Monorail Board Chairman Tom Weeks and Executive Director Joel Horn have resigned.
I'm reminded of that Bruce Springsteen song: "say goodbye it's Independence Day".
The winner of the contest to predict Horn's departure date is someone who simply identified themselves as "the_radish" and wrote
Joel Horn leaves "voluntarily" over the 4th of July holiday.Good call! Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at July 04, 2005 04:16 PM | Email This
Nevertheless something to celebrate with the fireworks tonight...
Posted by: KS on July 4, 2005 05:31 PMNow, like squeezing one end of a carnival balloon, he will pop us somewhere else to rack up MORE public retirement time on John Q. Public, who--at this time--is happily grilling things with his/her family thinking all is well and trusting his/her elected officials to discharge their duties in an efficient and honest manner.
Gotta love it. Happy 4th; Yes--quicker than I expected; good guess, Radish; try those skills now in a native kasino to test their powers!
Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on July 4, 2005 05:35 PMNow, the board will claim that they can move on and do it right!
Posted by: sgmmac on July 4, 2005 06:22 PMStefan -- how many folks working for the Conorail are making more than $100,000 per year? Didn't you post this on here several months ago? Are all those deadwoods going to be fired too? Or will Seattle motorists need to pay the MVET for a few more years to cover their salaries as well?
Posted by: Richard Pope on July 4, 2005 11:01 PMThese idiot council pansies are still talking about reviving this lame project. That's hard to believe.
If they want to build a monorail, they really ought to be talking to Sims and change light rail to monorail. I could get behind that. Plus, at least based on the initial estimated cost (which is always low), monorail costs half of light rail per mile of track.
Seems like a no-brainer. But, of course, we are talking about Ron Sims here - a guy that is not known for his brains. And, we are talking about Nickels here, a guy that takes the path of least resistance on everything ... (especially to the food counter, that fatso)
Posted by: BananaLand (aka Iguana) on July 5, 2005 01:11 AMPart of the package consisted of a specified number of commuter rail trips between Tacoma and Seattle and between Everett. There was also a timeline for implementation and schedules as part of the package used to sell this scheme to voters.
Today I picked up a flyer announcing 'expanded Sounder Commuter Rail service.' Looking the flyer over I see that there are four Amtrak trains listed as being part of the 'expanded service.' one leaves Everett at 11:36 AM the other at 8:46 PM and one leaving Seattle for Everett at 7:45 AM and another at 5:30 PM.
What I fully expect is for ST to announce that they have 'listened to their customers ...bla, bla, bla... and yada, yada, yada....' Pardon me but just exactly who is 'commuting' at 11:36 AM and 8:46 PM from Everett to Seattle?
Mark my words they will try to 'spin' this as fulfilling their commitment to provide the commuter rail service that voter’s approved. IT IS NOT AND TO PORTRAY IT AS SUCH IS UNSCRUPULOUS AND DISINGENUOUS BUT THAT WILL NOT STOP THEM.
Any chance that the msm calls them on this? I won’t be holding my breath, but it would be nice.
Posted by: JDH on July 5, 2005 07:34 AMThat unelected Monorail Board better hadn't spring some cutesy wootsy reduced Monorail on us without presenting new and better information about the extent and projected costs (and income) of the shortened system - and insuring that we get an up-or-down vote on it. No more Sound Transit debacles.
Posted by: Insufficiently Sensitive on July 5, 2005 07:35 AMWithout South Center, the Link LRT is nothing more than a commute system that will be jammed during rush hours 'only' in the inbound direction, empty the other way and at all other hours of operation - all because the one significant destination along the route, South Center District, was ignored. Thanks Joni, NOT!
Expect a new SMP director to receive effusive praise and buttery exhaltation for changing things for the better, (like Joni Earl didn't), and in reality leave the engineering of the monorail untouched or worsened.
Posted by: Artie on July 5, 2005 11:52 AMJoni's function is that of propagandist - to keep up an inexhaustible flow of happy talk about Sound Transit. She feeds the MSM to divert attention from the chicanery pulled by ST on the voters, and to ward off the well-deserved tar and feathers.
The concern is that the Monorail Politburo will follow in Sound Transit's footsteps, and attempt to paper over a real financial failure with more happy talk, and to wedge open the chances of yet more taxes to cover the losses. With sufficient attention focused on said Politburo by this blog and other commonsense players, we may be able to prevent a rerun of ST's bait-and-switch.
Eternal vigilance is the price...
Posted by: Insufficiently Sensitive on July 5, 2005 01:10 PMhttp://seattlepi.nwsource.com/transportation/91391_monorail16.shtml
All the reasons he opposed are coming true - with interest.
How stupid is it to rely on revenue from car tabs when the project has goals of getting people out of their cars or of even getting rid of their cars?