May 20, 2005
'mkay

Now we know what the priorities are:

John McKay, the U.S. attorney for Western Washington, will direct a preliminary FBI investigation into possible federal criminal violations by Spokane Mayor Jim West, McKay's office said Friday
Not that I have any sympathy for Jim West, but why is it that the U.S. Attorney can announce that he's investigating West, 10 days after he said he couldn't legally announce any investigation, such as into the King County election fraud scandal?

Could it be that this U.S. Attorney is more concerned about people jerking off in their offices than he is concerned about election fraud? You wonder what the U.S. Attorney does in his office.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at May 20, 2005 04:03 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Saw that this morning and just shook my head and kept on walking. A disgrace to the Law Enforcment profession.

Posted by: JDH on May 20, 2005 04:10 PM
2. I too found it strange that the Feds could begin an investigation in the Spokane situation almost immediately. At this point they only suspect that West used his office to offer employment to young men.

Here we are with the election mess months later. Laws broken left and right, admissions made in depositions and where are our federal officials? This situation MUST be investigated.

Posted by: Vicki on May 20, 2005 04:26 PM
3. This kinda highlights the unimportance of the election contest.

Posted by: Doc on May 20, 2005 04:40 PM
4. I suspose its only wishful thinking on my part, but perhaps he's waiting for the trial to conclude before making any anouncement of an investigation.

Wouldn't making such an anouncement prejudice the case? Could there be some kind of legal liability that he avoiding? In the West situation there are no civil actions on-going.

Like I said. It may just be wishful thinking.

Posted by: DeadWood on May 20, 2005 04:51 PM
5. Doc,
In case you didn't notice, the November 2nd election was also a federal election. Shouldn't a federal law enforcement official have some interest in federal crimes committed during a federal election?

Posted by: BJ Gadfly on May 20, 2005 04:53 PM
6. All I can say about our illustrious US Attorney is "Birds of a Feather will jerkoff together".

Or something like that.

Posted by: fRedinKingCounty on May 20, 2005 06:09 PM
7. This makes my blood boil.

Posted by: cc on May 20, 2005 06:19 PM
8. Hmmm, maybe he wants to grow up to be a judge someday, and doesn't want to do anything that might get him filibustered. His bio looks OK . . .
McKay DOJ Bio

Posted by: starboardhelm on May 20, 2005 06:39 PM
9. hmmmm, read the McKay DOJ bio. The only thing I found odd is that he is single and enjoys his 26 nieces and nephews.
Has he ever been married? If he graduated from college in '78, he is about 48.

Posted by: cc on May 20, 2005 07:00 PM
10. You're doing great work uncovering the truth about the election. Please don't ruin the professionalism of the site by vulgar and personal attacks directed at the perpetrators and their bodies.

Posted by: Dave on May 20, 2005 07:21 PM
11. Let me repeat myself for about the 10th time on this:
We don't want the Feds in here now on this election contest. It will shift the entire focus from the facts of this contest to BUSH interfering. Rossi has a double digit lead over Gregoire and it will grow if this election contest is set aside. The Feds can come in later. There is no hurry. The trial will provide a solid basis from which they can proceed.
BE PATIENT!!!
The Feds involvement now would surely change Rossi's momentum.

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on May 20, 2005 07:26 PM
12. First of all, the only reason I don't use the moniker of Mr. Cynical is that it was already taken.

Second, Mr. Cynical is absolutely right. You don't want the feds in there yet. Besides, the victory will be sweeter if handled in-state.

Third, Doc is still a moron.

Posted by: Danny on May 20, 2005 07:37 PM
13. The US Attorney's Office is a political office, not a law enforcement office. It's "easy" to go after an individual, such as Jim West, because their are no significant political consequences to either of the parties. Going after King County or even a major coroporation, for that matter, invokes all the political ramifications for the US Attorney, and the administration it answers to.

What has happened in King County Elections is NOT an anomoly. It is more the standard of behavior in King County, where management directs the peasant help to achieve the desired results, no matter the means, and then leaves the details to those seeking advancement, raises, or simple recognition.

DOT, DDES, the PA's Office, the Sheriff's Office, the Ombudsman's Office, the Board of Ethics, whatever... King County Elections is not the exception, but the rule. They're getting caught only because a statewide issue of significance has put them into the light where one of the major parties has sufficient political gain to warrant exposing the way King County government really does things.

