The Secretary of State's attorney Jeff Even is a decent fellow, but he has the unenviable job of arguing Sam Reed's often silly positions in the election contest. One gets the impression that Reed thinks its more important to protect election officials from having to take responsibility to do anything than to defend the integrity of the election.
Yesterday, as the WSRP daily summary reports
The lawyer for the Secretary of State objected that voter crediting information could not be used to prove anything about who voted or how many people votedI accept the argument that proving anything about any individual voter should require the voter's actual signature. But if you want to conclude anything about a large aggregation of voters (such as statistical patterns as was the context in which the argument was made), what else would you do if you didn't want to use the crediting records?
It's obviously impossible to ask the judge to review each of 600,000 absentee ballot envelopes, so you would need to create a summary report. The only imaginable way to do this would be to hire a bunch of people (say county workers) and ask them to go through the ballot envelopes one at a time, verify that the signatures are valid and that the ballot was postmarked on time. If so, you add the voter's name to a list along with the precinct they were registered in at the time of the election. You also make sure that you don't add the voter's name to the list a second time if it's already on the list. That way you will get an exact count of everybody who voted and by precinct and you won't have to rely on the crediting records created by election workers...
... who created the crediting records by performing the same procedure described above!
Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at May 26, 2005 03:09 PM | Email ThisYou need to get your head out of your rump and realize Even's client is Sam Reed, not the ultra wacko WA State Rep's or Deeeno Rossi. He's only doing his job. Give the poor schmuck a break.
Posted by: Unkl Witz on May 26, 2005 08:05 PMGOP a bit liberal for my tastes. Man, oh man, and sure finding it hard to look at that midget woman senator ya'll got up here. Other one might be ok if she wore a dress.
Posted by: righton on May 26, 2005 08:55 PMStart with a preconcived notion, let's say Gregoire (Fraudoire) should be elected.
Then everything WILL end with this.
'DON'T NEED NO STINKING VOTE COUNT VERIFICATIONS!'
I would worry about anyone who is 'surprised' at anything that is 'uncovered' at this point.
Posted by: arky on May 27, 2005 05:17 AMWho cares?
Posted by: Amused by liberal morons on May 28, 2005 10:09 AMNice job Randy.... I see you've mastered the art of cut n paste. Now how about an original thought...
Posted by: alphabet soup on May 28, 2005 03:11 PMSpeaking of pointless, notice that Mr. Carbunkl Manners is back?
More ponderous posturing platitudes covered in crap.
By golly he'll show us pesky Republicans where we are wrong.
Posted by: Amused by liberals on May 29, 2005 10:20 AM