I'll be on the John Carlson Show again this afternoon at 3:15pm, KVI 570.
David Goldstein will apparently be on the show again too. I worry for Goldstein that he seems to believe that being invited on KVI is a sign that he's being taken seriously. I'm only speculating, but my hunch is that he's there mainly so the listeners can enjoy making fun of him.
One of our anonymous trolls, "danw", pointed out in the comments [May 24 10:35am]
Snark rarely disputes what Goldy saysthat's true, but it doesn't mean what danw wants it to mean. It's also the case that I rarely dispute what Zippy the Pinhead says. Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at May 25, 2005 12:56 PM | Email This
I guess its similar to you getting a spot on The Stranger. Same difference. Every media outlet needs a token dissenter.
Posted by: Erik on May 25, 2005 01:10 PMBut Michele, that would mean you would have to turn off KVI while Goldy was talking. Creates quite a dilemma doesn't it?
Posted by: Erik on May 25, 2005 01:16 PMCongratulations for figuring this out! Go to the head of the class, Erik.
Posted by: Michele on May 25, 2005 01:26 PMCarlson can't come up with someone better to give a counterpoint?
Posted by: swatter on May 25, 2005 01:30 PMdon't be fooled by HA hits, 1/2 are conservatives and the other 1/2 is one person with many sockpuppets.
You can tell that Goldy takes perverse delight in hearing it, knowing that he has just succeeded in gettting Carlson to debase himself by REGULARLY having to say something on the air that he clearly is uncomfortable with (why else does Carlson keep bemoaning that he wishes Goldy should change the name of the website). Goldy also loves that he has just succeeded in getting John to disrespect an audience that mostly would rather not be subjected to that kind of coarseness of language. It's Goldy's perverse little delight.
I've already complained to them about it. And for the trolls who have a problem with this, I didn't see you guys complaining when King 5 TV refused to say the name of the website or show the name upon interviewing Goldy.
Posted by: Michele on May 25, 2005 01:49 PMThe reason why Stefan never responds to Goldstein, is that for the most part, Goldstein does not even deserve the dignity of a response. Most of his arguments are regurgitations of mainstream media articles that back his views, but are equally without merit when objectively compared to arguments such as Stefan's and other posters.
Goldstein fills a nice little niche for left leaning folks that like to vent that all right leaning folks are "wingnuts," rabid religious fundamentalists, etc. but if you want to understand what's going on, you can get a much more balanced and less narcissistic view simply by reading Stefan's posts, and the links to the mainstream sources he often refutes.
Yes, dissent makes groupthink more difficult.
Posted by: Erik on May 25, 2005 03:07 PMoh..........wait a minute, just read some of your posts. Nevermind, I guess you probably do think it's well reasoned logic.
Posted by: rb on May 25, 2005 03:49 PMYour guy has been censured from my discussions for improper indiscretions.
Posted by: swatter on May 25, 2005 03:51 PMAs for this "will of the people" line, they refuse to get that the election contest was brought about because we don't KNOW the will of the people. Well, actually, I think I do - Rossi won.
Posted by: Shannon K on May 25, 2005 05:44 PMTime for Erik to wake up and smell the dung!
Posted by: Budster on May 26, 2005 08:48 AM