February 17, 2005
Just Another Day In "Progressive" Seattle

Seattle blogger Skot, at Izzle Pfaff, in this sad but laugh-out-loud post, relates his recent encounter with Capitol Hill's finest: a happily deranged man confronting cars that were entering I-5, and a "hungry" panhandler. Quick, send the social services-mobile! The first guy's probably off the Thorazine he got addicted to before Western State sent him on his way; while the second is flush with cash from guilty, hoodwinked Seattle liberals. Skot writes:

I had a jolly time walking home from work the other day. So many new friends to meet! First up was the fellow who, at the freeway onramp off of Olive Way, simply sat down in the middle of the street. He wore jeans, a ratty jacket, and carried in his arms an ancient radio that, as far as I could tell, was playing nothing, but this did not prevent the man from feeling rhythm (I would not be surprised if the apparatus was capable of playing old 78s. In fact, that would be cool. ("Let's rock out to 'Sixty Minute Man' "!).

As he sat on the asphalt (in front of cars, who honked forlornly), he held his arms out horizontally and did kind of a hippie wave with them, bobbing his head ecstatically. He was like the quietest, loneliest Phish concert ever. The cars continued to beep at him peevishly, and after a moment, he incorporated their noise as synocpation; he bopped to his feet and boogied over to the nearest car's driver-side window and gave the occupants a happy double bang-bang set of gestures with his hands . . . you know, like, "Hey, you are rad! I would enjoy having a key party with you and your wife!" Or something. Unmoved by this display of appreciation, the driver frantically scrambled to lock his door. The man held out his decrepit radio to the window in an attempt to share the Music of the Spheres with the car's occupants, but still the radio remained silent.

The car veered around him onto the onramp, roughly at the same time I was veering around him, praying he wouldn't notice me. But he did: as I passed, he flashed me a gigantic grin and gave me the finger. I was actually pleased with this encounter, as it did not involve me talking to anyone.

...After the happy visit to the liquor store....I wandered back out...to be confronted by my least favorite "homeless" scam artist. "Got any spare change for foooooood?" he crooned, as he always does. He's a big blond guy, and his schtick is that he's perfected this man-boy persona that suggests that he's mildly retarded and helpless. He's been pulling this s*** on Broadway for ten years, and it drives me crazy, to the extent that I have jettisoned my usual "must-be-nice" reactions for pure brutality: "F*** no, you parasite." He does not drop his role for a second, and stares at me with a wounded look: but I have seen him about a billion times pulling out wads of bills to buy beer and lottery tickets.

Skot, you're not alone!

Hat tip: geek, cider-maker and Synth Stuff blogmaster Dave.

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at February 17, 2005 10:59 AM | Email This
Comments
1. As bad as it may seem here, I still think the San Francisco bay area is far worse. San Francisco actually makes cash payments to homeless folks, about $400/month if I remember correctly. Talk about a disincentive to clean yourself up. Of course because of that, more and more homeless flock to SF for the handouts and the access to Tent Cities. There really is nothing like the smell of urine and human feces, and the crunch of crack vials under-foot while you walk to Pac Bell Park to watch a Giants game to really put you in the mood for some good old family fun.

Posted by: Jason on February 17, 2005 11:17 AM
2. Yes, SF is worse. The climate is better, so more bums can thrive in CA. Heck, if I were a bum, I'd live in a warmer place than Seattle. But alas, bums are not rational.

Thanks for the post Matt. I never give these parasites money. If people would just stop "feeding the animals" then the problem would go away. These people would either wither up and die, or they would be forced to go out and create the means for living like the rest of us. It's a disgrace to all to see the callous disregard these bums have for the human spirit of living and achieving.

And it's always terrible to see some guilt ridden driver stop and give these bums money.

Posted by: Jeff B. on February 17, 2005 11:25 AM
3. Jeff B.-

I agree with you for the most part, but sometimes you've got to go with your gut feeling and help those who actually need help (not the professional cons.) "don't feed the animals" that is classic, it makes me think of Finding Nemo "mine, mine, mine."

Posted by: Adriel on February 17, 2005 11:32 AM
4. Capitol Hill residents won't be getting any sympathy from me. They brought this on themselves. Capitol has become a shrine to hyper-uncritical 'tolerance' and 'diversity' run amuck. All I have goot to say is: thank God those responsible are the one’s bearing the brunt of the impact of the ‘unintended (yea right) consequences’ of their embracing every sort of reprobate behavior and degeneracy known to mankind.

Posted by: JDH on February 17, 2005 11:36 AM
5. ha ha, reminds me of the good ole days of working downtown...

Posted by: Shawna on February 17, 2005 11:40 AM
6. Yes, how nice and wonderful that the author can get entertainment from the deranged, how sweet and innocent that the crazy marches to his own beat. I wonder how "Skot" would feel if the same if Mr. Beebop sank a knife into his father's chest at a Safeco Field game, as happened a few years ago to the fireman.

