May 17, 2005
Are they "Public Schools" or "Union Schools"?

If you ever thought that the public schools are run for any reason other than for the sake of their employee unions, think again: "Seattle tries to restrict vending near schools"

Hoping to discourage back-of-the-van pizza peddlers from luring school kids with their greasy but delicious wares, the Seattle City Council yesterday voted to ban mobile vendors within 1,000 feet of public schools.

Though council members cited concerns about childhood obesity, the action came at the request of the union representing school-cafeteria workers, whose pay and benefits are linked to the number of meals served each day.

There's a reason why school kids choose to buy lunch from the pizza man:
"The school lunch is cold. It's not that good," said Julie Mandefero, a junior munching on a bag of Doritos.
David Westberg, business manager of the cafeteria union, gets the last word:

"We're not trying to stifle free enterprise, we're just trying to stop illegal activity," Westberg said.
That's what they used to say in the Soviet Union after they criminalized free enterprise.

If it were only a matter of protectionism for union cafeteria workers and union bus drivers, that would be one thing. But it also seems that satisfying the teacher union always takes precedence over satisfying the students' parents and the taxpayers.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at May 17, 2005 10:35 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Excellent contribution, once again, Stefan.

Might I suggest "Dumbing Us Down" by John Taylor Gatto (New York City and New York State, Teacher of the Year)? His writings suggest that compulsory schooling has nothing to do with education, it is about teaching young people to conform to the economy and the social order. Once you start reading it, you cannot put it down. After having recently read this book, I have no doubt at all that your points in this post are right on.


Posted by: Homeschool Mom on May 17, 2005 10:49 AM
2. I love this quote: "Westberg admitted the city may not be able to do much to undo kids' disdain for cafeteria food."

If that isn't straight out of a central-control-nut handbook what is? I'll give him a hint. How about improve the service and the quality? Serve food that is meant to be hot, hot. Their solution is get rid of the competition instead of competing.

Posted by: Fred on May 17, 2005 10:58 AM
3. That's because they're cowards.

Posted by: Danny on May 17, 2005 11:03 AM
4. "We're not trying to stifle free enterprise..."

Riiiiigghhtttt......

Sometimes I think these people are so lost in the 'union mentality' that they forget reality and become a little too honest for their own good...

Posted by: Michele on May 17, 2005 11:08 AM
5. "We're not trying to stifle free enterprise, we're just trying to stop illegal activity," Westberg said.

Hmmmmmmm - seems to me that if they really were interested in stopping illegal activity, they would have the police or the health department taking enforcement action against the non-licensed vendors rather than pass another law that no one is going to enforce. And for those vendors who do have a license - isn't stifling free enterprise exactly what this ordinance does?

Posted by: Jay on May 17, 2005 11:08 AM
6. Homeschool Mom,
You are exactly right. The public school system in this country started in the late 19th, early 20th century, basically as a result of the industrial revolution. The wealthy in the Guilded Age needed good workers who had enough knowledge to read certain instructions and function in an industry. In my opinion the public school system, unless you can utilize it for your own gain(few people do), turns out good people who are "satisfied" with being average, therefore creating more middle-class folks for business to employ. We all know the most stable societies have always had huge middle-classes because those of us at that level have achieved enough that we won't start a revolution, and have the hope to move into the upper-class realm. Look at a bell curve graph of income in the US and it illustrates this.
I'm not saying it's bad, I'm just pointing out what I feel was originally behind public education, and still is to an extent.
I have friends who are teachers and I think they are great people. They are in their profession to give back to society, which is great. I don't think there is some great scheme to rule this country with an iron fist, but I do believe that our leaders, both political and business, are wise enough to realize that a stable country is what we all want.
God Bless America.

Posted by: David on May 17, 2005 11:32 AM
7. From the "slimes" article:

"At a minimum, they'll have to walk some of the calories off," said Councilman Richard Conlin."

What an arrogant bass turd!

They've made it a "gun free" zone (that fails to even slow school related violence), a "hate free" zone (guess where my kids learned what "queer" means), now a "carbo-free" zone?

Apparently the only thing you can count on with democrats is that they won't rest until it truly is a "common-sense-free" zone.....

Posted by: alphabet soup on May 17, 2005 11:33 AM
8. The problem with public eduication in Washington is that the educators are much more interested in themselves than in education. The Washinton Education Association should change its name to the Washington Educators Association. It is a labor union, more intnent on winning wages and benefits for its members than in any educational endeavor.

Posted by: L H Smith on May 17, 2005 12:46 PM
9. The problem with public eduication in Washington is that the educators are much more interested in themselves than in education. The Washinton Education Association should change its name to the Washington Educators Association. It is a labor union, more intnent on winning wages and benefits for its members than in any educational endeavor.

