January 14, 2005
Gov. Chris & Gandhi

Seattle Post-Intelligencer columnist Robert Jamieson today expresses grave doubts about Governor Christine Gregoire's character and integrity. Coming from a P-I columnist, this is fairly remarkable, and just one of many indications that Gregoire faces very tough sledding even if the state Supreme Court fails to order the new election sought by Republican challenger Dino Rossi.

Christine Gregoire dropped her inaugural speech on the ears of the state. The new governor said one thing. I heard and thought another.

Gregoire told the crowd in Olympia the other day that "we all have a chance to have a positive influence in the lives of others" because "we all leave personal legacies for the people we know and love."

...my brain flashed back, first to Gregoire's sorority days at the University of Washington. As president of Kappa Delta sorority more than three decades ago, she tolerated a "whites-only, Christians-only" rule. She presided over rituals with hooded white robes that even reminded some of her own sorority sisters of the Ku Klux Klan and the sorority's racist roots.

...Gregoire smiled during her speech in the Capitol Building. She preached about "a legacy of holding government accountable" and the importance of requiring "agencies to be more effective and efficient in achieving results, and ensuring that public tax dollars are being spent wisely." Her comments triggered the memory of when she was state attorney general. Her office missed a deadline to appeal a $17.8 million jury award to three disabled men abused while under state care. At the time, the 2000 judgment was the largest personal-injury verdict ever lodged against the state.

Instead of absorbing blame for the botched appeal -- as a laudable chief would -- Gregoire ducked, blaming an assistant, Janet Capps. That doesn't sound like taking responsibility for an error that walloped wallets of Washington taxpayers. It looks more like a calculating politician covering her rear end and finding a scapegoat.

Gregoire said the people of our state must change "the way we think about partisan politics, and change ... the way we reach out to each other and reconcile our differences."....In the post-election whirl, she blamed Rossi for being whiny in disputing ballot numbers and for fishing for votes. Didn't Gregoire whistle the same tune when she was behind, before a manual recount put her on top? Didn't she famously say every vote ought to count?

......"If we want unity," Gregoire said, nearing the end of her speech on Wednesday, "we must all be unifiers. If we want accountability, each of us must be accountable for all we do."

I started to feel queasy. "As Gandhi so famously said," Gregoire rhapsodized, "we must all 'be the change we want to see in the world.'" I wanted to throw up. Gandhi's ghost, I'm sure, wouldn't want to be invoked in the face of such hypocrisy, either.

As the governor embarks on her future of change, she'd do well to take an honest look in the cracked mirror of her past. What Gregoire (the person) would see would not reflect what Gregoire (the newly anointed politician) says.

It's not often a Democrat makes Robert Jamieson, or anyone at The P-I, want to throw up. FWIW.

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at January 14, 2005 04:57 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Look at your "So Sad" column. The bias of the PI and columnists is legendary and evil. How could a columnist write like this? Could the conclusions in the other posting be so wrong???

Posted by: tom on January 14, 2005 04:50 PM
2. This categorical slap by Jamieson must really hurt Ms. Chrissy. Yelling at her saying she is hypocritical and urging her to look at herself in a "cracked mirror" is a big OUCH!!!
And while it is indeed pleasurable to read this type of infighting between liberals, Jamieson is to be commended for pushing this issue forward with both facts and compassion.

Posted by: balanced but fair on January 14, 2005 05:04 PM
3. Hmmmm. Could it be the P.I. got tired of having its subscriptions canceled? Doesn't compute. Plus Connelly made up for it with his liberal tripe.

Posted by: CP on January 14, 2005 05:06 PM
4. Whoa!

Jamieson has the rare talent of objective writing....something we NEVER see at the Seattle PI! ....
The downside is.....He'll probably be looking for a job soon! sigh....

Posted by: Deborah on January 14, 2005 05:08 PM
5. Could it be that the "cracked mirror" remark suggests the mirror in the first Matrix movie? That opens up all sorts of possiblities! Remember anytime something repeats itself (like the Dem and liberal rants, Gergoire's actions, etc) it means the Machine has changed something!
GO BLOGS AND REVOTE!!!

Posted by: Victor on January 14, 2005 05:12 PM
6. Surprising but..They now have their Gov and why not make nice to the other side with a column he (Jameson) wanted to write long ago. The horse is out of the barn, so lockig the door now costs them nothing..time to move on and get about the State's business
Mr. Jameson, this could have been influential and a real show of balanced journalism prior to the election.
Was is spiked until now?

Posted by: Brad on January 14, 2005 05:12 PM
7. I think the liberal media is beginning to realize that Rossi has plenty of evidence (enough of a case) to get a revote.

