December 29, 2004
conspicuous by its absence: media scrutiny

If I was composing an article such as this (or any of these) for a news service like the AP, I'd be inclined to at least mention the Washington state election irregularities (prefaced with the standard "alleged") including, but not limited to: the special dispensation for the Democrats to knock on voters' doors to verify signature-rejected ballots, the later discoveries of unsecured and presumably mishandled ballots, and the registrations of voters to mailstops and storage facilities.

I might also mention the irregularity of enhancing/duplicating ballots by permanently altering them, after subjectively divining voter intent (they knocked on doors to verify signatures, why not these ballots, too?)

That these and so many other salient issues are absent from practically all "major media" articles and editorials about our gubernatorial election gets you thinking: SoundPolitics, and other bloggers, are finding enough substantive and glaring evidence, especially in King County, to raise significant suspicions. What we publish is immediately held to account, parsed by our opponents and allies alike, yet facts presented are easily validated via the same public source material we utilize.
The media's job, its very raison d'etre, is to be skeptical and diligent in pursuit of truth--all truth. Where are they now?

Take for example this quote:

Gov. Gary Locke said he strongly disagrees with Rossi's call for another election. "The people have voted, and all votes properly cast were counted," said Locke, a Democrat who's retiring after two terms.
A brave reporter might have followed this with: "However, there is some question whether, also counted, were improperly cast votes," with details about Precinct 1823, the malfeasant, unqualified, duplicate, and dead voters, etc.

But this would require journalistic cynicism to be directed equally towards both political parties.

Another quote, this time from Washington's mewling ballot-thaumaturge:

State Democratic Party Chairman Paul Berendt said Rossi should either concede or "immediately present evidence showing he has legal grounds to challenge the election."
Another glistening, perfect opportunity for the reporter to cast a wider net, and mention (with skeptical qualification, of course) what evidence has already been brought forward (see above-- or anywhere on this blog).

Our local media is acting more like a blind than a window.

(With much thanks to our ally Orbusmax.com, an incomparable clearinghouse of news from all over the Northwest.)

Posted by Brian Crouch at December 29, 2004 07:55 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Poor Paul Berendt-
He hasn't been able to sleep for weeks not knowing what we have found in those 400+ affadavits his goon squad went out and got AND he either stupidly (or intentionally to cover up for the real culprits) brought them in putting on that pathetic crying act. He and his comrades @ Goldy's blog are frothing and foaming at the mouth trying to get a handle on what the R's have.
Sorry Pauly-Wallowy--3 more weeks of "Sleepless in the Ukraine"!

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on December 29, 2004 08:37 PM
2. Hmmm...every day I read the paper and listen in vain for the dog that didn't bark, I'll call the paper and ask why.

Posted by: South County on December 29, 2004 08:54 PM
3. The media had better take a serious look at their polls and surveys tonight!

King 5, KIRO, and The Seattle Times are all conducting surveys regarding a Rossi concession, a revote, and Who do we believe actually should be the Governor.....

Every survey result as of 9pm is favoring Rossi!

How are they going ignore their own survey results?

Posted by: Deborah on December 29, 2004 09:03 PM
4. Well said Brian! Where is the media? Why are they not covering this? I would think this would be a big story. Its not like they would even have to work very hard. Its all there but they bury the story or don't even report it. I would guarantee that if it was the other way around you would hear about it every minute of the day, they would tell you just how corrupt the Republican party was and how the RP would not count "all the votes". Why are they not investigating the obvious "errors" that have occurred in this election? Biased? Without a doubt.
We have to expect a lot more from the media or realize that what they report is what they want to tell us (and what they want to believe) not what is real, so I guess that means not to use them as our source for facts.
Did you see the lack of real coverage for Dino Rossi's press conference today? It was a joke!
They stopped at the second question and gave their own opinion of his statement. It was very disrespectful of him and and those listening to their so called report. Some of the national media is picking up on the story. Add the local media to your email list, they need to know how their viewers see their lack of job performance.

Posted by: Kathy on December 29, 2004 09:12 PM
5. Maybe the reason the media is not here, is simply, the republicans lost, the democrats won. End of story.

Get over it

Move On.

Posted by: Magnum Serpentine on December 29, 2004 09:19 PM
6. Sorry Serp, not so.
Their head is buried in the sand as deep as yours.

Posted by: Kathy on December 29, 2004 09:24 PM
7. Thanks Kathy.

