June 20, 2005
Will Higher taxes prevent earthquakes?

Skor Grimm points out Rep. Ed Murray's laughable statement about the gas tax

"If the gas tax is overturned, major bridges will not be repaired. You will not see congestion relief on (Interstate) 405. The Alaskan Way viaduct will be closed or will fall down."
Yeah, whatever Ed. Maybe if Rep. Murray and the House Transportation Committe actually put together a sensible plan for transportation spending, the voters would be more willing to tax themselves than they are today.

In the meantime, it appears that the state government is already trying to sell bonds committed to the gas tax as early as July 1. What a bunch of sleazy jerks. Once bonds are sold that are contractually bound to the tax revenues, it will be nearly impossible to overturn the tax, an effective end-run around the credibile initiative that is underway to overturn the tax.

The No New Gas Tax campaign is going to court for a restraining order to suspend bond sales until it's determined whether the initiative qualifies for the ballot.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at June 20, 2005 04:23 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Stephan,
At least you can now say exactly, to what ends the Democrats are willing to go to put another rock on the backs of tax payers. Remember, this is the party for the "little people". A gas tax affects the poor the most. Since it causes the price of all consumable goods, that are shipped, to rise to cover the additional cost. I would hate to see what they do the the people that they are against.

Posted by: Mike P on June 20, 2005 04:41 PM
2. "Fall down" you say. Tell it to the nice man in the white suit.

Posted by: Dogbert on June 20, 2005 04:42 PM
3. In my little poll of 12, 8 people were signing the no tax initiative. 6 of the 8 agreed with me that they would have supported responsible taxation given accountablility. They saw, as most have, that such was not the case in Olympia this year.
This is more government bullying.

Posted by: Danno on June 20, 2005 04:44 PM
4. where can we sign this petition. I've kept my eyes open, but haven't seen anything. Any place on the Eastside ?

Posted by: FG on June 20, 2005 04:52 PM
5. FG;
I am collecting the signatures. Do you live in Bellevue area?

Posted by: EW on June 20, 2005 04:58 PM
6. Yes, how dare the State act efficiently and do what the bi-partisan legislature tells it to do when we have policital points to score! The horror, the horror.

But shouldn't we be worried about real corruption, such as this:

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apwashington_story.asp?category=1152&slug=Passenger%20Screening

"WASHINGTON -- The federal agency in charge of aviation security collected extensive personal information about airline passengers even though Congress forbade it and officials said they wouldn't do it, according to documents obtained Monday by The Associated Press."

Now this is a real government conspiracy against the people.

Posted by: JDB on June 20, 2005 05:19 PM
7. If a person sees something being done by any level of government, they should, by all means, contact the appropriate representatives and express their views. If you are concerned about this "real corruption", then you should most certainly take whatever action you believe will help.

In this state, we elect our representatives, and we expect them to work for us - the citizens of Washington. Our state constitution allows for us - the citizens - to express our will to those elected representatives by the initiative process, if we feel strongly about an issue.

If enough citizens sign the petitions to get Initiative 912 on the ballot, and enough citizens vote for Initiative 912 in November, then the will of the majority of Washington citizens will have been enacted into law by a constitutionally guaranteed process.

What part of that do you have a problem with?

Posted by: KB on June 20, 2005 05:37 PM
8. Enough taxes and we can stop earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes torandoes, global warming and locusts.

Posted by: JCM on June 20, 2005 05:41 PM
9. STOP EVERYTHING -- Heinz has just bought Lea and Perrins steak sauce unit -- this is terrible -- I do not buy any Heinz products (for political reasons) but I do very much like Lea and Perrins -- anyone have suggestions?

Posted by: Lew on June 20, 2005 05:44 PM
10. JDB = Just Deflect, Baby.

Posted by: jimg on June 20, 2005 05:55 PM
11. The Sky will surely fall if they don't get their new gas tax. Well Why don't all you state politicians take a 25% pay cut instead of letting that happen. Many airline workers, whose jobs are to keep the sky's from falling, are taking such cuts in pay while Gregoire is handing our 10k to 20k bonus's to all her top cabinet chronies. Tell us again Mr Murry why you can't afford to fix these things without robbing our pockets!

I'll be out collecting signatures thank You! If anyone in the Kent or Renton area need more initiatives, or need to sign this contact me - we have 18 days left!

Posted by: GS on June 20, 2005 06:01 PM
12. JDB: No the real issue is that your party's US Senate Whip called our troops Nazis.

Gee, this is fun! It's like free association, except that nothing you say bears any relation to what came before.

Posted by: ScottM on June 20, 2005 06:11 PM
13. Well, if the state manages to bond these increases that will just be one more reason for everyone to vote NO on any supplemental funding, which if denied will stop all these expenditures in their tracks. Unfortunately, then where does this gas tax money go, into the general slush fund?

Posted by: Tucker on June 20, 2005 06:49 PM
14. I want to know where the 28 cents a gallon in taxes we pay NOW goes?????

The viaduct needs to be replaced with a tunnel so that it doesn't fall in the next earthquake? Who volunteers to be in the tunnel during a earthquake?

Or even better yet in the tunnel in a Tsunami

Posted by: sgmmac on June 20, 2005 07:26 PM
15. Yes, how dare the State act efficiently and do what the bi-partisan legislature tells it to do when we have policital points to score! The horror, the horror.

Funny how they are a model of quick action and efficiency when it comes to "locking in" a tax hike when they see the will of the people coming to smack it down.. And yet what we get for that tax hike is something along the lines of initial pre-funding of the feasibility study study. Sort of like they were fiscal conservatives when it came to the pricetag of a "revote." Huh.. Actually I guess it's NOT that funny. It's pathetic.

Posted by: RookieRick on June 20, 2005 07:28 PM
16. heh good point sgmmac.. Maybe they should build an elevated tunnel! Or replace the viaduct with a MONORAIL!!!

It would probably save the whales too.

Posted by: RookieRick on June 20, 2005 07:33 PM
17. You miss one point. The gas tax money will be used to build a new sea wall. To protect City hall from falling into the sea(in about 10,000 years.) They need to save City Hall. Your Gas Tax is to save it. It is an emergency. Honest it is an emergency.

Posted by: David Anfinrud on June 20, 2005 07:39 PM
18. Let it fall in the ocean....... as a matter of fact, maybe the elections department needs to move closer so that mother nature can deal with them too!

Posted by: sgmmac on June 20, 2005 07:48 PM
19. "Enough taxes and we can stop earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes torandoes, global warming and locusts."

Perhaps, JCM, but it would appear that we cannot stop a plague of lemmings. Hmmmm...what's the 'collective noun' for a plague of blood-sucking insects...hmmm...what rhymes with bureaucrat?

Posted by: scott158 on June 20, 2005 07:59 PM
20. I love the idea of replacing the Viaduct with a tunnel! It was such a lovely concept in Boston! I mean, it was going to cost something like $2 billion and take five years and traffic would flow though the center of the city like greased lightening!

Of course, the fact that it ended up costing about $15 bil, took over 15 years, and leaks like a sieve should be ignored. Lets just start throwing money at it without really knowing what we're going to *do* with it.

As others have said, if the Viaduct is so dangerous that almost any tremor could knock it down, then perhaps we need to shut it down, now. Close it, and I bet the politicians will work out *real* fast what to do. Nothing cuts through the red tape like several thousand ticked off commuters.

Once that plan is in place, then come to the citizens with a gas tax.

Posted by: Eirik on June 20, 2005 08:02 PM
21. Gotta give the state credit for acting fast.

