A Sunday editorial in The Tacoma News Tribune says the unchecked provisional ballots, in particular, are legitimate cause for Republican Dino Rossi's legal challenge of Democrat Christine Gregoire's 129-vote victory in the 2004 Washington gubernatorial election.
....the counting of unscreened provisional ballots in King County – appears to justify the court review Rossi is seeking. It could prove fatal to Gregoire’s precariously slim margin.Provisional ballots are given to would-be voters whose registration cannot be immediately verified by poll workers. They are supposed to be sequestered until election officials can confirm that the people in question are in fact entitled to vote.
But at several polling places in King County, people who’d been given provisional ballots were allowed – accidentally, we hope – to feed them into vote-counting machines without the required screening. Once through the machines, the provisional ballots cannot be retrieved or distinguished from the ordinary ballots.
A few dozen might not have made a difference. But Dean Logan, King County’s elections chief, acknowledged last week that as many as 350 provisional ballots could have been counted by error.
It may be true, as Logan said, that most of these ballots – if checked – would have been found to be valid. But they weren’t checked. And there’s no reason to assume that people who might have deliberately bypassed the verification process were legitimate voters. Given the wispiness of Gregoire’s margin, Rossi can’t be faulted for asking the judiciary to take a hard look at these problems.
His challenge may not change the outcome, but it should give the Legislature extra incentive to do what it can to prevent such irregularities in future elections.
Presumably, both Seattle dailies will be printing editorials tomorrow, directly addressing why they are either for or against Rossi's decision to contest the election.
Hat tip: alert Sound Politics reader/commenter Laura.
UPDATE, with a hat tip to SP commenter Deborah: in an editorial, today's King County Journal endorses a fresh take on the WA Guv election, "Who's Our Governor? We Need a Re-vote." By the time this is all over, Gregoire may be wishing she'd agreed to Rossi's proposal for a re-vote before Rossi filed suit to contest, on Friday.
On another front, this week's "Egg All Over Face" media award for baseless commentary on the Guv Race goes to Josh Feit, of Seattle's Sandinsita weekly, The Stranger. In his "CounterIntel" column, Feit takes Gregoire harshly to task for not demanding that Rossi concede.
She should demand that he concede, rather than allowing him the breathing room to frame the debate with his calls for a revote.
As if such a move by Gregoire would make a bit of difference. Not to mention the obvious political liabilities of Gregoire urging Rossi's concession when there are so many unresolved questions and broad and justifiable public mistrust of the election results in Washington state. While Feit's column admittedly hit the streets Thurs. Jan. 6, a day before Rossi announced he would contest, it had already been reported earlier in the week that Rossi would do just that.
Yet, Feit sophomorically gripes:
Basically, Rossi's initiated a PR war in an attempt to instigate some sort of 'people's coup to intimidate lawmakers and overrun the legal process."
No, Josh, as you probably know by now from reading the papers, Rossi has filed suit in Chelan County court to contest the election, as permitted under law, and he is citing specific mistakes and errors which quite possibly may have affected the outcome of this 129-vote "victory" for Gregoire.
Memo to Stranger "brain trust" (Dan Savage and Tim Keck): time for a new political columnist? No I'm not applying, thanks. Maybe ex-Seattle alternative newsie Tom Robbins?
Posted by Matt Rosenberg at January 09, 2005 03:31 PM | Email ThisAnyway, what of the closeted Republicans at The Stranger?
Posted by: bmvaughn on January 9, 2005 04:16 PMBut as our disclaimer here notes, opinions expressed here are the individual views of the different contributors. We don't all agree on everything, whether it's the monorail (which I favor), or what we may think of The Stranger. And that's a good thing. Viva diversity!
(To address your comment further, I have no link to The Stranger at my own blog).
As for my previously stated theory (offered slightly tongue in cheek) that closeted Republicans run the Stranger, I think the Feit column is so poorly done, it might only underscore the point.
FWIW.
Posted by: Matt R. on January 9, 2005 04:33 PMThe KING COUNTY Journal also ran an editorial today calling for a revote!!
Speaking of KC.....Where is Ron Sims? I have not heard anything from him in all of this.
Yet - there is something inside that insists HE is the one who launched much of the fraud strategy that has taken over this county!
With Sims - came the surge in absentee ballot voting - With the surge in absentee voting came the discrepancies! Ron loves to brag about the surge in absentee voting during his terms in office....
Hmmm... Ron was upset with Gregoire during their run in the primary...He slung more mud at her than any Republican candidate would have dared! Then KC had to resort to ballot finds during the election and the recounts - to the point of exposure of their tactics! Could it be that Ron was still miffed at Christine and chose not to help the party perform a smooth election theft? Such bad blood between members of the same party could cause mistakes to be made....Could cause actions to be uncovered....
OK...just thinking aloud here....heh..
Posted by: Deborah on January 9, 2005 06:27 PMOK..I know there is NO proof to any of my rambling accusations....(Or any proof that I've seen printed about the origins of KC's fraud....)
But....Hey! The problems with our elections DID begin when Sims took office!....
If no one allowed themselves to indulge in conspiracy theories from time to time...we would never have been contesting this election! Sometimes the most brilliant finds start with the words....."I wonder"?
The liberal Dems don't hold the patent on conspiracy! They are just leaders in *absurd* theories! snicker.......
At least the conservative's theories have some basis in fact!
Posted by: Deborah on January 9, 2005 07:29 PMNot a problem! After dealing with the fools who continue to claim that "enhanced ballots" are acceptable, I am fully willing to learn why...
I would also like a job being the "enhanced ballot instructor"...wonder what it pays...
Posted by: smegma on January 9, 2005 07:42 PMhttp://www.thenewstribune.com/opinion/story/4423155p-4189610c.html
Posted by: CR Activist on January 9, 2005 10:08 PMBut seriously, "people's coup to intimidate lawmakers and overrun the legal process??"
Listen up, lefties who stole Slade's re-election with your even sloppier (so you tell us!) 2000 election -- what Dino's telling you all is THIS: You messed with the WRONG GUY! You are THROUGH with your phoney-baloney county election shenanigans. It isn't going to work THIS time. He will use the full force of the law to overcome your fraud, your thuggery and smugness that you've gotten away with in past, but NO more.
I remember what he said some weeks back. Any of x-tine's lawsuits designed to change the rules (like running crying to Judge Lum to get those 'harvested provisionals' ballots including dead guys and felons)"will be met with equal or greater force." It's come home to roost, baby. The corruption game you all have been playing is OVER.
HASTA LA VISTA, BA-BY!
Posted by: Michele on January 9, 2005 10:23 PM