Stefan is not making one thin dime from all his hard work on this investigation, it's a passion, not a profession. The PI, the Times, even the Stranger, once their staff is off, they're off. Or at least, that's how it seems. They have no zeal to expose what doesn't enrich them or aggrandize them.
I once talked to a bored-looking reporter at the WAGOP (aka WSRP) convention. I went about diplomatically trying to discern his leanings, and we talked a lot about which candidates I admired, and why. Didn't get much reaction or curiosity, although he was the one asking questions. Then he asked about the big controversy with a dark horse candidate, and i said something that made his pen flash to his
notepad. When it ended up not being QUITE controversial enough, he stopped writing.
The reporter came there with an agenda, and was only going to quote what suited it.

It occurred to me at that moment what a filter the media can be: One has only to read a transcript of a press conference, then read the reportage on said conference, to see that we are only getting a parsed version of reality from the professionals.

Posted by: Bleeding heart conservative on December 29, 2004 09:27 PM
8. Gary Locke sure picked his words carefully -- a little TOO carefully. Yes, and all the IMPROPERLY cast ballots were counted too, Gary. We are NOT stupid. We know what you said and what you did NOT say.

Brian is right. The media, predictably, are not doing their job. Thank goodness for blogs like this one, where the work of the media gets done FOR them, when they refuse to do it. I noticed that they sure kept quiet about the fact that Democrat hand-counters got fired for cheating. They should have put that across page one and named names. What's up with these lazy papers?

Posted by: Michele on December 29, 2004 09:27 PM
9. Good ol' Locke; taking a page from the Clinton book of partial-truisms: "The people have voted, and all votes properly cast were counted."

Yes, that may be true. He failed to touch on the topic of the votes that were improperly cast.

No matter how this turns out, the really good news will be not having to look at him any longer.

Posted by: Ken on December 29, 2004 09:30 PM
10. Woops, Michele, you beat me to it!

Posted by: Ken on December 29, 2004 09:31 PM
11. Gary Locke is more of a milquetoast than the Seattle media, if that is possible. I'm sure there's another 'Storm of the Century' right around the corner that they're just dying to cover.

The sad part is that if any Seattle news reporter really wanted to dig into this scandal, they'd likely end up being famous. If everything turned out honkey-dorey and nothing was amiss, what's the downside?

Posted by: Larry on December 29, 2004 09:34 PM
12. What can you say about Gov. Locke (Gridlocke) as I have come to know him, is what has he done in 8 years? The only thing I know is his trips abroad, 300 dollar haircuts and making babies. As the saying goes.....at least he did nothing, as in he didn't mess anything up. From CG's record we can't even expect that much from her.

Posted by: Kathy on December 29, 2004 09:43 PM
13. Ignore the news media. They are officially the old media now, gone the way of the telegraph and the teahouse. I get all of my news from the big three - Sound Politics, Orbus Max, and John Carlson. This is becoming true for more and more people, even on the left.

Speaking honestly, when is the last time YOU have read the newspaper or tuned into a local news show? I am having a hard time remembering the exact date for myself.

Posted by: Jonathan Gardner on December 29, 2004 09:48 PM
14. Gary vacations really well in China - oops I mean he leads "trade delegations" really well. Anyone read just the other day that Taiwan has "closed its borders" to Washington apples? Way to go Gary! What can you do for us next?

Posted by: Cheryl on December 29, 2004 09:51 PM
15. Deborah: Where on the Seattle Times and KIRO sites can you find their surveys? I looked but didn't succeed in finding them. I did find KING 5's. Maybe KIRO and The Times didn't like that Dino was winning and got rid of them before too many other people discovered that Christine is more hated than they thought. Thanks for letting us know about these!

Posted by: Michele on December 29, 2004 09:57 PM
16. Michele- I put up a link to one on the main page.

Posted by: Bleeding heart conservative on December 29, 2004 10:00 PM
17. Brian, there is no such thing as a brave reporter. They are all mindless cowards that follow the party line.

href=http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/087nhhbq.asp

Posted by: Jeff B. on December 29, 2004 10:03 PM
18. Trading with who is my question, and for what? .......how convenient, and on his way out. I bet he got a good bonus out of that one. Sounds like a page out of Clinton's book.

Posted by: Kathy on December 29, 2004 10:04 PM
19. Let's try that link again, without the typo.

Link

Posted by: Jeff B. on December 29, 2004 10:14 PM
20. A survey is running on www.nwcn.com.

Posted by: Susu on December 29, 2004 10:21 PM
21. Michele,

One both King and KIRO sites - you have to first click into the lead Rossi story to find the polls...