Posted by: bmvaughn on June 20, 2005 08:03 PM
22. Also remember to vote with your purchases. The Internet is mostly still tax free, and Portland is just a few hours away and a lovely city to visit and shop in.

Posted by: Gs on June 20, 2005 08:08 PM
23. It's like someone is paying them to create fodder to clobber them with in the next election.

Kudos to the team filing the restraining order. I would really like it if you would post the judge's name-

If I haven't said so before - there is already a LARGE amount of campaign money and resources available for anyone wanting to run against a certain incumbent liberal judge here in Thurston county superior court.

Posted by: Andy on June 20, 2005 08:16 PM
24. Hey sgmmac. I will gladly volunteer to be in that tunnel during an earthquake. Or any tunnel for that matter. Anyone with a background in engineering knows that tunnels are one of the safest place you can be in during an earthquake next to an open field, not many of those in Seattle anymore. :-( Besides the city has to find the extra $$$ for thier little "solution" (state only agreed to replacement costs not an upgrade) so you'll probably get your wish of either nothing or a replacement. Better drive fast!!! :-)

Posted by: Chokai on June 20, 2005 08:21 PM
25. Hey jdb...stick around. We'll let you know when and IF the WA state government ever does anything efficiently. In the meantime, you're really falling down on the job. Can't you find a way to blame Bush or Rove for this???

Posted by: Danny on June 20, 2005 08:37 PM
26. JDB,
"But shouldn't we be worried about real corruption, such as this:

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apwashington_story.asp?category=1152&slug=Passenger%20Screening

"WASHINGTON -- The federal agency in charge of aviation security collected extensive personal information about airline passengers even though Congress forbade it and officials said they wouldn't do it, according to documents obtained Monday by The Associated Press."

But you are not concerned that the WA state Government is collecting personal information on people buying OTC cold medicine? Oh thats right, they are all Democrats that signed that bill in to law.

JDB= Just Dont Believe me

Posted by: Mike P on June 20, 2005 09:00 PM
27. 05 "We'll let you know when and IF the WA state government ever does anything efficiently."

The next efficient action by the state will be to reschedule the Narrows Bridge Toll Plan to make it effective as soon as the booths are complete. Frequent bridge users know they are about done now. These funds will probably be used to stabilize the viaduct.

Mike

Posted by: Mike Gordon on June 20, 2005 09:03 PM
28. You all must think that the roads, bridges and tunnels came with the opening of the west by Lewis and Clark.

I read in the local paper just yesterday that if you drive about 12,000 miles a year and gets 17 miles per gallon it'll cost you 41 cents a week, that's about $22 per year. Drive your car over a pot hole and you might find your repair bill to be around $200 - $300 or more.

What I would like to see happen if you all get your way is that the state just stop repairing and building any roads, bridge or tunnels. Let the damn things go to hell until it's take $200 billion to fix them and see what you guys say then.

God forbid that it never happens, but if that Alaskan Way viaduct collapsed from an earthquake every one that signed that initiative should hang their heads in shame.

I’m sure you would find some way to blame someone, anyone else but yourself.

Posted by: mickh on June 20, 2005 09:04 PM
29. Question folks: Doesn't Seattle already have a tunnel that they're going to close for some reason? Why should we trust them with another one? Remember the aim is to kill the businesses that depend on a viable port facility and replace them with cute little botiques.
Frankly I don't trust the state or Seattle (KC)as far as I can throw them. Remember they're the ones who ripped out the electric buses and replaced them with diesel buses to fight polution. The suggestion above that this tunnel of love will somehow help the whales might not be that far fetched!
Glad I don't live there! Too bad my taxes go to the black hole of Seattle instead of helping with local problems.
(grumble)

Posted by: Victor on June 20, 2005 09:09 PM
30. Anyone have any idea of how many signatures have been collected to date? I have a couple of sheets full going into the mail tomorrow. Haven't had anyone not anxious to sign so far.

If anyone is interested and haven't read it on the Web site, you can pick up blank signatures at Kinkos for 34 cents each. There are spaces for 20 signatures on each. Also, if you have the capability of printing 11 X 17 sheets, you can print your own.

Posted by: Gil on June 20, 2005 09:27 PM
31. mickh,

I am sure no-one wants to see the viaduct pancake! However; there is a limit to the amount of tax dollars that people should pay their government without accountability for where those tax dollars are being spent. Where is the 28 cents that we are already paying being spent at? Who has it? Furthermore, I object to spending 100 million for animal bridges.... I also object to a felon elected Governor who says she will NOT support any gas tax without accountability and then on the last day she threatens all of the legislators with calling them back if they don't pass it!

Posted by: sgmmac on June 20, 2005 09:28 PM
32. The general opinion on this blog seems to be that people on here would support a tax for transportation if it were a "sensible plan". Then comments are made about how outrageous the current plan is. What I am not reading on here are ideas for a sensible plan. We need something specific. The whole idea of "anything but this" does nothing to fix the transportation problems in this state. The Alaskan Way Viaduct gets alot of the press because it is perhaps the most obvious of our state's transportation liabilities. While a tax hike will not prevent earthquakes, doing nothing is even worse. In the 1989 quake in the Bay area, a lot of damage occurred, but clearly the most catastrophic damage was to the Oakland freeway built just like the Alaskan Way viaduct. While I'm not thrilled about the idea of a gas tax, until I hear a better idea I think this is a step in the right direction and the lessor of two evils as opposed to doing nothing while our transportation problems get worse.

Posted by: Scott on June 20, 2005 09:36 PM
33. mickh,
Like Eirik said above: "As others have said, if the Viaduct is so dangerous that almost any tremor could knock it down, then perhaps we need to shut it down, now. Close it, and I bet the politicians will work out *real* fast what to do. Nothing cuts through the red tape like several thousand ticked off commuters.
Once that plan is in place, then come to the citizens with a gas tax."

I happen to agree wholeheartedly with him. If it's so damn dangerous, shut it down, NOW.

Posted by: cc on June 20, 2005 09:36 PM
34. FG,you can also get them at any Kinko's for about 34 cents. I got some at the Redmond Kinko's

Posted by: Michele on June 20, 2005 09:39 PM
35. jdb, when the state acts efficiently and responsibly (at all levels) they can raise my gas tax 20 cents and I'll happily pay it. Haven't seen that day come yet....

Posted by: Michele on June 20, 2005 09:41 PM
36. I sure hope they get the injunction. If they don't they'll be able to tax us until it is paid off regardless of the referendum.

Posted by: Deadwood on June 20, 2005 09:50 PM
37. Right Michele.--
Scott? Well, I would start with ONE regional authority, combining and coordinating the counties. Fire the current hacks. No more boondoggle studies. Mandatory performance audits. No chokehold by unions on wages, journeymen programs or bidding. Minimize the eco-impact studies. No half-baked routes like "almost" Ballard to "almost" the airport. Look at SF, Chgo. or other places. If we can not do it right, say so and look at other options. Stop the dreaming and do something even if it is a "fair-to-good" system. Taxes are fine if sensibly & effectively spent.

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on June 20, 2005 09:57 PM
38. I sure hope that the injunction is approved and the bond sales are postponed.

If not, I think that this time around Olympia may see a side of voters wrath at the ballot box the likes of which they have never seen before. D-Day may look tame in comparison.

If they dislike the inititive process so much they may wish for a miracle in the next election, because they are going to need it.

The normal every day voter may not be real sharp but they are not idiots either.