Perhaps they are trying to be somewhat objective now so that when all is said and done, they can say, "See, we had it covered".

Posted by: TADD on January 14, 2005 05:21 PM
8. While I rarely agree with him, I really do enjoy reading Jamieson's work. Here's another great column of his from just after election day

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/jamieson/198304_robert05.html

Posted by: Mike H on January 14, 2005 05:45 PM
9. The comment from "Tom" is off base. First, the "So Sad" column was by Jim Miller, not Matt Rosenberg. And Miller was not talking about all P-I columnists; he was talking about Joel Connelly. The criticisms he very properly directed at Connelly in no way apply to Jamieson. I may often disagree with Jamieson, but he is a much more thoughtful, much more independent, and for that matter much more civil columnist than Connelly. Jamieson is worth your time. Connelly isn't.

Posted by: j.a. on January 14, 2005 05:51 PM
10. THE SHARK & Blogging Come Under Fire
The Power of Blog, or the ability to change public-opinion through political reporting, commentary, and amateur journalism have never been greater.

The Seattle PI reports on 'THE SHARK"

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/jamieson/207532_robert12.html

Kudos to SoundPolitics, and the PI for objective journalism. Most of the Mainstream Media is working to "heal" our state, by giving positive publicity to LewdiChris (a.k.a. Fraudoire).

Shouldn't they be critical of what just happened in this election? While I'm sure many of us would prefer that to be the case, too many lefties permeate the Editorial Boards of our great Media Giants in Washington. Rather than questioning the government, and asking the tough questions that need to be asked, they roll over and play "catch". Connelly, another writer with the Seattle PI might as well just reprint Fraudoire's own press releases as his "editorial column". I called and asked him about his latest piece:

"In The Northwest: While the GOP rants, Gregoire gets to work"

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/connelly/207875_joel14.html

When asked why the PI and Times hadn't been reporting on the whole election fiasco, he said they're "not obligated" to report anything. Furthermore, he suggested that bloggers like SoundPolitics just throw lies and Innuendos around to see, "what sticks".

Rather than echoing Gov. LewdiChris' press releases, is it too much to ask for an objective and forthright analysis?

Cross-Posted on www.plucrs.blogspot.com

Posted by: CR ACTIVST on January 14, 2005 05:53 PM
11. Jamieson gets a long leash from his P-I Editors, and can apparently lay about him with Scotch Bonnets at any targetable individual. It's not a stretch to imagine the sort of bashing he'd direct at Dino Rossi, should Dino ever succeed in his election challenge. But at least he maintains a certain diversity in his targeting.

His colleague Joel Connelly must get paid more. Connelly's vitriolic one-sided attacks against anything right of liberal are launched from a position of privelege on a news page, not the op-ed section at all. But all was joy today in the bumper-to-bumper world, to hear him on John Carlson's show snorting and complaining against Sound Politics and its horrible attacks on CG and 'the people's business'. Someone here has stung him, and his plummy baritone rode roughshod over Carlson as he stereotyped Sound Politics as low-class and abusive by quoting some name-callers from the comment sections, as if they typified the blog.

As with Ken Schram yesterday, he would not give Carlson a straight answer to questions about the real abuses committed by the King County Elections people. Nor would Connelly acknowledge the clear reporting by Sound Politics of the election irregularities - which his 'newspaper' doesn't make any effort to investigate, other than quoting Dean Logan as gospel truth.

Posted by: Insufficiently Sensitive on January 14, 2005 06:05 PM
12. The Washington vote mess is on Hannity and Colmes on todays show, in about 3 mins. from now.

Posted by: Kathy on January 14, 2005 06:19 PM
13. darn I missed it, how was it?

Posted by: Adriel on January 14, 2005 06:37 PM
14. "The only way to fight knaves is with more knavery." Plutarch

It's not a lesson we'll soon forget.

Posted by: headless lucy on January 14, 2005 06:37 PM
15. Dino presents himself so well! He's professional, well spoken and clear. Of course the "left" host asked him to concede...and I didn't get to hear his answer. Did anyone hear what he said? I can always watch it again late tonight...

Posted by: J.C. on January 14, 2005 06:40 PM
16. We now have national attention. Dino Rossi spoke with Sean Hannity and let the world know of the underhanded dealings of King County and restated his desire for a new election to find the true winner of the Governor's race.

Posted by: Gil on January 14, 2005 06:41 PM
17. Don't wish too hard. You may get what you're asking for.

Posted by: headless lucy on January 14, 2005 06:45 PM
18. I think he was very clear in making the point that he could have asked that the 3rd count be thrown out and revert to the 2nd one but it would cast a cloud over his election, where CG is now.

He gave the media too much credit, but he made his points well and stayed focused on his goal, a re-vote.