Every error benefitted Gregoire. "The problem was with the software". "These were just mistakes and not fraud". This is the way King County operates. Stadiums, light rail, major development, CAO, whatever. If King County wants it and King County politicians like Sims, or Hague, former council members Vance, McKenna, Sullivan, or even the powerful unelected, like DOT Director Stephanie Warden, DOT Director Harold Taniguchi, or Dean Logan. Whatever they want, they will get it. There is no line that won't be crossed.

The software works, but by misusing it they can achieve the results they want. The data exists and the reports could be generated, but to do so would put their shinanigans at risk, so don't run the reports and don't snapshot the data so someone can audit it. If the data doesn't support the agenda, just maybe it will be accidentally corrupted. And if someone ever has to take the rap, just pin it on some of those hired High School grads who were setup as the potential scapegoats should anything go wrong. Protect the management at all costs. Let them simply apply the pressure and leave it to the low level grunts to use their imagination to figure out how to achieve the desired results.

You don't have to believe me. I've offered no proof, I've offered no credentials, and I definitely have my own agenda. But take my word that what has occured in King County elections is not an anomoly.

I listened to Slade Gorton dance around the "F" word today. Typical of a politician that knows that this sort of stuff is everywhere in King County and Olympia. He's just involved enough to take advantage of it for the political benefit of his party, but he still won't allege criminal wrongdoing. Why? Because if that standard was ever applied to King County or Olympia in the ranks of the civil servants and their leadership, it would gut the soldiers of both parties, put people in jail, and destroy the power both parties hold in subverting the truth and the law to achieve their goals - at our expense.

It's happened forever, and it will continue to happen until people abandon the belief that the culture of government conforms to the same rules as most people. The culture is corrupt. It is corrupting. And those that don't escape it are eventually corrupted by it.

Posted by: Mike on May 20, 2005 07:41 PM
14. Sheesh Mike, that was depressing. Time for a cold one.

Posted by: Danny on May 20, 2005 07:48 PM
15. Dave,
I think what Stefan said in his post was really funny. And I'm pretty old.

Posted by: cc on May 20, 2005 08:02 PM
16. I won't bash Mr. McKay at this juncture. Fed prosecutions move in mysterious ways.

However, at the end of this episode, if they haven't grown the proverbial chest hairs, I'll be right out amongst you leading the charge. Whilst it is a tad aggrevating, what true harm does it do to the case to have him (McKay) remain silent?

I've oft found that the less said, the more depth there is to an investigation. The Spokane deal is relatively straight-forwared. Patience, compadres. Let's not drop the hammer on him (The USAtty) 'til we have good reason. Plenty of time for that later if he fails to carry out his duties. (just cuz it hits the fan later doesn't mean that it splatters any less).

Posted by: MikeF on May 20, 2005 08:36 PM
17. forwared = forward

Serious case of Thai Po.

Posted by: MikeF on May 20, 2005 08:38 PM
18. If you want a clear picture of what i have come to expect from 'Law' enforcement, just look at what the WSP 'investigation, into the Brame situation yielded. The 'investigation' is a scandal & disgrace to the profession IMHO, those involved in cover ups passed off as investigations give the profession a black eye.

Posted by: JDH on May 20, 2005 09:12 PM
19. What Mr. Cynical said!.....(sort of)

Posted by: Deborah on May 20, 2005 10:12 PM
20. I don't know why McKay won't investigate the election fraud --and I'm sure that he does indeed have a reason-- but, as noted by CC above,
Mr. McKay is a Seattle native who grew up on Capitol Hill and attended St. Joseph’s Grade School and Seattle Prep High School. He is the fifth of the twelve children of the late Dr. John and Katie McKay. He is single and greatly enjoys his 26 nieces and nephews.
Somewhere in there lies a clue as to why the hapless Mayor West is such a juicy and inviting target for McKay.

Posted by: jaybird on May 20, 2005 10:57 PM
21. I agree with Mike F, Mr. Cynical and Deborah. A Federal investigation at this juncture would stick out like a sore thumb for the Bush Admin., while West is a Republican - so there is an element of perceived fairness and PR to this also.

However, after the contest is over with, then it will be time to remind McKay about a Federal investigation, if there is no announcement of an investigation by then. I understand Slade Gorton's position to stop short of using the "F" word - he has already unloaded on King County Elections a few weeks ago and got flack for doing so - PR and an element of PC (to be real). Politics is wierd in this state. Being from Oregon, where it is just as liberal in most cases, it is a bit less polarized there between the right and left, but I don't care for the all-mail voting/its an open invitation to less credibility in results.