Posted by: bigbird on June 20, 2005 10:14 PM
39. In addition, I agree with Michele wholeheartedly. I would gladly pay 20 cents a gallon more if I knew the viaduct would be completed. That's not what we are hearing though. This state, city, and county, want carte blanche with my money and I'm sick of it.
I posted this analogy here before but it is a good example of we the people having the last say.
Our not too bright city administration thought it needed a new street sweeper. They put it on the ballot and it failed big time. The city miraculously "found" the money to purchase the street sweeper without the levy.

Posted by: cc on June 20, 2005 10:23 PM
40. You lefties paint us like we expect free roads-you want alternatives...at the risk of sounding like a broken record, here's a few.

Few object to prioritizing projects and drawing what we in the business world call a ZBB line.

Few object to tolls.

Few object to Seattle/KC raising their half of the money before sticking the rest us with the bill- but somehow a Seattle crisis is more of an emergency for Longview tax payers than it is for King County- go figure.

Few object to performance audits on the DOT

Few object to projects with competitive bidding.

Few object to projects without huge union scams attached to them like bloated apprentice quotas.

MANY OBJECT TO SCREWING THE ENTIRE STATE WITH THIS AND EVERY OTHER SPENDING EMERGENCY COMING FROM THE LEGISLATURE THIS YEAR.

Posted by: Andy on June 20, 2005 10:24 PM
41. Yes Andy! Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yessss.

Posted by: cc on June 20, 2005 10:26 PM
42. Is the viaduct "REALLY" falling apart?

I suspect, and I have a little knowledge on the subject, that the retrofitting we did over the last four years since the Nisqually quake made it good for any normal quake we might expect.

What the retrofit cannot do, nor can a new viaduct, is adequately protect against a quake greater than 8.0. In fact the current viaduct is probably safer than a tunnel in an 8.0.

Any solution that does not build new arteries will not solve any of Seattle's traffic problems. Of course that would mean tearing down buildings and Seattleites would not like it. So it is not a solution anyone is planning for.

That said, I am of the opinion we should all just tell Seattle to scr@w themselves. If they want our money, then they will need to come up with real solutions to their traffic problems.

Chicken Little rants about the viaduct falling down are hyperbole. An 8.0 will cause such massive damage all over the Seattle downtown area that a collapsed viaduct will be a minor news item that day.

Posted by: Deadwood on June 20, 2005 10:26 PM
43. Deadwood, sad but true...

Posted by: cc on June 20, 2005 10:29 PM
44. I would recommend first that cut the paperwork to doing the project. When 33% of the cost is due to paperwork and paying lawyers to get permission to build the project.
2. No sales tax to be paid to buy goods to build and repair the roads.
3. Get rid of the Art requirement. If 10 billion is spent for a project. Guess what 500 Million dollars are spent on art. Thats a lot of road.
4. No more HOV lanes. IF you want to add a lane it is general purpose roads not HOV lanes.
5. IF an enviromental study has been done in the past decade it should stand. Do not need to day another enviromental study. Just update it with the process. IF you are repaving a road why should 20 to 30 percent of the cost of repaving an existing road be spent on redundent paperwork. No new lanes just set up a plan on how you are going to remove the old surface and put in the new surface with consideration to the enviroment.
6. An independent audit of all Government agencies no Politicians deceiding what gets audit and doesnt. WHy do we have a State Auditor when politicians block audits on their protected agencies.
7. If an audit finds loss of money that department obviously does not need it so they cut their budget by that much money. For example if 1 billion dollars is spent by a government agency and they can only show expenditures of 800 Million dollars. Obviously they only need a budget of 800 million dollars. Too often government agencies will waste money and never be held accountable for how they spend it. For example 2000 a person lost a million dollars on purchasing bad equipement. SHe was made a manager and give a pay raise with the understanding she would never be responisble for spending government money. WHere else do people get awarded for misusing other peoples money. Private industry it is called here is your pink slip.
8. You fund only the projects as the money comes in. No limit more loans on expected revenue. IF Qtr 1 had 500 million dollars. You see what projects through out the state can be funded for the next 3 months using that money. You fund the job 1 quarter at a time. Thereby you know you have the money in hand. You could do this monthly. I dont care I just dont like saying We are going to bond the tax money for the next 30 years to get more money up front. This way if the taxpayers see waste and fraud they can stop a project by cutting the funding for a project. Put the money to work to improve the hiways but if a project is looking like fraud you stop the funding and move the money to projects that will not have fraud and diverting money to projects other than roads. Remember the last time the voters were given a plan from DOV I saw 10000 minivans for mass transit being bought yet the road construction was only getting 20% funded. I would place a bet that the minivans were paid for before one inch of tar was added to 405. Democrats are too good at moving the money into other projects.

I guess this is a start. I once sent a 5 page document to David Irons on State GOvernment reform ideas. I lost the paper a long time ago. But I had around 75 ideas on Government reform that would work and improve the efficiency of State spending and funding. I spent a weekend after the 2000 election thinking about the subject. If we all took one government agency and look into how they spend their money we could maybe find 10 to 50% in cost cutting steps. I think the DOV could cut expenses by 50% by modest changes in the regulations. SD spends 1/10 what we spend for a flat road work job. If they can do the job at 1/10 our current costs. Maybe we should hire them to do our road work for us. Then we would see a lot of value for the money. Our Gas tax is mortgaged so we never see any improvement in the roads because they have already spent the next Decade of funding to pay for the loans for all the great roads they built in the last decade all 10 miles of it.
The only answer is getting people who understand the process but not afraid to rock the boat. Show the people the waste and how to fix it. ALso if excess money comes into the budget every dime should be spent on highways to fix the roads or on Police and Firefighters. Not more social programs. Until we can fix our infrastructure what good is a new social program. Could it be that they just want to increase taxes so they dont have to spend current budget money on roads. Think of all the extra money comming into the coffers over 2 Billion dollars more than the last two budget. How many planned road projects could that fund without raising any taxes.
just my 2 cents worth.

Posted by: david anfinrud on June 20, 2005 10:34 PM
45. Mr. Ed Murphy's attitude is "Trust me, I'm from the government". And if you don't trust Mr. Ed, then Mr. Ed's next tactic is to scare the livin' hell outa ya!! Next, we will hear that anyone who votes to repeal the gas tax will be accused of ATTEMPTED MURDER!!!!! You SPHeads don't want to be accused of ATTEMPTED MURDER do you??

This is government at it's absolute worst.

Ed Murphy SUCKS!!!!

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on June 20, 2005 10:35 PM
46. Hmm Shirley Hankins and Murray must be room mates. She parroted Murray's words at the Central Committe meeting a couple of weeks ago. I detest canned presentations.
Mel

Posted by: Mel on June 20, 2005 10:36 PM
47. Gee Ed Murray is such a famous structural engineer in his own mind. Yet I got his last name wrong on my prior post.
MR. ED and that loser Goldstein can easily do a new HorsesAss schtick. MR. ED Murray is the talking HorsesAss!

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on June 20, 2005 10:45 PM
48. Hey, Mr. C - I like Eddie Murphy, quit trashing him and focus on Mr. Ed Murray!

Posted by: Deadwood on June 20, 2005 10:48 PM
49. Sgmmac and Michele,

For sgmmac:

First get over the last election. The subject is the Gas Tax. Also you might feel different about those animal bridges if you happened to hit a deer at 60 miles an hour.

As with most taxes they go for things that we all take for granted. Often we don’t see them but they are needed and much of it is maintenance.

It’s like my house that I bought brand new 30 years ago. Since then I’ve put on a new roof, painted it a couple of times and replaced every kitchen appliance. It’s called maintenance.