Posted by: L H Smith on May 17, 2005 12:46 PM
10. In reading the linked article about closing school districts to pay for teachers' raises, I found a curious statement:

Both Manhas and SEA leaders agreed in principle last fall that closing schools and reducing bus service would free up funds that could be used to improve learning conditions for students.

So, are they really saying that closing schools and reducing bus service will improve learning conditions???

Hmmm...

Posted by: jmw on May 17, 2005 12:51 PM
11. So the schools aren't letting the kids exercise freedom of choice? Rather un-American huh? Lemmeseehere.... faculty knows kids have tobacco products on their person but can't frisk them because that's unreasonable. Never mind you can see the rascals puffing right outside the gate, with their substance that's not legal for them to have. But start a rumor one may have a plastic gun and see how fast they get the shake down.
Now we can't let junior consume products acquired outside the school within 1000 feet? Junior doesn't have to go 1000 feet off campus before he lights up though? And what about the sales tax the school is denying the state/city by not letting Jr. purchase mobile meals?
I recall a suburban school district going into the "Heart-wise" lunches full force. This because the nutrition director had a heart attack. Anyways, kids got nothing but low-fat choices. Do you think that resulted in low-fat kids? NOT. The garbages were full of low-fat, low-taste lunches from central kitchen. Afternoon classes were stuffed with kids that paid little attention and after-school restaraunt patronage was through the roof!
For being an "Institution of learning" they sure look stupid. Oh yeah, it's not about learning, it's about thought-free obedience.

Posted by: PC on May 17, 2005 12:59 PM
12. Capitalist's response to competition: improve the product or price.
Socialist's response to competition: have government remove the competition.

BTW, I read Gatto's book a few years ago. Very interesting. And yes, I do homeschool.

Posted by: Shannon K on May 17, 2005 01:04 PM
13. The only real monopoly is the government. That's why unions go to the government to get the force required to keep them alive. If it were left up to the free market, schooling would improve, it would come it at a lower cost, and teachers would be paid higher wages, while administrative overhead was reduced. And unions would be long gone.

First step: Get control of the legislature using the frustration generated over their complete ignorance of the electorate.

Second step: Gut unions, special programs, and all of the largesse in the current system so we can build a better educational system, that gives consumers choice and is competitive with other nations that take education seriously.

As long as we've got Democrats in Olympia, our kids are doomed.

I homeschool and private school. Anything less is child abuse, and puts my child in harms way both physically due to the gangs, violence, drugs and general thuggery in most public schools, and intellectually by being spoon fed an irrational leftist dogma from textbooks that aren't worth as much as a piece of firewood.

Posted by: Jeff B. on May 17, 2005 01:29 PM
14. Myopic, self-delusional wonks, pure and simple.

Mention anything to do with Afghanistan or Bush or the economy...and the automatic Pavlovian response from the Soviet of WA is the cry "outsourcing!!!"

Yet what have they done? The Soviet Union falls of it's own burdens of policy and miscalculation...and the export it to the US left...outsourcing.

And the elitist left here 'buys' it as if it is manna from heaven. Bringing in 'retired' statues of Lenin is only a symbol for their lack of wisdom.

Lord have mercy on us all.


Better yet, give me some viable alternatives to vote for/initiatives to sign and gather signatures for. I'm right there.

Posted by: scott158 on May 17, 2005 01:50 PM
15. We all like to joke about how socialist this city is but most of the time, even though it's not acting in a capitalist fashion, the council doesn't go too ridiculously far. This is pure and simple communism though. Next they'll ban all food establishment within a 1000 feet, then they'll take away the students' right to bring food from home. Welcome, comrades, to Union of Seattle Socialist Republics

Posted by: Mark Griswold on May 17, 2005 03:08 PM
16. Yes- home school looks better every day.

Posted by: Andy on May 17, 2005 03:10 PM
17. ...and who would you be blaming if one of the free enterprise avatars of pizza turned out to be a child molester? What about selling drugs to kids? Do you think that free enterprise should be stifled in that case? What if the pizza man sold pizza as a cover and drugs as well to the kids? Would you want school administrators to do something or would you send the EFF?

Posted by: headless lucy on May 17, 2005 03:32 PM
18. ...and what if the pizza man had an abortion mill, then you would be for it? What on earth are you on about HL?

I expect law enforcement to enforce the laws at all levels. When a child is put into the custody of the state (school) I would expect the state to take responsibilty for the child's safety. The child should not be able to leave school premises without parents' permission for ANY reason.

If the school is concerned about the children's safety is this how you would try and ensure their safety by sending the pizza man 800 feet further away? Typical lib, instead of getting to the point make some useless law to tout at the next election "I passed the blah blah law to make your children safer".

...or are you just trying to divert the topic with more nonesense?

Posted by: Fred on May 17, 2005 03:53 PM
19. Headless Wrote:

"...and who would you be blaming if one of the free enterprise avatars of pizza turned out to be a child molester?"