Actually...I may be mistaken about the KIRO poll - I believe it's on the home page on the left margin....

Posted by: Deborah on December 29, 2004 10:21 PM
22. And screw Morton Stupid. Gregoire just cost the state another $1,000,000 or more in the third hand recount. Why should we be afraid to spend money to get an honest answer?

Because Democrats are fearful of a real contest. Washington voters might show the Democrats who they really wanted for Governor, Rossi.

Posted by: Jeff B. on December 29, 2004 10:22 PM
23. Jeff B. -- yeah, and Gregoire will be a lot more expensive to taxpayers than that $4mm. It's a bargain.

Posted by: Bleeding heart conservative on December 29, 2004 10:26 PM
24. I haven't read a newspaper since I moved to Seattle from Chicago....

We had the Chicago Tribune, notably Republican (as Republican as a newspaper can be, at least), and the Chicago Sun-Times, famously Democratic.

Between the two there was competition, and you could count on investigative news reports on local events.

Here in Seattle, between the Times and the P-I...need I say more? It's the same news, packaged a little differently.

Capitalism (or lack thereof) at its finest - no competition, no results.

Posted by: Larry on December 29, 2004 10:28 PM
25. Hey, Larry, that's why we're here!
And we'll be doing coupon inserts every Sunday from now on. Know any good cartoonists?

The hunger for alternative media in Puget Sound is why we have three conservative talk radio stations in town... and one national host, Michael Medved.

Posted by: Bleeding heart conservative on December 29, 2004 10:33 PM
26. The KING5 poll is probably the most revealing because it doesn't allow multiple votes. Amusingly, the more folks that 'vote' the higher the percentage that says 'NO Rossi should NOT concede'. Right now with 3050 votes, 57.84% say DO NOT CONCEDE while 40.95% say do concede. The poor poor Gregoirians!

Posted by: Cheryl on December 29, 2004 10:39 PM
27. I suggest that Stefan share his findings with Jim Geraghty, who writes the Kerry Spot column on
National Review Online, or with Powerline.

Seattle's newspapers are no longer
relevant
. They are dinosaurs. Please stop reading them.

Posted by: FedUpWithThis on December 29, 2004 10:43 PM
28. He who controls the language controls the world...
State Democrat(ic) Party Chairman Paul Berendt

Posted by: Splatter on December 29, 2004 11:25 PM
29. Yes Michelle I noticed that too! It is the only poll you can only vote ONCE on. Goldy's got a link on his site for another poll and told his troup to vote as many times as possible. Seems that what they did in the election too.

Posted by: CP on December 29, 2004 11:26 PM
30. I would not read a Seattle paper if they gave it to me free.

They are however good for use as packing material, lining bird cages, spray painting, etc.

Posted by: Jeff B. on December 29, 2004 11:28 PM
31. LOL Jeff - but I'd be careful about lining any pets cages or litter boxes with that trash.

Posted by: CP on December 29, 2004 11:35 PM
32. Yeah, I just stoke the fire with mine.

Posted by: TADD on December 29, 2004 11:48 PM
33. Sorry, Kathy, I see very clear thank you. The republican lost The Democrat won.

End of Story

Get over it.

Move On

Posted by: Magnum Serpentine on December 30, 2004 07:50 AM
34. About the limp media coverage. I have a theory here about the media in this state... at least in the Western Washington media... This state tends to vote conservative on issues but then contradicts itself and votes in democrats that oppose those issues. The media tends to ignore races for offices knowing that if people don't hear anything, they'll probably just vote for the democrat.
I've lived in two other states, Hawaii and Arizona. In both those places the races got 'Presidential' style coverage.
I know they would claim that they are not in the back pocket of the democrat, and they're probably not, but might as well be.

Posted by: Rich on December 30, 2004 08:05 AM
35. How many times has King 5 News rushed to report the results of a particular poll over this election? They have poor Mr. Mack standing at the ready to announce some surprising upset..or some results that everyone expected in the first place...

It is just an incredible shame how King 5 news is ignoring the results of yesterdays poll! Now granted, I did not catch the early morning news broadcast - but so far this noon - there has been absolutely NO mention of the results favoring Rossi!

So incredibly biased, unprofessional and predictible for this lame liberal leaning news broadcasting service....I am shaking my head in embarrassment for them....

Jean? Dennis? I'm switching to Fox News on channel 13.

Posted by: Deborah on December 30, 2004 12:58 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?