For Michele,

I’m no engineer but I would hope that with the tests that have been done they feel confident that it will stand. But you must also believe that when/if they build a new one it will be much stronger as are all new buildings being built today.

As I said if the folks that want to defeat this tax succeed I honestly would love to see all maintenance STOP. I know it won’t happen but something has to stop this nonsense. Why do we have a representative government if we are not going to let them do their work.

There is a plan close to 200 project or more, go here: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/planning/wtp/

Posted by: mickh on June 20, 2005 10:51 PM
50. mickh,

The biggest complaint we all have is that the bulk of the money in the gas tax is going to projects that aren't even projects yet. Give us real projects with complete plans and true costs for the rebuilds of 520 and 99 and then see what we think.

Your statement about stopping maintenance is pretty laughable - so how are they spending all of the gas tax revenue they get already? I think most of us agree that some major changes need to happen at WSDOT before we give them a blank check to spend even more money even more inefficiently.

In your earlier post, you mentioned that a car getting 17mpg would only cost $22 with the gas tax increase. Where did you get those numbers? I just figured out that amounts to $67/year not $22. I hope you didn't get those numbers from someone down in Olympia, but I guess it would make sense.

Posted by: Bubbasaurus on June 20, 2005 11:21 PM
51. Mickh,

Great point using your home maintenance as a example. So to elaborate on that if I may. I live in an old brick house. Before the quake I had a few settling cracks and the chimney was a little out of square. BUT after the quake...the chimney was ready to fall into the roof, and the cracks are more produced and have exposed an underlying flaw in the framing of the house its-self.

So, given that,do I a) prop up the chimney, spakle and paint the cracks hoping that I wont live in the house when another quake rolls through, or b) call the contractor for repair estiamtes.

Posted by: DamnageD on June 20, 2005 11:32 PM
52. ...even better...

If the I-hate-Gregoire-anti-tax passes, then maybe since we haven't apeased the gods of taxation, another quake will strike...knock down that piece of shit viaduct (and sink the 520) then we'll REALLY know how much it was needed!

I'd love to listen to E Wa-ners whine and cry when their access to the Ports are reduced or destroyed.

Folks, the clock is ticking...and it has for years now. We have to do something, and it's going to cost money. Deal with it!

Posted by: DamnageD on June 20, 2005 11:45 PM
53. The real shame here is that all the activism, all the passion to repeal this tax just looks petty and vendictive. Since Rossi lost, does the right need something else to bitch about? What a waste of energy.

And maybe folks don't recall that our "leaders" don't really give a rats ass what we think about things. I seem to recall the GP making a very profound statement that we DIDN'T want a new stadium...just to watch it get built anyway.

Suckers!

Posted by: DamnageD on June 20, 2005 11:55 PM
54. Oh my Gosh Mr. DamageD, is the sky really falling?

Posted by: Deadwood on June 20, 2005 11:55 PM
55. mickh, I am over the election, because I expect politicians to honor campaign promises doesn't mean that I am crying about the election. Payback is a mother...... and voters will remember who is honest and who is not.

As for hitting a deer going 60mph..... That's a risk all over America. Not just here and we don't need to spend 100 million on animal bridges so that they can cross the road to mate and increase the gene pool, or whatever other stupid reason the enviro-nazi's seem to think these animals need bridges for.

We don't need billions in maintenance of roads. We don't need millions spent on insane artwork that no-one but a freak understands on roads either. Only Seattle would spend hundreds of thousands of dollars putting artwork at a sewer facility. This state is tax and spend crazy and Seattle is really out there with all of their insane ideas. Every week there is a new plan coming out of Seattle that costs millions....
Enough of it!

Posted by: sgmmac on June 20, 2005 11:56 PM
56. DamnageD--aka Chicken Little
The F***ing Sky is Falling!!!!

Listen Dimwit, if this is such a transportation emergency, did you ever consider a major reprioritization of government eliminating all non-essential programs?? How about doing things like:
1) Eliminating prevailing wage on these projects.
2) All State employees take a 10% cut in salaries and benefits.
3) Freeze all state travel starting with Gregoire's real fine European vacation.
4) Eliminate the 1 or 2% to the Arts bullsh*t.
5) Repeal the Growth Management Act so rural counties can develop a tax base.
6) Statewide spending freeze.

All you LEFTIST PINHEADS know is TAXTAXTAX as a first resort. Screw you DD. Then you try to guilt and scare people into supporting this massive tax increase.
BAD TRY===NO FU**** SALE HERE PINHEAD!!

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on June 20, 2005 11:58 PM
57. Resorting to playground bulling again I see. Just cause this is your school dosen't mean i'm any more intimidated by your bullshit...and i'll even type the whole word.

If you'd get OFF YOUR F@#$ING HIGH HORSE for a moment you'd see that I AGREE WITH YOU. I'm capable of understanding your points when valid and NOT being a complete shithead about it.

Get over your self or go have a drink.
Jezus!

Posted by: DamnageD on June 21, 2005 12:09 AM
58. DamnageD
Think about what you said. The roads would be nothing compared to the damage of all those buildings that will no longer exist. For a quake that big Seattle would not exist anymore. It would take decades to recover from the quake. Roads are minor compared to the lives that will be lost. Yes hundreds if not thousands of lives will be lost because we underfund emergency services. WHy because they do not get them votes. We cant have crime fighting policeman it will make the criminals angry. They are the biggest block of democratic votes. Here we have cars stolen every day. You have to be caught 14 times before you spend any time in jail. If you only get caught every 10 time you steal a car that a lot of cars stolen. WHat is the going rate 5 grand per car.
But back to the roads. Even if we rebuilt them tomorrow. They would be destroyed again anyway. For a quake that will destory the current roads. Has our technology on tunnels improved so that an earthquake will not bury the tunnel. I-90 will be gone. I saw the map it is on sandy soil that will act like quicksand. So if you are on that road odds are you will be buried alive. But the bridges as they are now may still stand. Just no road leaving Seattle will be present. I am not an engineer but your statements are not facts. THey are only guesses. But you have no idea what the damage will be like if the big one hits. If those two roads fail look at downtown Seattle being a pile of rubble. Or maybe even portions under water. Hard to say. No the main problem I have with the tax is that they take a 30 year loan out to get the money now. all our gas tax will be spent on projects not even planned. Read my previous posting of some ideas to improve the transportation system. Right now the tax payer pays over 75% of the cost of Mass Transit. WHy dont we increase the fares on Busses to cover expenses? Thereby more money could be spent on roads. The light rail will fail because we the tax payer pay over 95% of the cost of moving the person from point a to point b. Increase the train costs to equal the real cost of running the service and no one could afford to ride the train. Is that cost effectiveness? SO much money given away for projects that dont take more than a few hundred cars off the road every day. GOlly gee. That is some plan. SPend all the money and no extra general purpose lanes. We want better interchanges and more general purpose road. This plan has very little of either of them. If all I get a a nickel out of each dollar spent on good road fixes to me that is a big waste. Why would I want my gas tax for the next 30 years to go down the drain because they are taking loans out to keep any new road construction from happening. DO you mortgage your house to have a new addition added and pay for it up front and they will get back to you in a decade with an answer. All the while you are paying the principle and the interest. Do real time fixes. Fund x amount for each road construction job. Keep the gas tax in a particular region. Prioritize the jobs and fund them one by one. With the money that comes in. If you have a 50 million dollars come in this quarter. WHat jobs can you work for teh quarter to spend that 50 million dollars. The tax payer will see real progress after a year or two. They will see the roads being fixed and will support more money if they think it will improve congestion.

