little man. But heck, I believe in redemption, even of a fool like you. So let's try one last time to see if you have a single brain cell that you can use.
The subject of this thread is that Ron Sims is abusing his power and that this is shown by the arrest of Ms. Kempf.
I correctly stated that Ron Sims had no such power to abuse, that this was in the hand of the Republican Prosecuting Attorney, Norm Maleng, or the State Republican Attorney General, Rob McKenna, who, as it turns out, is the person running the investigation.
You have added nothing on point to this conversation. At all. Not a single line.
You obviously have no job, no friends, no life and no wit. I have definitly made my point that you can't engage in an actual conversation, but are stuck in your small minded attacks that for some reason you think make you such a big man as you sit in your dark, dank little apartment. You didn't even enjoy a beautiful day yesterday because coming up with a rejoinder to me was so important to you. Boy, what a loser.
So, do you have anything on point to add to this thread, or does the score just keep going up? Here's your chance, big boy. Put that amazing brain of yours to work. Do you have anything to add, or are you just something for me to play with and for everyone else to laugh at? I know where I'm laying my bet.
Posted by: JDB on July 25, 2005 04:05 PMThere is little doubt about why you don’t think before you speak. It’s easy to get away with sloppy illogical garbage at liberal websites because they don’t care about facts and make up everything they talk about, so it is understandable that you think it is O.K to behave in that way as well.
Thanks for the entertainment moron.
Posted by: Amused by morons on July 25, 2005 08:51 PMNotice that the dim-wit is getting angrier and more insistent upon defending his silliness with insults?
He is forgetting his lies, losing track of his idiotic inane bullshit and posting the wrong *resposnes* to the wrong threads now.
jdb, big deal. Go practice your spelling . . . ditzbag.
Posted by: Amused by morons on July 25, 2005 09:02 PMAnd you have yet to post something on topic in this thread. Boy, you must be really proud of yourself.
You cannot be anything but a loser if you don't even play the game. I don't care about facts? You apparently have no facts. You have done nothing but post feeble attacks about my typing. What a small, simple minded bile spewing idiot you are. The fact that you think crticisg my typing somehow makes you anything but a loser just shows you are delusional. And how easy to play with; you make puppets look intelligent.
So, babe, now everyone knows you have nothing. I've called you out, and you have run away. I might not be a great typist when I don't care about it, but you have nothing but bile, and you care so deeply. And now, everyone has seen it. What a wuss.
You are a coward and a fool. You deserve the misery your lonely life must be.
Run away little man, you have nothing but your fear.
Posted by: jdb on July 26, 2005 12:16 AMSad
(but funny ;'}
Posted by: alphabet soup on July 26, 2005 05:59 AMSad
(but funny ;'}
Posted by: alphabet soup on July 26, 2005 06:00 AMYou are becoming more and more angry, nasty, and pitiful all of the time.
For someone who claims to be in control, you are acting like someone who has
lost an argument and has nothing but personal insults left.
What is this you say about "I've called you out, and you have run away," silliness.
Called me out about what specifically?
Posted by: Amused by liberal morons on July 26, 2005 10:27 AMHonestly, it is obvious you have yourself figured as a debater, but you never engage any substantive debate because you never argue substance. You are a spoiler who carps at other peoples’ comments with lies and bullshit who believes that making things up is the same as citing facts. Your unfounded personal insults are in direct substitution for arguments, and you play cheap insulting badinage in substitution for debate. You only prove over and over again that you are a deluded liberal fool with no point, just anger and vitriol.
If you ever decide to engage in real debate, come up with a real argument, and I will defeat you easily because you are not very intelligent.
Nevertheless, you are amusing.
Your own comments on this thread prove you are a liar and a dolt (I'm being excessively kind). You never stated that “Ron Sims had no such power to abuse,” as you claim to have stated now. You said, “we know the one place that is leaking is the Attorney General's office.” The two things are totally different, and you presented no factual basis whatsoever for either statement, then or now. Then you stated that “Rob McKenna and his Republican AG's are out to get a poor person.”
Claims are not arguments jdb, they are mere assertions. You made no arguments on this thread, and that is the reason why I asked you if you ever think before you comment here. Since you do not know the difference between an argument and a claim, it appears that the correct answer to my question was NO.
jdb thinks my *crticisg* of his typing is not very funny. It wouldn’t be if he weren’t so arrogant and supercilious about his careless bosh. Nevertheless, I notice that he is much more careful in that regard; his comments reflect it. He is conspicuously pi$$ed about it though. It obviously pains him that someone is calling him to task about his laziness and slothful habits on all fronts, grammatically, pedantically and logically. It is forcing him to attempt to qualify his comments with some minimal standard of literacy, as well as cogency.
The problem for him is, he can use a spell checker to correct grammar but there is no way for him to acquire any new rhetorical skills. His lazy liberal outlook dooms him to the habit of seeking easy answers to everything, and as any intelligent person knows, the easy way is almost always the wrong way. Intellectually speaking, jdb is screwed and deep down he knows it. He is able to fake his way through because few people ever challenge his baseless claims. That’s why he attacks conservatives in an obstreperous way instead of a thoughtful rational one. If he had an argument, he would make it, but he doesn't actually know what an argument is, and all he has is anger.
He sure offers up good "arguements" though ;'}
Posted by: alphabet soup on July 26, 2005 04:34 PM