Most of these people unfortunately need to be in rehab or a mental institution, not the streets.

Posted by: Shaun on February 17, 2005 11:46 AM
7. If you want to have a good laugh at the expense of libs, check out the link.

http://www.blogsforbush.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3748

Posted by: jaybo on February 17, 2005 12:01 PM
8. wow, you must all be compassionate christians just like the president. i can just feel the compassion dripping off of you and it makes me feel all warm inside.

Posted by: grznt on February 17, 2005 01:15 PM
9. grznt,

When Jesus forgave and healed the poor, sickly and outcasts he always said one final thing "go and sin no more".

Jesus would not condone the type of behavior that jellyfish liberals condone. He was for changing lives, not perpetuating the status quo.

Would you rather support causes that actually help lift people up instead of holding them down?

Or is it more important for you to "stroke your ego" by passing out a buck or two once in a while so you can tell yourself and others how compassionate you are.

Posted by: jaybo on February 17, 2005 01:38 PM
10. Over the last several years, Capitol Hill has gone out of it's way to show how tolerant they are and everyone is welcome. Now the birds have come to roost and surprise! Birds of prey followed the flock. You reap what you sow.

You can't hide the jewelry after the robber is already in your home. People on Capitol Hill are being preyed upon by those they invited in. It's time to clean up your act and get rid of the criminals and deadbeats. Those that are truly in need should be given assistance. Those that are here to suck off the system should be shown the highway out of town. But nothing will ever change until the people of the community actually do something about it.

Posted by: Ken on February 17, 2005 01:52 PM
11. grznt-
I'm all for rehabilitation and a helping hand, just don't bite my arm off at the shoulder. There are those that take advantage of generosity and there are those that actually need it. It's just too bad the second group is so overshadowed by the first, maybe the dems would support a bill to arrest pro-panhandlers... oh but wait then we might scare off legitimate homeless.

Posted by: Adriel on February 17, 2005 02:23 PM
12. Those who refuse to recognize that there is a fundamental difference between helping others and encouraging destructive behavior are not worth even conversing with. There is no other explanation other than that they are indifferent to the suffering insist on contributing to. In a word they are 'evil.'

Posted by: JDH on February 17, 2005 02:40 PM
13. read the above jerk off.

Posted by: Adriel on February 17, 2005 03:28 PM
14. I wasn't responding to you in particular or I would have addressed my comments to you. I was responding to those all of those above who have a notion of compassion that is so indiscriminate it makes a mockery of the very concept.

Posted by: JDH on February 17, 2005 03:33 PM
15. This is SO horrible. How can you be so insensitive. This is an example of people that have been targetted by Bush, I say!

Quick! Put up a tent city; supply free housing; give away food. We want more people like this! The best way to do it is to make our city and county as comfortable and livable as possible for them. THEN WE CAN ATTRACT THEM FROM ALL OVER THE COUNTRY.

Maybe even from other countries. Think of the votes that the Silly Council would get.

Posted by: DeadManVoting (aka Iguana) on February 17, 2005 06:08 PM
16. Mental health funding for the indigent is practically nonexistent. You cannot condemn them for being mentally ill and then castigate them for not having the incentive to clean themselves up. That the mentally ill have few options for dignity and recovery is a stunning indictment of our society.

Posted by: cpk on February 18, 2005 10:04 AM
17. As someone who grew up within blocks of Western State Hospital and spoke with many employees and retired employees of that institution, ranging from cooks and interns to doctors, regarding the ‘reforms’ brought about in the 60’s I can say unequivocally that the left and their misguided notion of compassion that bears ultimate responsibility for the mentally ill being on the streets and when not on the streets sitting in a room staring at a blank wall. Prior to the time that the ‘reforms’ were put in place the most patients were required to get out of bed, bath and groom themselves and work. The ACLU and other ‘enlightened’ souls that came into prominence in the 1960’s saw to it that the patients ‘right’ to sit in their own feces all day if that was their prerogative was protected. What was the result of this you ask? You don’t need to, the results greet you with a cardboard sign as you exit the freeway or pester you for fortified wine money as you try to walk around Seattle that is when they are not when not assaulting the staff at Western State Hospital. The libs will respond that Ronald Reagan is responsible for closing the hospitals thereby throwing these sick unfortunates on the streets; this is not quite the way the story went down. Liberal do-gooders had made it nearly to involuntarily hospitalize the insane or mentally ill, therefore there were many many hospital beds that were sitting empty and eating up tax dollars, the Reagan did enact policies closing these empty hospitals. AND THAT MY FRIENDS IS THE REST OF THE STORY, so when you libs see someone lying in their own feces on the street, you should feel guilty, for your policies have fostered it.

Posted by: JDH on February 18, 2005 10:53 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?