Posted by: David Anfinrud on June 21, 2005 12:09 AM
59. David,

I couldn't agree with you MORE about the overall damage that will be inflicted upon the greater metro area when (NOT IF) the big one hits. The least of our worries would be that POS viaduct or pontoon POS 520 were destroyed.
As far as the underfunded FD/PD...again I concur. I vote for EVERY SINGLE LEVY that I can...we NEED those services. And the friggen car thiefs, I hope Satan uses them as cushions for his bony arse in hell!
I do have a pretty good idea the damage we'll sustain. And I didn't pretend to have a solution. I'm trying to make a few simple points here. One being that the energy being spent on repealing the gas tax could really be used (in my opinion)in a more constructive measure. Pressuring the politicians to be accountable for what they are spending. Or enacting some drastic measures...like CYN-IRR has laid out ( yes, arse hole, i agree with you, even if your being a dick).
You've got good points David, don't think that just because I dont agree with ONE petition taht i'm incapable of seeing a bigger picture. I'm allowed to disagree, it dosent make me the enemy, retarded or a pinko commie. I just dont agree with THIS method.

Posted by: DamnageD on June 21, 2005 12:30 AM
60. Anybody who buys those bonds while knowing the funding is potentially going to get clipped at the knees deserves to lose their investment. You gotta know the campaign for the trolls to keep the tax on is going to go like this..."We can't let the bonds fail in the name of keeping a good reputation for future bonds"

Posted by: PC on June 21, 2005 12:40 AM
61. Bubbasaurus, you raise a good point which is all those who call for 'firm projects'. We can't just say 'build a freeway from X to Y' and put it on the ballot, it's to big to do that. It does actually have to be studied and planned to minute detail. The closest pure commercial project (in scale) I can think of is building a new high-rise in downtown seattle, a highly capitalist and therefore efficient venture. Yet this requires YEARS in planning, including location, tenants & pre-leases, and so on. And this is before all the big city red-tape you have to go through. Man I pitty the guys who go through that permitting process! Your gas tax right now is paying for all the study work on say SR-520 to do it right, possibly as much as $500M when you include buying the additional needed land (which is included in this thing I guess from what I read.)

(Side rant: What's really needed is some type of control on the dumbasses who live next to these things and create legal problems. It all comes down to responsibility! Don't buy a house next to an airport/road/stadium without realising that might expand some day dumbass! I especially love people who get a discount on property because of an easement and then try to sue when it's used! Our whole society has a serious responsibility problem.)

As for the several people who ask if the viaduct is really falling apart as a Seattle resident I will relay a few observations (I drive nearly daily on the viaduct and park in the area frequently) about this piece of crap architectural wonder.

1) The road isn't flat anymore. If you are stuck in trafic you can see the dips from it bending/flexing. If you are driving it's kind of like a speedboat going over gentle swells. Fun in a sort of perverse way actually.
2) You can see raw steel rebar in multiple locations on the structure.
3) The so called 'retrofit' the DOT did that someone foolishly thought might make it 'stronger' consists of strapping a couple of steel beams onto the side of the thing (a sort of 'splint')
4) A coworker had a chunk of concrete land on her car about a year ago.
5) Goddamn the things' just UGLY too, what were they thinking in the first place.

Posted by: Chokai on June 21, 2005 12:50 AM
62. Chokai-

Man I'm with ya on your side rant! 100%

Posted by: DamnageD on June 21, 2005 12:59 AM
63. And when the No New Gas Tax initiative succeeds and kicks this thing out, maybe they can put together a responsible plan. you know, be like the rest of us have to when WE want to build something and need money from the bank. We've personally been through that process--you have to tell the bank WHAT your plans are, who's building it, how much it costs, cost breakdowns, what materials you're using, have insurance and permits already in place, etc. These people haven't done that for the viaduct---why are THEY exempt from any accountability on building projects?

Posted by: Michele on June 21, 2005 01:04 AM
64. And maybe if they weren't funneling several hundred million dollars of this tax to SOUND TRANSIT we wouldn't see it as quite such a farce. They never much talk about that part in the press. They know it's just good money after bad. Yet we're supposed to just suck it up and pay it anyway. FUH-GET ABOUT IT! Sound Transit already HAS its own dedicated funding source and they said they wouldn't be taking state money because of that. Yet, there they go--screwing us AND eastern Washington for more with this gas tax. NO WAY, PAL!

Posted by: Michele on June 21, 2005 01:10 AM
65. Chokai--
There are many of us who truly believe your point (5)UGLY is the driving force behind this project. WHO stands to gain in vastly improved property values if this VIADUCT is replaced with a tunnel???
The Gas Tax should not be used for asthetic purposes. PERIOD!
I could care less how ugly the Seattle waterfront is because of that hideous piece of crap VIADUCT. As long as it's functional....make do!!

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on June 21, 2005 01:12 AM
66. Politics in Washington is about as sleezy as it comes. Selling bonds on these taxes so quickly, and before there is a plan ... amazing.

Posted by: BananaLand(aka Iguana) on June 21, 2005 02:04 AM
67. DamnageD, you said: "I'd love to listen to E Wa-ners whine and cry when their access to the Ports are reduced or destroyed."

1. Seattle isn't the only port around.
2. Ever heard of the Columbia River?

Posted by: Andy SW on June 21, 2005 04:28 AM
68. "One being that the energy being spent on repealing the gas tax could really be used (in my opinion)in a more constructive measure. Pressuring the politicians to be accountable for what they are spending."

Hmmm. I wonder if the possibility that enraging a democratic (small "d" -- not the party) populace with its heavy-handedness (G_DDAMN YOU PEASANTS, IT'S AN EMERGENCY! LIKE THE OTHER 80-90 THAT WE DECLARED IN THE MOST RECENT SESSION), and resulting in a citizen initiative being placed on the ballot, could be construed as being constructive and 'pressuring' the politicians to be more accountable with what they are spending.

Regardless of how one feels about the initiative, or how one intends to vote if/when it makes it to the ballot, my opinion is that it serves as a well-deserved smack-upside-the-head for Christine I and the Legislature.

Posted by: FlyingTigress on June 21, 2005 04:56 AM
69. So can anyone tell me, what happen to the 5 cent increase?

Posted by: LeeS on June 21, 2005 06:43 AM
70. DamnageD.....

A tunnel that everyone thinks is such as great idea "must be built on bed rock" and I've not heard one word from are so called experts if there is any they can attach to. Now granted, we can dig real deep to find it at a cost of ????.
One only has to look at the I-5 convention center mess and ask yourself. Who in their right mind would build something like this over a major freeway that takes 4 lines down to 2 and IF it came down during a earthquake. It would bring this whole area to a full blow stop.
So should we trust these people who built this mess.

PS... yes I'm a Engineer.

Posted by: LeeS on June 21, 2005 06:54 AM
71. LeeS,
The 5 cents went toward um, well, you see, um, I don't know where it went silly. But we really do need more because we can take more.

Michele,
Your arguments summed up in one word, accountability. That's all we are asking for and since they won't give it, this initiative is the only way we can demand it.
As we have stated above, we have no problem paying taxes for necessary services but this is ridiculous. We cannot give them carte blanche anymore. We must hold the politicians, who play politics with our money, accountable.

Posted by: cc on June 21, 2005 07:30 AM
72. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/

Posted by: FlyingTigress on June 21, 2005 07:30 AM
73. Actually, I had heard about the July bond sale when I-912 was just starting up. It has been a possibility all along.