I'd blame the molester...Wow...who'd think of blaming the perpetrator. Also, who's to say that a free enterprise vender has a greater chance of being a molester than someone who gets a job in the cafeteria at a school?? Check out the "Coaches who Prey" story in the Seattle Times a few months back.

Headless (what an appropriate name) continues:

"What about selling drugs to kids? Do you think that free enterprise should be stifled in that case? What if the pizza man sold pizza as a cover and drugs as well to the kids? Would you want school administrators to do something or would you send the EFF?"

Same answer as above. Further, when I was in school, other students/former students were much more likely to be "dealing" then some pizza guy trying to make a buck.

Posted by: Mark D on May 17, 2005 05:20 PM
20. Headless is yanking your chain, folks.. it's what trolls do. Nobody capable of operating even anything as simple as a web browser is THAT stupid.

Pay no attention to the lady with no brain.

Posted by: RookieRick on May 17, 2005 07:00 PM
21. Another good book on unions is The worm in the apple How teachers unions are destroying american education

Posted by: mike with1/2 a bike on May 17, 2005 08:51 PM
22. Public school administrators have to be the most insufferably arrogant bureaucrats in this country. They make the IRS look like an enlightened, friendly group of nice guys that reluctantly has to collect your taxes.

They have almost total control over you and your children and boy are they corrupted by it. There is nothing too picayune for them to attempt to control. Is the roach coach with it's greasy hotdogs getting too close to a re-education center? Why should the Commissars of Education think of anything other than banning them? They have the power. Why not use it?

Posted by: Bill K. on May 17, 2005 10:41 PM
23. Typical union response. How much money, time, tax dollars and efforts are being mustered against some poor pizza vending shmuck?

Meanwhile, Johnny can't read, nor make change, but simply points to the pizza image on the pizza truck menu to order and grunts some rap music babble under his breath to order.

Back at school, cafeteria napkins are recycled "100 greatest books" pages that students think are quaint fairy tales from their parents' pasts. Here we come, world--your American competitors! Sheesh.

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on May 17, 2005 10:52 PM
24. While the public education establishment is focused on satisfying their primary constituents (unions; not students and parents), they seem oblivious to the huge and rapidly growing challenge this country faces from a combination of the world-wide availability of internet connectivity and fundamental changes in other societies; i.e.:

IIRC without looking it up again right now, last year India graduated about a million more kids from college than we did. China graduated about SIX TIMES as many scientists and engineers as we did.

Reference and recommended reading:
The latest by Tom Friedman:
"The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century".

Methow Ken

Posted by: Methow Ken on May 18, 2005 01:02 AM
25. Yes Methow Ken, but did those Indians & Chinese get to dress just like Britney Smears, or drive a brand new Acura? I didn't think so ;'}

(let's get our priorities straight!)

Posted by: alphabet soup on May 18, 2005 06:49 AM
26. ...and who would you blame if there were sunspots that turned out to be carbuncles on Jupiter’s a$$. What about selling the PI or Seattle Times to Farsi’s? Do you think that free enterprise should be stifled in that case? What if the pizza man was really Jabba the hut? Would you want liberal moron school administrators to pants pansies or would you send a hide bound cadre of moribund dyspeptics?

Posted by: Headless Louie on May 18, 2005 09:02 AM
27. Okay school administrators, a multiple choice question for you here.

Pizza vendor is also using his operation for a "nooner" with consenting students. What action does the school take??
1) If it's a hetero act, file charges of course.
2) If it's a homo act, shrug and say it's "alternative livestyle.
3) Just make sure the kids get a condom before they order a pizza.

Posted by: PC on May 18, 2005 09:30 AM
28. Plus -- Garfield HS PTA wants to ban military recruiters -- A Seattle high school bars military solicitation

via www.drudgereport.com.

Favorite quote:

" Steve Ludwig, whose son is a senior and whose daughter will enter as a freshman next fall, made a point shared by many in attendance: Garfield does not allow organizations that promote illegal activities to recruit students to perform those activities, nor does it allow organizations that discriminate on the basis of race, gender, national origin, or sexual orientation to recruit on campus.

"Planned Parenthood, as far as I know, does not advocate or perform illegal acts. The US military does," Mr. Ludwig continued. "

ARGH!!!

Posted by: starboardhelm on May 18, 2005 10:22 AM
29. Junior high and high school cafeterias are filled with pop and sugary or salty mass-produced junk food machines. Complain and you get nowhere. Delivered pizza surely has at least SOME nutritional value!

Most of the main course selections in public schools, even at the elementary level, contain all sorts of artificial ingredients and are marginally nutritious at best. NYC public schools recently got a new head chef, and natural, healthy food was put in all over the city. Test scores and behavior improved dramatically. If they can do it in NYC, why not here???

Posted by: publicschoolsRsoviet on May 29, 2005 02:34 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?