Posted by: KS on May 20, 2005 11:00 PM
22. Jaybird,
We are speculating here but it does look really funny given what Stefan said in his post. I really do wonder what the U.S. Attorney does in his own office.

Posted by: cc on May 20, 2005 11:17 PM
23. I would not remotely consider defending what Jim West did, but...

The purpose of the federal government is to keep foreign powers from beating us up, keep the states from beating each other up, and provide a common set of rules (weights & measures, copyrights, currency, etc.) for us all to play by. Slightly oversimplified, but that's basically it.

The malfeasance of the mayor of Spokane has roughly zip, zilch, nada of any importance to do with foreign powers or even other states of the union. He is not a federal official; he was elected by, and answerable to, the people of Spokane. The Spokanonians would be wise to toss him out, but are perfectly capable of doing that on their own. How is this a federal matter? DC is not the wellspring of all wisdom; a newly-hired federal employee does not feel his IQ jump by 30 points upon touching down at an airport in the DC area.

We can, and as a matter of principle we should, deal with our own bloody pervert mayors, without any "help" from the wrong Washington.

Posted by: TB on May 21, 2005 01:45 AM
24. I like the way you put that, TB, and I get the impression that McKay doesn't shine his Gucci loafers without permission from someone.

So who sicced him on West?

Makes me wonder if anyone at the federal level pays any attention to what is really going on in Washington state.....

Posted by: alphabet soup on May 21, 2005 06:24 AM
25. One other "coincidence" is that West is a high-profile Republican.

Posted by: South County on May 21, 2005 06:41 AM
26. Oh my gosh. Un-freaking-believable.
When will justice prevail?

Posted by: zapporo on May 21, 2005 07:20 AM
27. Let me say up front that, yes, West did some things in office, and maybe used his office to do some things that were, at the very least, ill-considered, and maybe worse. Okay? That said, I find myself unable to dismiss and forget some little things that West has himself said and suggested and intimated about this whole matter in his own defense. Specifically, that he has been targeted for "outing" by certain persons and groups because he was a closeted gay Republican. When one takes the time to consider the whole sad West saga from that point of view, and when one then, at least momentarily, gives West the benefit of the doubt on the worst of the accusations that are being made against him, one gets an entirely different impression of what's really going on there. At least I do.


And we all know who these groups are and what their agendas are. And we know how vicious and vengeful they are and can be. They are also volatile, meaning that they can turn and attack and out anyone, if it suits furtherance of their agenda.

Seems to me that if pursuing West is a "beard" for a pursuing official, it is a dreadful mistake to believe that it is also some kind of a safe harbor from these groups. In fact, it may be just the opposite. Because if the pursuer is himself a closeted gay presidentially-appointed officeholder, be becomes the next fat target for outing by these same groups. Seems to me. Maybe I'm assuming way too much here, but the scenario does work.

Posted by: jaybird on May 21, 2005 07:49 AM
28. Mike
I think you eloquently stated what we all feel and believe. My faith in the party I support is that they are less likely to be corrupt. Thankfully, whenever a troll drags out some "smiking gun" against the Republicans, usually its nothing and when it rarely is true, its usually a minor thing. I too have seen Republican fraud and a political agenda contrary to the voters. Small town politics thankfully. It served to wipe the delusions and brainwashing from my brain and pick through facts first. Another reason why I supported the president and rossi during this last election and both their conflicts.

Posted by: Mark Beyer on May 21, 2005 08:28 AM
29. Jaybird, You are correct. Me thinks there is a lot more to McKay and the investigation into West than meets the eye.

Posted by: cc on May 21, 2005 08:56 AM
30. I think what bothers me the most is that I heard McKay on the John Carlson show going on and on about how he is not allowed to announce investigations due to some sort of federal law or other. And yet here is the announcement that he is investigating the West case. I would hope that he would be investigating the felon voters since this would not look political and they are doing the same investigation in Wisconsin, but at least be consistent. Either you can or you can't announce an ongoing investigation. This is the sort of BS that irks people who follow along.