I have a limited understanding of the whole bond process, can anyone help? I think that like home loans, they have different rates based on some rating system. Considering the dismal failure of sound transit, a floundering monorail project, no effective auditing or accountability oversight, not to mention our national embarrassment of a state election, I wonder how many additional tax dollars will be spent on higher bond rates?? We certainly will not qualify for the good student or safe driver discounts.

Posted by: dl on June 21, 2005 07:44 AM
74. To LeeS,

A tunnel must be built in bedrock? Everyone knows that downtown Seattle is built on tidal mudflats. Didn't the new stadiums have extra large budgets for stabilizing them, because earthquakes cause all that old mud to jiggle?

Typical of Seattle to think that just because they want it, they can buy it, even if it is essentially physically impossible.

Posted by: dl on June 21, 2005 07:51 AM
75. The idea that you do bonds means we get less for our money.Will not a large portion of the gas tax go to interest payments over the life of the bond.
Think of it we waste the money on projects that are not completed and need more money. We tie up the money we get into paying loans on the money they collect. The typical Seattle transportation success story. You have to use mass transit because they have no money for new roads.
Plus the fact that so much of the money is again diverted to Mass transit projects. That is what I am against. The money must be spent on actual new road construction. Fixing transportation issues. No down payment and demand more later. Eventually you get to the point of no more money available.
Look what happened with the Cigarette tax. Raise the tax and get less revenue.
Look at all the extra money coming into the government coffers instead of using them on roads they are looking for new projects to fund. Obviously Roads are not an emergency. So the gas tax is not an emergency. The gas tax is used to increase tax revenue so State government say they are doing something on roads yet increase spending on anything but roads. Gas tax is not the only source of money. State Revenue should also be used. Until I see the State saying I want to fix the transportation problem why not growing goverment projects and truly funding roads as a priority they dont deserve any more money.
Just think about it. Why is gas tax an emergency bill. yet of the over 2 billion dollars of new money rolling into the budget that was not there in the last budget how much of it went to actual road construction. Priorities must be set and Social program spending does not fix the roads. Increase gas tax so you can divert money into Social Programs is not fixing the roads(Sales tax on all goods used to build or fix the roads a hidden benifit to adding more money from gas tax to general fund). Just my two cents worth.

Posted by: David Anfinrud on June 21, 2005 08:00 AM
76. Before anyone gets carried away supporting the increase in tax for a tunnel is strongly suggest they take a look at google maps and the satellite view. Zoom in so you can just cover the area from where the tunnel emergences to the area by the stadiums. It is just over a mile and by removing 5 +/- older building a ground level 10 lane freeway could be built. Probably the cost would be 5% of what is proposed and be better all the way around.

Posted by: ipsi dixit on June 21, 2005 08:05 AM
77. mickh said, " Why do we have a representative government if we are not going to let them do their work."

Jeffro says " Why do we have a representative government if they are not going to let represent the will of the people."

Posted by: Jeffro on June 21, 2005 09:20 AM
78. The History of Philosophies ( Liberals and Conservatives)

The History began some 12,000 years ago. Humans existed as members of small bands o nomadic hunter/gatherers. They lived on deer in the Northern Mountains in the summer and would migrate to the Southern beaches and live on fish and lobster in winter.

The 2 most important events in all of history were the invention of beer and the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer. These were the foundations of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into 2 distinct sub-cultures, namely the Liberals and Conservatives.

Once beer was discovered it required a great amount of grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early human ancestors were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the
brewery. That's how villages were formed.

Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to B-B-Q at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as "the Conservative movement." Other men who were weaker and less skilled t hunting learned to live off of the conservatives by showing up for he nightly B-B-Q's and doing the dishes, sewing, fetching things and
hair dressing. These were the people who began the Liberal movement.

Some of these Liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest became known as "girleymen". Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy, group hugs and the concept of entitlement programs that dictate how to evenly divide amongst all people, the meat and beer that Conservatives worked so hard to provide.

Over the years Conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the jackass.

Modern Liberals like imported beer, but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal fare. Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of their women have higher testosterone levels than their men.

Most social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in Hollywood and group therapists are liberals. Liberals also invented the designated hitter rule because it wasn't "fair" to
make the pitcher bat.

Their biggest contribution was to make the education system less stressful by requiring a student only be as smart as the dumbest class member.

Conservatives on the other hand drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still provide for their women. Conservatives are big game hunters, rodeo cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, police officers, corporate executives, soldiers, athletes and generally anyone who works productively outside government.

Conservatives who own companies hire other Conservatives who want to work for a living.

Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to "govern" the producers and decide what to do with their production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the Liberals remained in Europe when Conservatives were coming to America. They
crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get MORE for nothing.

Posted by: 4pawz on June 21, 2005 09:23 AM
79. The federal agency in charge of aviation security collected extensive personal information about airline passengers even though Congress forbade it and officials said they wouldn't do it, according to documents obtained Monday by The Associated Press."

Now this is a real government conspiracy against the people.

I'm suspicious that when all the facts are known, there is much less to this story tham now appears.

Posted by: South County on June 21, 2005 09:24 AM
80. If the I-hate-Gregoire-anti-tax passes, then maybe since we haven't apeased the gods of taxation, another quake will strike...knock down that piece of shit viaduct (and sink the 520) then we'll REALLY know how much it was needed!

I'd love to listen to E Wa-ners whine and cry when their access to the Ports are reduced or destroyed.

Folks, the clock is ticking...and it has for years now. We have to do something, and it's going to cost money. Deal with it!


...a sacrifice to the tax gods...I like that phrase.


For those of you who believe that if you pay for it, you'll get it...I have something on e-bay I'd like to sell you.


No, on second thought...even con men have standards...only politicians do not. Why would any sane person support any transportation program cooked up by King County?

Posted by: South County on June 21, 2005 09:30 AM
81. The following is an op/ed piece my Mark Hulst, Chairman of GoWashington on the gas tax.


9 ½ cents is a lot
for those who don’t have it

by

Mark Hulst, Chairman
GoWashington

With the July 8 deadline fast approaching, thousands of everyday, hard working men and women are hustling to get 225,000 valid signatures in the first step toward repealing the recently passed 9 ½ cent-per-gallon gas tax. I am proud to be a member of this committed group and believe it is time for all of us to fight this unfair and inappropriate tax.
I am appalled the Democrats rushed this tax through without first insuring the Department of Transportation was properly spending the 5 cent-per-gallon tax passed in 2003 – just two years ago. The Legislature passed a bill last session allocating $4 million to fund performance audits of the Department of Transportation, so why couldn’t the Democrats wait until the audits were completed? Good management dictates that you know what you are spending and where before you seek additional funding.
As has been said before by myself and countless others, “what we need is real accountability in state government for where our tax dollars go.” There isn’t one person in this state who doesn’t understand the need to improve our highways and roads. What we don’t understand is why we can’t have better management and accountability in how these projects are handled.

Also, how does a 9 ½ cent a gallon tax to pay for rebuilding the Alaska Way Viaduct and the 520 floating bridge help the hop ranchers in Moxee, or the orchardists in Yakima, or the wheat farmers near Spokane? It doesn’t! The only people who are going to really benefit from this gas tax are those in Seattle. Little, if any, benefit will be seen by taxpayers in rural counties or small town communities throughout eastern Washington or other parts of the state.


Granted the Democrats did earmark one cent of the 9 ½ cent gas tax for local governments to improve roads in their immediate areas. But what this means is that roughly one-third of Washington’s population will be paying a tax on which they will receive only a pittance in benefits. When does the time come when the rest of the state stops paying for the troubles of Seattle?