Posted by: kathy on January 14, 2005 06:52 PM
19. Hannity and Colmes will be shown again at 11 pm PST...

I will be watching...

I think it's great - that Rossi has National momentum growing in this contest!

Posted by: Deborah on January 14, 2005 06:53 PM
20. I must be a real bonehead, but what does FWIW mean?

Oddly, that's the second time I've seen it today!

Posted by: DeadManVoting (aka Iguana) on January 14, 2005 07:01 PM
21. FWIW = For What It's Worth.

Go here for more:

http://bovis.gyuvet.ch/3dict/390ainet.htm

Posted by: Ken on January 14, 2005 07:11 PM
22. That article knocked my socks off. It's not every day you see an article like that in the P.I.

I read the Seattle P.I. Op-Ed section several times a week, and whatever I read usually makes me want to vomit.

Posted by: Cyd (Metnally Insane) on January 14, 2005 07:21 PM
23. Gil,

You have had Nat'l attention from the moment Rossi was declared the winner by 261 votes. I am in NE (No not New England, Nebraska). This thing has been followed in the Blogs, on national radio, in national dead tree and online newspapers. Where have you been? LOL

Posted by: Ordi on January 14, 2005 07:26 PM
24. Pffh! Gandhi never ran for elected office. What does he know?

Posted by: S.K. on January 14, 2005 07:50 PM
25. Many of the comments in the PI have been common knowledge for some time. The left leaning news organizations in this state swept it under 'til the election was over. Now it is surfacing once again...conveniently after the election and just when most of us have decidedly rejected CG for what she is...a self-serving bureaucrat. It was all too evident in her speech. I too got the dry heaves from the ilk.
What is more disturbing is the populist promises spewed forth and no means to back up financially all she intends to give. This state can’t afford to have her in power for to long.
I wonder how the democratic stonewalling will play out in the media…blocking our efforts with court actions. I just hope it widens the belief this governor has to go...NOW!

Posted by: R.W. Nut on January 14, 2005 08:00 PM
26. Are there any plans in the works to show a little support for the hearing on the 20th?
I'm sure there will be a lot of supporters there but with work constrictions, children etc., a lot of us can't make it. Why not have one place in each community (maybe like your voter polling place) where everyone can be at noon, in orange, in support of what "let every vote count" really means.

Might be a good day to at least pull out that orange T-shirt.


Posted by: kathy on January 14, 2005 08:03 PM
27. It doesn't surprise me really.

First, Jamieson takes surprising positions from time to time. I don't think he's as far left as the rest of the PI.

Second, he is black and is probably offended by the racist past of gReGore. After all, it's usually the rightous Democrats who are out monitoring slips and language or behavior that MIGHT indicate some sort of deviation from their definition of political correction.

They don't often expect that filter to be applied to themselves. But, hey, live by the sword, die by the sword, right?

Posted by: DeadManVoting (aka Iguana) on January 14, 2005 08:07 PM
28. Wow!

Posted by: Ken Muler on January 14, 2005 08:11 PM
29. Another story in the P-I talks about the Governor's "Road to Heal." I'd suggest a different name for the road... The story describes a bit of hypocrisy in the Dem's arguments, but if you look at it and compare it to the different tactics used at different times during the first counts, it verifies that they will do anything or say anything to get their victory. I don't see how a Governor could win in this fashion and say that this is the best possible election... Talk about low expectations! How can we trust her to push real change or real accountability is she is willing to accept such mediocre performance? Look at the performance of the AG's office during her terms, and you will see that accountability is not very high on the priority list...

Here's the article:

Democrats want the case thrown out because they believe the state Constitution grants the Legislature (which is now controlled by Democrats), not the courts, the power to invalidate a gubernatorial election. They will argue that the court lacks the proper jurisdiction to rule on the matter.

That's a stark contrast to what Democratic lawmakers maintained throughout two days of heated debate this week, that the courts are the appropriate place to decide whether the election should stand.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/207867_governor14.html

Posted by: Mark on January 14, 2005 08:14 PM
30. Kathy,
I would love to see more support at the smaller venues. I was at the OLY Rally and it was alot of fun....Yes politics can be fun...I like your idea...e-mail Vance.

Posted by: R.W. Nut on January 14, 2005 08:16 PM
31. Wow! The rest of the Republican Aparatchik has noticed how y'all snatched defeat from the hands of victory!

Posted by: headless lucy on January 14, 2005 08:16 PM
32. Headless

Funny...very funny

Posted by: R.W. Nut on January 14, 2005 08:19 PM
33. Having the right jump on a PC attack is dangerous medicine even if the target is acceptable. Seattle has enough problems with that.

