October 26, 2004
Silver Lining?

The King County Council approved the draconian "Critical Areas Ordinance" that sharply limits what rural property owners can do with their land. It's an unfunded land grab conceived by urban environmentalists and put into law by the (Bolshevist) Democrats who hold the Executive and a 7-6 majority on the Council.

The Hamilton's Pamphlets blog notes a possible silver lining in this dark cloud of Stalinism: he believes it could energize enough rural residents into turning out for Republicans next Tuesday that it may well put us over the top in key races.

One can only hope.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at October 26, 2004 10:07 PM | Email This
Comments
1. I'm not a property owner so I don't "have a dog in the fight" but I still think that this is one of the stupidest and most unfair things I have ever seen.

"We live in cities, so let's screw those (sniff) 'rural people' with their pickup trucks and Wal-mart wardrobes."

I think this will seriously backfire on the elitist snobs on the council, and it couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch of jerks.

Posted by: Mumblix grumph on October 26, 2004 10:27 PM
2. Do you ever want to be a property owner? If so, you have a dog in this fight. I live in Snohomish County, and I was considering buying a house here next year. This stupid, immoral decision is going to jack up property prices here even more, so I don't know if I'll be able to. I am sincerely torqued off.

Posted by: Timothy on October 27, 2004 09:41 AM
3. We all have a dog in the fight to protect private property. Without private property, their is no liberty.

Posted by: Gary B on October 27, 2004 10:57 AM
4. I wouldn't be surprised to see a resurgence in the on-again off-again movement for rural King County to secede and form their own.

Posted by: Vexorg on October 27, 2004 10:57 AM
5. The exquisite gentlemen of "1000 Fiends of Washington", who supported this Critical Areas Ordinance, are the same well-connected bunch who brought us the antidemocratic Growth Management Act. They care not that property rights are no less civil rights than any others in the Bill of Rights, and are deliberately setting out to seize control of all land use under the misnomer of 'protecting' all those rural acres.

In short, their protection racket is structured to vest control of low-density acreage in high-density urban voters, giving them nearly total veto power over the hopes and dreams of the owners of rural property. By misusing the concept of 'regulation', they hope to create idyllic sylvan scenery for their own public benefit, at the personal expense of those who worked and saved for years and generations to acquire those acres.

It is the same sort of corrosive tyranny as is exercised in universities by the creators of speech codes - only instead of gutting the First Amendment, they now attack the Fourth.

The King County Council does not propose any compensation to those divested of their former control over their property. The Council could not have failed to see how this would radically reduce the value of that property. It has yet to face the radical reassesment and reduction in taxes which the rural owners are justified in demanding, but the high-density urbanites will soon be facing some sort of increased taxes to replace those lost from the rural acres.

Perhaps the motivation of those 1000 "Friends" of Washington is bipolar. On one hand, their greed for control of their fellow citizens is gratified, and on the other - well, won't there now be hundreds of cozy country estates available at dirt-cheap rates for these noble uber-citizens to acquire for their weekend retreats? Think of all the planning they can achieve there for their next assault on the hopes and liberties of the rest of us.

Posted by: Insufficiently Sensitive on October 27, 2004 06:39 PM
6. I am a property owner in rural King County, and I sincerly hope this stupid move by KC cost the democrats badly.

And yes, it's time to restart the Cedar County movement.

Posted by: (the other) John Hawkins on October 27, 2004 09:24 PM
7. To get things to move it will take more than the rural dwellers to get mad again. It will require a lot of us urbanites as well. But I am getting there.

Posted by: Ron Hebron on October 27, 2004 10:49 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?