In addition, local taxes will have to be raised – in addition to the 9 ½ cent gas tax – for communities to qualify for this funding. If a community votes no to additional taxes, they lose funding for their local road projects, but still have to pay the gas tax. Backers of the new gas tax, call this an incentive. In the old days, we called it blackmail.

The fact is the 5 cent gas tax and this latest 9 ½ cent gas taxes are extremely regressive; hitting the poorest of the poor hardest. These additional taxes will cost the poorest families approximately $150 per year; money desperately needed for food and other family needs. The Democrat’s rush to pass this tax invalidates their claims of protecting the “little guy”.

Now is the time for all of us to stand up and say “No” to the tax and spend Seattle liberals who believe our taxes are for their improvements. Now is the time for all Republicans to stand up and protect Washington’s taxpayers. Now is the time to tell Olympia that we have found our voice and that voice says, “No more wasteful spending!”

I urge everyone to sign the petition to repeal the gas tax. If you have already signed, then make sure your family members and your neighbors have signed this most important petition. Together we can make a positive difference for all of Washington State.

Mark Hulst is the former chairman of the Skagit County Republican Party and chairman of GoWashington. GoWashington is a political action committee dedicated to electing Republican to the Washington State Senate, House of Representatives, and County Councils/Commissions. It is headquartered in Olympia, Washington.

Posted by: David Adams on June 21, 2005 09:33 AM
82. 4pawz-

Laughed my a$$ off. Well done.

Posted by: Jeffro on June 21, 2005 09:44 AM
83. It's important for all of us to support the initiative not only by signing it but also by sending money to the folks in Kirkland running the campaign:

No New Gas Tax
218 Main St. #412
Kirkland, Wa 98033

I'm sedning them a check today, and I urge everyone to provide some financial support for this worthy cause.

Posted by: L. H. smith on June 21, 2005 09:59 AM
84. DamnageD; If the I-hate-Gregoire-anti-tax passes, then maybe since we haven't apeased the gods of taxation, another quake will strike...knock down that piece of shit viaduct (and sink the 520) then we'll REALLY know how much it was needed!

Why can't you liberals get it through your thick heads what we are saying about taxes? If the States puts a package together showing actual needs, costs and logical economic plans to archive them then we will listen and act accordingly to support it. I am sure most of us would even be willing to pay more in taxes if the facts bore out. We are tired of the massive waste of money by the leaders who direct public money to their own personal leberal agendas regardless of what the public mandates. You people better listen and you better wake-up because there is a huge groundswell of voter anger about to run over the top of you.

Posted by: 4pawz on June 21, 2005 10:01 AM
85. "If the gas tax is overturned, major bridges will not be repaired. You will not see congestion relief on (Interstate) 405. The Alaskan Way viaduct will be closed or will fall down...

...dogs and cats living together...mass hysteria!"

Posted by: flexnfx on June 21, 2005 10:15 AM
86. To Jeffro:

It’s called an ELECTION…and you cast a VOTE if they don’t do what you think they should do.

Just remember you only get ONE vote and so do I.

Posted by: mickh on June 21, 2005 10:19 AM
87. Michele:

Come on you can't be serious...

You said: "when WE want to build something and need money from the bank. We've personally been through that process--you have to tell the bank WHAT your plans are, who's building it, how much it costs, cost breakdowns, what materials you're using, have insurance and permits already in place, etc. "

Many are long term projects and you just don't do the detail planning/design/material specs/permits until you know what it is your going to build, be it a house, tunnel, road or whatever. It's simply a waste of time and money.

Then you end with: " why are THEY exempt from any accountability on building projects? "

They are absolutely being accountable and responsible. They are not going to go through the expense and effort of designing a road, tunnel or viaduct when they don’t know what it is they going to build (now that would be irresponsible).

I take it from your post that you build a house and I’m sure you didn’t design a high rise and a house when you went to the bank for a building loan.

Posted by: mickh on June 21, 2005 10:20 AM
88. The Democrat propaganda doesn't match its arguments. Fraudoire just told us that there would be over $500 million in extra revenue supposedly because of her. So why is she raising the gas tax? They are talking out of both sides of their mouth.

Posted by: pbj on June 21, 2005 10:21 AM
89. mick from the bscorner, it is obvious you don't what you are talking about. There has been study upon study of the projects proposed to be used by the State. Take the ones off the shelf, declare an emergency and start building. Declare environmental appeals null and void and eliminate prevailing wage (which really isn't prevailing wage). Talk about cost savings.

Oops, they already declared an emergency, didn't they?

Posted by: swatter on June 21, 2005 10:30 AM
90. This weekend I had the chance to sign I 912 outside of the local Safeway. I mentioned to the guy that I thought he probably was not having to explain too much about what this initiative was about. Then he said something curious; No, I'm not having to explain it much, too bad that there are not that many people interested in it. I did not have the impression that there was nobody interested in it. In fact I was waiting for somebody to finish signing as I talked to him. It occurs to me that there could very well be stinking Democrat scum out there that love taxation in all of its forms who would make us believe that we have signed an initiative then throw it away. I hope I'm not just being paranoid. After the 2004 governors election, I put nothing beneath this slime.

Posted by: REBEL on June 21, 2005 10:34 AM
91. I think I can understand why many residents of the state would not trust its current government. I wouldn't, either. They're acting like they're stuffing their pockets as fast as they can.

Posted by: Bostonian on June 21, 2005 10:40 AM
92. To Mick and the other tax loving libs: Explain to me why myself and others who live in Pullman should NOT sign I-912? We get a measly $9 million of the $7 billion, plus maybe a $100K a year from the 1 cent kickback to the counties. The $9 million we do get is not even on our list of needs. See http://palousitics.blogspot.com for details.

How is it fair that a vast majority of the 9.5 cents goes to King County projects that we will never use? Why not tolls and local levies?

I seem to remember America got started under similar circumstances (taxation without representation). Is this not tyranny?

Posted by: On the Far Right Side of the State on June 21, 2005 10:45 AM
93. 4pawz--
Excellent history recap. You need a spot in Evergreen College. Almost-brainwashed students would treat it like a witchcraft class--curiously signing up and filling the 'evil right'class, like a driver staring at a car wreck. Lib faculty would sneer and peak in the door windows hoping for a glimpse of student revolt or chaos. They would see wide-eyed kids finally learning something useful for life. "The paw is mightier than the sword!"

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on June 21, 2005 10:55 AM
94. Yes, to all of the above right side. Who cares about you anyway? You don't pay your fair share, but the trucks that bunk up here do use your roads, and I like the nice roads when I take the vacation trips.

If you don't like it, why don't you merge with Idaho? Or form your own state?

Posted by: swatter on June 21, 2005 10:56 AM
95. L.H. Smith--
Ummm, before I start encouraging folks to blindly send money to this Initiative, it would be nice if John Carlson, Kirby Wilbur and others involved disclosed how much is going to be sucked off by Brett Bader and others "consultants" for their "services". Know what I mean??

1) How much is going to direct costs such as staffing to process petitions, advertising, mailers etc. vs.

2) Consultants

With time so short (July 8th is 17 days away), it's easy to get caught up in the euphoria of repealing this onerous gas tax and not take a few moments to clearly document for people who is getting paid, how much and for what.
Know what I mean?