The UW is known for its over the top PC agenda wtih woman studies and the like.

When I was there, a single (caucasion) guy stood up to the woman studies prof and they attempted to crucify him. His name was Pete..something.

Posted by: Erik on January 14, 2005 08:22 PM
34. Just a thought...did Price Harry steel his fascist costume from Gregior's closet?

Posted by: R.W. Nut on January 14, 2005 08:23 PM
35. "Democrats want the case thrown out because they believe the state Constitution grants the Legislature (which is now controlled by Democrats), not the courts, the power to invalidate a gubernatorial election. They will argue that the court lacks the proper jurisdiction to rule on the matter. "

Mark,

I saw that too! Yesterday, I believe....
But I thought it was in a letter received from one of the Democrats in the legislature...Perhaps she used the PI story for her letter...

Anyway - I thought it was so absurd! So contrary to what actually transpired in the legislature when the vote was taken to delay the certification of the Governor! The Democrats in the house and senate voted against the delay - citing the matter was for the courts to decide!!

I guess the Dems want it denied both ways! They love to confuse an issue until it exasperates everyone!

Heh...It isn't going to work this time....

Posted by: Deborah on January 14, 2005 08:36 PM
36. Brainless Lucy - Why don't you go back to your own blog?

Oh, that's right, you're losing debates there also.

Posted by: Lawrence on January 14, 2005 08:37 PM
37. Wow! I had heard that they were trying to have the case thrown out. What I heard was that they tried to block the Rossi group from obtaining any more information on the election, that the Rossi campaign should have all the info they need before they filed.
Now the democrats are saying the courts are not the place to make the decision?

Posted by: kathy on January 14, 2005 08:41 PM
38. Ordi,
I had seen some other national interest before but not to this extent. I had hopes that it would be nice to get Rossi on one of the Fox News channels. Expecially since more folks watch it than the local news. Besides, our local press leans far left and the information gets watered down before it gets to the public.

Posted by: Gil on January 14, 2005 08:49 PM
39. Gandhi's Ghost?
Wonder if he voted in King County.

Posted by: John on January 14, 2005 09:14 PM
40. R.W. Nut
Thank you for the kind words.
I wish I could have made it to Oly.
I find it difficult to watch this thing play out and feel that there is not an avenue that we can let our desires be known. Its not the first time the will of the voters have been ignored, its the first time they were challenged.

Posted by: kathy on January 14, 2005 09:25 PM
41. Jamieson has one characteristic that Country Joe doesn't...and what is worse, expresses no desire to aspire to...and that is the ability to put himself in the shoes of others and really try to understand their perspective.

With Country Joe, the only perspective that matters is his, and if you behave yourself, he'll lower himself to explain why only an idiot wouldn't agree. Otherwise, you can just stew in your juices and be on the outside looking in.

For Jamieson, I don't think that it's a right/left thing. He leans left, but it's tempered by realism.

The reason you notice him is that he's a rarity in the Seattle MSM. He doesn't have to look "objectivity" up in the dictionary.

Posted by: scott158 on January 14, 2005 09:26 PM
42. You go guy! Robert Jamieson, my man. Courage and integrity. Run for office dude!

paul daniel

Posted by: paul daniel on January 14, 2005 10:28 PM
43. Whoa! Hooded white robes??? As if the whites-only sorority story wasn't bad enough--I didn't hear about THAT little detail when said flap aired.

I do agree with one thing she said : "we must all BE the change we want in the world" or whatever that was. YES, X-TINE, PLEASE BE THE CHANGE THAT MAKES YOU INTO AN UNEMPLOYED EX-GOVERNOR

Posted by: Michele S on January 14, 2005 10:50 PM
44. And, I must add, when do we EVER hear one lefty publicly RIP another one so publicly?? That was positively scathing....

Posted by: Michele S on January 14, 2005 10:57 PM
45. Whoops--I repeated myself. That should have been "publicly RIP another one so fiercely??"

Posted by: Michele S on January 14, 2005 11:10 PM
46. Erik -

Was that crucify or castrate?

The Women's Studies department at UW, as with most universities, is a lead in the victim cult that contemporary feminism has become.

But, hey, you know that you are part of a vast patriarchy conspiracy, now don't you?

Posted by: DeadManVoting (aka Iguana) on January 15, 2005 02:12 AM
47. While I am happy with the overall intent of Jamieson's article, please note that he does not have the facts in the history of Kappa Delta Sorority. Once again the press is distorting what they do not know in order to prove the point that they want. In no way, does Kappa Delta support the KKK and there are no white hooded robes. Don't believe everything you read in the newspaper!

Posted by: Sandra Richardson on January 15, 2005 01:04 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?