Posted by: Calvin A on May 21, 2005 09:22 AM
31. CC, we are on the same page. Whether or not McKay ought to investigate the election fraud (and, hey, I'm persueded by others in this thread who have said that we are better off if he doesn't), and the travails of Jim West are two entirely separate matters. While, strategically, we may not want McKay investigating the election, there is no question but that an inquiry into a corrupted and fraudulent election falls squarely within the purview of the US Attorney, and that the feds have jurisdiction and near plenary power to intervene and take action in such cases. And, whether we want him to do it or not, it's at least arguably quite appropriate that he should. But, OTOH, the case of the Mayor of Spokane supposedly visiting a few gay chatrooms on city time, and maybe offering jobs to a few of his little "friends," to the extent that is a crime, can be handled quite nicely by state-level law enforcement, thank you. It's hard to see how it in any way rises to the level of a federal case, no matter how you look at it. McKay has taken the case on as a target of opportunity, for his own reasons, not because the facts or the law demand it.

Posted by: jaybird on May 21, 2005 09:50 AM
32. Hmmm...

I read in today's paper that the US Attny for Eastern Washington had to recuse himself from the West case due to his personal *friendship* with West......And that is why McKay has stepped in....
This shows how any relationship that a US Attorney has with the subject of an investigation can cause that attorney to recuse himself from the investigation.....
If McKay has any relationship or friendship with any of the subjects involved with the Washington State or King County election investigation (which is very likely considering his history here in Western WA)...he would have to recuse himself from the investigation...but not necessarily announce it to the public....

An investigation into *State* election fraud would probably not be given to that state's US Attorney. It would go the Regional or National office...

Posted by: Deborah on May 21, 2005 12:50 PM
33. Wholeheartedly agree with Jaybird and Deborah. But now I wonder what personal "friendship" the Eastern Washington US Attorney has with Mayor West.
I saw Mayor West on the news last night. They showed him at a prayer breakfast. It looked to me like he had a lot of support.
If McKay recused himself from the KC election fraud investigation, we deserve to know that and who will step in to investigate in his place.

Posted by: cc on May 21, 2005 01:58 PM
34. Mike McKay comes from a very, very good and decent family. But now he is just a rotten lousy politician.

It shows you that politics corrupts even those with good upbringings.

Posted by: Sean on May 21, 2005 02:33 PM
35. "If McKay recused himself from the KC election fraud investigation, we deserve to know that and who will step in to investigate in his place."

What's Ashcroft doing these days?

Posted by: Dogbert on May 21, 2005 07:13 PM
36. http://www.spokesmanreview.com/local/story.asp?ID=69429

Hmmm...Sean..
I found this interesting piece about Mike McKay (John McKay's brother)in the Spokesman Review..Concerning Eastern WA US Attorney McDevitt's recusal from the West case...Here's a snippet:
------------------------------------------------
A former Republican U.S. attorney, Mike McKay, said his friend McDevitt has no choice but to bow out because of the appearance of a potential conflict.

"I know Jim McDevitt, and his integrity is really Grade A," McKay said when contacted in Seattle where he now is in private practice. "Whatever his decision is will be the right one."

For two years, McKay served on the Seattle archbishop's "case review board," which examined how that Roman Catholic diocese handled sex abuse cases leveled against its priests. McKay said he has closely followed issues surrounding West, including allegations that he molested two boys in the late 1970s and early 1980s when he was a sheriff's deputy and Scout leader.

McKay, appointed U.S. attorney in the Western District of Washington in 1989 by President George H.W. Bush, said he had to recuse himself from three or four cases during his four-year term as chief prosecution in Western Washington.

Attorney Tim Kosnoff, of Bellevue, said McDevitt has no choice but to stand aside.

"There are concerns that the public would lack confidence in the U.S. attorney's impartiality, given his connections to Jim West," Kosnoff said. His clients include several men abused as boys by Boy Scout leaders and priests.

Kosnoff said he believes it will take a federal grand jury and a thorough FBI investigation to answer questions beginning to emerge a week after allegations against West were published in The Spokesman-Review.

The state of Washington lacks a grand jury system that allows people to be compelled to testify under oath.

"The federal grand jury is the only viable tool that exists out there in these kinds of situations," Kosnoff said, referring to abuse of public office issues surrounding West.

"When you empanel a federal grand jury, people don't have a choice. They have to testify if they're granted immunity," Kosnoff said. "The power of the federal grand jury is unparallel in our society."

Posted by: Deborah on May 21, 2005 07:19 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?