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on June 21, 2005 11:19 AM
96. Swatter, good idea on statehood. Then we can charge you an extra 9.5 cents for every kilowatt of electricity you use. That should about cover our "fair share"

Posted by: On the Far Right Side of the State on June 21, 2005 11:32 AM
97. Michk-

What the hell have you been smoking. Our politicians have a history of ignoring the wishes of the PEOPLE that they represent AND work for. Our fine Gov said one thing "no new taxes" and strapped a butload of taxes onto our backs, with the support of the legislature. How does that represent us? How can we change that by voting when our elections are completely unreliable?

As for building anything in this state - have you ever had anything built? Shed or 200,000 sq. ft. business park, I've been involved in both and Michelle is RIGHT and you are SO WRONG. Stop speaking out of your a$$.

Also, don't lecture me on one person, one vote - it's your fu¢king party that was voting multiple times and stuffing provisional ballots in with the rest...

Posted by: Jeffro on June 21, 2005 11:44 AM
98. Jimmie-howya-doin:

Thank you for your great response. It is truly amassing to see how the Conservative man has progressed over the Liberal man (sic) these passed 12,000 years.

Jimmie-howya-doin:

Thank you for your comments, I laughed until my stomach hurt. The sad part is the Liberals will now emailing for the next few weeks for the suggested class schedule.

Posted by: 4pawz on June 21, 2005 11:48 AM
99. I will try this again (and I get confused by the Liberals postings

Jeffro:
Thank you for your great response. It is truly amassing to see how the Conservative man has progressed over the Liberal man (sic) these passed 12,000 years.

Jimmie-howya-doin:
Thank you for your comments, I laughed until my stomach hurt. The sad part is the Liberals will now emailing for the next few weeks for the suggested class schedule

Posted by: 4pawz on June 21, 2005 11:52 AM
100. To Jeffro:

Well thanks so much for raising the level of discourse.

I can’t figure out if it’s your age, IQ or intelligence that your displaying but in any case it’s a minus 1.

Good job Jeffo. I’m sure if you have kids they must be very proud. It was cute the way you used the “ ¢ “ in the F word.

BTW, a teacher once told me that people that swear do it because they don’t have anything to say.

You’ve made her case.

Posted by: mickh on June 21, 2005 12:49 PM
101. mickh-

Typical liberal tactic, attack someones IQ. Ooooh, you liberals are so smart and so are your teachers. Intellgent people never use profanity blah, blah blah.

Again, I'm curious- have you built any structure in this state? The private sector has to secure financing and to secure financing, the assorted lenders have to be assured that you are actually going to build something from start to finish.

I guess government doesn't have to do that since they have an endless supply of tax money to draw from.

Posted by: Jeffro on June 21, 2005 01:55 PM
102. Wait a second, how exactly is taking billions of dollars from the taxpayers without a REAL budget of what a project is going to cost or a REAL revenue source to finish it being "RESPONSIBLE"?

Posted by: Palouse on June 21, 2005 02:32 PM
103. 4pawz-
What the hell. Professors we are. Let's sneak in an agenda of classes. Admin. won't notice an extra class change fax at Evergreen--we will just show up with our briefcases and in business casual dress with big conservative smiles.

Hints from the audience? Here are mine off the cuff:
101--"Voter Integrity and The Deceased--Making Sense of Putrefaction."
102--"Absentee Voting Studies--The Invisible Man and Etherial Vapours"
103--"Fingers & Toes--Counting Votes in the 21st Century--a King County Perspective"
104--"Crime & Punishment--(Abridged Version)--How to Retain Your Job (& Salary & Bene's) and Dignity Despite Right Wing Attacks."
105--"Ballot Stuffing--That Silly Myth Pervades." (Guest Speaker-Chicago Voting Precinct Captain, Stuffalo Boxxo.) I'm ready to roll--have my pocket protector filled.


Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on June 21, 2005 07:30 PM
104.
Jimmie-howya-doin, you’re hurting my stomach again.

How about the elective class
101--"Effective Felon voting" class could be available for four consecutive years with credit earned for "on site training in Monroe" or another accredited four year prison of your choice (or not your choice). This is currently one of the number one fields of employment in King County after graduation.

Posted by: 4pawz on June 21, 2005 08:08 PM
105. Why do we need another tax? Why doesn't Olympia manage itself like the rest of Corporate America?

An interesting fact that I gleaned from the state's web pages indicate that there are more than 104,000 Washington State Employees--a numbert that has almost doubled the number since 1989 and makes Washington State the single largest employer by far. The ratio of state employees to state residents since 1989 has also increased. Now considering that during that same period most businesses became a bit leaner with the implementation of electronic office automation and outsourcing this increase doesn't make sense. If Olympia trimmed its roles by a mere 10% it would save taxpayers in excess of $520 Million dollars annually (conservatively figured without perks and benefits). So why do we need a tax increase when we can right-size the workforce to achieve the necessary working capital?

For those of us who migrated from the Golden State, we remember the awesome effects of Proposition 13 limiting the taxes people pay and forcing state and local government to tighten appropriately. Since Prop 13 and subsequent cost cutting that state had years of overflowing coffers (except the brief tenure of a wacko governor who was ousted by recall). The more Christine and friends push for incrementally ever-increasing tax burdens, I'm afraid that our next move must be to enact such drastic stops to force responsibility.

Posted by: Elvis is the King County on June 21, 2005 10:08 PM
106. How about the Woman-only classes:
106--Underarm Hair Braiding
107--LegHair Delousing
108--How to find a Girly-man to abuse

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on June 21, 2005 10:12 PM
107. ok--ok--stop it you guys--funny bone now tingling-I'll now (respectfully) call you "Professor 4Pawz"--heck--promotions are in order for not solving anything--just look at our King Co. elections "fallout."

Class dismissed--another screw-off (oops--teacher contract) "teacher training day" that I got paid for--Me & 4pawz spent it at Starbucks working on the next year's 'curriculum.'

Actually--Elvis raised a good point--I remember hearing on radio about the ratio of edu. admin to teachers in WA being very high relative to other states. Anyone? This--I think--is the first ripe area for an audit.

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on June 21, 2005 11:11 PM
108. mickh, your post was just plain embarrassing for you. Sorry, but it was

Posted by: Michele on June 21, 2005 11:30 PM
109. I've been sitting at my computer for hours, logged into my husband's biz computer doing accounting. How boring is that at this time of night. I finally quit and checked to see if you guys are playing nicely with your little friends. Jimmie and 4pawz . . . I was laughing so hard that I was afraid I would wake up gramps . . . and he would not be a happy camper. He may own his own business, but he gets up at 4:15 to go to work, 6 days a week, so he needs his beauty sleep - yes, conservatives work very hard for their money.

Thank you guys for being so smart and so funny. Elvis, thanks for the interesting statistics. Keep singing . . . I like your music!

Posted by: lksimstrailgrammy on June 21, 2005 11:39 PM
110. 109 - Transportation Project Overrun planning

110 - Emergency Clause Writing

111 - Gun Control for non NRA members

Posted by: GS on June 22, 2005 12:00 AM
111. Sorry, Grammy--let Gramps sleep--better rested for the toils--

bless him and the 238 other people he carries on his shoulders while working--illegal immigrants, freeloaders, Tent City-zens, King County election workers (with promotions), K. County code enforcement officers (watch out!) and a host of other useful idiots; 415 am? bless him again; I'm usually dreaming of sugarplums at that time; or sometimes waking up in a cold sweat (ok--honestly, a wet bed!) re-living the election with that damn recurring dream of being "too late" to vote and the election is called for Her Grace by 1 vote! (insert 'Dean Scream' audio soundtrack here) as the Aussies say, "good day!"

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on June 22, 2005 12:03 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?